ML17342B142
| ML17342B142 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/1988 |
| From: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| L-88-13, NUDOCS 8802110018 | |
| Download: ML17342B142 (45) | |
Text
'v REGULA Y INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIC YSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR: 8802110018 DOC. DATE: 88/01/12 NOTARIZED:
NO FACIL:-50-250 Turkey Point Plant>
Unit 3i Florida Power and Light C
50-251 Turkey Point Planti Unit 4i Florida Power and Light C AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION PJOODYz C. O.
Florida Power Zc Light Co.
RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION GRACE. J. N.
Region 2.
OFc o0 the Director
SUBJECT:
Forwards summary of. mgt-on-shif t (MOS) weekly repts.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
D036D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR + ENCL +
SIZE:
TITLE: Turkey Point Management Onshift Program NOTES:
DOC)(ET 0 05000250 05000251 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME DRP/ADR-2 PD2-'2 PD INTERNAL:
AEOD NRR DEPY NRR QORISSEAUs D NRR/ADT NRR/DOEA DIR NRR /P MAS/ILR8 OGC/HDS2 RGN2 FILE COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 REC IP IENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DRP-1/2 EDISONi G DEDRO NRR DIR NRR/ADP NRR/DLPG/PEB NRR/DRIS DIR RMANiJ R
F LE 01 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 23 ENCL 23
,l t
P. O.
14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408-0420 Ilf/g JANUARY
'1 2 f988 L-88-13 Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional'Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Re:
Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Mana ement-on-Shift Weekl Re ort
Dear Dr. Grace:
Pursuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order dated October 19, 1987, the attached summary of Management-on-Shift (MOS) reports is submitted.
Should there be any. questions on this information, please contact us.
Very truly yours, C. O. Wo Execut ice President COW/SDP/cn Attachment cc:
J. Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, USNRC Gordon E. Edison, Project Manager, NRR, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant R. E. Talion, President, PPL 8802iiOOiB'80ii2P PDR ADDCK 05000250 R
I f
1 s
h
~
N
't
~
~
I
MAN EMENT ON SHIFT OS)
WEEKLY
SUMMARY
REPORT WEEK STARTING:
PAGE 1
4 1988 OF 1
Five hIOS observers were on shift:
Bruce M. Parks, St. Lucie QA Supervisor for Performance Monitoring (01/04-10/88, Day); J.
H. Barrow, St.
Lucie Operations Superintendent (01/04-11/88, Night); T. A. Finn, Turkey Point Training Superintendent (01/04-11/88, Night); Daryle L. Osborn, Turkey Point Engineering Configuration Control Manager (01/06-11/88, Night); and J.
M. Donis, Turkey Point Site Engineering Supervisor (01/08-11/88, Night).
While on shift these hIOS observers reported potential safety
- problems, questionable work practices, operating strengths, areas for improvements, and general recommendations.
During this period Unit 3 was ramped to 100% power (Mode 1).
Power was reduced to 85% in order to improve secondary. chemistry.
Unit 4 remained at 100% power (Mode 1). No immediate safety problems were observed.
The following questionable work practice was observed.
The solenoid for Pressurizer Steam Space Sample valve CV-4-956A was scheduled to be replaced.
Neither the safety evaluation nor the work order adequately addressed the'upport required for the replacement solenoid.
A request for engineering analysis has been issued to resolve the solenoid support problem.
Some improvements to procedures were recommended by MOS observers.
Revise Reactor Protection Periodic 4-OSP-049.1 to detail the meaning of test light indications.
Ensure all operators are aware of the revision to OP-65.2 which allows them to change backup Nitrogen hot ties.
Miscellaneous improvements recommended by MOS observers are listed below:
Remove miscellaneous items from file cabinet tops in the areas behind the Control Boards.
The Control Room must be notified anytime work on the Safety Assessment Computer System might cause a computer system disturbance.
Improve the durability of Control Room drawings.
Perform surveillances on their scheduled days in order to alleviate the confusion associated the Technical Specification test intervals.
Include operator participation during the conceptual design stage of the Plant Change/Modification process.
Schedule more engineers for MOS observer watches.
The engineers'wareness of plant operations would be heightened and better communications with plant personnel would be established.
The Management on Shift (MOS) procedure (0-ADM-019) was revised to provide the MOS observers with more guidance especially in the area of professionalism.
The MOS Daily Reports now include a "professionalism" section that was first used on the night shift of January 7, 1988.
This is the initial phase of FPL program to establish "valid requirements" on which to promote and appraise professionalism.
ATTACHMENT'OS DAILY REPORTS
0;ADM-019 144agement on Shifl, (MOS)~
MOS DALAI Y REPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date. '1/04/88 From:
Bruce M. Parks seruer)
Shift:
Qx Day Q Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Shift briefings Toured Auxiliary building and Turbine building Attended ERT meetings for troubleshooting and corrective action on LT-461 (Pressurizer.Level Channel) indication of higher than actual level.
Unit 4 steady'tate 100','0 power; Unit 3 at 74% power with 3",o/hr increase toward 100% power.
B.
D.
F.
Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None observed Actions taken None Strengths ERT meetings for LT-461 were thorough Potential root causes were discovered A plan of attack was developed For blowdown of reference
- leg, potential problems were anticipated and preventative/corrective action were addressed.
Area(s) for improvement None G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
B.M M
bseruer D t Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear 01/04/88
C
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) ~
MOS 1)AII.YREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
01/04-05/88 From:
J.H. Barrow M
bserver Shift:
Q Day Qx Night h.
Plant evolutions observed B.
Continuing load increase to 1000'o on Unit 3 Observed planning between operation and maintenance as work was planned to unplug a sensing line to Pressurizer Level Indicator LT-461.
Observed shift meetings during and after turnover Observed starting of n3An and "B" Heater Drain Pumps Immediate safety problems C.
D.
E.
None Questionable work practices None Actions taken None Strengths Both the onconing and off-going NPS and ANPS were active during shift turnover as'they reviewed the shift relief checklist.
hkaterial condition of secondary plant is in good condition.
F.
Area(s) for improvement Area behind vertical panels in Control Room needs to be policed.
(Empty boxes and miscellaneous items on top of file cabinets).
G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
J.H. Barrow M
server D
Reviewed By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear Date; / 0 01/04-05/88
'l
0-ADM-019 i anagement on Shift (M0$)
MOS l)All.YRE I'ORT TQ:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
01/04-05/88 From:
(M bseruer)
Shift:
Q Day Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 ramping reactor power to 100% at 3%/hr Unit 4 steady state operations at 100% reactor power Shift turnover PSN and APSN Shift briefing Plant tour Troubleshooting Unit 3 Secondary Drain System B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices IGC has been attempting to replace the solenoid for the Pressurizer Steam Space Sample valve CV-4-956A.
The safety evaluation for CPWO86-252 states that the new solenoid ASCO model-NP831654E is replacing ASCO model LP831614 which is listed in the instrument index.
But the solenoid presently installed is a MAC P/N 56B12681C.
This is also noted in the safety evaluation.
This was identified by NCR 86-435.
The MAC solenoid is installed, supported only by the copper instrument air lines.
The ASCO solenoid is heavier than the MAC. The copper tubing will not properly support the ASCO solenoid.
This is evident by the crimped instrument air line on a sister
- valve, CV-4-956B, Pressurizer Liquid Sample, which has the ASCO solenoid installed.
The CV-4-956B solenoid is supported only by the instrument tubing.
The work order and the safety evaluation do not address supporting the solenoid.
D.
Action taken The job was placed on hold until discrepancy resolved The PSN was notified concerning the crimped air line on CV-4-956B.
CV-4-956B was stroked and timed as per OP-0209.1 Appendix P. and tested satisfactory.
PWO submitted to repair/mount solenoid on CV-4-956B.
01/04-05/88
0-ADM.-019 Magelnent on Shift (MOS) ~
MOS DAILYREPORT Page Strengths None Area(s) for improvement None G.
Recommendations To standardize the installation of solenoids on control valves i.e. several mounting methods for various applications that are evaluated, approved and proceduralized.
Note:
4i5 shift APSN and NPOs spent the major portion of the shift troubleshooting P3 secondary.
Their efforts produced approximately 25 MWE. Good job.
Completed By:
M bseruer P
I Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear (5,
~
INALPAGE Date.
01/05/88 t ilOS.) I&Ill81 01/04-05/88
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
ol 05 Ss From:
Bruce hf. Parks (M
bseruer)
Shi ft:
Qx Day Q Night Plant evolutions observed 100'e power operation, both units'ttended ERT meetings on LT-461 Observed shift meetings and turnovers Observed miscelIaneous operation surveillances and logkeeping B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices None noted D.
Actions taken None
,E.
Strengths APSN and STA noted bent support on Reheater Drain line, roped off area and notified system engineer.
NWE walked rest of system.
Good attention to detail.
F.
Area(s) for improvement None G.
Recommendations Ensure RCOs are aware of intent to reboot SAS.
The screens go blank without warning.
Completed By:
B.hi. ParksI bseruer D t Reviewed By:
Operations S ypprintenden uclear
~ly, i/c/eY Date: /
01/05/88
~ 0-ADM-019 Magement on Shift (MOS)
MOS 1)AILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
01/05-06/88 From:
J.H. Barrow (M
bseroer)
Shift:
p Day px Night h.
Plant evolutions observed Both Units at 100',b power Observed precautions made by Operations personnel to check with Technical Staff on Technical Specification interpretation on Reactor Protection System.
Observed shift meetings during and after turnover Toured Unit 3 Secondary Plant.
B.
Immediate safety problems C.
None Questionable work practices None Actions taken None F..
Strengths Both the oncoming and off-going supervisors were active during shift turnover as they reviewed the Shift Relief checklist, Unit 3 Generator Seal Oil System was clean with no oil on pumps or floor.
Area(s) for improvement The two sets of Technical Specifications are a major source of confusion.
G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
J.H. Barrow seroer Date:
01/06/88 Reviewed By:
perations Su erintendent-Nuclear ey i/t/e'l/O5-O6/88
O'-ADM-019 anagement on Shift (MOS)
MOS I)AII.Y REI'ORT Bag>>
To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
01 05-06 88 From:
(M bseruer)
Shift:
p Day px Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 100% reactor power, routine operations Unit 4 at 100% reactor power, routine operations Plant tour Shift turnover PSN and APSN Shift briefing Reactor Protection Periodic 4-OSP-049.1 train "B" Troubleshooting reactor trip relays "RT 5 and 6" train "B" B.
C.
D.
Immediate safety problem None Questionable work practices None Actions taken None Strengths None Area(s) for improvement Operations and IAC had difficulty finding information detailing the meaning of test light indication while performing Reactor Protection Periodic 4-OSP-049.1.
During the testing of the under voltage matrix the white test light did not go out. It required phone calls out of plant and time to find prints to research what this indication meant.
01/05-06/88
0-ADM-019 5~agement on Shift (MOS)
MOS DA1LYREPORT Page G.
Recommendations Describe in the basis, for 3/4 OSP-049.1 what the test lights are indicating.
Prints readily available in the Control Room for the Reactor Protection circuitry.
Incorporate action statements in 3/4 OSP-049.1 if acceptance criteria can not be met.
Train operations and IAC on the above.
Completed By:
TA server Date.
Reviewed By:
le IIOS. I I'C4 I47 r
1 Operations Superintendent-Nuclear g
I 4
F NALPAGE icg~
Dat.
01/05-06/88
O-ADM-01.9 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page TQ:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date; 01/06/88 From:
Bruce M. Parks (M
bseruer)
Shift:
Qx Day Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Plant operation at steady state Shift briefing Morning Plan of Day meeting Implementation'.of 4-OSP-075.3 (Auxiliary Feedwater Backup Nitrogen)
RCO turnover Followed up on Clearance Tags.
No problems identified.
B.
Immediate safety problems None observed C.
Questionable work practices None observed D.
Actions taken None E.
Strengths Good participation in the shift briefings Area(s) for improvement None G;
Recommendations None Completed By:
B.M. Parks M
bseruer Date:
01/06/88 Reviewed By:
.J perations Superintendent-Nuclear
/'0 i tlI+
~A)8<
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift(MOS)
MOS 1)AII Y REI'OKT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date 01/06-07/88 From:
Dar le L Osborn (M
bser Uer)
Shift:
p Day px Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 4 at 100% power Unit 3 at 100% to 85% power Shift turnover Shift coordination meeting Plant tour with PSN B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices None D.
Actions taken None 01/06-07/88
0-ADM-019
~egement on Shift(MOS)4 MOS DAILYREPORT Page Strengths An AFW Nitrogen Backup Header Valve misalignment occurred during the post test valve repositioning following implementation of 4-OSP-075.3, nAFW Nitrogen Backup System Low Pressure Alarm Setpoint and Leakrate verification".
The error was identified approximately 70 minutes after completion of the test by a Turbine Operator (T.O.) during his preshift turnover walkdown.
The T.O. promptly notified the PSN, and procedure 4-OP-065.2 (AFW/hiS1V Nitrogen Backup System) was implemented to restore the correct valve alignment.
This event identifies a strength in general "attention to detail" being demonstrated by operators at Turkey Point, in that, although human error did occur, the systen identified the error pronptly and corrective measures were instituted inmediately.
F.
brea(s) for improvenent The controlled drawings (Piping and Instrumentation
- Diagrans, Ttaining and Education
- Drawings, Logic Diagrams) used frequently by the operators were complete and in proper order.
However, due to their frequent use, these docunents were not set in a neat and "user friendly" manner.
Suggest evaluating the possibility of laminating these drawings with plastic or auditing and replacing worn out documents on a weekly or bi-weekly schedule.
G.
Recommendations None Completed By:
Daryl L. Osborn M
bseruer Date:
01/06-07/88 Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear tP, I/7/<r P FINALPAGE
- @OS I I'CNIO'I 01/06-07/88
0-A0 M-019 anagement on Shift (MOS)
MOS l)AII.YREI'ORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Da te:
01/06-07/88 From:
J.H. Ba w
(M bseruer)
Shift:
p Day px Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Load reduction to 85% on Unit 3 Observed "B" Diesel Generator Test End of shift meeting Shift turnover and shift briefing Reviewed problem found on Auxiliary Feedwater System Valve lineup on back Nitrogen source.
B.
Immediate safety problems None C.
Questionable work practices None D.
Actions taken None 01/06-07/88
4
. 0-ADM-019 Magement on Shift(MOS) ~
MQS I)A/LYREPORT Page 2
Strengths F.
The nuclear plant Turbine Operator found a
backup Nitrogen valve misaligned at the beginning of the 3:30 to 11:30 p.m. shift.
This proves that the backup to check valve posit'ions on the Auxiliary Feedwater System Nitrogen supply was adequate to restore the misaligned valve to proper position in 45 minutes.
Area(s) for improvement If surveillance tests were executed on the scheduled day, there would be little difficulty 'evaluating the time interval between tests as required by Technical Specifications.
G.
Recommendations Even though the operating procedure used to restore Nitrogen bottles to service on the Auxiliary Feedwater System vras technically correct, the procedure was a little difficult to follow. 1f the procedure was improved from a human factors point of view, future valve alignment may be more likely to be executed correctly.
Completed By:
J.H. Barrow server Date.
OI/O7/8a Reviewed By:
aQ06,I I'VOIIa1 perations Superintend<- Nuclear I(lite P FINALPAGE 01/06-07/88
4 r
rz
0-ADM-019 Man age ment on Shift (MOS)
MOS DA1LYREPORT Pisl T0 Opera tions Superintendent
- Nuclear Date; 01/07/88 From:
B.M. Parks server)
Shift:
px Day p ¹ight h.
Plant evolutions observed B.
88% power operation - Unit 3 100o'0 power operation - Unit 4 Preshift change and post shift change 'meetings Morning Plan of the Day meeting Handling of injufed person in containment 4
Implementation of 3-OSP-59.1 Reaction to low Nitrogen pressure on "3A" Main Steam Isolation Valve Immediate safety problems C.
D.
None Questionable work practices None Actions taken None Strengths F.
Prompt action on handling of injured man.
An IGC Technician was burned by steam while performing ERT planned troubleshooting on LT-3-461. The man was quickly evacuated from containment.
Proper notifications were made.
(The event was in progress at MOS shift change).
Area{s) for improvement G.
None Recommendations Ensure all shifts are aware of the provisions in OP-65e2 allowing operators to change backup Nitrogen bottles for the Main Steam Isolation Valves and Auxiliary Feedwater System.
A brief entry was made into a Limiting Condition for Operations because Maintenance did not work a PWO to change bottles (issued yesterday) and the operator initiating the PWO did not take advantage of this provision.
Completed By:
B.M. Parks bserver Date:
01/07/88 Reviewed By:
Management Review By:
Operations uperi ntendent-Nuclear
~ate 01/07/88
0-ADM-019 hOaagement on Shift (MOS)'
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
01/07-08/88 From:
J.H. Barrow server Shih:
g Day g Night h.
Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 89% power to clean up condensate.
Unit 4 at 100% power End of shift meeting, shift change over and shift planning meeting.
Changing of Nitrogen bottles on Auxiliary Feedwater System.
Routine Control Room operational activities.
B.
C.
D.
Immediate safety problems None Questionable worl practices None brea(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Entries in log books were neat, legible, and comprehensive.
Use of the public address system was kept to a minimum.
Shift meetings were informative with the appropriate representation.
Annunciator alarms were investigated promptly followed by appropriate communications to operators on watch stations.
Procedural steps were adhered to by Operations personnel.
There were no distractions in the Control. Room that interfered with the RCOs focus on the control board.
F.
Recommendations None Completed By:
J.H B
w server Date; 01/08/88 Reviewed By:
Management Review By:
ae I ~>8/89 perations Superintendent-Nuclear ate 01/07-08/88
. O.ADM-019 hOhagement on Shift (MOS)O MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
01 From:
Dar le L. Osborn server)
Shift:
p Day g Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Unit 4 at 100o/o power Unit 3 at 90% power PWO WA-880080148 Plant tour with PSN Shift turnover meeting B.
C.
D.
Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover meeting was conducted in a professional manner with a clear and concise exchange of information and status.
Recommendations None Completed By:
Dar le L. Osborn server D t:~i Reviewed By:
Operations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Management Review By:
ae ate e V(2' oluTI1o 01/07-08/88
,4-ADM-019 Magement on Shift(MOS) ~
MOS DA1LY.REPORT
)'age To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuc]ear Date:
01 08 88 From:
Bru M
P k
(M bseruer)
Shi ft:
Qx Day 0 Night A.
Plant evolutions observed 0720 Plan of the Day Meeting Shift briefings Implementation of 4-OSP-'75.1 section 7.1 "Auxiliary Feedwater Train I Operability Verification".
Toured RCA - Observed frisking at exit of RCA.
Routine plant operation at steady state including logkeeping, clearance processing, surveillance activity, etc.
B.
C.
D.
Immediate safety problems None observed Questionable work practices None observed Area(s) for improvement The plant needs to put additional effort and emphasis on getting surveillances done on schedule without use of the grace period.
As pointed out by the QC Supervisor in the morning Plan of the Day meeting, the grace period for completion of the RHR pump monthly periodics ran out this v:eekend.
In addition, a Hydrogen Analyzer Test was within 10-12 hours of the end of the grace period upon completion.
E.
Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift meetings were attended by Operations and hiaintenance personnel.
Good discussions of plans for the shift and problems with plant.
2.
When repetitious alarms occurred fiom testing, the operator checked for additional alarms prior to clearing the alarm.
3.
Procedures were followed in a verbatim fashion.
The RCO was careful to ensure simultaneous readings when taking data to compare Control Room and local indications.
a MOS.l 1WQI%1 01/08/88
0-ADM-019 anagement on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page Recommendations See D-1 Emphasize to Operations, Maintenance, Health Physics and other departments performing surveillances the need to perform surveillances on schedule (e.g O-OSP-200.1 "Schedule of Plant Checks and Surveillances").
Completed By:
Bruce M. Parks bseroer Date:
01/08/88 Reviewed By; Operations Superintendent-Nuclear gg/
Date:
Management Review By:
//IIr
] Illh~
Date MANAGEMENTINITIALRESPONSE a ll(15.I UI%7'aa 01/08/88
I
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page ro:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date; 01/C8-C9/88 From; J.H. Barrow (M
bserver)
Shift:
p Day px Night h.
Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 89'"o power Unit 4 at 1009b power Shift briefings and turnover Shift activities. were limited to routine operations with no major plant evolutions.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Immediate safety problems None observed Questionable work practices None observed Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 1.
Very few people entered the RCOs designated operations area during the observation period.
Z.
Most of the interface with other departments was conducted in offices leaving the Control Room area quiet and orderly.
3.
Several departments were active in beginning of shift planning session.
Recommendations None Completed By:
J.H. Barrow server Date.
01/09/88 Reviewed By:
perations Superi ntendent-Nuclear r/
Date:
I~ II Management Review By:
P
// /6'~ia 95 ate a QO5 I QtlV7/tA 01/08-09/88
0-ADlVI-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page ro:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
From:
M. Donis (M
server)
Shift:
p Day px Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 in Mode 1 at approximately 90".o power Unit 4 in Mode 1 at 100',b power Return of LT-3-461 to service following Maintenance Operability Test of CV-4-956.
Shift turnover meeting B.
C.
D.
E.
Immediate safety problems None observed Questionable work practices None observed Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover meeting conducted in a professional manner.
Attended by Maintenance and Operations personnel.
Good flow of information.
Conduct in Control Room demonstrated good teamwork and attention to detail.
Recommendations None Completed By:
J.M. Donis M
bserver Date:
01/09/88 Reviewed By:
perations uperintendent-Nuclear I/
Date; Management Review By:
P
//pW g ~au%
ate 0 Ill% I VI%7/IN 01/08-09/88
V
0-ADM-019 anagement on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date:
01 09 88 From:
(M seruer)
Shift:
px Day p Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Shift briefings Implementation of 3-OSP-75.2 "Auxiliary Feedwater Train 2 Operability Verification" section 7.1.
Toured Tu rbine Buildin g Reactor Plant'peration at steady state power.
B.
Immediate safety problems C.
D.
None observed Questionable work practices None observed Area(s) for improvement None observed Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 2.
3.
4, Logs were well kept and legible.
Entries were such that the train of events were clear.
Shift meetings had excellent discussions of planned plant activities, Procedure steps were adhered to by personnel.
Copies of procedures were used by both Control Room personnel and personnel at the control stations.
Coordination between Control Room and personnel outside was evident during Auxiliary Feedwater Testing.
Recommendations None Completed By:
Bruce M. Parks M
bseruer Date.
01/09/88 Reviewed By:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear g/
Date:
I ~ II Management Review By:
///I&
ae ate A N(N I III.II1'b5 01/09/88
I lf+ 1 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page ro:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
01 09-10 8S From:
(M 6server)
Shift:
p Day px Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Shift briefings Routine Control Room activities with Unit 3 at 90%
and Unit 4 at 100~o power.
"C" Auxiliary Feedwater Pump surveillance test.
B.
Immediate safety problems C.
D.
None observed Questionable work practices None observed Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments z.
3.
Ope'rators were requested to monitor their watch stations carefully to find areas for improvement especially in the equipment maintenance area.
A very informative discussion was held to explain the reason for increased surveillance on the Nitrogen Backup System for the Auxiliary Feedwater System.
There was an active discussion during the shift briefing which included other plant disciplines.
Prior to performing a scheduled surveillance test on "C" Auxiliary Feedwater Pump the operators involved with the test held a
discussion using the surveillance procedure as a guide.
The third RCO performed the test leaving the Unit 4 RCO free to monitor the rest of the control board.
Rec,ommendations None Completed By:
J.H. Barrow server 01/10/88 Reviewed By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear rl Date: l ~
Management Review By:
P
/I II&
ate D
~P ate
- Ilgwu I VIIV7%I ns Ino inlaQ
()
0-ADM-019
~ anagement on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page ro Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
9-10 88 From:
.M. Donis bseruer)
Shift:
p Day px Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 in Mode 1 at 90% power Unit 4 in Mode 1 at 100% power Steady state operation Performance of 4-OSP-75.1 - "C" Auxiliary Feedwater Test.
"3C" Charging Pump in break-in run.
B.
C.
D.
Immediate safety problem None observed Questionable work practices None observed Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 2.
Shift turnover meeting included a very thorough briefing of the requirements for verifying the Auxiliary Feedwater Nitrogen backup supply pressure every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
Bases for this requirement were discussed.
Questions by RCO were answered in detail.
Observed performance of "C"
Auxiliary Feedwater Operability Test (4-OSP-75.1).
There was excellent communication between Control Room and field personnel.
Rec'ommendations None Completed By:
bseruer Dt:~
Reviewed By:
perations uperintendent-Nuclear Date:
/
Management Review By:
P ate a
ate a II05 I UI%7%b 01/09-10/88
0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent
- Nuclear Date From:
(M bseroer)
Shift:
Qx Day Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Shift briefings Routine steady state power operation Toured Turbine Building and switchgear rooms Observed portions of 3-OSP-49.1 "Reactor Protection System Logic Test".
B.
C.
D.
Immediate safety problem None observed Questionable work practices None observed Area(s) for improvement None observed Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments l.
2.
3.
Logs v'ere thorough.
Control Room was quiet and plant activities were conducted in a professional manner.
Procedures were followed.
Communications between the Control
- Room, Cable Spreading
- Room, and Reactor Trip Breaker Room were established and maintained such that Reactor Protection System testing was controlled in accordance with the procedure.
Copies of the procedure were distributed and followed by the various stations.
Recommendations None Completed By:
M bserver
'Date:
Reviewed By:
Management Review By:
perations Superintendent-Nuclear
~
ftigI'e g/
Date:
/ ~
ate a Ill&I al aT'aa
' 0-A'DM-019 nagement on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT To Opera tions Superintendent
- Nuclear Da te:
01/10-11/88 From:
J.H. Barrow (M
bser ocr)
Shift:
~
Day Qx Night A.
Plant evolutions observed Routine plant operations in Control Room Shift turnover Beginning of shift planning meetings Portions of Unit 3 Reactor Protection Test Immediate safety problem None observed C.
Questionable work practices None observed D.
Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Following my five nights on shift as a
MOS observer in early October,
- 1987, I
reported that major plant priority seemed to be focused on numerous plant improvement programs that address long range goals.
I stated that this emphasis had Tninimized the effort to maintain plant equipment.
Presently there is a more balanced interest in maintaining equipment as well as continuing long range plant improvement programs.
This observation has been validated by input from operators.
I 4 M@'i I I'"Uli'1/10-11/88
O-ADM-0~9
~ anagement on Shift (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page Recommendations Two engineers from the site engineering staff served as tAOS observers during five of my seven shifts.
Based on their positive comments about the benefit of interfacing with operators, I am recommending that more site engineers serve in this capacity for the following reasons:
l.
It will provide, some relief to the plant management who have provided MOS coverage since August, 1987.
The engineers will be able to hear about and see the operators concerns.
The engineered job will meet the real needs of the plant.
It will establish better communications between plant personnel and the site engineering staff.
Completed By; J.H. Barrow M
server D:~f Reviewed By:
0 erations'perintendent-Nuclear Data:
I /I /I Management Review By:
PM-I~lli Ita'te I~tu/65 ate MANAGEMENTINITIALRESPONSE e IIoa. I Olla'taa 01/10-11/88
O'- A' M-019 nagement on Shift (MOSiO MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:
Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
01 10-11 88 From:
J.M. Donis bserver)
Shi ft:
Q Day Qx Night h.
Plant evolutions obser ved Unit 3, Mode I at approximately 9C% power Unit 4, Mode 1 at approximately 100% power Reactor Protection Test (Unit 3)
Start of "3A" and "3B" Heater Drain Pumps {3-OP-81)
B.
Immediate safety problems Yone observed Questionable worlr practices Yone observed D.
Area(s) for improvement Yone Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments l.
Attended shift turnover meeting.
Good participation by all departments.
Meeting conducted in a professional manner.4y PSN and APSN.
2.
Excellent coordination between Chemistry Department and Operations during restart of Heater Drain Pumps (Unit 3).
Both departments anticipated potential adverse consequences and'repared to take action in advance of possible steam generator chemistry concerns.
01/10-11/88
r I
<v er 0- ADM-019 anagement on ShiA, (MOS)
MOS DAILYREPORT Page Recommendat fons 4
Operators should be given greater opportunity to participate in the Plant Change/Modification (PC/M) process during the conceptual design stage.
By providing their input, the operators would buy into the projects and the
- design, in all likelihood, would better satisfy the needs of the customer.
Conceptual design packages could be reviewed by a
standing committee (rotating members) of operations personnel.
Comments could then be collected and presented by the Operations PC/M Coordinator at the Operability/implementation review meetings.
Completed By:
M bsert/er D
Reviewed By:
. uJ.
peratians Superintendent-Nuclear Date:
/ //
Management Review By:
/1 //
$'f Da ate MANAGEMENTINITIALRESPONSE 01/10-11/88
a V.
e