ML18017B215
| ML18017B215 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1980 |
| From: | Herdt A, Kleinsorge W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B213 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-80-15, 50-401-80-13, 50-402-80-13, 50-403-80-13, NUDOCS 8008280126 | |
| Download: ML18017B215 (13) | |
See also: IR 05000400/1980015
Text
~R AEOII
~o
Cy
A.oo
I
o
Yr4~
~o
+a*++
UNITEDSTATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSlON
REGION II
10$ MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303
Report Nos. 50-400/80-15,
50-401/80-13,
50-402/80-,13,
and 50-403/80-13
Licensee:
Carolina Power 6 Light Company
411 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh,
NC
27602
'Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401,
50-402
and 50-403
License Nos.
CPPR-158,
CPPR-159,
CPPR-160,
and
CPPR-161
Inspection at
Inspector:
Approved by:
A.
SlB99iRY
. Kleinsorge
R. Herdt, Section Chief,
CES Br
ch
'Date Si ned
Date Signed
Inspection on June
16-20,
1980
Areas Inspected
This routine,
resident inspection
involved
41 inspector-hours
on site in the
areas of licensee action on previous inspection findings; radiographic examination
(Unit 1);
cadweld splicing (Unit 1); reinforcing steel
storage
(Units 1, 2,
3
and 4); inspector followup items; licensee identified items (50.55(e)); safety-
related
component - Observation of work and work activities (Unit 1); and steel
structures
and supports (Unit 1).
Results
Of the eight
areas
inspected,
no
items
of noncompliance
or deviations
were
identified in six areas;
two items of noncompliance
were
found in two areas
(Infraction - "Fabricator and Contractor Under Cut" paragraph
3.d; Infraction
"Failure to Follow Reinforcing Steel Storage Procedure" -paragraph 5.d.)
DETAILS
1.
Persons
Contacted
Licensee
Employees
>R.
M. Parsons,
Site Manager
"G. L. Forehand,
Principal
QA Specialist
="V. M. Safarian,
Senior
QA Specialist - Welding
"F. A. Shaikh, Project Engineer Welding
"T. H. Wyllie, Senior Construction
Manager - CPSL
-M. F. Thompson, Jr., Director CSS - CPRL
"-R. Hanford, Principal Engineer,
Metallurgy/Welding
~N. J. Chiangi,
Manager,
Engineering
and Construction
-G.
M. Simpson, Principal Construction
Spec - Inspection
-W. Seyler, Project Civil Engineer
W. P. Tomlinson, Project Engineer - Nuclear
Other licensee'mployees
contacted
included five construction craftsmen,
three technicians,
and four office personnel.
Other Organizations
-R. Isom, Construction
Manager Daniel Construction
Co.
(DCC)
F.
P. Hazelip, Welding 6 QA Superintendent
Chicago Bridge and'Iron Co.,
(CBGI)
-Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection
scope
and findings were
summarized
on June 20,
1980 with
those
persons
indicated in Paragraph
1 above.
The items of noncompliance
described in paragraph
Nos. 3d and 5d were discussed.
No dissenting
comments
were received from the licensee.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous inspection Findings
a
~
(Closed)
Unresolved
Item (400/79-05-01):
Cold spring controls.
This
item concerns
the licensee
lack of workable requirements in the area
of cold spring controls for piping.
The inspector
reviewed
EBASCO
Drawings
CAR-2165-G-107SOl
Rev
1 "Field Installation Tolerances
for
Hangers"
and CAR-2165-G-107
S02 Rev.
1" Field Installation Tolerances
for Piping" which the
licensee
had
developed
to provide workable
requirements
for piping cold spring control.
No discrepancies
were
noted.
This item is considered closed.
b.
- (Closed)
Unresolved
Item (400/80-09-01):
"Surface Defects in Hanger
and Iiner Attachment Welds".
This item concerns
NRC inspector identified surface defects in contain-
ment spray system hanger
and attachment
made
and accepted
by the
licensee's
contractor,
CBRI. The inspector
reviewed results
(records)
of visual examination,
made by the licensee,
performed on welds subject
to the
under
cut
requirements
describ'ed
in paragraph
3.6.4 of
AWS
D1.1-77.
This review disclosed 'that
RH vertical,.weld of clip to pad
joint (hanger
No.
1-CT-H-7 and
pad
No.
65C3
on drawing
CBSI-65 Rev.
3) did not meet
the undercut
requirement.
The undercut
was repaired
at the licensee's
direction.
The inspector stated that he would close
this matter
as
an unresolved
item and would identify it as
a noncom-
pliance.
This matter is discussed
under paragraph
3d of this report.
(Closed)
Unresolved
Item (400/80-09-02):
"Undercut Containment
Spray
Piping Attachment Weld".
This item
concerns
NRC inspector identified mechanical'ndercut
in
containment
spray
system piping attachment
weld made
and accepted
by
the licensee's
fabricator,
Southwest Fabricating
and Welding Company,
Inc.
(SwFab).
The inspector reviewed results (records) of visual exam-
ination, made by the licensee,
performed on welds subject to the undercut
requirements
described in paragraph
NB-4424 of ASME Section III (71S73).
This review disclosed
that the top trunnion weld on Bergen Paterson
drawing 1-CT-H-71 and
SwFab drawing 1-CT-5-1 did not meet the undercut
requirements.
The undercut
was repaired at the licensee's
direction.
The inspector stated that he would close this matter
as
an unresolved
item and would identify it as
a noncompliance.
This matter is discussed
under paragraph
3d of this report.
The fallowing are examples of unacceptable
undercut:
The undetected
unacceptable
undercut discussed
in paragraph
3b and 3c
above indicate that the contractor
and fabricator did not inspect in
that area
and the licensee's
QA program did not prevent the incorpora-
tion of nonconforming supporting structures into the plant.
(1)
The
RH vertical weld of clip to pad Joint
(hanger
1-CT-H-7 and
pad
65C3 on drawing CBRI 65 Rev.
3) exhibited undercut 1/8" long
by 0.043" deep.
AWS D-l.l-77 requires
that undercut
be no more
than 1/32-inch (0.03125") deep.
(2)
The
top trunnion attachment
weld,
on Bergen
Paterson
Drawing
1-CT-11-71
and
SwFab Drawing 1-CT-5-1, exhibited undercut that
reduced
the material thickness
to 0.186";
the required
minimum
thickness
as determined
by CPSL is 0.190."
ASME B and 8/ Code S71
Paragraph
NB-4400 requires that undercut shall not reduce material
thickness below the required minimum.
Failure to fabricate
and inspect in accordance
with above applicable
codes is in noncompliance with 10 CFR 50.55a.
J
This is an infraction and is assigned
item no 400/80-15-01:
"Fabricator
and Contractor Undercut".
"3"
e.
(Open)
Unresolved
Item (400/80-13-04,
401,
402, 403/80-11-04):
Final
Weld Peening".
This item concerns
the peening of final weld layers without regard for
final surface
inspection.
This item was discussed
with the licensee,
who stated that they expect
a resolution by July 1,
1980.
This item
remains open.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort (Units 1, 2,
3 and 4)
a.
Construction Progress
The inspector conducted
a general inspection of the power block construc-
tion site,
the pipe fabrication
shop,
the pipe storage
area
and the
containment
dome fabrication area,
to observe
construction
progress
and construction activities such as welding, nondestructive
examination,
material handling and control, housekeeping
and storage.
b.
Radiographic Examination
The inspector
observed
radiographic inspection in progress for repair
weld no HXSN19A58062 Rl on
a Unit
1 component cooling heat exchanger.
The above inspection
was
compared with the applicable procedure in the
areas
of type of material,
surface condition, material thickness,
type
of radiation source, film brand/type,
minimum source to film distance,
type
and thickness
of screens,
exposure
condition, radiographic film
processing,
quality of radiographs,
film density,
use of densitometer,
radiographic identification, use of location markers,
method of reducing
and testing for back scatter,
selection
and use of penetrmeters,
and
evaluation and disposition of radiographs.
Co
Cadweld Splicing (Unit 1)
The inspector
observed
the
cadweld splicing of three joints and the
inspection
of seven
cadweld joints to determine
whether applicable
procedural
requirements
were met.
The applicable
procedures
are
as
follows:
QCI-15.4 Rev.
2
WP-01 Rev.
11
WP-15 Rev.
5
CQC-15 Rev.
2
"Cadweld Splicing Inspection"
"Installation of Cadweld Splices"
"Cadweld Splicer Qualification"
"Cadweld Control"
d.
Reinforcing Steel Storage
(Units 1, 2, 3 and 4)
On June
24,
1980,
the inspector,
accompanied
by
a representative
of
the licensee,
made
a general inspection of the excavated
area north of
the power block.
The inspector noted in excess of seventy five examples
of reinforcing steel in the mud and/or covered with oil;
CPM Procedure
AP-X-01 Revision 0, "Temporary Storage of Reinforcing Steel and Embeds"
requires
reinforcing steel to be maintained in Level D storage.
Procedure
AP-XIII-05 Revision
8 "Material Storage"
requires
Level
D
stored
items to be on dunnage to allow air circulation and to minimize
trapped
water.
Failure to follow established
procedure is in noncom-
pliance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V.
This is an infraction
and is assigned item No. 400/80-15-02,
401, 402, 403/80-13-02:
"Failure
to Follow Reinforcing Steel Storage Procedure".
Within the areas
inspected,
no items of noncompliance
or deviations
except as described in paragraph
5d were identified.
6.
Inspector Followup Items
a
~
(Closed) Inspector follow-up Item (400, 401/79-26-01,
402, 403/79-25-01):
"gA/gC Inspection Procedures".
This item, concerns
the
licensee
need for adequate
guidance within
procedure
for visual
inspection
of piping
The
inspector
reviewed licensee inspection procedure
NDEP-601 Rev 2, "Visual Examina-
tion of Welds" which the licensee revised to provide additional guidance
for visual inspection of piping welds.
No discrepancies
were noted.
This item is considered closed.
b.
(Open) Inspector Follow-up Item (400, 401/79-26-02,
402, 403/ 79-25-02):
"gA Surveillance of Contractor Welding Activities".
C.
This item concerns
the lack of a gA surveillance procedure for contractor
welding.
The inspector
reviewed
licensees
Procedure
CgA-20 Rev 0,
"Surveillance
of Contractor
Welding
and related Activities".
The
inspector stated that in view of connection between this item and the
item of noncompliance
discussed in paragraph
3d this item will remain
open.
(Open) Inspector Follow-up Item (400/80-13-02,
401, 402, 403/80-11-02):
"Interrupted Preheatin'g".
d.
This item concerns
procedural
inadequacy
in the area of weld preheat
maintenance.
This item was
discussed
with the licensee,
who stated
that they expect
a resolution
by July 1,
1980.
This item remains
open.
II
(Open) Inspector follow-up Item (400/80-13-03,
401, 402, 403/80-11-03):
"Flux Storage".
j
This item concerns procedural
inadequacy in the area of submerged
arc
welding flux storage.
This item was discussed
with the licensee,
who
stated
that
they expect
a resolution
by July 1,
1980.
This item
remains open.
I
7.
Licensee Identified Items (50. 55 (e) )
a.
New 50.55(e)
Items
Prior to the inspection the licensee identified the following item as
a potential reportable item:
One instrumentation
tubing support
frame manufactured
by Bergen-
Paterson of Laconia,
was found to contain deficient
welds during receiving inspection.
The welds exhibited undercut
and lack of fusion.
After the initial notification and prior to
this inspection
the licensee
stated
that this condition was not
considered
significant
and thus not reportable.
This inspector
reviewed/inspected
the applicable
deficiency reports,
evaluation
and the item in question.
Based on the above review and inspection
this inspector concurs that the item is not reportable.
Thirteen
embedment
plates
manufactured
by Afco in Little Rock,
Ark.
were
rejected
during receiving
inspection ,for deficient
Anchor bolt
and
shear
lug fillet welds
were
found to
contain porosity, lack of fusion,
and overlap.
After the initial
notification
and prior to this inspection
the licensee
stated
that this condition
was not considered
significant and thus not
reportable.
This
inspector'eviewed/inspected
the
applicable
deficiency reports,
evaluation
and
a representative
sample of the
items in question.
Based
on the above review and,inspection this
inspector concurs that the item is not reportable.
One embedment plate manufactured
by Alfab of Enterprise,
was
rejected
during receiving
inspection for deficient welds.
Three
anchor bolt fillet welds were rejected for unacceptable
undercut.
After the initial notification
and prior to this
inspection
the
licensee
stated
that this
condition
was
not
considered
significant
and thus not reportable.
This inspector
reviewed/inspected
the applicable deficienty reports,
evaluation
and
the item in question.
Based
on the above review and inspec-
tion this inspector concurs that the item is not reportable.
(4)
Five of five embedment
plates for the
emergency
service
water
intake structures
supports
received
from the Peden Steel
Company
in Raleigh, North Carolina have been rejected.
The welds attaching
the anchor bolts to the embedment plates
do not meet
code overlap
requirements.
After the initial notification and prior to this
inspection the licensee
stated
that. this condition was not consi-
dered significant and thus not reportable.
This inspector reviewed/
inspected
the applicable
deficiency reports,
evaluation
and
a,
representative
sample
of the
items in question.
Based
on the
above
review and inspection this inspector
concurs that the item
is not reportable.
(5)
Four No.
8 and four No.
11 "I" shaped
rebars
were not placed in a
column
as required
by drawings.
The
column~ is located in the
auxiliary building and is integral with a wall.
The bars
were
noted missing during
a routine
gC check in preparation for the
next
pour.
After the initial notification,and prior to the
conclusion
of this inspection
the licensee
stated
that this
condition was not considered significant and thus not reportable.
This inspector
examined the column in question to verify location
and the
number of missing bars.
The inspector
observed
concrete
removal activities
on the top of the column.
This item will be
evaluated during subsequent
inspections.
Safety Related
Components - Observation of Work and,Work Activities (Unit 1)
a.
The inspector
observed lifting, setting,
and placement activities for
steam generator serial
No 1631 to determine whether work and inspection
activities, location placement
and mounting/supporting,
and generation
and maintenance of inspection records met applicable procedural require-
ments.
The applicable procedures
are as follows:
Rigging International
Procedure
960-12
Rev 3, "Lifting,
Rigging and Placement of Steam
Generator"
Procedure
WP-120 Rev 2, "Setting the
The inspector
noted,
during the lifting setting
and placement activities,
of the
above
steam
generator,
there
appeared
to be
an adequate
number of
QA/gC inspection personnel
performing their assigned
duties
and responsi-
blities.
Within the area
inspected,
no items of noncompliance
or deviations
were
identified.
Steel Structures
and Supports (Unit 1)
The inspector
observed welding work activities for steel structures within
the containment
as described
below to determine whether applicable
code
and
procedure
requirements
were being met.
The applicable
code for containment
fabrication is the
ASME B and
PV Code Section III Division 2 1975 edition
with addenda through winter 76.
The inspector
observed
in-process
welding activities of containment struc-
tural field welds
as
described
below to determine whether applicable
code
and procedure
requirements
were being met.
The following weld was examined
o
0
in process
to determine
work conducted in accordance
with traveler,
welding
procedures
available; welding .technique
and sequence;
weld "geometry, fit-up
electrical characteristics;
equipment condition:
Structure
Identification
Containment
Spray
Piping Restraint
CT-H-33
In the area inspected
no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
t,