ML18016A992

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards SER Accepting Util 980127 Relief Request 2RG-008 Related to Snubber Inservice Insp Requirements for Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii) for Second 10-year Insp Interval
ML18016A992
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/18/1999
From: Peterson S
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Scarola J
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML18016A993 List:
References
TAC-MA0989, TAC-MA989, NUDOCS 9906240051
Download: ML18016A992 (3)


Text

Mr. James Scarola, Vice ident Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant a". CaroIIna Power 8 Light Company Post Office Box165, Mail Code: Zone 1

New Hill, North Carolina 27562-0165 tune 1999

SUBJECT:

EVALUATIONOF RELIEF REQUEST 2RG-008 RELATED TO SNUBBER INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS - SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (TAC NO. MA0989)

Dear Mr. Scarola:

By letter dated January 27, 1998, Carolina Power 8 Light Company (CP8L) submitted the Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Plan for the second 10-year inspection interval. Relief request 2RG-008, related to the ISI requirements for snubbers, was included in the ISI Program Plan.

Specifically, 2RG-008 requested relief to perform ISI of snubbers in accordance with the HNP Technical Specifications (TS) in lieu of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) OM-4 Code.

By letters dated August 24, 1998, and April27, 1999, CP&L submitted revisions to relief request 2RG-008.

The staff has reviewed and evaluated relief request 2RG-008 as documented in the enclosed Safety Evaluation.

The staff has determined that the proposed alternative will provide a reasonable assurance of operational readiness, and that compliance with the existing requirement would result in hardship or unusual difficultywithout a compensating increase in the level of safety. Accordingly, the request for relief is authorized pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)3(ii) for the second 10-year inspection interval.

Sincerely, Original signed by:

Sheri R. Peterson, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-400

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc: See next page Distribution:

Docket.Filets PD II Rdg PUBLIC OGC HBerkow JZwolinski/S Black BBonser, Rll ACRS FILENAME-G:>PDII-2)HARRIS>RRMA0989.WPD

  • no major changes to SE OFFICE NAME PM:PDII/S2 RLaufer W LA:PDII/S2 EDunnrng on EMEB KManol QGc S:

Dll/

eters D:

Berk DATE

/g /99 4 /44 /99 5 /27/99

'G/j /99 g/

/99 f/ ie99 COPY e

No es No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No r /t<

'P'PO'624005i O'P06i8 PDR ADQCK 05000400 8

PDR OFFICIALRECORD COPY

'k r-

(4gP,R RE00

~o Cy a

~

A.nO IVl R

qO

+w*w+

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 205554001 tune 18, 1999 Mr. James Scarola, Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Carolina Power 8 Light Company Post Office Box 165, Mail Code: Zone 1

New Hill, North Carolina 27562-0165 SUBJECT EVALUATIONOF RELIEF REQUEST 2RG-008 RELATED TO SNUBBER INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS - SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (TAC NO. MA0989)

Dear Mr. Scarola:

By letter dated January 27, 1998, Carolina Power 8 Light Company (CP8L) submitted the Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Plan for the second 10-year inspection interval. Relief request 2RG-008, related to the ISI requirements for snubbers, was included in the ISI Program Plan.

Specifically, 2RG-008 requested relief to perform ISI of snubbers in accordance with the HNP Technical Specifications (TS) in lieu of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) OM-4 Code.

By letters dated August 24, 1998, and April27, 1999, CP8 L submitted revisions to relief request 2RG-008.

The staff has reviewed and evaluated relief request 2RG-008 as documented in the enclosed Safety Evaluation.

The staff has determined that the proposed alternative will provide a reasonable assurance of operational readiness, and that compliance with the existing requirement would result in hardship or unusual difficultywithout a compensating increase in the level of safety. Accordingly, the request for relief is authorized pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a) 3(ii) for the second 10-year inspection interval.

Sincerely, Sheri R. Peterson, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-400

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc: See next page