ML17347B586

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of 900118 Meeting at Region II Ofc Re Design Validation Insp Repts 50-250/89-203 & 50-251/89-203. Major Areas Discussed:Differences Between Sys Drawings & Procedure 3/4-OP-030, Component Cooling Water Sys
ML17347B586
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/14/1990
From: Ebneter S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Goldberg J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9003050198
Download: ML17347B586 (58)


See also: IR 05000250/1989203

Text

l.

February 14,

1990

Florida Power and Light Company

ATTN:

Mr. J.

H. Goldberg

Executive Vice President-Nuclear

P. 0.

Box 14000

Juno

Beach,

FL

33408-0420

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MEETING SUMMARY - TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT

DOCKET NOS.

50-250

AND 50-251

This letter

refers

to the

meeting

conducted

at

our request

at

the

NRC

Region II Office on January

18,

1990.

The meeting

involved

a discussion

of

the

issues

identified during the

Design Validation Inspection

(DVI) (50-250

and 50-251/89-203) .

It is our opinion that this meeting

was beneficial

and

provided

a better

understanding

of the issues.

In accordance

with Section

2.790 of NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10,

Code of Federal

Regulations,

a copy of this letter

and its enclosures

will

be placed in the

NRC Public Document

Room.

Should you have

any questions

concerning

these

matters,

we will be pleased

to

discuss

them.

Sincerely,

(ORIGINAL SIGNED BY S. E.

EBNEZER)

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees

2.

Meeting Su@nary

3.

Meeting Agenda

4.

Handout

cc w/encls:

K. N. Harris, Vice President

Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL

33102

(cc w/encl cont'd - See

page

2)

Stewart

D. Ebneter

Regional Administrator

P00

0 01.98 900214

PDR

ADOCK 0 0002

0

Q

PDC

Florida Power and Light Company

February 14,

1990

(cc cont'd)

J.

E. Cross,

Plant Manager

Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL

33102

L.

W. Bladow

Plant

gA Superintendent

Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL

33102

D. Powell, Regulatory

and

Compliance Supervisor

Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL

33102

Harold F. Reis,

Esq.

Newman

and Holtzinger, P.C.

1615

L Street,

NW

Washington,

D.

C.

20036

John T. Butler, Esq.

Steel,

Hector and Davis

4000 Southeast

Financial

Center

Miami, FL

33131-2398

Attorney General

Department of Legal Affairs

The Capitol

Tallahassee,

FL

332304

Jacob

Daniel

Nash

Office of Radiation Control

Department of Health

and

Rehabilitative Services

1317 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahssee,

FL'2399-0700

Jack Shreve

Office of the Public Counsel

Room 4, Holland Building

Tallahassee,

FL

32304

Administrator

Department of Environmental

Regulation

Power Plant Siting Section

State of Florida

Twin Towers,

2600 Blair Stone

Road

Tallahassee,

FL

32301

( cc w/encls cont'd - See

page

3)

rW

Florida Power

and Light Company

February 14,

1990

(cc cont'd)

Joaquin Avino

County Manager of Metropolitan

Dade County

111

NW 1st Street,

29th Floor

Miami, FL

33128

Intergovernmental

Coordination

and Review

Office of Planning

and Budget

Executive Office of the Governor

The Capitol Building

Tallahassee,

FL

32301

bcc w/encls:

~

~

G.

. Edison,

NRR

ocument Control

Desk

NRC Resident

Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

P. 0.

Box 57-1185

Miami, FL

33257-1185

  • FOR PREVIOUS

CONCURRENCE - SEE

ATTACHED COPY

RII:DRS

KPoertner

02/

/90

RII:ORA

SDEbneter

02/

/90

RI I:DRS

FJape

02/

/90

RII:DRS

TAPeebles

02/

/90

RII:DRS

AFGibson

02/

/90

RI I:DRP

MSinkule

02/

/90

I

pC'

Florida Power

and Light Company

February 14,

1990

(cc cont'd)

Joaquin Avino

County Manager of Metropolitan

Dade County

111

NW 1st Street,

29th Floor

Miami, FL

33128

Intergovernmental

Coordination

and Review

Office of Planning

and Budget

Executive Office of the Governor

The Capitol Building

Tallahassee,

FL

32301

State of Florida

bcc w/encl:

G.

E. Edison,

NRR

Document Control

Desk

NRC Resident

Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

P. 0.

Box 57-1185

Miami,

FL

33257-1185

RII:DRS

Poer

er

02/Q

90

RI I:ORA

SDEbn

er

02/

/90

I:D

FJape

02/y /90

RII: D

eebles

'2/g /90

RII'l

AFGi son

02+/90

RII:DRP

MSinkule

02/

/90

W

ENCLOSURE I

LIST OF ATTENDEES

Nuclear

Re ulator

Commission Attendees

H.

N. Berkow, Director, Project Directorate II-2, NRR

R.

C. Butcher, Senior Resident Inspector,

Turkey Point

R.

V. Crlenjak, Chief, Reactor Projects

Section

2B,

DRP

S.

D. Ebneter,

Regional Administrator

R.

Gramm, Special

Inspection

Branch,

NRR

E.

V. Imbro, Chief,

Team Inspection Section 8,

Special

Inspection Branch,

NRR

F. Jape,

Chief, guality Programs

Section,

DRS

M. V. Sinkule, Chief, Reactor Projects

Branch 2,

DRP

Florida Power and Li ht Attendees

D. A. Chancy, Director, Nuclear Licensing

R.

D. Gill, Manager of Civil Engineering - Nuclear

J.

B. Hosmer, Director, Nuclear Engineering

J. J.

Hutchenson,

Manager Plant Support

G. Madden, Senior Licensing Engineer

L. F. Pabst,

Design Reconstitution

Manager

H. N. Paduano,

Manager Nuclear Engineering

R.

E. Rose,

Supervisor

Configuration Control

R. L. Wade, Project Supervisor - Turkey Point

e

ENCLOSURE

2

MEETING SUMMARY

This meeting

was

conducted

to discuss

the

issue's

identified during the Design

Validation

Inspection

(DVI) (Inspection

Report

50-250

and

251/89-203)

performed

during

the

periods

of

September

11-15,

September

25-29,

and

October 12-13,

1989.

The meeting

was

opened

by Mr. G.

Madden

by stating the objective

and

agenda.

Mr.

R.

Wade

gave

the

opening

presentation,

discussing

the eight unresolved

items identified in the

Design Validation Inspection

and the status

of the

licensee's

action to resolve

the items.

Mr.

R.

Rose

discussed

the licensee's

actions with regard to differences

between

the

system

drawings

and procedures

3/4-0P-030,

component

cooling water

system.

Mr. L.

Pabst

discussed

the

actions

planned

to improve the

component

Design

Requirements

and presented

a

schedule for completion.

Mr. H. Paduano

discussed

the Florida Power

and Light

calculation

program

and

technical

oversight

of contractors.

Mr.

Hosmer

summarized

the licensee's

actions

to date

and the actions to be taken in the

future.

Mr. Ebneter

discussed

the importance of establishing

the design basis

of Turkey Point and maintaining the design basis

once established.

0

rw

ENSURE 3

AGENDA

FOR NRC/FPI

MEETING

PEP

PROJECT-4

INSPECTION

CONCERNS

JANUARY 18,

1990

)

I.

OBJECTIVE & INTRODUCTION

II.

UNRESOLVED ITEMS FROM AUDIT

I II.

PROCEDURE

ITEMS

IV.

DESIGN

BASIS

RECONSTITUTION

V.

CALCULATION PROGRAM

VI.

TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT OF CONTRACTORS

Vll.

SUMMARY

G. R. MADDEN

R. L. WADE

R.

ROSE

L. F. PABST

H. N. PADUANO

H. N. PADUANO

J.

B. HOSMER

W)

0

OBJECTIVE

1

o

PROVIDE OUR RESPONSE

TO URI'S AND GENERIC

ISSUES

RESULTING FROM DESIGN VALIDATION.

o

DEMONSTRATE OUR COMMITMENT FOR APPROPRIATE

ACTION

PROACTIVE ENGINEERING.

TURKEY POINT DESIGN VALIDATION INSPECTION

UNRESOLVED

ITEMS

EIGHT IDENTIFIED

THREE

COMPLETE

FIVE WORKING

TWO - VENDOR DOCUMENTATION REVISION

ONE - PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT

ONE - LONG TERM CALCULATION

ONE - LONG TERM PHYSICAL PLANT MODIFICATION

NRE

LVED ITEM

URI 89-203-10

CCW HEAT EXCHANGER FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY

Background:

Stress

report considered

heat exchanger

and

concrete

pedestal

configuration as rigid when actually flexible

Status:

Reanalysis

of the ICW piping system

complete

- satisfactory

Reanalysis

of the CCW piping system

complete - satisfactory

Reanalysis

of the CCW Hx concrete

pedestal

complete

- satisfactory

A revised stress

report from the heat exchanger

vendor is expected

by 6/30/90

URI 89-203-13

REPLACEMENT CCW HEAT EXCHANGER SHELL

SIDE NOZZLE LOADS

Background:

CCW heat exchanger

qualification report was not

revised

and reissued

to reflect revised

nozzle loads

Status:

A revised stress

report from the heat exchanger

vendor is

expected

by 6/30/90

URI 89-203-14

CCW RELIEF VALVE REPLACEMENT

Background:

A calculation did not address

certain loading

combinations

and stress

limits

Status:

Revised calculation complete

- satisfactory

UNRESOLVED

ITEMS

URI 89-203-15

COMPONENT COOLING WATER OPERATING PROCEDURES

Background:

Certain procedure

deficiencies

were identified

Status:

Procedures

have

been

revised

URI 89-203-16

CCW PUMP AND SURGE TANK SEISMIC QUALIFICATION

AND ANCHORAGE CHECK

Background:

FPL could not provide documentation

on certain

OEM

components

substantiating

complete seismic qualification and adequacy

of anchorage

Status:

Anchorage analysis

complete

- satisfactory

U-4 surge tank meets functionality - modifications during next U-4

refueling outage

to upgrade anchor safety factors to current standards

URI 89-203-18

CCW PIPE SUPPORT

CALCULATIONS

Background:

Certain calculations

contained

errors and procedural

deficiencies

, Status:

Revised calculations complete - satisfactory

m

UNRESOLVED

ITEMS

URI 89-203-20

COMPONENT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Background:

The Component

Design

Requirements

contained

erroneous

and Inconsistent

Information

Status:

Specific items addressed.

Programmatic

review/verification

Initiated - to be complete

6/91

URI 89-203-23

ACCEPTABILITY OF THE MINIMUM BATTERY TERMINAL

VOLTAGE

Background:

No bounding calculation to show that all devices

located

remotely from the battery bus will operate successfully

at the minimum

allowable terminal voltage of 105 VDC

Status:

Specific components

Identified and reviewed during audit were

shown to be satisfactory.

Evaluation of methodology for bounding

calculation

In progress.

Scope

and detailed schedule

being developed

- completion will not

extend

past-'- 12/31/90.

0

III PROCEDURE ITEMS

During the PEP-4 Audit at Turkey Point Plant, differences

between

system

drawings

and

procedures

3/4-OP-030,

Component Cooling Water System, were identified.

~ Identified items have been corrected

Deficiencies

1)

CCW Fill Valves,

Not referenced

in procedure

2)

CCW Vent Valves,

Position was incorrect

in procedure

Actions Taken

Procedure Corrected

Procedure Corrected

3)

CCW Vents Valves,

Not shown in procedure

Other Actions

Added to Procedure

System

Engineers

reviewed other procedures

to identify

weakness and take corrective action.

  • /DC/tt (Makeup Valves 1/17/90)

COI%%)NEIN DESIGN BASES

A.

SIX (5)

SPECIFIC

XkSTJLNCXS OF

ERRONEOllS Al

lHKCESSARV

XIIFOi5SLTIONBERK XDKNTXFXEDIllTEK

CORs ma RPS, CN un KtS

B.

Caeemam

SaSreS

lhamRaemT

03R)

CONTAZI%$

ERRORS

Al

MERE

INY

ASKlNATELY .

SllPPORTKD SY REFERENCES

C.

l~eONESVS

SOV SsmtCXarrLV'aarFXSO

aaaXSST

COMPONENT

SESESN

RKQUX559KNT AN) SQFFXCIKIT

CALCllLATIOSNLSUP5%RT

NOT PROVIOED

t

SESIN SASXS

A.

SIX (5)

SPECIFXC

INSTANCES

OF

ENRONEOllS., ANl

Ql5lEC&kSARV INFORMiTXQNMKRE ZOENTtFEES IK YHK

CSms ma RPS, CN mao EPS

II

A.

CeaaECTZOSS

ma

Vm

SIX

(5)

m ECXFXCau V

LOKIffXFXEBDEFICIENCXKS ilAVKSEEN ENlKREO XNYO

mac nnaaa. NO aramE memSS

E'

AGTlVITY

199$

J

FQ

A H

J

J

A

S 0

N

D

J

FQ

A H J

J

A

S

O

N 0

"REPAIR" FXISTING

ENT DESfGN RIES

18 ORIGINALSYSTEMS

OESGN VERIRCATION

48 ORIGINALSYSTEMS

. REQ3LVE ITEMS FFK)M

DESIGN

VERIFICATION

1&ORIGINALSYSTEMS

e

I.

REASON FOR

IMPROVEMENT

B.

COMPONENT

DESIGN

REQUIREMENTS

(CDR's)

CONTAINED ERRORS

AND WERE NOT ADEQUATELY-

SUPPORTED

BY REFERENCES

EXAMPLE:

VALVE CV LIMITED TO A MAX OF 20 TO PREVENT PUMP

RUNOUT.

CORRECT:

VALVE CV LIMITED TO A MAX OF 20 TO LIMIT ENERGY

RELEASE FROM CONTINUED FW TO CONTAINMENT

REFERENCE:

PTN

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

DATE, VOL.

PAGE

B.

CORRECT ANY REMAINING ERRORS

IN THE

COMPONENT

DESIGN

REQUIREMENTS

(CDRs)

PROVIDE SUPPORTING

REFERENCES

FOR

CDR

STATEMENTS

I.

REASON

FOR

IMPROVEMENT

COMPONENTS

NOT SUFFICIENTLY VERIFIED AGAINST

COMPONENT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (CDRs)

AND

SUFFICIENT CALCULATIONALSUPPORT

NOT PROVIDED

EXAMPLE:

CORRECTED

AND REFERENCED

CDRs STATE:

VALVE CV LIMITED TO MAX OF 20

VERIFY'NSTALLED VALVE CV LIMITED TO MAX OF 20

EXAMINE:

CALCULATIONS AND/OR TEST DATA

WALKDOWN: VALVE STOP

IN SPECIFIED

POSITION

FPL A Tl

C.

PERFORM

DESIGN VERIFICATION ON THE COMPONENT

DESIGN

REQUIREMENTS

C

P

AL

LATI N PR

RAM

I.

REASON

FOR

IMPROVEMENT

A.

FPL CALCULATIONS HAVE NO CENTRAL INDEX AND

- RETRIEVABILITY IS CUMBERSOME.

B.

CDR'S VERIFICATION PROGRAM IS LACKING FOR

SOME

COMPONENTS.

0

FPL CALCULATION PROGRAM

II. FPL ACTIONS

A.

CALCULATION INDEX/RETRIEVABILITY

IMPROVEMENTS

o

ISSUE

A STANDARDIZED FPL CALCULATION

PROCEDURE

CONSISTENT

WITH INPO

GUIDELINES AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS

TARGETS

Complete

o

DEVELOP A FPL COMPUTERIZED INDEX

4/90

e

o

REQUIRE MAJOR A/E CONTRACTORS TO

MODIFY EXISTING COMPUTERIZED INDEX

4/90

o

LOAD THE INDEX WITH EXISTING CALCULATIONS

4/92

0

FP L CALCULATION P ROG RAM

II.

FPL ACTIONS

B.

ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS TO ENHANCE

CD R VERI F ICATION

TARGETS

o

ADDITONAL CALCULATIONS WILL BE DEVELOPED

FOCUSING FIRST IN THE ELECTRICAL AREA

o

D.C. LOW VOLTAGE

1990

o

SET POINT CALCULATIONS FOR

RPS

1990

o

4KV EMERGENCY BUSSES

AND SR 480V SHORT

CIRCUIT CALCULATIONS

1990

o

4KV EMERGENCY BUSSES

AND SR 480V VOLTAGE

1990

DROP

CALCULATIONS

o

BATTERY LOAD PROFILE CALCULATIONS

1990

e

NRC-P EP-4-AU DIT

CALCULATION PROGRAM

IMPROVEMENTS

1/90

1/91

DEVELOP CALCULATION INDEX

4/90

6/91

4/92

ISSUE

PROCEDURE

MAINFRAME

PROGRAM

OPERABLE

FIVE,SPECIFIC

CALCULATIONS IDENTIFIED

CDR

VERIFICATION

REQUIRED

CALCULATIONS

BACKFIT INDEX WITH HISTORICAL DATA (FPL& CONTRACTOR)

FUTURE

DESIGN MODIFICATIONS

CONTRACTOR TECH NICAL OVERSIG HT

I.

REASON

FOR

IMPROVEMENT

DETAILED TECHNICAL ASPECTS

OF ENGINEERING

PACKAGES AND CALCULATIONS CONTAIN ERRORS.

CONTRACTOR TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT

II. FPL ACTIONS

. A.

QA AUDITS

o

CONTRACTORS

INITIATED CALCULATION IMPROVEMENTS

DURING LATTER HALF OF 1989

o

INCREASING FREQUENCY OF QA AUDITS DURING 1990

NTRA T

R

TE

HNI AL

VER

I

HT

II. FPL

A Tl

N

B.

ENGINEERING LETTER TO ARCHITECT ENGINEERS

o

STRESSED

NEED

FOR

IMPROVEMENT

o

DEFINE

EXPECTATIONS

o

PENALTIES INVOKED WHEN EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT MET

0

CONTRACTOR TECHNICAL OVERSIGHT

II.

FPL A TI

N

C.

IMPROVE EXISTING OVERSIGHT/REVIEW BY DISCIPLINE

ENGINEERS

o

LETTER TO ENGINEERS

STRESSING

TECHNICAL ASPECTS

OF

REVIEWS

o

RE-EMPHASIZE TECHNICAL OWNERSHIP

n

0

o

DISCIPLINE MANAGERS/SUPERVISORS

REVIEW COMMENT

SHEETS

CONTRACTOR TECH N ICAL

OVERS IG HT

ll. FPL

A Tl

N

D.

ESTABLISH A PROGRAM FOR FPL ENGlNEERlNG

TECHNICAL ASSESSMENTS

o

UTILIZE SENIOR

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL

o

PERFORM

"IN-PROCESS"

REVIEW/MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS

FOR

PROCESS

IMPROVEMENTS

o

FOCUS

ON TECHNICAL QUALITY:

o

CALCULATIONS

o

DESIGN

BASIS

o

DESIGN

ANALYSIS

o

SAFETY ANALYSIS

o

DESIGN 'NTEGRATION

o

TRANSMIT "LESSONS LEARNED" FROM ALL OF ENGINEERING

WORK TO FPL A/E's ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS

NTRA T

R

TE

HNI AL

VER

I

HT

~PPL 4 Tl

M

E.

VENDOR QIP

o

A/E's WERE SELECTED

o

BECHTEL FOCUSING

IMPROVEMENT OF CALCULATIONS

o

DEVELOPED

IMPROVED GUIDELINE/CHECKLIST

o

CALCULATION TRAVELER USED TO CONTROL AND MONITOR

0NTRACTOR

TECH MICAL OVERSIGHT

II.

FPL ACTIONS

F.

TECHNICAL QUALITY INDICATORS

o

CALCULATION ERRORS

o

INCLUDE A "GRADE" BASED ON ABOVE IN THE CURRENT

A/E

ASSESSMENT

\\

0

1

SUMMARY

I.

IMMEDIATE ACTION

.

0

URI's COMPLETE OR COMMITTED

0

GENERIC PLAN

o

CALCULATIONS

0

OVERSITE

o

CDR

o

PLANT PROCEDURES

A

MMARY

ll.

FUTUR E

EMPHASlS

o

AGGRESSIVE

SELF

ASSESSMENT

AND

INDICATOR MONITORING

o

DO MORE IN-HOUSE FPL ENGINEERING

o

HIRE 27 PEOPLE

IN 1990

o

TEAM AT BECHTEL

,o

TRAINING SHIFT TO MORE PRODUCTION SPECIFIC

o

DEVELOP INFRASTRUCTURE FOR

FUTURE FPL

STANDALONE TEAM

0