ML18004B921

Submits Proposed Rev to Plant QA Program for NRC Approval. Proposed Change Incorporates Document Sampling Program. Justification for Change Discussed

ML18004B921
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	09/02/1987
From:	Zimmerman S CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
NLS-87-171, NUDOCS 8709090097
Download: ML18004B921 (5)

Text

R TORY INFORMATION DISTR' SYSTEM (RIDS)

AXCESSICJN NBR: 8709090097 DOC. DATE: 87/09/02 NOTARIZED:

NO FACIL: 50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Planti Unit 1> Carolina AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ZIMMERMANiS. R.

Carolina Power 5 Light Co.

RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

DOCKET 0 05000400

SUBJECT:

Submits proposed rev to plant GA program for NRC approval.

Proposed change incorporates document sampling program.

Sustification

%or change discussed.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

G004D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE:

GA Topical Report>

Amendmenti or Correspondence (Docket/Utility Speci NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.

05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 LA COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME BUCKLEY'S B COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 INTERNAL:

AF/LFMB EXTERNAL: DMB/DSS NRC PDR 01 2

2 1

1 1

1 NRR/DLPG/GAB RQN2 FILE LPDR 2

2 1

1 1

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 11 ENCL 11

0 il I

CKK Carolina Power 8 Light Company SERIAL: NLS-87-171 10CFR50.50 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-000/LICENSE NO. NPF-63 QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM CHANGES Gentlemen:

Carolina Power R Light Company (CPRL) hereby submits for NRC aporoval, a proposed revision to the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SHNPP) Quality P ssurance (QA) program.

Because this change reduces a program commitment, NRC approval is required prior to implementation per IOCFR50.50(pa)(3).

The following provides a description and lustification for the proposed change.

Currently, the SHNPP QA program requires that completed maintenance work request ackages be reviewed by the Quality Organization to ensure that hold point requirements ave been satisfied and necessary documentation attesting to the completion of the work has been generated.

The proposed change reduces the quantity of maintenance work requests being reviewed by incorporating a document sampling program.

The program requires that a sample of work requests be reviewed rather than each and every one.

This change provides consistency between SHNPP QA program requirements and CPRL's other nuclear plant QA program requirements.

Although the proposed change reduces a program commitment, the revised program continues to provide assurance that hold point requirements would be satisfied and that necessary documentation attesting to satisfactory completion of the work would be enerated.

Thus, the SHNPP QA program would continue to meet the applicable 0CFR50, Appendix B criteria.

Pursuant to 10CFR50 50(a)(3)(iv), this QA program change willnot be implemented until NRC approval has been granted.

This program revision, if accepted, willbe incorporated into the FSAR as shown in the attached mark-up.

(9l.9) 836-6623.

If you have any questions, please call Mr. Steve Chaplin of our Nuclear Licensing staff at Yours very truly,

~

~

S.. Zim erman

- Ma ger Nuclear icensing Section SRZ/GB/lah (52603DK)

Enclosure cc:

Mr. B. C. Buckley (NRC)

Dr. J. Nelson Grace (NRC-RII)

Mr. G. F. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP) 8709090097 870902 F'11 Fayettevilte Street o P. O. BOx 1551

~ Raleigh, N. C. 27602 pooLI 1l,

SHNPP FSAR 17.2.15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS The SHNPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes requirements for the control of nonconforming materials, parts or components.

The Corporate QA Program addresses QA and other organizational responsibilities for the definition and implementation of activities related to nonconformance control.

This includes identifying those individuals or groups with authority for the disposition of nonconforming items.

The Corporate QA Program requires QA to document concurrence of the adequacy of corrective action and initiate follow-up action to verify proper implementation of the corrective action.

The program requires that material,

parts, or components found nonconforming through review, inspection, surveillance, testing, or audits be controlled by administiative procedures.

These procedures provide for the following:

a)

Identification of nonconforming items by use of nonconformance tags, stickers, or other appropriate status indicators and segregation of

,those items, if practical, to prevent inadvertent use pending proper disposition and reinspection.

b)

Identification of those individuals or organizations responsible for disposition of nonconforming items.

c)

Preparation of nonconformance reports which identify nonconforming items and describe the nonconformance, the disposition of the nonconformance,

'and the reinspection or testing performed to determine the acceptability of the item after the disposition has been completed.

d)

Verification of the acceptability of rework/repair of items by reinspection or testing of the item as originally performed or by a method which is equivalent to the original inspection and'esting method.

e)

Nonconformance reports which are dispositioned "use as is" or "repair" are retained as part of the quality records.

f)

Quarterly analysis of selected reports as determined by OA be performed

~~d forwarded to management to show, uality trends.

On 0 sample.

abls G}4 (n accordan<c ~<'proye rocedures ko L oncon orming tems t at requx,re rewor.

repm.rs y t e p ant ma ntenance organization are identified to the plant maintenance organization through the use of maintenance work request forms.

Work request form packages include or reference procedures and instructions (including OA hold points) as required by which work has to be accomplished.

Referenced procedures and instructions are reviewed and concurred by QA prior to start of work.

Upon completion of the work, the maintenance work request form package is reviewed ~A-t~

ensure QA hold point requirements hays, been satisfied and the necessary documentation, attesting to satisfacF8Jy-'Fcbmp3.egog':

ogJ the hark, has been generated.

Work request form packages, +ere the resolution of the nonconformance is "accept as is", are ~ifarwa@ed through QA.

Quality

. t,, )leg~

Assurance in this case verifie that the documented engineering evaluation,

~ justifying the "accept as is",

• "J"'n She sampe above

'onJibon Js refereAc'c or fr'ice~(fed ~t$ g)

+bc Wow(c. rcguc5,t.

~

~

Amendment No.

l' I

llsgRC-DS ev'sP-8 > ~>~

A C~

0