ML17352A716
| ML17352A716 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point, Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1994 |
| From: | Croteau R, Norris J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9407120313 | |
| Download: ML17352A716 (93) | |
Text
June 30, 1994 Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389, 50-250 and 50-251 LICENSEE:
Florida Power
& Light Company (FPL)
FACILITY: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 and Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
SUBJECT:
COUNTERPARTS MEETING On June 23, 1994, the staffs of Florida Power
& Light Company (FPL), Region II, and'NRR met with their counterparts at the FPL offices.
The purpose of this thi'rd annual meeting was to discuss items of mutual interest with the main focus on improving communication and effectiveness of regulatory oversight.
Enclosure 1 contains a list of attendees.
Enclosure 2 contains the meeting's agenda and visual aids used by the participants.
(Original Signed By)
(Original Signed By R. Croteau For)
R. Croteau, Project Manager Jan A. Norris, Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate II-2
'roject Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/enclosures:
See next page Distribution
--Docket File -'-,
NRC
& Local PDRs PDII-2 RF M. Russell/F. Hiraglia, 12-G-18 L. Reyes S.
Varga G. Lainas H. Berkow J. Norris R. Croteau E. Tana S. Flanders, ll-F-23 S.
D. Verrelli, RII OFC LA:PDII-2 PH:PDII-2 PH'PDII-2 D:PDII NAME ETana M7 DATE 4 g 94 JNorris RCrotea 3"/94 6
3" 94 HBo k
?s 94 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY F ILENAHE: G: iMEETSUH3. FLP 4
t'407120313 940630 PDR ADOCK 05000250 PDR i )
0 pv 7
1
-~,,Fla~ida Power and Llgn'i icii
~ny
,. CC:
Jack Shreve, Public Counsel Office of the Public Counsel c/o The Florida Legislature 111 West Madison Avenue, Room 812 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1400 Senior Resident Inspector St. Lucie Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7585 S.
Hwy A1A Jensen
- Beach, Florida 34957 Mr. Joe Hyers, Director Div. of Emergency Preparedness Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Harold F. Reis, Esq.
Newman
& Holtzinger 1615 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 John T. Butler, Esq.
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Florida 33131-2398 Mr. Thomas F. Plunkett, Site Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Hiami, Florida 33102 Hr. Thomas R.L. Kindred County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Hr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operations ABB Combustion Engineering, Nuclear Power 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Maryland 20852 C. L. Burton Plant General Manager St.
Lucie Nuclear Plant P.O.
Box 128 Ft. Pierce, Florida 34954-0128 Hr.
Edward J.
Weinkam Licensing Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P.O.
Box 4332 Princeton, Florida 33032-4332 Mr. Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Regional Administrator, RII U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Hr. H. N. Paduano, Manager Licensing
& Special Programs Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 14000 Juno
- Beach, Florida 33408-0420 Hr. J.
H. Goldberg President Nuclear Division Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 14000 Juno
- Beach, Florida 33408-0420 Mr. D. A. Sager Vice President St. Lucie Nuclear Plant P.O.
Box 128 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954-0218 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Senior Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.
Box 1448 Homestead, Florida 33090 Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.0.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Joaquin Avino County Manager of Hetropolitan Dade County ill NW 1st Street, 29th Floor Miami, Florida 33128
ENCLOSURE 1
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 COUNTERPARTS MEETING June 23, I994 Attendees Name Office J. Norris E.
Weinkam S. Flanders S.
Reynolds S.
Hale J. Burford M. Dryden H. Berkow R. Croteau E.
Thompson W. Skelley S. Elrod G. Boissy K. Landis L. McLaughlin R. Dietz G.
Madden M. Miller D. Verrelli T. Johnson L. Trocine NRC FPL NRC NRC FPL FPL FPL NRC NRC FPL FPL NRC FPL NRC FPL FPL FPL NRC NRC NRC NRC
r t
e AGENDA fOR THE FPL/NRC COUNTERPARTS MEETING JUNE 23, 1994 FPL OFFICES 700 UNIVERSE BLVD.
JUNO BEACH, FLORIDA ENCLOSURE 2
8:00 a.m.
8:05 a.m.
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF MEETING - FPL Turkey Point Plant - E. Weinkam
- Various Licensing Issues St. Lucie Plant - L. McLaughlin
- Various Licensing Issues Juno Headquarters
- H. Paduano 10:00 a.m.
10:15 a.m.
12:00 noon 12:45 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
2:30 p.m.
- Licensing 5 Special Programs
- S/G Replacement
- Thermo-lag update
- Stretch Power Status
- IPEEE BREAK NRC Headquarters
- Other Issues LUNCH NRC Region II
- Various Issues
- Resident Inspector Issues WRAP-UP DEPART FPL OFFICES Paduano Moaba Paduano Thompson Skelley
.94071203]3 an FPL Group company
~ ~\\
~ +
~ ~
~
~
+op pW4 LICENSING COUNTERPARTS MEETING JUNE 23, 1994 JUNO BEACH, FLORIDA
(I
>oI Oje
~
~
TURKEYPOINT PLANT LICENSING DEPARTMENT Organization LICENSING MANAGER E.J. WEINKAM REGULATION/COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST PLT SPECIALIST J.E. KNORR OEF ENGINEER/ANALYST (PLT ANALYST I)
C.L. MOWREY OEF TECHNICIAN (SR PLT TECHNICIAN)
M.E. GOLOIE LICENSING ENGINEER I
TENG G.
SALAMON'ICENSING ENGINEER SR PLT ENGINEER O.I. HANEK LICENSING ENGINEER (SR PLT ENGINEE R.J. TOMGNT
s'
+
o~
TURKEYPOIlVT PLANT LICENSI1VG DEPARTME1VT SIGNIFICAlVTACCOMPLISHMENTS LICElVSE AMENDMENTSISIGlVIFICAlVTLICElVSI1VG ACTIOlVS CONSTRUCTIOlV PERMIT TO OPERATING LICENSE PERIOD RECAPTURE CRANKING DIESEL GENERATOR ELIMINATION BIOMETRICS SYSTEM EXEMPTION IMPLEMENTATIOlVOF REVISED 10 CFR PART 20 STEAM GENERATOR OVERFILL PROTECTIO1V (GL 89-19)
RELAXEDAXMLOFFSET CURVE (RAOC)ICORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR)
FIRE PROTECTION TECHlVIC4L SPECIFICATIONS RELOC4TION
~c~o
>ope~
TURKEYPOINT PLAlVT LICElVSIlVGDEPARTME1VT so~
~go+
SIGNIFICAlVTREGULATORY ISSUES SALEMROD CONTROL EVE1VT COLD OVERPRESSURE MITIGATING SYSTEM (COMS)
ANALYTICAL ASSUMPTION ERROR/EXEMPTION PXTAlVlVULARBURlVABLEABSORBER (WABA) M4VUFACTURllVGERROR CONTAIlVMENTTENDO1VS REACTOR VZSSEL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITYISSUES (GL 92-01 and UPPER SHELF ENERGY) st Poi4p
+
o~
+oZ TURKEYPOINT PLAlVT LICENSI1VG DEPARTMENT OPERATING EXPERIENCE FEEDBACE (OEFl SIG1VIFIC4NT ITEMS ADDRESSED COLD OVERPRESSURE MITIGATINGSYSTEM (COMS) AlVALYTICAL ASSUMPTIO1V ERROR (ref: WESTINGHOUSE 1VSAL 93-00$)
COlVTAINMENTSUMP BLOCK4GE (ref: NRC IN 93-34)
SALEMROD CONTROL (ref: WESTINGHOUSE NSAL 93-007)
OPERATOR LOG FALSIFIC4TION (ref: "NUCLEAR NETWORE" PS 2544)
RE4CTOR TRIP SETPOINT REDUCTION FOR CONTIlVUED OPERA TIO1V WITHINOPERABLE MSSVs (ref: WESTINGHOUSE NSAL 94-001)
)
(l
+0/
+Ooggg
$4 TURKEYPOI1VT PLANT LICENSIlVG DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 1VO TEMPORARY WAIVERS OF COMPLIANCEKOTIFICATION OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION IN 1993 OR 1994 COMPLETED ALLACTIOlVS FOR STATION BLACKOUTRULE VOLUNTARYLER ON ASCO SOLENOIDS LICEiVSINGMANAGER COMPLETED MANAGEME1VT SRO CERTIFICATION TRAINING LICENSING ENGIlVEER QUALIFIEDAS SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR LICENSIlVGENGIlVEER SCHEDULED TOATTEND 11 WEEK TURKEYPOIlVT SYSTEMS/PROCEDURES TRAINING COURSE Ve +orOp TURKEYPOIlVT PLANT LICEiVSING DEPARTME1VT COST BENEFICIAL LICElVSINGACTIONS MULTI-DISCIPLI1VESTRATEGIC ACTIVITIES TEAM:
MEETS ATLEAST MONTHLY REVIEWS FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES) IiVDUSTRYPUBLICATIOlVS, AlVD TURKEYPOI1VT LERs COMME1VTS 01V PROPOSED RULEMAKING DEVELOPS COST-BE1VEFIT AlVALYSES AlVD PRIORITIZATIOlV FOR CBLAs CBLAs INPROCESS INCLUDE EMERGENCY BUS SEQUENCER "ACTIO1V"STATEME1VT RPS/ESFAS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY ARPI vs. GROUP STEP COUlVTER ALLOWABLEDIFFERENCE CONTAINMENTAIRLOCK USE DURING REFUELING
-6<<
0
c%o
>ope~
+Oog
+%4 TURKEYPOINT PLANT LICENSING DEPARTMENT EVOLVINGREGULATORY ISSUES THERMO-LAG FPL'S TURKEYPOINT OUTDOOR EXEMPTIO1V PE1VDING STAFF REQUIREMENTS MEMORAlVDUM DESIG1V BASIS THREAT SERVICE WATER SYSTEM OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE IlVSPECTION SELF-ASSESSMENT:
MARCH 6 - APRIL 7, 199$ (PROPOSED)
BEST ESTIMATE LARGE BREAK LOCA REANALYSIS - WESTINGHOUSE OWNERS GROUP TOPICAL REPORT REVIEW
<ge Pi Op
+
oi
~o)ee3; Vi4 TURKEYPOI1VT PLANT LICENSING DEPARTMENT FUTURE ACTIVITIES CONTINUATIOlVOF CBLA TEAM INITIATEPROGRAM TOIMPROVE THE TECHNICALSPECIFICATION BASES CONTIlVUE PERSO1VlVEL SUPPORT TO UlVITOUTAGE ORGAlVIZATIONS ATTAIN TURKEY POINT SYSTEMS/PROCEDURES TRAINING FOR ALL DEPARTMElVT PERSO1VlVEL TURKEY POlNT UNlTS 3 &4 BACKGROUND IPEEE Commission policy statement on Severe Accidents concluded that existing plants pose no undue risk to public health 8 safety.
- The NRC issued GL 88-20 Individual Plant Examlnatlon (IPE).
08/85 11/88
~ BACKGROUND
- Turkey Point committed to perform IPE plus Fire, 1g8g and Hurricane External Events.
~ OBJ ECTIVES
~ METHODOLOGY
~ RESULTS
- Turkey Point IPE, Fire, Hurricane Completed
- The NRC issued GL 88-20 Supplement 4 individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE).
- Completed St. Lucle IPE.
Completed Turkey Point IPEEE Analysis.
- St. Lucfe IPEEE Comp'letlon.
06/91 06/91 12/93 6/94
NRC SEVERE ACCIDENTCLOSURE ELEMENTS IPE Dewlop Plant PS A model Itevlew lor P bat Spedsc Vulnwablkties COHPLETED Juss tggt Internal Events LOCAs QS LS LOOP Reactor Tdp LOIIF Containment Performance IPEEE METHODOLOGY (NUREG 1407)
(1) Review Plant Spec)I)c Hazard Data and Licensing Base (FSAR)
(2) Identify Significant Changes, Ifany, since OL Issuance IPEEE OBJECTIVES t-To dewlop sn appreclascn ol severe acddent behavior.
2-To understand Ihe most Ikely severs ecddent sequences erat could occur al hdl power opemang condklons.
2 ~
To gain quantkatlvs understandlny ol the overag Ikellhood ol core damaye and fission producl releasee.
4-IInecessary,lo reduce Ihe ovwag Ikellhood ol core damage end nssion pmduct reise>>s Irymodgylny, where appropriate, hardware and procedures that would help prevent ormltlgate savers acddems.
External Events Sel ands Fbs Hunlcane Tornado Hazardous Chernhal l7ansportatlonl Nearby Facghy (3) Does Plant/Facilities Design Meet 1975 SRP Criteria'2 (Qu)ck Screening 8 Walkdown)
OR (4) Is the Hazard Frequency Acceptably Low2 (6) Bounding Analysis (Response! Consequence)
YES YES YES ACCIDENTMANAGEMENT Dwelop Acddenl llanayement Ouldellnestnllo) to Cope with Swore Acddent Consequences IMure)
Severe Accident Assumed Beyond Design Seals ICore Damage)
Sanartos OR (6) PRA m Documentation Ihcl. IdontIAod Reportable )hmts and proposed bnprovements
l gt
FIRE
- PTN IPEEE Fire Analysis was performed and results Included In the IPE submittal In June 1991.
-Utlllzed EPRI developed FIVE'ethodology
~ The analysis was based on a draft version of FNE.
~ 3 phase approach I. Oualitatlve-Screenlng outflre zone if:
- No safe shutdown equipment, "or"
- Fire does not cause plant trip.
IL Quantitative - Calculate CDF byfirzone Fire ignition frequency calculatecL Component unavailability assumed In fire zone.
Conditional CDF calcWateduslng PSA model.
III.Walkdowns BesuBa:
No fire zones were found to be slgnlfleant risk contributors which would result in failure to achieve a safe shutdown condition.
HIGH WINDS AND EXTERNALFLOODING
- Hurricane Hurricane Analysts (includes External Flooding, Precipitation, and Hurricane Winds) performed and results submitted In the IPE Report (06/91).
gethod~olo g
- Performed walkdowns.
- ldenflfled Hurricane 8 Flooding hazards.
- Performed scoplng study for Flooding Analysis.
- Utilized PSA Model for Hurricane Wind Analysis.
~esul
- Identified Storm surge as dominant contribution to core damage.
(upperbound 1E</yr, lowerbound 1E</yr)
- Compensatory measures:
Upgrade of Emergency Plan Procedure 20106 Including:
- Hurricane Preparation.
- New Appendix with recommendatlons for Class 5 Hunlcane Including preparation, mlVgaVon, and recovery.
Joint NRC/INPO Review Team indicated Procedure 20106 contributed signflcantly to the preparation for Andrew.
Post Hwrlcane Andrew:
- Upgrade of Turkey Point Units 1 8 2 Chimney after Andrew.
- Deletion of Raw Water High Tower.
- Improved Emergency Communications.
- Additional Andrew Lessons Learned Implemented.
'FIVE-Fire-Induced Vulnerability Evaluation
HIGH WINDS (Cont'd)
SEISMIC
- Tornado
- Identified tornado hazards.
- Ident!fled vulnerable targets.
- Developed models for tornado wind load and missile hazards.
- Scoplng and PRA analysts technIques were utlllzed.
- CDFs were calculated using PRA models.
Qesu1ts:
No vulnerability was Identlfled.
Mf,~hf~lgy:
- Alternate method proposed as allowed by NUREG-1407.
- Credit FPL Plant Specific Seismic Adequacy Evaluation Program.
Resolve USI A46 and Generic Letter (GL) 87-02.
Based on a very low seismic hazard for South Florida Walkdowns by Seismic Expert Review Team(SERT).
~Rg~l
- Walkdowns Completed.
- Equipment Upgrades made as recommended by SERT.
- Results documented and submitted to NRC.
Closure Items identified.
TRANSPORTATION/NEARBY FACILITY OTHERS
- Alrcrash (4 Airports were studied)
- Transportation (Ship, Railroad, etc.)
- Explosive
~ Natural Gas tunit 1 8 2)
~ Hydrogen
~ LPO
- Toxic Chemical
~ Hydrazine
~ Chlorine
~ Sulfuric Acid
~ Sodium Hydroxide
- Methodology
~ Screening
~ Calculated hazard frequency using accepted modefing techniques.
-Llghtnlng
~ Design and Historical Events reviewed.
-Other External Events Screened Based on LocatlontJudgement
~ Forest Rre
~ Snow
~ tce
~ Coastal Erosion
~ Landslide
~ Volcanic Activity i Etc.
~ No Vulnerablfitles identifie.
- No Vulnerabllltles ldentllled.
TURKEYPOINT IPEEE
SUMMARY
OBJE S 0 EE
~ Credible External Events Identified
~ Most Likely External Events Analyzed
~ Coro Damage Frequencies Estimated As Required BESKI' Beyond Design Basis Hurdcane Storm Surge
- Dominant External Event
- High Uncertainty In Hazards Frequency
- Uppedrrxrnd 1EQiyr and LowertNund 1E4lyr
~ Hurricane Emergency Ran Procedure Upgraded
- 1992 Boloro Hurricane Andrew
- Further hnprovement AtterAndrew - Lessons Learned
~ Seismic Improvements htsdo Based on Stto Specitlo Wsltrdown program No Severe Accident Vulnerabllltles Identlfled OLVE E
FPL Managed and Performed 95% of the IPEEE Program
f
)l 0
go~+
Oly~
ge TURKEY POlNT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT
~Sco e
+
Re-license Turkey Point Units 3 5 4 2300 MW,/unit 62 MW. output gain Major re-analysis Nuclear Steam Supply Systems Power Conversion Systems Minor physical modifications WRSTI%TCNJUNETHUP.UZ:grh
ge TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT Technical As ects
+
Background and Previous Studies Feasibility review performed for uprating PTN to 2300 MW, Previous. studies indicated prudency in selected 2300 MW, Original plant design power level Core DNB design margin Also noted that H.B. Robinson, a sister plant, is licensed to 2300 MW, WPSTRETClhJUNETHVP.UZ~rh
e
~$+
oI TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT
+
Target Performance Parameters Turbine Volumetric Flow Tests performed Data used to set target performance parameters T,, operating band of 574.2 + 3'F selected Considerations include:
Analyses feasibility 20 % steam generator tube plugging margin RCS temperatures for reactor head and steam generator corrosion Turbine valve throttling losses Operational flexibility Cost of analyses WASTRHCM'4UNKTHUP.UZ:grh
~ye Po<
+
o~
+o) gag V~
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERNIAL POWER UPRATE PROJECT
+
Major Plant Equipment Review Major plant equipment was reviewed for capability to accept the uprating No major equipment replacements identified Minor operational adjustments projected 0
WPiSTRKtCHUUNETHUP.UZ:orh
OCp~
+ET
~~O~
o>oar >
TURKEY POlNT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT
+
Scope of Analyses and Modifications Analyses to consist of:
Small Break LOCA Steam generator tube rupture Non-LOCA transients Radiological dose calculations Containment analyses Structures, systems, and components Potential-modifications:
Setpoint and scaling changes Main steam safety valve orifices Main feedwater regulating valve trim CCW support changes Auto start of third condensate pump Replacement of turbine coupling bolts Rod control system changes for Salem asymmetric rod withdrawal WPNTRETC HV V NETH VPUZ:Orb
>orn+
+
o~
40gy
+%4 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMAL POWER UPRATE PROJECT
+
Licensing Much precedent exists Typically 11 to 13 month review time In addition to uprate will need approval of:
Best Estimate LOCA Methodology Revised Thermal Design Procedure (RTDP) e Specific environmental approval not projected as needed Intervention possible WPNTRETCHUUNETHV$'.UZ:lyh
go~
4'~
ge TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERNIALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT
~Cos
+
Projected Job Cost Total Project implementation Costs $ 18.1M
+
Projected Recovery
$ 14.2M proposed for recovery through Fuel Cost Recovery Clause
$3.9M FPL payroll/expenses expected to be OS.M WWA'RDCHVUNETHUP.UZ:erh
+p y+0 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMAL POWER UPRATE PROJECT
+
Cost Benefit Analysis Three economic benefits derived:
Defers capital and ORM expenditures for new generation-$ 6.9M Low incremental cost of added MWH (03.27) produced by PTN will reduce overall PTN cost per MWH by 3%
Added nuclear generation lowers FPL's overall generation cost by displacing more expensive fossil fuels-$ 124.8M WRSTRKTCIOJUNETHUP.UZ:gth
PI TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT
~Benefi s
+
Benefit to the Rate Payer Reduces system fuel expense by an estimated
$ 124 million Lowest cost capacity management option More cost effective than DSM by approximately 2C per MWH.
+
Benefit to the FPL Shareholder Deferral of cash requirements More intensive utilization of existing assets WPlSl'RETCIAJUNEfHUP.UZ4Ph
~
~
4~y
+
o~
0 g pyO TURKEY POlNT NUCl EAR PLANT THERMAL POWER UPRATE PROJECT Pro'ec Schedule 1/94 3/94 6/94 9/94 1/96 3/Ss 6/96 9/96 1/96 3/96 6/96 9/S6 1/97 3/97 6/97 Engineering Analysis Licensing Submittal NRC Revfew Implementation Of Modifications
.:'P&fREtCtAJUNEfHUP.UZ:grh
~ye
+
gO
+ofyeg PW TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT Modifica ions Im lemente A er NRC A royal 1/84 0/84 8/848/841/96 8/868/869/961/968/888/888/88 1/878/97 8/878/971/98 8/88 6ISS 9/981/8$
Engineering Analysis Ucenslng Submittal 0
W Q
Q Q
0 Q
00 00 NRC Renew Implementation Of Modificatlons-W 0
W 0
Q Q
W Q
0 00 Q
Q000 0
W W
W 0
0 Q
R W
W W
W W
0 W
W W
N W
W W
W Q
W W
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
R W
W W
W W
H H
0 W
W W
W H
W W
W W
W W
W W
W 0
0 W
0 W
W W
0 0
H 0
W W
W WR8TRHCHVUNETHUP.UZ:gth
TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMAL POWER UPRATE PROJECT Curren Sta us
+
Integrated Schedule
+
Penalty/Incentive Negotiations MW, Schedule
+
Contract Issuance
+
Project Team
+
Analysis
+
Budget WPWTItETCIAJVNEDIVP.UZ:0th
0
g+I Wyg
+
o~
Opg pg4 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERIMIALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT Pro ec Or aniza i n R.S.
KUNDALKAR'ANAGER; PTN ENGtNEER(NG EA. THOMPSON PROJECT ENGINEER
'THERMALUPRATE EJL. THOMPSON PLANT INTERFACE COORDINATOR S.O. BRAGI BOP COORDINATOR LA. MARl1N NUCLEAR FUELS COORDINATOR D.C. BAKER COORDINAT M.R. OORDON COST/SCHEDULE COORDINATOR STONE 5 WEBSTER 4 TELEDYNEENO.
I I
I WanmaHOVSE I
I STAFF MECH - J. HOFFMAN ELEC - R, SLEEKER ldaC - W. BUSCH CIVIL-M. MORAN NUC/LIC-D. BAKER WRSTllEtCHUUNEBIUP.UZ:Orb
~pe TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMAL POWER UPRATE PROJECT
~Anal sl 1994 JUN JULAUGSEPOGTNOVDEC J 1996 FEB MARAPR MAYJUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV NSSS Inputs Confirmed Small Break LOCA Analysis T-G Review Reports BOP Heat Balance System Reviews I
I System Component I
Reviews I
I I
I I
I I
Transient Analyses I
I SGTR Analysis I
I Dose Analysis I
I Containment Analysis I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
'I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
.I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I '
I I
I I
'I I
I I
WRSTlIETCNJUNETHUP.UZ:0th
~C+ +Op'URKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT THERMALPOWER UPRATE PROJECT Summa
+
Project is feasible
+
Expected implementation in 1997 at a total project cost of $ 18.1M
+
Expected megawatts is 62 MW, or $ 292,000 per MW,
+
Lowest cost capacity management option WRSTRETCHUUNETHVP.UZ:0th
e
~ ~ Nucgp
~e~
(,c:
phg ~
W%C+
(COVF$9402St Fl ROJ
0
St. Lucie Licensin
~ Organization and Function
~ Responsibility
~ Organization
~ Relationship to Plant Organization
~ St..Lu'cie Licensing Organization
~ Specific Work Accountabilities
~ Licensing Manager
~ NRR interface
~ Region II Interface
~ Corrective Action Coordinator
~ Tech Spec Coordinator
~ Commitment Tracking
~ Cost Beneficial Licensing Actions
~ Current Projects
~ Future Projects
.0 ORGANIZATlONAND A COU TABILI NUCLEARDIVISION PRESIDENT J.H. GOLDBERG ST. LUCIEPUQP VICE PRESIDENT D.A. SAGER (~ ag6)
Directs all activities at the nudear phnt site.
~ e e
SERVICES MANAGER C.A. PELL (296)
Accountable for administration, budget, fire protection, training, security, hazardous material programs and Information Services activities.
PLANTGENERAL MANAGER C.L BURTON (74t)
Directs all facets of plant operation.
PLANTUCENSING
'ANAGER LLMcLAUGHLIN Accountable for licensing activities and interface with the NRC.
HUMANRESOURCE MANAGER A. DeSOIZA P)
Accountable forproper implementation of personnel polldes and procedures.
NUCLEARMATERIAL MANAGEMENTMANAGER T. KREINBERG (46)
Responsible for Purchasing, Stores, Contracts and Interlace with Procuremenl Engineering.
0 0 0 0 0 a 0 Q 0 0 0 Q Q 0 0 % 0 0 0 ~
~
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING PROJECTMANAGER
~
rEG SITE
~
~ (4q D.J. DENVER pg)
~
Accountable for all plant engineering projects affecting design changes.
TRAINING MANAGER P.L. FINCHER (65)
Accountable for the technical and administrative qualilication and certification ol plant personnel.
OPERATIONS MANAGER J. SCAROLA (236)
Accountable for the conduct ol operation ol the plant.
MAINTENANCE MANAGER R.E. DAWSON (34I)
Accountable for equipment operability.
TECHNICAL MANAGER D.H. WEST (34)
Accountable for the technical support of the plant and of plant activities.
CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGER H.L FAGLEY (I tg)
Accountable lor management ol major plant modifications and construction activities.
OUTAGE MANAGER C.D. SCOTT (l0)
Accountable for Planning and Scheduling Plant Outages and Daily Coordination of Operations and Maintenance Activities.
e;, ~i ui ~ I I'I.u>!l1 05/I2/94
ST. LUCIE NUCLEARPLANT ORGANIZATlONCHART NUCLEARUCENS!NQ TJEPARTMENT ORGAMZATTON APNL 1, 1S94 LlCENSHO. ';
- ."'hNh68l =-
NUCLEARREACTOR REOVLAT1ON,:..':
ITTKRFACS-'".-T7gg4OAL.
> c
- 6PEORCATNN.
~ ETONEER"'-
RL @HZ REGION II NTETFACE J W. HOLT PAGE 3 iIill(IIlhWVICIIA+J
Commitment Identification FPL leners to the NRC reviewed by Plant Licensing to identify commitments made.
Due Date?
CAR Corrective Action Request forms(CARs) are generated for items with due dates.
OIN Open Item Notice forms(OINs) are generated for items without specific due dates.
Dates are negotiated with department heads.
Written Commitment Change?
NP-3M Letter to be sighed out by the Pros(dont, Nuclear Division.
Complete. Commitment Perform actions necessary to complete the commitment.
CAR/OIN Closure Responsible depanment returns completion paperwork to Licensing. Licensing verifies action ls complete, VAULT The completed/signed CA~ OIN is issued for storage to the plant Nuc ear Records Vault.
PSL CBLAs PRIORITY 3.
DESCRIPTION HIGH SUR BYPASS FLOOD PROTECTION ISEG NUREG 1366 8
SAVINGS
-10K 63K 3.035M SAVINGS 904K STATUS FPL TO WITHDRAW AT NRC.
DUE 5.1-94 L'CENSAG SLGMiT aOOiT.ONAL iNFO SV 8
4 84OULY CNA3)
LICHENS'NG >ACKAGc TO FAG FOA AEV'Edl 8 4.84(JULY CA+3'I 3.
5.
RETS CONT. SPRAY NOZZLE SURV.
ILRT BIOMETRICS MOVABLEINCORE DETECTOR 31K 117K 1605K 6,59M 32.81K 1943K 63.04K RECEIVED 10-27-93 RECEIVED 11-8-93 RECEIVED 3-30-94 RECEIVED 11-29-93 RECEIVED 2-8-94
- ACCUMULATEDSAVINGS SHOWN IN 1994 DOLLARS
I I ~
0
e Current Pro'ects
~ Independent Safety Engineering Group
~ Flood Protection
~ QA Audit Frequency
~ RPS/ESFAS Response Time Tables
~ 1C HPSI Pump
~ Seismic Instrumentation
~ PSL1 BAMTInventory Reduction
~ PSL1 Reduced RCS Design Flow
Future Pro'ects
~ PSL2 Main Feed Isolation Valve
~ Environmental Protection Plan
~ PSL1 RWT Repair
~ PSL1 WR S/G Level
~ IPEEE
~ PSL1 PORV/LTOP
~ GL 93-05/ NUREG 1366
LICENSING 8c SPECIAL PROGRAMS Pageos of 2 H.N. PADUANO MANAGER NUCLEAR LICENSING S SPECIAI. PROGRAMS D.A.CULPEPPER CHIEF ENGINEERING ASSURANCE D.L SMITH CHIEF ELECTRICALENGINEER RA BLOCK O.A BROWN LS. ELFORO WA. SKELLEY NUC-CHF SENIOR STAFF ENGINEER PROBABILISTICRISK ASSESSMENT M.W. MIGUARO D.A PARKER G.E REGAL H.R. GAVANKAR CHIEF CIVILJMECHANICAL ENGINEER C N. GUEY RR JENNINGS O.M. SANCETTA E STEIN M.B VINCENT
- ZAMANAU S.T. HALE C L FISHER S.C KHVRANA S.E. KLOOSTERMAN T.E. ROBERTS LICENSING SEE NEXT PAGE
e LICENSING &SPECIAL PROGRAINS Page2of2 NUCLEARLICENSING J.N. BURFORD SUPERVISOR NUCLEAR UCENSING M.S. DRYDEN CF. FERRIDAY M.A. SCHOPPMAN S.P. TREPANIER D.C. BAKER LEAD PTN LICENSING ENGINEER KW. FREHAFER P.K GREEN t.M. KING RL'TEVIESERG S.A. VERDUCI R.W. WINNARD LEAD PSL LICENSING ENGINEER Ct. SUEHRIG R GQUUW RW. GRAZ RE NOSIE D.t. WASIK Aa ot: tune 1, 1994 Po9o 14 of 14 laauod:
tune 3, 1904
ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 STEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT PROJECT SGRP FLORIDAPOWER AND LIGHTCOMPANY JUNE 23, 1994
SGRP Team Com onent Fabrication:
~
Babcock and Wilcox Industries {BWI)
Com onent Im lementation Team:
~
MK-Ferguson Group {MKF)
~
Prime Contractor
~
Project INanager/Construction
~
B W Nuclear Technologies {BWNT)
~
Cutting and Welding
~
ALARA/Decontamination
~
Licensing - Component Equivalency
~
Duke Engineering and Services {DE88)
~
Design Engineering
I ~
PSL-1 STEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT PROJECT MILESTONE PLAN ACTUAL PHASE I BOARDAPPROVAL ORDER REPLACEMENTSTEAM GENERATOR SELECT IMPLEMENTATIONCONTRACTOR ESTABLISHSITE OFFICE FIRST S/G COMPONENTS ARRIVEIN SHOP t
REFUELING OUTAGE-TEMPlATEAND COLLECT DATA PHASE II-BOARDAPPROVAL START ENGINEERING REFUELING OUTAGE - COLLECT DATA/VERIFY COMPLETE ENGINEERING MK-FSITE MOBILIZATION REFUELING OUTAGE - COLLECT DATA/VERIFY NEW STEAM GENERATORS ARRIVEON SITE COMMENCE STEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT FIRST PRIMARYPIPE CUT INSTALLLASTNEW STEAM GENERATOR POST WELD HEATTREAT CONSTRUCT!ON OPENING RETURN TO POWER 6/92 6/92 11/92 1/93 2/93 4/93 6/93 6/93 9/94 4/95 11/95 3/96 11/96 9/97 10/97 10/97 11/97 12/97 6/92 6/92 11/92 1/93 3/93 4/93 6/93 6/93
. LUCIE UNITNO. 1 STEAM GENERAZOR FABRIC4TIONSTATUS UNIT 1 UNIT 2 SAFE. END WELDED TO CAP.
MATERIALAT BWI.
CAP-TO.PETAL WELD COMPLETE.
PETAL ASSEMBLY COMPLETE.
LUGS WELDED TO PETALS.
ROLLING OF STEEL PLATES COMPLETE.
LONG SEAM WELOS COMPLETE.
PLATE AT BWI READY FOR ROLLING.
ROLLING OF STEEL PLATES COMPLETE.
LONG SEAM WELDS COMPLETE.
PLATE AT BWI READY FOR ROLLING.
MATERIALOUE AT BWI SHOP 8/94.
MATERIALDUE AT BWI SHOP 8/94.
PRE PRODUCTION QUALIFICATION IN PROCESS AT SUMITOMO METALS IN JAPAN.
PRE PRODUCTION QUALIFICATION IN PROCESS AT SUMITOMO METALS I
IN JAPAN.
NOZZLE WELD BUILDUP AND PWHT COMPLETE.
NOZZLE WELD BUILDUP ANO PWHT COMPLETE.
~a OV INSPECTION PORTS COMPLETE.
THICKSHELL.TO.SEC. SHELL WELD COMPLETE.
INSPECTION PORTS COMPLETE.
THICKSHELLTACKED TO SEC. SHELL.
INSPECTION PORTS AND HANDHOLE COMPLETE.
INSPECTION PORTS COMPLETE.
HANDHOLEFORGINGS NOT THRU NOE CYCLE.
g; g,'~
&@4'kgi GUNORILLING COMPLETE. TUBESHEET WELDED TO STAY CYLINDER.
INLET AND OUTLET NOZZLES WELDED IN PLACE.
GUNORILLING COMPLETE.
INLET AND OUTLET NOZZLES WELDED IN PLACE.
c ~ lpga C <~RS~e&R~DR>eV ISSSJ L'Vh.
RE
St. Lucie-1 Steam Generator Replacement Project 8
A 8
E Stand Alone Safety Evaluation SASE VOLUME 1 Steam Generator Replacement Report SASE VOLUME2 Steam Generator Equivalency Report SASE VOLUME3 Steam Generator Replacement Project Design Basis Documents
.SASE VOLUME4 Steam Generator Replacement Project Supplemental Documents
I
~
~
0
Steam Generator Replacement Report
~
10CFR50.59 Evaluation Performed to Assess Implementation Activities
~
Activities Evaluated Include:
Rigging and Handling, Heavy Loads, etc.
~
Cutting and Welding 0
Temporary and Permanent SGRP Modifications
~
Support/Whip Restraint Changes
~
It/Ianway Platforms Blowdown Interface
~
Insulation {Reflective m~~"'lanket)
Original Steam Generator Storage Facility
==
Conclusions:==
~
No Unreviewed Safety Question
~
o ec ec ane euire
Steam Generator Replacement Report (cont.)
Environmental Evaluation Performed to Assess Implementation Activities Activities Evaluated include:
Waste Water
~
~
Construction
~
Radiological Aspects
~
Return to Operation
~
Storage, Use, and Disposal of Hazardous Materials and Wastes
==
Conclusions:==
No Unreviewed Environmental Question
y Steam Generator Equivalency Report 10CFR50.59 Evaluation Performed to Assess Component Equivalency
~
Differences Evaluated Include:
~
Increased Primary Volume
~
Decreased Secondary Mass
~
u in
~
Thinner wall
~
Material (l-690)
~
Addition of Main Steam Flow Restrictor
~
Weight/Center of Gravity
~
==
Conclusions:==
~
No Unreviewed Safety Question No Tech Spec Change Required
Summa Licensing Documents to be Completed by Late 1994 Engineering to be Completed by Mid 1995 Preliminary Informational Audit Conducted in December, 1993 by Region II Inspector BillCrawley Future NRC Interactions
~
Region II (On Site and BWI)
~
NRR Staff Review
I ~
0
THERMO LAG VPDATE
Background
FPL Submittal - Performance Based Approach NRC Staff/Commission Meeting on Options Turkey Point Proceeding Outdoor Exemption Unique in the Industry Based on Traditional NFPA Evaluation Some modifications may still be required Desire approval by September 30, 1994 Circuit Analyses
< 50 ft. from Major Combustible Small Conduit Outdoors Banked Conduit Rating of Thermo Lag Installations Draft Application Guide Some Disassembly 8 Inspection PSA Continuing/Some Resources Reassigned
THERMO LAG UPDATE St. Lucie Proceeding Wall Testing Schedule to Test in September 1994 Circuit Analyses Rating of Thermo Lag Installations Evaluation of Thermo Lag for R.G. 1.75 PSA proceeding with IPEEE Scheduled for December 31, 1994 Final NEI Application Guide/Staff Requirements Memorandum Finalize Approach and Schedule After Issue Revise 50.54(f) Response as Appropriate
~ ICE@~
Cr P
~4 O~
C)c
+~ sf*pyI'nited States Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC-FP&L COUXHERPARTS MEETING OVERVll',% ON LICENSE RENEWAL STEVEN A. REYNOLDS SCOTF C. FLANDERS JUNE 23, 1994 JUNO BEACH, FLORltDA
Table of Contents
+ Background
+ Staff Approach to Revising Part 54
+ Part 54 Rulemaking Schedule
+ Industry Activities
+ Part 51 Proposed Amendment Rulemaking
+ Part 51 Public Comment
+ Part 51 Rulemaking Schedule
Part 54: Background
+ Final Part 54 effective January 1992
+ Industry and NRC experience implementing the rule
+ Senior NRC management review of issues
+ September 1993 public workshop
+ December 1993 staff recommendation to revise rule
+ February 1994 Conimission SRM to revise rule
+ March 1994 public meeting with Nuclear Energy Institute(NEI)
+ June 1994 Commission meeting
0
Staff Approach to Revising Part 54
+ Maximize credit for Maintenance Rule and existing programs
+ Focus on management of aging effects - not mechanisms
+ Ensure equipment function is maintained
+ Focus review on certain passive, long-lived SCs (e.g., reactor vessel, containment, and non-redundant portions of systems)
+ Evaluate explicit time-limited provisions or analyses
+ Identify ifnew programs are needed to manage aging
Part 54: Retained in Proposed Revision
+ Principles of License Renewal
~
Regulatory process is adequate to ensure the current licensing basis (CLB) will continue to provide an acceptable level of safety
- with the possible exception of aging effects in the period of extended operation.
~
The plant-specific CLB must be maintained during the period of extended operation.
Part 54: Retained in Proposed Revision
+ Integrated Plant Assessment (IPA)
~
Initial broad consideration of plant systems, structures, and components.
~
Quickly focuses review.
+ Initial Scope of License Renewal.
+ Review of Time-Limited Aging Analyses.
Part 54: Principal Changes
+ Eliminates the Term ARDUTLR
+ Focus on Aging Effects vs. Aging Mechanisms.
+ Focus on Ensuring functionality.
+ Narrowing the Focus of the Aging Management Review
0
PART 54: Principal Changes
+ Simplified Integrated Plant Assessment (IPA).
~
Deletes requirement to list Systems, structures and components important to license renewal.
~
Flexibility to develop methodology for identifying "passive," and "long-lived," and "nonredundant" structures and components.
+ Reduced Information in Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Supplement.
+ Reduced Reporting and Control Requirements.
Part 54: Schedule
+ Proposed amendment published for public comment.
07/94
+ End of public comment period (90 days).
10/94
+ Final rule to Commission for review and approval.
03/95
+ Regulatory Guide &, Standard Review Plan (draft)
Fall '95
I
Industry Activities
+ Babcock A. Wilcox Owners Group
+ Baltimore Gas Ec Electric Co. (Calvert Cliffs)
+ Virginia Power
+ Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
+ Department of Energy
0'
The Proposed Part 51 Rule
+
Purpose:
Regulatory Efficiency
+ Generic Environmental Impact Statement Bounds 118 Nuclear Power Plants 104 Environmental Issues Categorization of Iss'ues
+ Codification in 10 CFR Part 51
Part 51: Public Comments
+ Proposed rule issued for public comment in September 1991
+ Over 1,000 comments were received
+ Major areas of concern included:
Public participation Need for the proposed action Alternatives to the proposed action Solid waste management
0 0
Part 51: Schedule
+ Position paper to the Commission I
+ Final rule package to the Commission
+ Final rule published
+ Final Regulatory Guide A Environmental Standard Review Plan 06/94 12/94 03/95 07/95 12
Ca g,)'p Y
I 0
/i Cl