ML18005A742

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-400/88-34.Corrective Actions:Maint Foremen Received Addl Training on Tech Spec & MMM-001, Maint Conduct of Operation Requirements for Overtime
ML18005A742
Person / Time
Site: Harris 
Issue date: 12/21/1988
From: Watson R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
CON-NRC-655 HO-880246-(O), NUDOCS 8901030237
Download: ML18005A742 (5)


Text

ACCElZRATED Dl. TR1BUIIO.t DEMONSTRATION SYFI'EM

~

~

(

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

CESSION NBR:8901030237 DOC.DATE: 88/12/21 NOTARIZED: NO ACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION WATSON,R.A.

Carolina Power 6 Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to NRC 881122 ltr re violations noted in Insp Rept 50-400/88-34.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE01D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR l ENCL g SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response DOCKET 05000400 NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.

05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DEIIB NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10 NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS 1 RGN2 FILE 01 ERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME BUCKLEY,B AEOD DEDRO NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 O~IE OMAN,J REG=FI*LE 02 NRC PDR RESL MARTIN,D COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 R

I D

S NOTE 'IO AZZ "RICS" RECIPIENTS.

PXZASE HELP US K) REMJCB KLSTE.'ONTACT 'IHE DOCUMENT OONTRlDL DESK, RXN Pl-37 (EXT. 20079)

KO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FRY DISTRIBUTION LISTS H)R DOCUMENTS YOU DClNiT NEEDt TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 25 ENCL 25

Carolina Power 8 L~ont Cornpanv DEC 21 1988 HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT P.O.

Box 165 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 File Number.

SHF/10-13510E Letter Number'HO-880246 (0)

NRC-655 Document Control Desk United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO ~ 50-400 LICENSE NO. NPF-63 REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Gentlemen.

In reference to your letter of November 22,

1988, referring to I.E. Report RII:

50"400/88-34, the attached is Carolina Power and Light Company's reply to violation "A" identified in Enclosure 1.

It is considered that the corrective actions taken/planned are satisfactory for resolution of the item.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Very truly yours, MGW:tbb Enclosure R. A. Watson Vice President Harris Nuclear Project cc.'r.

W. H. Bradford (NRC SHNPP)

Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)

Mr. M. L. Ernst (NRC - RII) 890i030237

~ 00~00 SS122i AOQCK 05~

9 P

MEM/HO-8802460/1/Osl

0

Attachment to CPSL Letter of Res onse to NRC I.E.

Re ort RII:

50-400 88-34 Violation A

Re orted Violation:

Technical Specification 6.2.2.f requires that administrative procedures shall be developed and implemented to limit the working hours of unit staff who perform safety-related functions, including key maintenance personnel.

Deviations from guideline limits are required to be authorized by the plant general manager or his designee, with documentation of the basis for granting the deviation.

The guideline limits on work hours include:

24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in any 48 hour5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> period, and 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in any 7 day period.

Contrary to the

above, guideline limits on work hours for key maintenance personnel were exceeded without the required authorization during the period of July 30,
1988, through September 16, 1988.

Noted were twenty-two instances of exceeding the limit of 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in any 7

day period, and 12 instances of exceeding the limit of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in any 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation'.

The violation is correct as stated.

The violation occurred due to the lack of awareness by some personnel of the requirements of Technical Specification 6.2.2.f and Procedure MMM-001, Maintenance Conduct of Operation, concerning limits on overtime.

Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved:

A revie~

was conducted of recent maintenance overtime.

Discrepancies were identified to the Plant General Manager and subsequent approval was documented.

Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Violation.'aintenance foremen have received additional training on Technical Specification and MMM-001 requirements for overtime.

A memorandum was issued by the maintenance manager to maintenance personnel reminding them of their responsibilities for ensuring proper approval of overtime.

MMM-001 will be revised to require that maintenance supervisors conduct monthly reviews of overtime.

Signs will be posted in maintenance shops to remind personnel of overtime approval requirements.

MEM/H0-8802460/2/OS1

Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved:

Full compliance is pending revision to MMM-001 to include the maintenance supervisory review and posting of signs in the maintenance shops as stated above.

These actions are expected to be completed by January 31, 1989.

MEM/H0-8802460/3/OS1