ML17349A752

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Turkey Point Unit 3 1992 Refueling Outage Inservice Insp Rept, Per ASME Code Section XI
ML17349A752
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/1993
From: Plunkett T
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17349A753 List:
References
L-93-60, NUDOCS 9303160060
Download: ML17349A752 (6)


Text

ACCELERAT+ DOCVMENT DISTR+VTION SYSTEM ACCESSION NBR:9303160060 DOC.DATE: 93/03/10 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g, FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant,.Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION PLUNKETT,T.F. Florida Power 8 Light'o.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards "Turkey Point Unit 3 1992 Refueling Outage I Inservice Insp Rept," per ASME Code Section XI.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: R047D TITLE: OR COPIES RECEIVED7LTR Submittal: Inservice/Testing/Relief Jfrom.ASME ENCL / SIZE:

Code

~4'O D S

NOTES: $ 4S~Z~or@

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 LA PD2-2 PD RAGHAVAN,L 1

2,2 0 1 1 INTERNAL: NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 FMB 1 0 OGC/HDS3 "1 0 REG FILE 01 1 1 RES MILLMAN,G 1 1 R 1 1 EXTERNAL: EGSG BROWN,B 1 1 EGS(G RANSOME,C 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 A

NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE +ASTE! CONTACI'HE DOCUMEN'I'ON'I'ROL DI>K, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DIS't'RIDUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMEN'I'S YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 15 ENCL -12

f*? ~'

) '. ~ r

~ .

d A I

P.O. Box 029100, Miami, FL, 33102-9100 MAR 10 1993 r.-93-60 10 CFR 50.55a U. S. Nuclear Regulatozy Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: Turkey Point Unit 3, Docket No. 50-250 Inservice Ins ection Re ort Attached aze the following reports for Turkey Point Unit 3, 1992 refueling outage in accordance with the provisions, of the ASME Code, Section XI:

Form NIS-1 Owners'ata Report foz Inservice Inspections.

Form NIS-BB Owners'ata Report of Eddy Current Examinations.

Form NIS-2 Owners'ata Repozt of Repairs and Replacements.

Summary of Visual Examinations and Functional Testing of Snubbers.

Summary Tables of Inservice Inspection Examinations.

Summary of Visual VT-2 Examinations and Third Period Pressure Testing.

As discussed in Reg Guide 1.147, Code Case N-498, "Alternative Rules for 10 Year Hydrostatic Pressure Testing foz Class 1 and 2 Systems,Section XI, Division 1," was used during this period.

Should there be any questions concerning this report, please contact Use Very truly yours,

'///

T. F. Plunkett Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear TFP/JEK/3k attachment cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC R. C. Butcher, Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant

~aosi~O060-+~00~>>'~>>0, PDR ADOCK 0 S o+7 PDR 8 an FPL Group company rfr

I t >'~608y iI

TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT 3 1992 INSERVICE INSPECTION REPORT Executive Summar The inservice inspection examinations performed during this outage and the cumulative total of exams meet the requirements of Table B of ASME Section XI. No unacceptable conditions or reportable indications were found.

100% of the A, B, and C steam generator tubes were eddy current tested. The A and B steam generators each had one tube plugged. The C steam generator had 5 tubes plugged.

The NIS-2 forms discuss the repairs and replacements which took place during the 1992 refueling/maintenance outage.

Visual examination and functional testing of snubbezs was completed in accordance with ASME Section XI and Technical Specifications. Visual examinations did not reveal any failures. There were no snubber failures in the functional test sample, The summary tables of the inservice inspection examinations cover the second outage of the third period of the second interval.

Selected class 2 and 3 piping was tested in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code. All leakage found during the testing was from mechanical joints. Each leak was addressed by repair or ad)ustment under the control of a Plant Work Order.

I al a 0 1

~ x7 J