ML18003B093
| ML18003B093 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/04/1985 |
| From: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8504110682 | |
| Download: ML18003B093 (7) | |
Text
APR 4 1985 ~
Docket No.:
50-400 Mr. E. E. Utley Executive Vice President Power Supply and Engineering and Construction Carolina Power Im Light Company Post Office Box 1551
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Utley:
Subject:
Shearon Harris, Unit 1 - Request for Additional Information in Regard to the Offsite Dose Calculational Manual
Dear Mr. Utley:
We have completed our initial evaluation of the Offsite Dose Calculational Manual which was submitted by Carolina Power and Light Company letter dated August 31, 1984 and find that additional information, as described in the enclosure, is required to continue our review.
Sincerely,
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page DISTRIBUTION
.00-'4 0.
NRC PDR L PDR NSIC PRC System LB83 Rdg JLee BBuckley DL:
D 883 BBuckley yt G
nighton 3/P40 /85 g~/85 85OP11068 "04OO NV<@N sfGNEQ BY George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No.
3 Division of Licensing JPartlow BGrimes EJordan
- Attorney, OELD ACRS (16)
~
Ik k
~ k
~
k F
kk k
k
Mr. E.
E. Utley Executive Vice President Power Supply and Engineering and Construction Carolina Power 5 Light Company Post Office Box 1551
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 George F. Trowbridge, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts 5 Trowbridge 1800 M Street,
'NW Washington, DC 20036 Richard E. Jones, Esq.
Associate General Counsel Carolina Power 5 Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Mall Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 M. David Gordon, Esq.
Associate Attorney General State of North Carolina Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Thomas S. Erwin, Esq.
115 W. Morgan Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. George Maxwell Resident Inspector/Harris NPS c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 1, Box 315B New Hill, North Carolina 27562 Charles D. Barham, Jr.,
Esq.
Vice President 5 Senior Counsel Carolina Power 5 Light Company Post Office Box 1551 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. John Runkle, Executive Coordinator Conservation Council of North Carolina 307 Granville Road Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Mr. Wells Eddleman 718-A Iredel 1 Street Durham, North Carolina 27705 Shearon Harris Mr. George Jackson, Secretary Environmental Law Project School of Law, 064-A Univeristy of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Dr. Phyllis Lotchin 108 Bridle Run Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Mr. Travis Payne, Esq.
723 W. Johnson Street Post Office Box 12643
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 Mr. Daniel F.
Read CHANGE Post Office Box 2151
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Bradley W. Jones, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
Region II 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Richard D. Wilson, M. D.
725 Hunter Street Apex, North Carolina 27502 Regional Administrator - Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Robert P.
Gruber Executive Director Public Staff -
NCUC Post Office Box 991
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
~.
Dr. Linda Little Governor's Waste Management Board 513 Albemarle Building 325 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Shearon Harris, Unit I Request for Additional Information -
ODCM Review
~Sub ect Liquid Setpoint Total Dose (Section 6.2)
Pa<ac No.
2-7 6-1 Comments Although the Applicant indicated that the Normal Service Water (NSW) is monitored and covered by T/S 3.3.3.0, the Applicant has not provided a setpoint calculation for such a monitor.
Also, the Applicant's Figure
- 2. 1-2 does not show such a flow path in the flow stream diagram.
Provide the setpoint calculation for the NSW monitor, and revise Figure 2. 1-2, as appropriate.
Under assumption (4), the Applicant stated, "To sum numbers represented as 'less than'<),
use the value of the largest number in the group.
(i.e.,
<5+<1+<1+<3=<5)".
Pro-vide the basis for this assump-tion.
Direct Radiation (Section 6.3. 1)
Other Uranium Cycle Sources (Section 6.3.4) 6-2 6-3 Under Applicant's Step (1), the Applicant stated that the direct radiation dose at the plant boundary in each sector will be determined.
The Applicant,
- however, has not indicated by what method this direct radiation dose will be obtained.
Provide the method for estima-ting doses from direct radiation.
The Applicant stated that dose from other fuel cycle sources will be treated as
<1 mrem/yr.
Provide the basis for this statement.