ML18003A303
| ML18003A303 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 11/21/1978 |
| From: | Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Jackie Jones CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7812120201 | |
| Download: ML18003A303 (5) | |
Text
NOV 2l 1S78 Docket Nos.
50-400 50-401, 50-402 and WR5 Mr. J, A. Jones, Executive Vice President - Engineering Construction and Operations Carolina Power 8 Light Company 336 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Jones:
SUBJECT:
IMPLEMENTATION OF STAFF REVIEH REQUIREMENTS - SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1, 2, 3 5 4 - OPERATING, LICENSE REVIEH During the last several years we have reviewed and,approved several new'egulatory guides and branch technical positions or other modifications to existing staff positions.
Our practice is that substantive changes in staff positions be considered by the NRC's Regulatory Requirements Review Cottmittee (RRRC) which then recommends a course of action to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR).
The recommended 'action includes an implementation schedule.
The Director's approval then is used by the NRR staff as review guidance on individual licensing matters.
Some of these actions will affect your application.
This letter is intended to bring you up to date on these changes in staff positions,so that you may consider them in your Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) preparation.
The RRRC applies a categorization nomenclature to each of its actions.
(A copy of the summary of RRRC Meeting No.
31 concerning this categoriza-tion is attached as Encl.osure 1.)
Category 1 matters are those to be applied to applications in accordance with the implementation section of the published guide.
Me have enclosed lists of actions which are either Category 2 or Category 3, which are defined as follows:
Category 2:
A new position whose applicability is to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
You should describe the extent tP which your-design conforms, or you should describe an acceptable alternate, or you should demonstrate why confor-mance is not necessary.
Category 3:
Conformance or an acceptable alternative is required.
If
>ou'o not, conform, or do not have an acceptable alternate, then staff-approved. design revisions will "be required.
OAFICC+
CUANAMCW DATC~
PEEEC POEM 318 (9-76) NRCLE 0240
~O~ol
- U O, OOVCNNMCNT I'NINTINO ONNICC I I ~ 7 ~ Nl TOO I
k
+gg gag>y fJ
Mr. J. A. Jones.
t I 1!- g,~
2>>
NOV P. L 1978 We believe that providing you with a list of the Category 2 and 3,matters approved to date will be useful in your FSAR preparation, and they will
,be an essential part of our operating license review.
Enclosure 2 is a
list of the Category 2 matters.
Enclosure 3" is a list of the Category 3
matters.
In addition to the RRRC categories, there a'iso exists an NRR Category 4
list which are those matters not yet reviewed by the RRRC, but which the Director, NRR, has.deemed to have sufficient attributes to warrant their being addressed and considered fn ongoi,ng reviews.
These matters will be treated lfke Category 2 matters until such time as they are reviewed.by the
- RRRC, and a definite implementation program is developed.
A. current list of Category 4 matters is attached (Enclosure 4).
These also should be, considered fn your FSAR.
In some instances
'the items in the enclosures may not be applicable to your application.
Also, we recognize that your application may, in some instances, already conform to the stated staff positions.
I'n your FSAR you should note such compliance.
If you have any questions please let us know.
Sincerely, 01fginal Sign<4 by; Roger S. Boyd
'Roger S. Boyd, Director Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor'egulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
See next page OT'T'ICE~
OUIINAMOW P
DATC3R'WR
¹3:LA MRushb o
.ch 11/
8 LWR ¹3:
SMiner 11/~
/78 LWR ¹3:BC
--:e>P.
OParr 1 1/~ /78 L
/D DVassal 1 o DPM:A/D DRoss 11/g~ /78 11/
/78 D M:
~
~ ~ ~
RBogd'1/y /78 HRC PORN,318 (9.76) NRCbf 0240 0 V O, OOVORNMONT RRINTINO ORRICOI ITT~ III 1< ~
I
I p fthm fI g,
~
Mr. J. A. Jones CC:
George F. Trowbridge, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge 8 Madden 1800 M Street, N.
W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Richard E. Jones, Esq.
Carolina Power
& Light Company 336 Fayetteville Street
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Thomas S. Erwin, Esq 115 W. Morgan Street
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Jesse C. Brake, Esq.
Associate Attorney General State of North Carolina P. 0.
Box 629
- Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq.,
Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Michael C. Farrar, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Dr. John H. Buck Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Bo'ard U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 1 ~
~/
I\\(o'Pgp
~
'E