ML18005A280
| ML18005A280 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1988 |
| From: | Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18005A279 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-88-01, 50-400-88-1, NUDOCS 8802090602 | |
| Download: ML18005A280 (2) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1
NOTICE, OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Shearon Harris Docket No. 50-400 License No.
CPPR-158 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on January 11-15, 1988 violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988),
the violations are listed below:
A.
Licensing Condition 2.F requires Carolina Power and Light Company to implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the approved fire protection program as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report for the Facility as amended and as approved in the Safety Evaluation Report dated November 12, 1983 and the Safety Evaluation Report dated January 12, 1987.
Contrary to the above, the requirements of FSAR Section 9.5. 1, "limiting conditions for operation, action statements, and surveillance requirements for the fire protection program will be established,"
has not been fully implemented in that the action statements in Procedure FPP-013 for inoperable fire suppression systems do not adequately define the corrective action required.
Section 8.2 of Procedure FPP-013 requires a
continuous fire wat'ch to be posted in areas containing redundant systems or components and an hourly fire watch for all other areas when the fire suppression system protecting the area is inoperable.
Procedure FPP-013 does not include any information as to which areas protected by fire suppression systems do or do not contain redundant systems or components.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
B.
Licensing Condition 2.F requires Carolina Power and Light Company to implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the approved fire protection program as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report for the facility as amended and as approved in the Safety Evaluation Report dated November 1982 and the Safety Evaluation Report dated January 12, 1987.
Procedure FPT-3302 which is part of the approved fire protection program requires a quarterly Main Drain Test on suppression system in the Reactor Auxiliary Building.
Contrary to the
- above, review of records showed the following. discrep-ancies:
Suppression systems 1A-1-190 and 1A-2-190 on the 190 elevation were tested January 17 and August 28, 1987; suppression systems lA-1-286 8802090602 88020(5 PDR ADOCK 05000400 G
Carolina Power and Light Company 2
Shearon Harris Docket No. 50-400 License No.
CPPR-158 and 1A-2-286 on the 286 elevation were tested February 4 and August 28, 1987; and suppression systems 1A-1-305 and lA-2-305 on. elevation 305 were tested. February 4 and July 7, 1987 and again on August 28, 1987.
These tests did not meet the quarterly requirements specified by procedure FPT 3302.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or. explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Coranission, ATTN:
Document Control
- Desk, Washington, DC, 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Shearon Harris within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include Ifor each violationj:
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results
- achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is
- shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 26'tv
~lan R. Herdt, Chief Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety Dated yt Atlanta, Georgia this gg day of February 1988