ML18003A904

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Mechanical Engineering Branch Request for Addl Info Re Criteria Used for Design & Const of Piping Supports in Fsar.Clarification of Codes & Stds Used for Design & Const Required to Complete Review
ML18003A904
Person / Time
Site: Harris  
Issue date: 06/01/1983
From: Knighton G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Utley E
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8306160657
Download: ML18003A904 (4)


Text

~,I, et Nos c.

50-400 and 50-401'.

Mr. E.

E. Utley Executive Vice President Carolina Power 8 Light Company

'ost Office Box '1551

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Dear Hr. Utley:

Subject:

Request for Additional

Attorney, OELD

(

1983 '" 'ISTRIBUTION:~

Document Control 50-'400/401 NRC PDR PRC System L PDR LBP3 Reading JLee NPKadambi

Jordan, IE Taylor, IE ACRS (16)

Information shearon Harris C

Attached is a request for additional information resulting from discussions between the Hechanical Engineering Branch staff with the resident inspector at the Shearon Harris facility. It has come to the attention of the IIEB that the.criteria used for the design and construction of piping supports are not completely defined in the FSAR.

Subsequently, the staff have discussed the concern with your staff and the architect-engineer (Ebasco).

The clarification of the codes and standards used for the design and construction of safety-related pipe supports is required to complete the HEB review, and this item should be added to Chapter"1 of the DSER as an additional open.item.

Please contact the Project tIIanager if you have any questions.

Si ncerely, I

f-OHgtnal stg<<d by:

Qearge N Kg<qhton

.r

~

< C George,w'.

Knighton," Chief Licensing Branch No.

3 Division of Licensing

Attachment:

As stated

. cc:

See next page 83061606S7 830601 PDR ADOCK 05000400 PDR j

OL:LBP ~~+

NPKadambi/yt eglf e ~ ~efBog e o ~ o ~ e ~ o ~

3f OFFICE/

SURNAME/

OATEN

~ eooooooeeooooeoooeo

~ eo ~

53 ighton

'5/QT83""'"'RG FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 19SI-33~r960

< YLi~a

)~ ~ IVM Ail

y>>g+Qp+

I w

~

=I, C

C Shearon Harris Mr.

E.

E. Utley Executive !lice President Power Supply and Engineering and Construction Carolina Power

& Light Company Post Office Box 1551

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 cc:

George.

F. Trowbridge,

Esq, Shaw, Pittman, Potts Trowbridge 1800 M
Street, NW Washington, D,

C.

20036 Richard E. Jones, Esq.

Associate General Consel Carolina Power

& Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Mall

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 M. David Gordon, Esq.

Associate Attorney General'tate of North Carolina Post Office Box 629

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Thomas S. Erwin, Esq.

115 W. Morgan Street

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. George Maxwell Resident Inspector/Harri s NPS c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

?oute 1,

Box 3158 New Hill, North Carolina 27562 Charles D. Barham, Jr.,

Esq.

Vice President

& Senior Counsel Carolina Power

& Light Company Post Office Box 1551

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. John Runkle, Executive Coordinator Conservation Council of North Carolina 307 Granville Road Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Mr, Wells Eddleman 718-A Iredell Street Durham, North Carolina 27705 Mr. George Jackson, Secretary Environmental Law Project School of Law, 064-A University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

><. Ph!j)is Lotchin Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Mr. Travi s Payne, Esq.

723 W. Johnson Street Post Office Box 12643

Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 Mr. Daniel F.
Read, President CHANGE Post Office Box 524 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Bradley W. Jones, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reqion II 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Richard D, Wilson, M.

D, 725 Hunter Street Apex, North Carolina 27502 Regional Adminstrator - Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission 101 Marietta Street Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Karen E. Long, Esq.

Staff Attorney Public Staff -

NCUC Post Office Box 991

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

~

~

210.

Mechanical Engineering Branch The staff's review of the FSAR finds that specific information related to the design and construction of ASt<E Class 1, 2 and 3 piping supports needs to be clarified in order to complete our review.

SRP Section 3.9.3 states that our review includes an assessment of design and structural integrity of the supports.

The review addresses three types of supports:

1) plate and shell, 2)

linear, and 3) component standard types.

For each of the above three types of supports, provide the following information (as applicable) for our review:

a)

Provide the design and service loading combinations used for ASthE Class 2 and 3 supports including the corresponding design and service limits and deformation limits used.

b)

Describe which parts of the supports are designed and constructed as component supports and which parts are designed and constructed as supplemental building steel (NF vs. AISC).

c)

Provide the basis used for the design and construction of all ASHE Class 1,

2 and 3 component supports.

In addition, address which codes and standards were used as the basis for the welding procedures and for preservice and inservice inspection procedures associated with component supports.