ML18017B070
| ML18017B070 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/1980 |
| From: | Bradley R, Rausch J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B067 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-80-07, 50-400-80-7, 50-401-80-07, 50-401-80-7, 50-402-80-07, 50-403-80-07, NUDOCS 8005200040 | |
| Download: ML18017B070 (9) | |
See also: IR 05000400/1980007
Text
0
~R REOII
~4
"o
0
o Q
gO
+w*e+
UNITEDSTATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303
SPR 15 S@
Report Nos. 50-400/80-07,
50-401/80-07,
50-402/80-07
and 50-403/80-07
I,icensee:
Carolina Power 6 Light Company
411 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh,
NC
27602
Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401, 50-402,
and 50-403
License Nos.
CPPR-158,
CPPR-159,
CPPR-160
and
CPPR-161
Inspection at Shearon Harris site near Raleigh,
NC
Approved by:
SUMMARY
Inspector:
R. D. Br dley
c
o
. Rausch,
Acting Section Chief,
RCES Branch
Date Signed
/S ~o
ate Signed
Inspection
on March 4-7,
1980
Areas Inspected
This routine,
unannounced
inspection involved 36 inspector-hours
on site in the
areas of construction status,
licensee action on previous inspection findings,
licensee identified items,
and IE Circular 79-25,
Supplement
A.
Results
Of the four areas
inspected,
no items of noncompliance
or deviations
were iden-
tified in three areas;
one item of noncompliance
was found in one area (Infrac-
tion - Inadequate
measures
to control nonconforming curing compound - Paragraph
5.b).
DETAILS
1.
Persons
Contacted
Licensee
Employees
"S.
d p
"R.
%N
"G
""A.
D. Smith, Vice President,
Power Plant Construction
W. Howe, Vice President,
Technical Services
M. Parsons,
Site Manager
J. Chiangi, Manager,
Engineering
6 Construction
L. Forehand,
Principal Site
QA Specialist
M. Iucas,
Senior Resident Engineer
Other licensee
employees
contacted
included construction craftsmen,
technicians,
QA specialists,
and discipline engineers.
Other Organizations
F. Clawson, Site
QA Representative,
Ebasco Services,
Inc.
-Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection
scope
and findings were summarized
on March 7,
1980 with
those persons
indicated in Paragraph
1 above.
The licensee
acknowledged
the noncompliance
discussed in paragraph
5b.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
(Open) Noncompliance
(400-401/79-23-01):
Failure to Follow Procedures.
The licensee's
procedure for field bending of rebar has been completed
and
is currently being circulated for comments.
This noncompliance will remain
open pending issuance,
and subsequent
RII evaluation of the licensee's
procedure.
4.
Unresolved
Items
5.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
Independent
Inspection
a ~
Construction Status
Rigging International is presently erecting
a large derrick crane
which will be used for installing nuclear
steam supply system
com-
ponents in the Unit 1 containment building.
Preparations
for the
removal of the erecting mast were proceeding in order to make way for
"2-
installation of the main boom.
Concrete placed to date
now totals
341,000 cubic yards.
On March 6,
1980, the inspector observed
a
portion of placement
number
1RAXW257001 for an exterior wall in the
Unit
1 reactor auxiliary building.
Controls were found to be in
accordance
with established site procedures.
Installation of rein-
forcing steel for the remaining two lifts of the Unit 1.containment
primary shield wall is in progress
and preparations
for leg restraint
for the loop
$/ 3 equipment foundation has begun.
b.
Unit 1 Containment Primary Shield Wall
On March 4 at 2:00 p.m., the inspector monitored construction repair
activities underway on patch PlOB for shield wall placement
1CBIW260001.
A painter
was observed
applying
a concrete
curing compound
on the
patched
surface using
a container
whose label had an expiration date
of February
19,
1980.
The assistant
area superintendnet
was immediately
notified and subsequent
discussions
resulted in some uncertainty
as to
whether the
compound being applied
came from that container,
or whether
acceptable
compound
had been mixed and transported in a container with
an expired label.
Further investigation of the paint shop'field
storage
area disclosed additional
compound with the
same February
19
expiration label.
A check was then made of warehouse
number
9 which
is the control distribution point for coating materials.
It was noted
that 42 containers
of the questionable
batch
(f/6917B121) of Nutec
10
primer/sealer
had been put on hold status,
identified,
and segregated
from the other materials
whose shelf life had not expired.
A review
of correspondence
associated
with the subject batch disclosed that the
manufacturer
was being contacted with regard to the possibility of
extending the shelf life date.
Although procedure AP-XIII-07 on storage inspections
requires
the
warehouse
materials supervisor to notify the
QA group for information
and the resident engineer unit for final disposition, there is no
procedure
requirement for notifying the field storage units of materials
that are nonconforming
so that they can be identified and segregated.
This matter is in noncompliance with Criterion XV of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 'in that measures
have not been established
to control noncon-
forming materials in field storage
areas in order to prevent their,
inadvertent
use.
The following Construction
QA Procedures
(CQA), Construction
QC Pro-
cedures
(CQC), Construction Administrative Procedures
(AP), Construc-
tion Technical Procedure
(TP).
Construction
Work Procedure
(WP),
Quality Control Instructions
(QCI),
CPGL Corporate
QA Manual,
and
EBASCO Specifications,
were reviewed regarding the adequacy of in-
place controls for concrete curing compounds:
CQA-6, Concrete Monitoring
CQA-8, Material 'Issue Control
CQA-ll, Protective Coatings
Program Monitoring
-3"
CQA-21, Storage
Control Surveillance
CQC-2, Nonconformance
Control
CQC-6, Receiving Inspection
CQC-7, Marking and Tagging
AP-XIII-05, Material Storage
AP-XIII-07, In-Storage Inspection
and Maintenance
AP-XIII-08, Material Issue
TP-29, Inspection of Protective
WP-24, Protective Coatings - Concrete
QCI-71,
QA Inspection Status Identification
QCI-13.4, Concrete Repair Inspection
CPGL Corporate
QA Manual
CAR-SH-CH-06, Concrete
CAR-SH-CORl, Protective Coating Materials
CAR-SH-COR2, Protective
Coatings Application-Field
Deficiency and Dispostion Report,
DDR-364
Nonconformance
Report,
NCR-C-295
QC Field Report,
M-79-224
Concrete Repair Report,
1CBIM260001-PlOB
During the above review activity.
discussions
were held with construc-
tion superintendents,
discipline engineers,
QA specialists,
and con-
struction inspection personnel.
It was determined that Nutec
10 is
being used
as
a form release
agent,
as well as
a curing compound for
Service Ievel I concrete walls,
and as such, is safety-related.
Although the material is considered
compatible with some of the other
used at the site, it is not included under the site protective
program.
Nutec
10 is subsequently
removed by sand blasting
prior to applying the necessary
protective coatings.
Procedure
CQA-21 provides for periodic surveillance of storage
areas,
and shelf life is one of the items for examination.
However, the
licensee
was unable to produce
any documents
which verified that
curing compound shelf life had ever been monitored during field stor-
age.
In one instance,
shelf life was verified at time of application.
As a result of the inspector's
discussions,
the licensee promptly
issued
a deficiency report and two memoranda instituting interim
control over shelf life materials.
Following an evaluation by the
licensee,
responsibilities will be defined
and
a procedure
established
for controlling shelf life of curing compounds after warehouse
issuance.
This item has
been classified
as
an infraction and is identified to
the licensee
an noncompliance
number 400/401/402/403/80-07-01,
"Inade-
quate
Measures
to Control Nonconforming Curing Compound".
No deviations
were identified.
C
~
-4-
6.
Licensee Identified Items
Prior to this inspection,
the licensee identified the following items under
a ~
(Closed)
Item 400-401/79"23-04
and 402-403/79-22-04,
Ultrasonic test
not performed
on vendor supplied spool pieces.
Discussions
were held
with the Ebasco site
QA representative
and two revised spool sheets
were reviewed to ensure that design temperature
and pressure
had been
included.
Both spool sheets
Q4122-AB Rl, sheet
68X, and Q3302-AL,
sheet
65, were found to address
the appropriate
design temperature
and
pressure,
and the correct
NDT requirements
were specified.
This item
is closed.
b.
c ~
(Open) Item 400-401/79-14-01
and 402-403/79-13-01,
Improper welds on
engineered
embedment plates.
The licensee's
date for completion of
all corrective actions
was previously estimated to be March 1,
1980.
In an interim report dated February 29,
1980, the licensee
advised RII
that additional time will be required to complete its engineering
evaluation
and corrective action for several additional plates.
Also,
final accountability for all plates
needs to be resolved It is now
estimated that the licensee will submit his final report on or before
June
1,
1980.
(Closed)
Item (400/80-03-03),
Lamination in maintenance rail support
plates.
The inspector
reviewed the licensee's final report dated
February
19,
1980,
examined deficiency and disposition report
DDR 345,
the associated
corrective action report,
and
QC field report W-563..
Discussions
were held with appropriate
QA specialists
regarding the
determination of reportability under
on February
14,
1980.
All support plates that had previously been welded in place
were removed.
Those plates,
along with the remaining portion of plate
and remaining fabricated plates
were scrapped.
A replacement plate
was ultrasonically tested
and subsequently
used to fabricate
new
support plates.
7.
Inspection
and Enforcement Bulletin and Circular
a
~
b.
(Closed)
79-CI-25:
Shock Arrestor Strut Assembly Interference.
The
inspector
reviewed the deficiency and disposition report,
DDR No. 360,
which had been prepared
to document the defective strut assembly
identified in supplement
A of the subject circular.
This item had
been placed
on hold status
pendinq receipt of replacement, parts
on
April 1,
1980.
The deficient rear bracket will be scrapped.
This
strut assembly interference
problem was identified under Part
21 by
Bergen-Paterson.
(Open)
IEB 79-28, "Possible Malfuncation of Namco Model EA 180 Limit
Switches at Elevated Temperatures".
The licensee
has determined that
the subject
Namco Model EA180 limit switches
are not used in safety-
related
NSSS equipment provided by Westinghouse.
An investigation of
the use of these
switches in non-NSSS
equipment is continuing.