ML18004B526
| ML18004B526 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 10/08/1986 |
| From: | Watson R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-487 HO-860358-(O), NUDOCS 8610240226 | |
| Download: ML18004B526 (3) | |
Text
OCT 0 8 )a85 HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT P.O.
Box 165 New Hill, NC 27562 File Number'.
SHF/10-13510E Letter Number'HO-860358 (0)
Dr. J. Nelson Grace United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)
Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC-487
Dear Dr. Grace:
In reference to your letter of September 23, 1986, referring to RII: 50-400/86-60-01, the attached is Carolina Power
& Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure l.
It is considered that the corrective actions taken are satisfactory for resolution of the item.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Yours very truly, R. A. Watson Vice President Harris Nuclear Project MW/cge Attachment cc:
Messrs.
G. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP)
B. C. Buckley (NRC) 8610240226 PDR AOOC 861008
<.05000ypp PDR MEM/HO-8603580/PAGE 1/OS1 t l
V t
t t
C
Dr. J. Nelson Grace Page 2
~ Attachment to CP&L Letter of Response to NRC Report RII:
50-400/86-60-01 Re orted Violation:
10CFR50.55(f)(1') requires CP&L to implement the equality Assurance program describ'ed or referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report.
Section 1.8.5.5 of the CP&L equality Assurance Program requires that measures be established to ensure that drawings are in'ccordance with the documented plant configuration.
Contrary to the above, drawings were not in accordance with the documented plant configuration in that during the week of July 28,
- 1986, the resident inspectors found the as-constructed condition of the Emergency Service Water System, as described in Ebasco drawing CAR-2165-G-047, Rev.
17, CP&L Simplified Flow Diagram, CPL-2165-S-0547, Rev. 5, and FSAR drawing 9.2.1-1, did not show piping modifications and the actual piping arrangement of the installed equipment.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
The violation is correct as stated.
Flow diagram drawings and physical arrangement drawings were worked by separate groups within the Design Sub-Unit.
No cross-check between flow diagram drawing revisions and physical arrangement details were performed.
The lack of this cross-check led to the referenced violation.
Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved:
Ebasco drawing 2165-G-047 and Simplified Flow Diagram 2165-S-0547 have been revised (Rev.
19 and Rev.
8 respectively) to correct the discrepancies noted by the inspector.
FSAR figures will be updated periodically to reflect the latest revision of the flow diagram drawing.
In addition, revisions to the safety related portions of other flow diagram drawings have been reviewed against the physical design details to ensure that they are consistent.
No other inconsistencies were found.
Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance:
Instructions were issued to requiring that flow diagram physical design details for to the Engineering Sub-Unit the Design Sub-Unit on August 9, 1986 drawing revisions be reviewed against consistency prior to submitting the revision for review.
Date When Full Com liance Was Achieved:
Full compliance was achieved on August 22, 1986.
MEM/HO-8603580/PAGE 2/OS1