ML18003A585

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-400/79-02,50-401/79-02,50-402/79-01 & 50-403/79-01. Corrective Actions:Appropriate Personnel Instructed in Document close-out Procedures
ML18003A585
Person / Time
Site: Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/1979
From: Howe P
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18003A584 List:
References
NUDOCS 7905080330
Download: ML18003A585 (6)


Text

April 6, 1979

"-,',, rgNII, Carolina Power tt Light Company ygaI'ail

<6:

~'r.

James P. O'Reilly United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

,r,",,'..., ',

In reference to"your letter'f February>27.,

1979, referring 50-400/79-02, 50-401/7942, 50402/7P-01,'nd 50-403/79-01, is Carolina Power

& Light Company's reply to the deficien'cy It is considered that the corrective and preventive actions satisfactory for resolution of this item.

I Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

to RII!;~(RDS the'etta'chad, as identified.

taken are Yours very truly,"

P.

W.

we Vice President Technical Services,-,

NJC/gea (477/005)

Attachment cc:

Mi. J. A. Jones

7 905 080 3M CQ

I 0

~P P,

1

INFRACTION Condition Re ortedt A.

~I As required by Criteron VI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 ~ as implemented by commitments set forth in the PSAR, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.8.5.6, each participant in the program shall establish measures to assure effectiv'e document control.

. These measures provide a means to assure that obsolete documents are not used; that controls are exercised for document changes.

CP&L Administrative Procedure AP-IX-02 in the SHNPP Construction Procedures Manual states that documents which have been affected by an RCI, PCR/PW, or DCN shall be stamped or marked to in-dicate that they are affected.

In addition, document recipients are required to sign a transmittal form which indicates receipt of the documents and compliance with the disposition instructions prior to returning the transmittal to Document Control.

Contrary to the above, established measures do not provide a means to assure that obsolete documents are not used in that:

The following drawings selected from the stick files (control number 001) maintained in the Field Superintendent's trailer for the Fuel Handling Building and the Reactor Auxiliary Common Building were not stamped to indicate all of the applicable PGR's and RCI's.

a.

Drawing CAR-2167-G-1399R3 did not reflect that RCI-C-269 was applicable.

The master drawing on file in Document Control also did not reference the subject RCI.

b.

Drawing CAR-2167-G-1610R3 did not indicate that FCR-C-336 was applicable.

2.

The following drawings selected from the stick files (control number 035) maintained in the Field Engineering Office trailer did not indicate applicable revision level/all appropriate FCR/RCI documents:

a.

Drawing CAR-2167-G-1897R3 with FCR-C-188 outstanding is on file even though it has been superseded by revision 4.

The Document Transmittal form on file in Document Control indicates that the recipient received revision 4 and destroyed revision 3.

b.

Drawing CAR-2168-G-153SOlR7 does not reflect that FCR-AS-001,

002, 003 and RCI-C-52, 61, 76, 84 and 85 are applicable.

It also references DCN-650-05 which applies to drawing CAR-2168-G-154S01 only.

In addition, the master drawing indicated FCR-AS-004 was applicable although this FCR is applicable to drawing CAR-2168-G-153SO2 only.

n

,R,

Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved:

l.

Each example cited in the NRC inspection report was checked and the affected documents were corrected.

Responsible personnel werc instructed in the requirements of the document transmittal procedure.

2.

A 100/'audit was conducted during the period from January 29, 1979', to February 14, 1979, to determine if similar discrepancies existed.

This audit identified other documents which were incorrectly stamped.

These were corrected during the audit.

3.

Site management implemented a review of procedures controlling Design Change Notices (DCN's), Field Change Requests (FCR's),

Permanent Waivers (PW's),

and Requests for Clarification of Information (RCI's) to develop recommendations for positive control.

4, The following procedural changes were made and implemented on..Harch 19, 1979:

a.

A new Administrative Procedure AP-IX-15, Im lementation of DCN's FCR's and PW's, which assigns responsibility and establishes a metho to follow through and close out DCN's, FCR's, and PW's was developed.

b.

Procedure AP-IX-05, Field Chan e

Re uest, was revised to assign responsibility for closing out FCR's and PW's.

c.

Procedure AP-IX-02, Document Control, was revised to delete the requirements for stamping documents affected by DCN's, FCR's, PW's, and RCI's.

5.

Affected personnel were given written notification of the above changes and instructed to disregard stamping on the documents.

Corrective Ste s Which Will Be Taken To Avoid Further Noncom liance:

Procedural changes requiring cognizant Discipline Engineers to monitor implemen tation and close out of DCN's, FCR's, and PW's were developed to provide positi control.

Implementation of the current system of control for DCN's, FCR's, and PW's commenced on March 19, 1979, and retrofit of previously issued documents is expected to be completed by April 20, 1979.

+ ~~

C