ML18010A413
| ML18010A413 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 09/19/1991 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Eury L CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18010A414 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9110080106 | |
| Download: ML18010A413 (29) | |
See also: IR 05000400/1991012
Text
1 9 f991
Docket No. 50-400
License
No.
Carolina
Power
and Light Company
ATTN:
Mr. Lynn W. Eury
Executive Vice President
Power Supply
P. 0.
Box 1551
Raleigh,
NC
27602
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT
OF LICENSEE
PERFORMANCE
(NRC
INSPECTION
REPORT
NO. 50-400/91-12)
This
refers to the
NRC's Systematic
Assessment
of Licensee
Performance
(SALP)
Report for your Harris facility which
was
sent to you
on July 23,
1991; our
meeting to discuss
the report
on August 1,
1991
and your written comments
dated
September
16,
1991, relative to the report.
The
SALP >Board considered
your
comment
and concluded
that
a
change
to the
initial SALP Report should
be made.
Enclosed is our summary of the August 1,
1991 meeting;
a copy of SALP slides; your response
dated
September
16,
1991;
SALP Board Disposition of your comment;
and
a revision to the initial SALP
Report which constitutes
the final SALP Report.
The performance
at your Harris facility has
been superior
and our SALP Report
indicates that your efforts have
been directed
toward the safe operation of the
unit.
Your continued
commitment to improve overall performance
should lead to
continued superior performance.
No reply to this letter is required;
however,
should you have
any questions
concerning
these matters,
I will be please
to discuss
them with you.
Sincerely,
Original Signed
by
Stewart
D. Ebneter
Enclosures:
(See
page
2)
Stewart
D. Ebneter
Regional Administrator
91100801 Ob 9i0919
ADOCK 05000400
6
Carolina
Power
and Light Company
SEP I 8 l991
Enclosures:
1.
August 1,
1991
Meeting Summary
2.
August 1,
991
SALP Slides
3.
CPIIL Letter
Dated September
16,
1991
4.
SALP Board Dispostion
5.
Errata Sheets
6.
Final
SALP Report
cc w/encls:
R.
B. Richey, Vice President
Harris Nuclear Project
Box 165
New Hill, NC
27562
C.
S. Hinnant
General
Manager
Harris Nuclear Plant
Box 165
New Hill, NC
27562
C. S. Olexik, Jr.,
Manager
Regulatory Compliance
Harris Nuclear Project
P. 0.
Box 165
New Hill, NC
27562
H.
Ray Starling
Manager - Legal
Department
P. 0.
Box 1551
Raleigh,
NC
27602
Dayne
H. Brown, Director
Division of Radiation Protection
N. C. Department of Environment,
Health
5 Natural
Resources
P. 0.
Box 27687
Raleigh,
NC
27611-7687
bcc w/encls:
(See
page
3)
Carolina
Power and Light Company
'
GAP >9 89"
bcc w/encl s:
The Chairman
K. C. Rogers,
Commissioner
J.
R. Curtiss,
Commissioner
F. J.
Remick,
Commissioner
J.
N. Taylor,
H. L. Thompson, Jr.,
J.
F. Wechselberger,
Regional
Coordinator,
T.
E. Hurley,
S. Varga,
B. Noxafari,
E. Adensam,
F. Allenspach,
SALP Coordinator,
Regional Administrators,
RI, RIII
RIV, and
RV
K. Clark, RII,
PAO
D. Verrelli, DRP, RII
H. Christensen,
DRP, RII
E. Nerschoff,
DRP, RII
L. Watson, Chief,
DRS and
DRSS Branch Chiefs,
and Section Chiefs
Document Control
Desk
NRC Resident
Inspector
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Route 1,
Box 315B
New Hill, NC
27562
HChristensen
09/
/91
- NRR
EAdensam
09/
/91
DVerrelli
09/
/91
- RII:DRSS
BMallett
09/
/91
- SEE PREVIOUS
CONCURRENCES - ATTACHED
- RII:DRP
- RII:DRP
- RII:DRP
EMerschoff
09/
/91
- RII: DRS
CJulian
09/
/91
- NRR
BMozafari
09/
/91
- RII:ORA
JNilhoan
09/
/91
Carolina
Power and Light Company
1 9
1991
bcc w/encl s:
jument Control
Desk
H. Christensen,
RII
B. Mozafar i,
NRC Resident
Inspector
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Route
1,
Box 315B
New Hill, NC
27562
RI I: DRP
HChristensen
09/g/91
RII:D P
DVerrelli
09/(II/91
RII: DRP
EMersghoff
09/'g /91
via 'A~
ozafari
09/) $ /91
RII:
)M.<;."'+
09/P/91
09/g/91
RII:
CJu
n
09/A/91
I
.
A
J il
an
09/J
/91
ENCLOSURE. I
~fI
i
S
A.
B.
C.
A meeting
was
held at 10:00
a.m.
on August I, 1991, at the Harris
Energy
and
Environmental
Center,
near
New Hill, North Carolina, to
discuss
the
SALP Board Report for the Harris facility.
Licensee Participants
S.
H. Smith, Jr., President
and Chief Executive Officer
W. Graham,
Vice Chairman,
L. W. Eury, Executive Vice President
R. A. Watson,
Senior Vice President
C.
D. Barhom, Jr., Senior Vice President
G.
E. Vaughn, Vice President
Nuclear
Services
R. B. Richey, Vice President
Harris Project
A. M. Lucas,
Manager Nuclear Engineering
S. Hinnant, Plant Manager
l
The list of licensee
attendees
above
does
not include the large
number of Carolina
Power
and Light Company
employees
that
were
present
at the
SALP presentation.
The personnel
were supervisors,
plant operators,
maintenance
personnel,
and
various
plant staff.
This large turnout
was beneficial to the
SALP process
and is highly
recommended
for future presentations.
NRC Participants
S.
D. Ebneter,
Regional Administrator
L. A. Reyes,
Director Division of Reactor Projects
E.
G. Adensam, Director, Project Directorate II-1, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation
(NRR)
B. L. Mozafari, Project Manager,
D.
M. Verrelli, Chief, Reactor Projects,
Branch
No. I
J.
E. Tedrow, Senior Resident
Inspector - Harris,
M. C.
Shannon,
Resident
Inspector - Harris,
K. M. Clark, Public Affairs Officer
ENLCOSURE
2
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
NRC
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT
OF
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
(SALP)
SALP CYCLE 9
DECEMBER 1, 1989
THROUGH
JUNE 1, 1991
SHEARON HARRIS
AUGUST 1, 1991
SALP PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
$ . IDENTIFY TRENDS IN LICENSEE
PERFORMANCE
2. PROVIDE A BASIS FOR ALLOCATION
OF NRC RESOURCES
3. IMPROVE NRC REGULATORY PROGRAM
REGION II ORGANIZATION
.'FFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
l
ADMINISTRATOR
S. EBNETER
DEPUTY J. MILHOAN
T V A
PROJECT8
CHIEF
B. WILSON
DIVISION OF
REACTOR PROJECT8
DIR.
L. REYES
DEPUTY E. MERSCHOFF
DIVISION OF
REACTOR 8AFETY
DIR.
A. GIBBON
DEPUTY
J. JOHNSON
DIVISION OF
RA DI ATION SAF E T Y
AND 8AFEGUARDS
DIR.
J. BTOHR
DEPUTY
B. MALLETT
DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS
ORGANIZATION
DIVISIONOF
RECC TOR PRO>ECTS
L. REYES
DEPUTY
E. MERSQHOF F
REACTOR PROJECTS
BRANCH NO. 1
CHIEF 0. YERRELLI
PROJECTS
SECTION
NO. 1A
PRGJECTB SECTION
NO. 1B
CHlEF H. CHRISTEN8E
- CHIEF F. CANTRELL
BRUNSWICK
HARRIS
ROBINSON
FARLEY
9RAND GULF
SUMMER
NRR ORGANIZATION
OFFICE OF
MUCl EAR REACTOR
REGULATIOM
DlR. T. MURLEY
- ASSOC. DIRECTOR FOR
PROJECTS
J- PARTLY
ASSOC- DIRECTOR FOR
iXSPECTIOM AXO
YEl HNICALASSESSMENT
DIVISION OF
REACTOR P RQJECTS I/II
S. VARGA, DIR. I/II
G. LAINAS, ASST. DIR. II
E. ADENSAM, DIR. II-0
B. MOZAFARI PROJ. MGR.
HARRIS
blVISION OF
ENGINE ERING
TECHNOLOGY
DIVISION OF
OPE RATIONAL EVENTS
ASSESSMENT
DIVISION OF
REACTOR INSPECTION
AND SAFEGUARDS
DIVISION OF RADIATION
PROTECTION AND
MERQENCY PREPAREDNESS
DIVISION OF
REAQTPR PRP JEPTIl III/IV/V
AHD
8PEQIAL PRP JEQTQ
DIVISION OF I.ICENSEE
PERFORMANCE AND
QUALITYEVALUATION
blVISION OF
SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY
RE
FOR OPERATING REACTORS
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS A
A. PLANT OPERATIONS
B. RADIOLOGICALCONTROLS
C. MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE
E. SECURITY
F. ENGINEERING/TECHNICALSUPPORT
G. SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY
VERIFICATION
AREA PERF
RMAN E
CATEGORY 1
LICENSEE MANAGEMENTATTENTION TO
AND INVOLVEMENTIN NUCLEAR SAFETY
OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED
IN A SUPERIOR LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE.
NRC MllLLCONSIDER REDUCED LEVELS
OF INSPECTION EFFORT.
AREA PERF
RMAN E
CATEGORY 2
LICENSEE MANAGEMENTATTENTION TO
AND INVOLVEMENTIN NUCLEAR SAFETY
OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED
IN A GOOD LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE.
NRC WILL CONSIDER MAINTAINING
NORMAL LEVELS OF INSPECTION
EFFORT.
AREA PERF
RMAN E
CATEGORY 3
LICENSEE MANAGEMENTATTENTION TO
AND INVOLVEMENTIN NUCLEAR SAFETY
OR SAFEQUARDS ACTIVITIES RESULTED
IN AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE;
HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE NRC'S CONCERN
THAT A DECREASE IN PERFORMANCE MAY
APPROACH OR REACH AN UNACCEPTABLE
LEVEL, NRG WILL CONSIDER INCREASED
LEVELS OF INSPECTION EFFORT.
EVAL ATl N
RtTERlA
1. MANAGEMENTINVOLVEMENTAND CONTROL
IN ASSURING QUALITY
2. APPROACH TO IDENTIFICATIONAND
RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES
FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT
3. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
4. REPORTING, ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE
ACTION OF REPORTABLE EVENTS
5. STAFFING INCLUDING MANAGEMENT}
8. TRAININGEFFECTIVENESS AND
QUALIFICATION
VIOLATION SUMMARY
(CYCLE 9)
DECEMBER
1,
1989
THROUGH JUNE
1,
1991
I
II
III
IV
V
HARRIS
0
0
23
0
- ISSUED SUBSEQUENT
TO
ASSESSEMENT
PERIOD
REGION
II AVE.
0
0
PER
OPERATING
UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT
PERIOD
't4
(1
DECEMBER 1, 1989 JUNE 1, 1QQ1
(CYCLE 9}
COMP
FAILURE
24%
OTHER
1
MAINT.7
OTHER
2%
DESIGNS
CONSTR.
20%
TOTAL
(4s)
PERSONNEL
53%
OPERATINQ 16
PERSONNEL
(2~)
FUNCTIONAL AREA DISTRIBUTION
For Eighteen Region II Sites
SALP CYCLES 8, 9, AND 10
Number of Sites
RAD
M/S
SEC
FUnctional Areas
ENG/TS
SA/QV
~ CATEGORY 1
ES CATEGORY 2
KQ CATEGORY 3
FACILITY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
HARRIS
FUNCTIONAL ARE
RATING LAST
PERIOD
RATING TH!S
PERIOD
PLANT OPERATIONS
(OPERATIONS
& FIRE PROTECTION}
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS
MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE
SECURIT Y
ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL SUPPORT
(ENGINEERING, TRAINING & OUTAGES}
SAFETY ASSESSMENT/
QUALITY VERIFICATION
(QUALITY PROGRAMS
& LICENSING)
2
1.
SALP CYCLE 9
OPERATlONS
(CATEGORY 1)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THE AREA
OF OPERATIONS REMAINED EXCELLENT
STRENGTHS
~
IMPROVED PLANT RELIABILITY
~
PROFESSIONAL, DEDICATED STAFF
~
PLANT HOUSEKEEPING
~
OPERATIONS INTERFACE WITH OTHER
SITE ORGANIZATIONS
~
INCREASED ATTENTION TO SECONDARY
PLANT COMPONENTS
~
NO REACTOR TRIPS
CHALLENGES
~
CORRECT EXAMPLES OF INADEQUATE
SUPERVISION
~
PERFORMANCE DURING PLANT HEATUP
OR COOLDOWN
RADI L
I AL
NTR
L
(CATEGORY 1)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA
REMAINS EXCELLENT
STRENGTHS
~
MANAGEMENTSUPPORT FOR
RADIATIONPROTECTION PROGRAM
~
STRONG ALARA PROGRAM
~
REDUCED CONTAMINATEDAREAS
~
LIQUID AND GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
PROGRAM EFF ECTIVELY MANAGED
~
EFFECTIVE DOSE CONTROL
CHALLENGES
~
PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS
~
INOPERABLE RADIATIONMONITORS
~
SP ENT FUEL SHIP MENTS
~
POST ACCIDENT SAMPLING SYSTEM
MAINTENAN E/
URVEILLAN E
(CATEGORY 2)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE REMAINED GOOD
STRENGTHS
~
OUTAGE PRE-PLANNED TO REDUCE
SHUTDOWN RISK
~
COMPUTERIZED AUTOMATED
MAINTENANCEMANAGEMENTSYSTEM
INCREASED EMPHASIS IN SECONDARY
PLANT MAINTENANCE
PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCEPROGRAM
VIBRATIONALANALYSIS
LUBE OIL ANALYSIS
~
SURVEILLANCE TEST SCHEDULING
PROGRAM
~
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCEINSPECTION
PROGRAM
MAINTENAN E/
URVEILLAN E
(CONTlNUED
CHALLENGES
~
POST-MAINTENANCE TESTING
SURVEILLANCE TEST PERFORMANCE
~
PROCEDURE ADHERENCE
~
IMPLEMENTATIONOF THE INSERVICE
TESTING PROGRAM
EMERGENGY
PREPAREDNESS
(CATEGORY 1)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA
REMAINS EXCELLENT
STRENGTHS
~
QUALIFICATIONAND TRAINING
PROGRAM
~
EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION
~
STAFF OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE
ORGANIZATION QUALIFIED AND
WELL TRAINED
~
STRONG PROGRAM IN MAINTAINING
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FACILITIES
~
COORDINATION WITH OFFSITE
AUTHORITIES
CHALLENGE
~
ACTIVATIONOF EMERGENCY RESPONSE
FACILITIES
SECURITY
(cA~EGoav
~)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA HAS
IMPROVED TO EXCELLENT
STRENGTHS
~
AGGRESSIVE SECURITY PROGRAM
~
ACCESS CONTROL PROGRAM
NEW GATEHOUSE
TRAINING DRILLS
~
SECURITY HARDWARE UPGRADES
~
PROFESSIONAL STAFF
~
AGGRESSIVE FITNESS FOR DUTY
PROGRAM
CHALLENGE
~
MAINTAINPERFORMANCE
ENGINEERING/
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
(CATEGORY 1)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA HAS
REMAINED EXCELLENT
STRENGTHS
~
PROACTIVE MANAGEMENTSUPPORT
~
STRONG ENGINEERING SUPPORT
~
EFFECTIVE SYSTEM ENGINEERING
PROGRAM
DEFINED DUTIES
GOOD COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN
ORGANIZATIONS
~
TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR PROGRAMS
PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE
INSERVICE TESTING
EROSION/CORROSION PROGRAM
~
PROCUREMENT ACTIVITIES
ENGINEERING/
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
(cow~iwu~D)
CHALLENGES
~
TRAINING EXAMINATIONDEVELOPMENT
~
TEAM COMMuNICATIONSKILLS
TRAINING
SAFETY ASSESSMENT/
QUALITY VERIFICATION
(CATEGORY 1}
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN THIS AREA
REMAINS EXCELLENT
STRENGTHS
~
OPERATING EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK
PROGRAM
~
CONSERVATIVE APPROACH TO SAFETY
ISSUES
~
PLANT MANAGEMENTINVOLVEMENT
~
GOOD SELF-IDENTIFICATION OF
PROBLEMS
~
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING OF
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
CHALLENGE
~
IMPLEMENTATIONOF THE NUCLEAR
ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT