ML18010B079

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Ref Matl Listed in Encl 1 Requested Prior to Requalification Program Evaluation Scheduled for Wk of 930802 Re Exam Rept 50-400/93-301
ML18010B079
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/09/1993
From: Peebles T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Orser W
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9304300088
Download: ML18010B079 (16)


See also: IR 05000400/1993301

Text

FORD I

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9304300088

DOC.DATE: 93/04/09

NOTARIZED: NO

FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear

Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina

! y

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

PEEBLES,T.A.

Region

2 (Post

820201)

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

ORSERiW ~ ST

Carolina

Power

6 Light Co.

SUBJECT:

Informs that ref matl listed in encl

1 =requested prior to

requalification program evaluation

scheduled

for wk of

930802

re

exam rept 50-400/93-301.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE42D

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR

ENCL

SIZE:

TITLE: Operator Licensing Examination Reports

NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.

DOCKET ¹

05000400

05000400

'ECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD2-1

PD

INTERNAL: ACRS

NRR/DRCH/HOLB10

RGN2

FILE

Ol

EXTERNAL: NRC

PDR

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

LE,N

NRR DRCH/HHFBPT

E(~ F'E

02

NSIC

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

NOTE TO ALL RIDS

RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK.

ROOhk P 1-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAhlE FROM DISTRIBUTION

LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

10

ENCL

9

APR

9 l993

Carolina

Power

and Light Company

ATTN:

Mr.

W. Skip Orser

Senior Vice President

Nuclear Generation

'.

0.

Box 1551

Raleigh,

NC

27602

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

RE(UALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATION -

SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER

PLANT EXAMINATION REPORT

NO. 50-400/93-301

Arrangements

have

been

made

between

Mr. Rick Garner,

License Training Manager,

and Mr. Stephen Cahill, License

Examiner, for an evaluation of the

requalification program

and licensed

personnel

at your Shearon

Harris Nuclear

Power Plant.

The evaluation visit is scheduled

for the week of August 2,

1993.

The requalification examinations

and the subsequent

evaluation of the

facility requalification program will be performed in accordance

with Sections

601 through

604 of NUREG 1021, Operator Licensing Examiner Standards,

Revision 7.

You are encouraged

to ensure that your training staff and

proposed

examinees

are familiar with these

standards.

For the examiners

to adequately

prepare for this visit, it will be necessary

for the facility to furnish the approved

items listed in Enclosure

1,

"Reference Material Requirements."

Failure to supply the reference

material

as required

by Enclosure

1

may result in postponement

of the examination.

The

Chief Examiner

may request that the facility submit

a proposed

examination for

use during the examination

week in addition to the material

requirements

of

Enclosure

1.

Submission of a proposed

examination,

even if requested,

is

optional.

However, if a proposed

examination is submitted,

those

personnel

participating in its development

may become subject to the security

restrictions described

below.

Mr. Garner

has

been

advised of our reference

material

requirements,

whether

a proposed

examination is requested,

and where

these

items are to be sent.

A

Your attention is directed to the guidance

promulgated

in Revision

7 to

NUREG-1021 pertaining to the content

and scope of simulator examination

scenarios.

The scenario

examination

bank should cover the, entire spectrum

of Emergency Operating

Procedures

(EOPs),

including alternate

decision

paths

within EOPs,

and incorporate

a range of failures with varying degrees

of

severity for the

same type event.

Each scenario

should contain simultaneous

events that require prioritization of actions

and allocation of resources,

and

should exercise

EOPs in-depth, i.e., scenarios

requirl

transitions

and/or

decisions

to be made

on actions to take within the

EOPs.

9304300088

93040'P

PDR

ADQCK 05000400

V

PDR

Carolina

Power

8 Light Co.

+'R

9 i993

You are requested

to designate

at least

one employee to be

a member of a joint

NRC-facility examination

team.

The employee shall

be

an active

SRO (per the

requirements

of 10 CFR 55.53(e)

or (f) from the Shearon

Harris Operations

Department.

You are encouraged

to designate

a second

employee

from, the

training staff to be

a member of the examination

team.

This employee

should

be

an active

SRO (per the requirements

of 10 CFR 55.53(e)

or (f)), but

may be

a facility or

INPO certified instructor.

If desired

and agreed to by

the Chief Examiner,

you may designate

one additional

employee

from the

training staff with appropriate qualifications to be

a member of the

examination

team.

In addition to these individuals,

a simulator operator

must

be

made available for scenario

preview and validation during the on-site

examination preparation

week.

In some cases, it may

be necessary

to designate

a simulator operator during the test

item review period.

This individual will

also

be subject to the examination security agreement.

Any facility representatives

under the security agreement

shall

be restricted

from knowingly communicating

by any means

the content or scope of the

examination to unauthorized

persons

and from participating in any facility

programs

such

as instruction, examination,

or tutoring in which an identified

requalification examinee(s) will be present.

These restrictions shall

apply

from the day that the facility representative

signs the examination security

agreement

indicating that the representative

understands

that

he or she

has

specialized

knowledge of the examination.

The Chief Examiner will determine

when,facility representatives

have received specialized

knowledge concerning

the examination

and require execution of an examination security agreement.

In most cases,

the examination

team

members will not be required to enter into

an examination security

agreement

more than

60 days prior to the examination

week.

The simulator operator will 'normally become subject to the requirements

during the examination preparation

and validation week,

but in some cases,

this

may occur

as

much

as

30 days prior to the examination

week to support

operating test

item review and revision.

Sixty days prior to the examination administration date,

the facility training

staff shall identify and provide directly to the NRC's Chief Examiner

a list

of the proposed

operators,

including crew .composition, for the examination.

Also, to ensure privacy,

the, only copy of the current mailing address

and

Part 55 docket

number of each proposed operator should be mailed in an

envelope

labeled

"To Be Opened

By Addressee

Only" to the attention of Hr.

Thomas A. Peebles,

Chief, Operations

Branch, Division of Reactor Safety,

Region II.

The facility management

is responsible for providing adequate

space

and

accommodations

to properly develop

and conduct the examinations.

Enclosure

2,

"Administration of Requalification Examinations," describes

our requirements

for developing

and conducting the examinations.

Nr. Garner

has also

been

informed of these

requirements.

Also,

a facility operations

management

representative

(as

a minimum, first level

above shift supervisor)

should

observe

the simulation facility examination

process

at the site.

Carolina

Power

& Light Co.

This request

is covered

by Office of Management

and Budget

(OMB) Clearance

.

Number 3150-0101,

which expires October 31,

1995.

This estimated

average

burden is 7.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> per response,

including gathering,

xeroxing,

and mailing

the required material.

Send

comments

regarding this burden estimate

or any

other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions

for

reducing this burden, to the Information and Records

Management

Branch,

MNBB-7714, Division of Information Support Services,

Office of Information

Resources

Management,

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission,

Washington,

D.

C.

20555,

and to the Paperwork Reduction Project

(3150-0101),

Office of

Information. and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-3019, Office of Management

and

Budget,

Washington,

D.

C.

20503.

Thank you for your consider ation in this matter.

If you have

any questions

on

the evaluation

process,

please

contact

Mr. Michael Ernstes,

Chief, Operator

Licensing Section

2, at (404) 331-5594,

or myself at (404) 331-5541.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY T. k PEEBLES

Thomas

A. Peebles,

Chief

. Operations

Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosures:

1.

Reference

Material Requirements

2.

Administration of Requalification

Examinations

3.

NRC Rules

and Guidance for Examinees

cc w/encls:

G.

E.

Vaughn

Vice President

Harris Nuclear Project

P. 0.

Box 165

New Hill, NC

27562

W.

R. Robinson

Plant General

Manager

Harris Nuclear Plant

P. 0.

Box 165

New Hill, NC

27562

C.

S. Olexik, Jr.,

Manager

Regulatory Compliance

Harris Nuclear Project

P. 0.

Box 165

New Hill, NC

27562

(cc w/encls cont'd

- see

page

4)

Carolina

Power

5 Light Co.

cc w/encls.cont'd:

H.

Ray Starling

Vice President

- Legal

Department

Carolina

Power

and Light Co.

P. 0.

Box 1551

Raleigh,

NC

27602

Dayne

H. Brown, Director

Division of Radiation Protection

N,

C. Department of Environment,

Health

8. Natural

Resources

P. 0.

Box 27687

Raleigh,

NC

27611-7687

Ms. Gayle

B, Nichols

Staff Counsel

SC Public Service

Commission

P. 0.

Box 11649

Columbia,

SC

29211

A. Wayne Powell

Training Supervisor

Harris Nuclear Plant

Route

1,

Box 327

New Hill, NC

27562-0291

bcc w/o encls:

S. Ebneter,

RA

A. Gibson,

DRS

N. Le,

NRR

H. Christensen,

DRP

S. Vias,

DRP

R. Baldwin,

DRS

S. Cahill,

DRS

Nr. J.

Tedrow, Harris Senior

Resident

Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Route

1,

Box 315B

New Hill, NC

27562

bcc w/encls:

Document Control

Desk

RII:

SCa

ll:sj/sd

04/4 /93

RII:

HE

tes

04/ 93

RII:DRS

TP e les

04/) /93

ENCLOSURE

1

REFERENCE

MATERIAL RE UIREHENTS

Test items to supp'ort all aspects

of the requalification examination

must

be

provided to the

NRC 60 days prior to the examination date.

All test

items should

be developed 'in accordance

with the guidelines

provided

in Sections

602 through

604 of NUREG 1021, Operator Licensing

Examiner

Standards,

and their respective

attachments.

For the first requalification evaluation at the facility, the submittal

must

contain at least:

700 test

items for use in the written ekamination.

They should

be

equally divided between

the two sections of the examination,

and there

must

be at least

350 test

items for use in each section.

75 Job Performance

Measures

(JPHs) for use

on the walk-through portion of

the operating

examination.

To the extent possible,

approximately

40

percent of the

JPHs should evaluate "in plant" tasks

(system/component

operation outside the control room).

15 simulator scenarios

of approximately

50 minutes

each in length for use

on the simulator portion of the operating

examination for examinations

administered

in one week.

For subsequent

requalification examinations facilities are expected

to make

submittals reflecting progress

toward the following targets

over the next five

years after the initial evaluation visit:

A minimum of 700 test

items for use in the written examination equally

divided between .the two sections of the written'examination

and which

cover all safety-related

elements of the facility Job Task Analysis

(JTA).

The bank shall

be dynamic in nature,

in that at least

150

questions

a year shall

be reviewed,

revised,

or generated:

New questions

that are developed

should cover equipment

and system modifications,

recent industry,

and licensee

events

and procedural

changes.

JPHs to evaluate

each operator

and senior operator safety-related

task

identified in the facility JTA, which meet the criteria in ES-603.

The

JPH bank should

expand at

a rate of at least ten

JPHs per year until this

'goal is reached.

It is estimated

at .125 -

150 JPHs will be the final

result.

Development of the questions

associated

with the

JPHs shall also

continue,

such that there is

a representative

sample of questions

given

the knowledges

associated

with the task listed in the JTA.

A bank of at least

30 simulator scenarios

which reflect all plausible or

expected

abnormal

and emergency situations to which control

room

operators

are expected

to respond or control.

At least five scenarios

per year should

be generated

until all aspects

of the emergency

operating

procedures

are covered with sufficient variation in the type and scope of

initiating events

and level of degradation.

Enclosure

1

For all requalification examination

and evaluation visits, the facility shall:

Submit

an Examination Test Outline/Sample

Plan which meets

the

requirements

of ES-601,

Attachment l.

Provide the associated

examination

banks (written, simulator,

and

JPN)

and associated

reference

material to'the region

and contractor.

At a

minimum, this shall

include Technical Specifications,

applicable plant

operating,

surveillance

and administrative

procedures,

abnormal

and

emergency

operating

procedures,

emergency

plan procedures,

and training

material utilized in the requalification training (including student

handouts

and lesson plans).

Additional reference

material

may be

requested

by the Chief Examiner.

If a proposed

examination is submitted to the region,

also submit

a copy

of the simulator scenario portion to the Chief, Regional

Support

and

Oversight Section,

Operator Licensing Branch, Division of Licensee

Performance

and guality, Washington,

DC 20555,

45 days in advance of the

first day of the examinations.

The reason for the increased period of

days is to allow a reasonable

amount of time for feedback,

discussion

and

time to make

any necessary

changes.

ENCLOSURE

2

ADMINISTRATION OF

RE UALIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

An evaluation of at least

12 facility licensed

operators

is required for

a program evaluation.

Normally the crew scheduled for requalification

training during the period selected for the program evaluation

should

be

selected.

The sample will include other licensed

operators

who are not

routinely performing shift duties or are not maintaining

an active

license

per

10 CFR 55.53(3).

The restrictions

on crew composition in the

simulator are described

in ES-601

C. l.b.

and

ES-604.

2.

3.

4.

5 ~

The simulator

and simulator operator(s)

shall

be provided for examination

develop'ment.

The date(s)

and duration of time needed

to develop the

examinations will be agreed

upon

by the Chief Examiner

and the facility.

The reference

material

used in the simulator will be reviewed

by the

Chief Examiner.

No material will be used that is solely used for

training.

A single

room shall

be provided for completing Section

B of the written

examination.

The location of this room and supporting rest

room

facilities shall

be such

as to prevent contact with all other facility

and/or contractor

personnel

for the duration of the examination.

Minimum spacing is required to ensure

examination integrity and will be

evaluated

by the Chief Examiner.

Minimum spacing consists of one

examinee

per table

and

a 3-foot space

between tables.

No wall charts,

models,

and/or other training materials shall

be present

in the

examination

room.

6.

Copies of reference

material for Section

8 of the written examination

shall

be provided for each

examinee.

The reference

material will be

reviewed

by the Chief Examiner

and will consist of Technical

Specifications,

operating/abnormal

procedures,

administrative procedures,

and

Emergency

Plans

as available to the plant operators.

7.

Video taping capabilities

may be utilized.

The facility should contact

the Chief Examiner for restrictions related to its usage.

8.

9.

An attempt will be made to distinguish

between

RO and

SRO knowledge

and

abilities to the extent that such

a distinction is supported

by the

facility training materials.

Prudent scheduling of exam week activities is important to help alleviate

undue stress

on the operators.

Your training staff and the Chief

Examiner should work very closely in formulating

a schedule

which does

not result in excessive

delays

in crews or individuals being administered

their examination.

The following are

some suggestions

for structuring

the

exam activities to achieve this purpose:

Enclosure

2

Don't bring in crews or individuals well before their scheduled

exam

times.

When examining operators

in groups, it is better to hold the group

just completing their exam vice the groups that are taking their

exam later.

Following simulator scenarios,

the facility evaluators

and

NRC

examiners

should quickly determine

whether follow-up questioning is

required,

so that the crew may be released

to talk among themselves

about the scenario.

Ensure that time validation of JPHs, particularly those. performed in

the simulator, is conducted

accurately.

A reasonable

schedule

should

be established

to prevent operators

from waiting for

simulator availability to complete their JPHs.

ENCLOSURE

3

NRC

RULES

AND GUIDANCE FOR

EXAMINEES

Use black ink or dark pencil

ONLY to facilitate legible reproduction.

Print your name in the blank provided

on the cover sheet of the

examination.

Fill in the date

on the cover

sheet of the examination, if necessary.

Answer each question

on the examination.

If additional

paper is

required,

use only the lined paper provided

by the examiner.

Use abbreviations

only if they are

commonly used in facility literature.

The point value for each question is indicated in parentheses

after the

question

and

can

be used

as

a guide for the depth of answer required.

Show all calculations,

methods,

or assumptions

used to obtain

an answer

to

a short answer test item, whether

asked for in the question or not.

Unless solicited,

the location of references

need not be stated.

Proportional

grading will be applied.

Any additional

wrong information

that is provided

may count against

you.

For example, if a question is

worth one point and asks for four responses,

each of which is worth 0.25

points,

and you give five responses,

each

response will be worth 0.20

points.

If one of your five responses

is incorrect,

0.20 will be

deducted,

and your total credit for that question will be 0.80,

even

though you may have listed the four correct responses

in the answer

key.

Partial credit

may be given, except

on multiple choice questions.

Therefore,

ANSWER ALL PARTS

OF THE QUESTION,

AND DO NOT LEAVE ANY ANSWERS

8LANK.

If parts of the examination

are not clear with respect

to their intent,

ask questions of the examiner only.

You must sign the statement

on the cover sheet that indicates

the work on

the examination .is your own and that you have not received or been given

any assistance

in completing the examination. 'his must

be signed

AFTER

the examination

has

been completed.

Rest

room trips are to be limited, and only one examinee

at

a time may

leave.

You must avoid all contact with anyone outside the examination

room to avoid even the appearance

or possibility of examination

compromise.

Cheating

on the examination

would result in a revocation of your license

and could result in more severe penalties.

Enclosure

3

1

15.

Each section of the .examination is designed

to take approximately

90

minutes to complete.

You will be given two hours to complete, each

section to allow for'hirty minutes of review.

16.

The examination

has

been time validated

by knowledgeable

persons.

You

should

be aware that not every answer

needs

to be verified by consulting

a reference,

and excessive

usage of reference

material

may cause

you to

not complete the

exam in the allotted time.

17.

Due to the existence of questions

that will require all examinees

to

refer to the

same indications or controls, particular care

must

be taken

to maintain individual examination security

and avoid any possibility of

compromise -or appearance

of cheating.

18.

When you are finished

and

hav'e turned in your completed

examination,

leave the examination

area.