ML17341A380

To Topical QA Rept

ML17341A380
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie, Turkey Point
Issue date:	03/31/1981
From:	Hudiburg J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17266A480	List: L-81-314, Forwards Revision 4 to Topical QA Rept,In Respoonse to NRC 810514 Request ML17341A380
References
FPLTQAR-1-76A, FPLTQAR-1-76A-R04, FPLTQAR-1-76A-R4, NUDOCS 8107290152
Download: ML17341A380 (154)

Text

FLORIDA POWER Fa LIGHt COMPAIIY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TABLEOF CONTENTS Rev.

4 Date March 31, 1981 Page 1

of 2

Si07 PDR p

Title Page Abstract NRC Staff Evaluation Letter Table of Contents Policy Statement Introduction Topical Quality TQR 1'0 TQR 2.0 TQR 3.0 TQR 4.0 Requirements Organization Quality Assurance Program Design Control Procurement Document Control TQR 5.0 Instruction, Procedures, and Drawings TQR 6.0 Document Control Control of Purchased Items and Services TQR 7.0 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components TQR 8.0 TQR 9.0 Control of Special Processes Inspection TQR 10.0 TQR 11.0 Test Control Control of Measuring and Test Equipment TQR 12.0 TQR 13.0 Handling, Storage, and Shipping TQR 14.0 Inspection, Test, and Operating Status Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components TQR 15.0 TQR 16.0 290i52 8i0723 ADOCK 05000250 PDR Corrective A'ction N

NUMBER DATE 0

January 23, 1976 1

March 31, 1981 4

March 31, 1981 3

March 31, 1981 4

March 31, 1981 4

March 31, 1981 2

March 31, 1981 3

March 31, 1981 1

March 31, 1981 1

March 31, 1981 1

September 30, 1980 1

March 31, 1981 0

January 23, 1976 2

March 31, 1981 t

3 March 31, 1981 j

0 January 23, 1976 1

March 31, 1981 1

September 30, 1980 1

September 30, 1980 3

September 30, 1980 2

September 30, 1980

FI.OAIOA PowjA 5 LICHT COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TABLEOF CONTENTS Rev.

4 psts March 31, 1981 page 2

of 2

SUBJECT TQR 17.0 Quality Assurance Records TQR 18.0 Audits Appendices A -

Organizations and Figures NUMBER DATE 0

January 23, 1976 2

June 30, 1977 Figure l-l:

Organization of Departments Affecting Quality 4

March 31, 1981 Figure 1-2:

Figure )-3:

Figure 1-4:

Figure 1-5:

Figure 1-6:

Figure 1-7:

Figure 1"8:

Figure 1-9:

Quality Assurance Organization Project Management and Quality'ssurance Interface Environmental and QuaHty Assurance Interface Advanced Systems 8I: Technology and Quality Assurance Interface Engineering and Quality Assurance Interface Construction and Quality Assurance Interface Power Resources, Power Supply, and Quality Assurance Interface Purchasing, Inventory Resources and Quality Assurance Interface 4

March 31, 1981 4

March 31, 1981 3

March 31, 1981 3

March 31, 1981 4

March 31, 1981 4

.March 31, 1981 3

March 31, 1981 4

March 31, 1981 Figure 1-10:

Operating Plant Site Management Organizations Qualification and Experience Requirements for QA Personnel 2

March 31, 1981 2

March 31, 1981 C

Baseline Document Matrix D

Gray, Green, and Orange Book Matrix to QA Procedures (QPs) 4 March 31, 1981 4

March 31, 1981 List of Corporate QA Procedures (QPs) t Topics to be Addressed in Safety Analysis Reports 4

March 31, 1981 0

January 23, 1976

a TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE'REPORT Rev.

3 FLORIDA POWER Ea LIGHT COMPAIIY QUAL'FIYASSURANCE PROGRAM POLICY Date March 31 1981 Page 1

of 1

NEED FOR POLICY To avoid undue risk to the health and safety of the public and company employees, it is necessar'y to design, construct, and operate nuclear power plants with a high degree of functional integrity, quality and reliability.

STATEMENTOF POLICY It is the policy of Florida Power 8T Light to design, construct and operate nuclear power plants of a quality level that will meet or exceed government regulations and will merit public satisfaction by providing electricity in a reliable, efficient, and safe manner.

The President of Florida Power 8c Light Company i's responsible for the execution of the Quality Assurance Program for Florida Power 8c Light Company'nuclear power plants.

The authority for developing and verifying execution of the Program is delegated to the Manager of Quality Assurance through the direction of the Director of Nuclear Affairs, the Vice President of Advanced Systems h Technology, and the Executive Vice President.

The head of each organization performing quality related activities is responsible for'.

identifying those activities within his organization which are quality related as defined

~

by the QA Program; establishing and clearly defining the duties and responsibilities of personnel within. his organization who execute those quality related activities; and pl'arming, selecting, and training personnel to meet the requirements of the QA Program.

. J. Hudiburg, Presi ent Florida Power 8T Light Company

l

~

P

4. 1

~'1 Ql

'l"

~',

I

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Ree FLORIOA POWER 4 LIGHE COMPANY INTRODUCTrON Date Page ~ef~

The Topical Quality Assurance Report (FPLTQAR 1-76A) contains the description of the Florida Power 8c Light Company (FPL) Quality Assurance Program relative to its nuclear power plants.

This report consists of three parts:

The Introduction, which delineates the purpose and summarizes the scope and'pplicability of the Topical QA Report.

The second

part, Topical Quality Requirements (TQRs),

which delineate QA Program requirements and summarizes the FPL approach to activities related to materials, parts, a

components,

systems, and services included in the Quality Assurance Program.

The third

part, Appendices, which provide supporting statements, tabulations, and technical analyses or deviations which are not, in themselves, the subject of the report.

The Topical QA Report shall be an integral part of the corporate Quality Assurance Manual (FPL-NQA-100), and shall delineate the generic requirements and responsibilities by which FPL implements the corporate QA Program.

Revisions and changes to this Report willbe made in accordance with a Quality Procedure as'outlined in TQR 2.0.

The remainder of the QA Manual is comprised of Quality Procedures (QPs) which provide the corporate interpretation of the Topical Quality Requirements and present a common corporate position.

The Quality Procedures also serve as the documents which describe how the interfacing of tasks between departments or organizations is achieved.

The Quality Procedures also cover those technical elements which require a

common corporate position for interfaces or resolution of problem areas.

'In addition to the Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Instructions (QIs) are developed as required by each of the implementing plants and departments.

Quality Instructions describe the measures to be used to implement the quality requirements of the QA Manual.

The Quality Instructions describe actions and responsibilities to be performed within a department or organization and address the requirements of the appropriate Topical Quality Requirements, Quality Procedures and ASME requirements.

The FPL Quality Assurance Program meets the requirements provided by the NRC Regulatory Guidance and Industry Standards as listed in Appendix C of this Topical Quality Assurance Report.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT FLORIDA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY INTRODUCTION Date March 31, 1981 Page 2

of 2

The requirements of this Topical QA Report apply to safety related materials, parts, components, systems and structures; and to services employed for design, procurement, construction, operation, maintenance, refueling, repair, and modification.

The safety related systems for each plant are specified in the respective plant Safety Analysis Report.

The FPL Quality Assurance Program fully addresses the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.

The Topical QA Report shall be applicable to all existing nuclear plants, those under construction, and supporting FPL departments, and willbe referenced in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR).

For future plants, the description of activities, requirements, and organizational structures that are unique to a particular plant shall be addressed in the respective SAR document.

Appendix F identifies the additional information which willbe addressed in the QA section of the SAR documents due to the specific or unique nature of applicability to each future'plant.

Manager of Quality Assurance

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Date March 31 1981 Page 1.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The FPL organizational structure shall be defined such that the responsibilities for establishment and implementation of the Quality Assurance Program are clearly identified.

The authority and duties of individuals and organizations performing quality assurance and quality control functions shall be described, and shall illustrate the organizational independence and authority necessary to identify problems; to initiate, recommend, or provide solutions; and to verify implementation of solutions.

In addition, the description shall illustrate that t

persons or groups responsible for verifying the correct performance of an activity are independent of the person or groups responsible for performing the activity.

1.2 IMPLEMENTATION The President of Florida Power 8c. Light is ultimately responsible for the execution of the Quality Assurance Program for Florida Power h Light Company (FPL) nuclear power plants.

The authority for developing and verifying execution of the program is delegated to the Manager of Quality Assurance, through the direction of the Director of Nuclear Affairs, the Vice President of Advanced Systems h

Technology, and the Executive Vice President.

The reporting relationship of each department involved with the Quality Assurance Program is shown in Figure 1-1.

To provide for a review and evaluation of QA Program policies and activities, the President has established the QA Committee, chaired by the Executive Vice President.

This organization's responsibilities are defined in Section 1.2.1 below.

The head of each department or organization performing quality related activities is responsible for:')

identifying those activities within his organization which are quality related as defined by the QA Program; b) establishing and clearly defining the duties and responsibilities of personnel

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWFR 5 LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION psTO 'arch 31, 1981 Page ~of~

1.2 IMPLEMENTATION(Cont'd) within his organization who execute those quality related activities; and c) planning, selecting, and training personnel to meet the requirements'of the QA P

'I Program.

The responsibility, authority, and organizational relationship for performing quality related activities within each organization shall be established and delineated in organizational charts and written job or functional Pa I

P descr iptions.

a P

A QA/QC Coordinator shall be designated by the head of each department or

~

P organization except for the Company Nuclear Review Board and the Quality Assurance Committee, since these committees are review and policy forming bodies (of which the Director of Nuclear Affairs is a member).

The QA/QC Coordinator is the prime interface for coordination of quality related matters within his department, with the QA Department, and with other departments.

The interface of each department with Quality Assurance is illustrated in the Figures of Appendix A.

The organization chart, Figure 1-1, illustrates the lines of authority and areas of r

responsibility for each of the organizations that are involved in quality related P'ctivities.

The Project Management organization shown in this figure is applicable only during design, construction, and modification of power plants I

(determined by management on a case-by-case basis)'s described in Section 1.2.3.

Below are listed the departments and organizations that have Quality Assurance responsibilities.

Specific organizational responsibilities for implementation of the Quality Assurance Program are described in the corresponding section numbers.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Date March 3~1'~

Page of 1.2 IMPLEMENTATION (Cont'd) 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 Quality Assurance Committee Quality Assurance Project Management Corporate Contracts 1.2.10 1.2.11 1.2.12 Power Supply Inventory Resources Company Nuclear Review Hoard 1.2.6 1.2.7 1.2e8 Power Plant Engineering Purchasing Construction 1.2.9 Power Resources 1.2.5 Environmental Affairs 1.2.13 1.2.14 1.2.15 1.2.16 1.2.17 General Engineering Fuel Resources Nuclear Analysis Corporate Records Executive and Documentary Files 1.2.1 Quality Assurance Committee The Quality Assurance Committee, chaired by the Executive Vice President, is comprised of executive level management with responsibilities for the execution of the Quality Assurance Program within their responsibilities.

This Committee's composition and reporting relationship is shown in Figure 1-1.

The Quality Assurance Committee is responsible for reviewing and evaluating QA Program policies and activities.

Policy changes shall be initiated when Committee findings indicate the necessity.

Quality Assurance Program status reports shall be periodically prepared by the QA Department and routed to the members of the QA Committee for their review.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWER Ea LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION pate March 31, 1981 Page ~af~

1.2.1 Quality Assurance Committee (Cont'd)

In addition, QA Committee meetings shall be held by the Executive Vice President to keep members apprised of conditions including'significant problems that require management attention.

The Quality Assurance Committee shall be the final authority for resolution of contested quality policies, differences of opinion, and stop-work or other corrective action requests when lower level agreement cannot be reached between QA or QC and other departments.

1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department The Quality Assurance Department shall be responsible for administering the FPL Quality Assurance Program.

This includes developing and verifying implementation of corporate policies, plans, requirements, and procedures affecting quality.

The QA Department retains responsibility for delegated portions of the QA Program by performing initial evaluation and subsequent periodic audits of the contractors'A Program.,

The QA, Program responsibility further extends to the performance.

of audits within the Company to assure management that the established requirements and procedures are being implemented, and that the Program complies with regulatory requirements.

Periodic (approximately annual) audits of the QA department shall be performed by a

team independent of the QA Department, which is selected and approved by the. Chairman of the Quality Assurance Committee.

The results of this audit are presented to the QA g

a Committee and sent to the Company Nuclear Review Board for review.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TAR 4A FLORIOA POWER Ta LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATlON pate March 31> 1981 Page ~ef~

1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (Cont'd),

The organizational freedom of the QA Department is accomplished through the corporate structure, illustrated in Figure 1-1, which provides independence from those departments responsible for design, procurement, engineering, construction, and operation.

With Quality Assurance as the sole function of this organizationally independent department,

'the Manager of QA and his staff, both on-site and off-site, are completely free from the cost and scheduling pressures of design, procurement, construction, and operation.

The QA Department has the'reedom and authority to:

a) identify quality problems; b) initiate, recommend or provide corrective action; c) verify implementation of the corrective action, and d) recommend the stoppage of work or operations adverse to quality, when necessary.

The Manager of Quality Assurance reports to the Director of Nuclear Affairs.

This level of reporting, and their membership on the Quality Assurance Committee, assures that the QA Department has direct access to the levels of management necessary to assure effective implementation of the QA Program.

The Manager of QA directs and administers the Quality Assurance

Program, including developing and verifying implementation of

policies, plans, requirements, procedures, and audits which assure compliance with regulatory requirements including 10CFR50, Appendix B.

He shaQ also be responsible for the technical direction and the administrative control (e.g., performance appraisal, salary review, hire/fire, position assignment) of all members of the Quality Assurance Department.

The qualification requirements for the positions of Manager of QA and Assistant Manager of QA are described in Appendix B. Reporting directly to the Manager of Quality Assurance are:

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT'QR 1.0 FLORIDA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION March 31, 1981 Date Page 1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (ContId) o Assistant Manager of QA - Systems and Audits o

Assistant Manager of QA-Procurement and Reliability o Assistant Manager of QA - St. Lucie Projects o

Assistant Manager of QA-Turkey Point o Assistant Manager of QA Engineering and New Projects The duties, responsibilities, and authorities of each Assistant Manager and his group are described in the sections which follow. The organization of the Quality Assurance Department is shown in Figure 1-2.

a.

Quality Assurance Systems and Audits Group o

Develop and maintain the QA Manual, QA Department Quality Instructions, QA Department Organization Manual; prepare and revise the Topical Quality Assurance Report and the QA portion of the SAR Documents; o

Assist other departments in the development of Quality Instructions by review and comment and thxough interpretation of NRC and corporate Quality Assurance requirements; o

Develop and implement a Quality Assurance indoctrination program for FPL supervisory personnel, and a training program for the Quality Assurance Department; o

Prepare reports on Quality Assurance Program activities for presentation to the Quality Assurance Committee by the Manager. of l

C Quality Assurance; o Maintain a file system for documentation of quality assurance activities performed by the QA Department; o Review regulatoxy guides,

codes, and standards for impact on the Quality Assurance program and recommend appropriate program changes;

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATXON Rev.

P Oefe March 31> 1981 Page 7

of 26 1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (Cont'd) o Plan, coordinate and implement a comprehensive system of periodic internal audits with support from the other Quality Assurance groups, when necessary,'

Initiate, recommend or provide solutions and verify implementation of solutions for quality problems identified; b.

Quality Assurance Procurement and Reliability Group o

Assist in, the development and implementation of policies, plans, requirements, and procedures for the requisition and purchase of materials, equipment and services related to nuclear power plants and to the acceptance and storage of equipment and material; o Perform appropriate surveillance of hardware during manufacture,'

Develop and implement a program for auditing of supplier QA/QC programs; o

Review FPL procurement documents and changes to these documents,'nd for assuring that the necessary quality requirements are imposed on all orders for nuclear safety related materials, equipment and services;

, o Assist other FPL departments in the identification of quality problems associated with procurement and storage;

initiate, recommend, or provide solutions; and verify implementation of solutions; o Review,

approve, and periodically audit the execution of FPL contractor quality assurance programs; o Maintain a file system" for documentation of quality assurance activities performed by the QA Procurement group',

TOPlCAL QUALlTYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWER Ee LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Rev.

4 Date March 31, 1981 Page ~af~

1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (Cont'd)

The responsibility of this group, in terms of phases of procurement, begins with the preparation of the procurement

document, extends through bid evaluation, vendor selection, fabrication, and shipment; and ends upon receipt of shipment at the FPL construction

site, operating

plant, or warehouse.

This group, through audits and surveillances, assures that the contractor's organizations performing QA functions have sufficient authority and organizational freedom to implement effective QA programs.

c.

Quality Assurance St. Lucie Projects Group o Assist in the 'development and implementation of policies, plans, requirements, and procedures for portions of the quality assurance program related to construction of St. Lucie Unit 2 (PSL-2);

o Ensure and verify implementation of the Quality Assurance Program during the construction phase of PSL-2 through audits of FPL and contractor organizations; o Notify the NRC of PSL-,2 site reportable incidents under Part 50.55(e) in accordance with the approved procedure',

o Maintain a log of all PSL-2 construction open items identified by the NRC; other federal, local and state agencies; and the FPL QA St.

Lucie Projects group; and inform appropriate FPL management when there is an indication that a commitment willnot be met on time; o Maintain a

records center at the plant site for PSL-2 Quality Assurance records; o Maintain a file system at the plant site for documentation of quality assurance activities performed by the QA St. Lucie Projects group',

TOPlCALGUAI.ITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR-1.0

Rev, SL01IOA tOWCAl LIGHT COLliANY ORGANIZA'XION Date Match~31 1981 Pros 9

ot Z6 1.2.2

'uaHty Assurance Department (Coat'd) o Support, Plant Construction turnover through vcri6cation that records required for quality activities are available',

o Assure plant quaHty related activities performed by the Architect/Engineer meet the quality aspects of the coatract3 o Review Construction and Construction QC procedures with respect to the FPL QA Program, SAR Document commitments, aad appHcable codcsf standards aad regulatioas; (for procedure review requirements see TQR 5.0)3 o Review site generated FPL procurement requests and purchase orders aad changes

thereto, assuring that quality requirements have beea speci6cd, where appHcable3 o Assist in the development and implementation of poHcies, plans, requiremcn~

and procedures for portions of the quaHty assurance program related'to the operation of St. Lucie Unit 1 (PSL-1) 3 o Perform audits at PSL-1 to identify quaHty problems in the area of plant operatio~

system turnover, modification, and maintenance3 iactuding such areas as refueHng, iaservice inspection aad testing, procurement of spare/replacement

parts, material

storage, health physics> chemistry> plant security, and fire protectioa3 o

Recommead stoppage of work or operations adverse to quaHty at PSL 1

and PSL 2 in accordance with the appropriate Quality Procedurcs3 o Review and comment oa QuaHty Instructions or equivalent quaHty related administrative procedures prior to issue, with respect to the requirements of'he FPL Quality Assurance Program) the PSL-1 Final Safety Analysis Report; and the plant Techaical Specifications3 o

Assure that the status is tracked for all PSL-1 open items idcatiQcd by the NRC3 other federal, local and state agencies'aad the FPL QA St L'ucie Projects group; and inform appropriate management when there is an indication that'a commitment willnot be met on time3

FLORIDA PowtA 41 LIGHT COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT ORGANIZATION TQR 1e0 4

'. March 31, 1981

, Date a

page 10 of 26 1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (Cont'd) o Perform QA Review of construction related FPL originated design documents, applicable to PSL, to assure inclusion of appropriate quality requirements;,

a The scope of responsibility of this group is confined to the St. Lucie Projects activities, The responsibility for PSL-2 begins with site

- exploration activities, and extends until preoperational and start up testing.

The group shall be responsible for construction Quality Assurance activities, but the work, of establishing and executing the Quality Assurance

Program, as

applied to construction or any part thereof, may be delegated to other organizations.

The interface with the QA Procurement group ends with the

~receipt of '

shipment of nuclear safety related equipment at the construction site.

The Quality Assurance program'or the shipment is then within the purview of. the QA St. Lucie Projects group.

The St. Lucie Projects group shall provide the assurance that an orderly and effective turnover of data packages and equipment is accomplished.

a e

e Thegoperations activities of this group for PSL-2 shall begin when the plant manager is designated and the development of procedures for preoperational testing is started.

a a

During the operations phase, the QA St. Lucie Projects group responsibility begins at the point of acceptance of a shipment of replacement/spare parts at the PSL"1 plant warehouse.

This group is called upon to, audit the St.

Lucie Unit 1

(PSL-1) operating plant.

The St.

Lucie Projects group interfaces with the Plant Manager and his staff onmite by assisting in the resolution of quality related problems.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 Rev.

PLORIOA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION pate March 31> 1981 page 11 og 26 1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (Cont'd)

A Project Quality Assurance Engineer is assigned from this group to provide an interface with the Project Management Department and the QA"St. Lucie Projects group.

This individual is the QA Project team member for the St. Lucie Project.

The Assistant Manager QA - St. Lucie Projects is responsible for developing and verifying the execution of the onmite Quality Assurance Program for the St. Lucie Projects.

d.

Quality Assurance Turkey Point Group o

Assist in the development and implementation of policies, plans, requirements, and procedures for'portions'of the quality assurance program related to the operation of nuclear power plants at Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 (PTP);

o Perform audits at PTP to identify quality problems in the area of plant operation, system

turnover, modification, and maintenance; including such areas as refueling, inservice inspection and testing, procurement of spare/replacement

parts, material

storage, health physics, chemistry, plant security and fire protection',

I o

Recommend stoppage of wor'k or operations adverse to quality at PTP in accordance with the appropriate Quality Procedures; o

Review and comment on Quality Instructions or equivalent quality related administrative procedures prior to issue, with respect to the requirements of the FPL Quality Assurance Program; the PTP Final Safety Analysis Report; and the PTP Technical Specifications; o

Assure that the status is tracked for all PTP open items identified by the NRC; other federal, local and state agencies; and the FPL QA Turkey Point group, and inform appropriate management when there is an indication that a commitment willnot be met on time,'

FLORIDA POWER E LIGHT COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT ORGANIZATION TQR 1.0 Rev.

4 March 31, 1981 P.>>

12

.1 26 1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (Cont'd) o Maintain a file system for documentation of quality assurance activities performed by the Turkey Point group.

o Review documents submitted to the CNRB as requested by the QA Department CNRB member; o

Assure plant quality related activities performed by the Architect/Engineer for the plant meet the quality aspects of the contract; o Review site generated FPL procurement requests and purchase orders and changes

thereto, assuring that quality requirements have been specified, where applicable.

During the operations phase, the QA Turkey Point group responsibility begins at the point of acceptance of a shipment of replacement/spare parts at the PTP plant warehouse" This group is called upon to audit the Turkey Point operating plant.

The Turkey Point group interfaces with the Plant Manager and his staff on-site by assisting in the resolution of quality related problems.

The Turkey Point group shall also provide the assurance that an orderly and effective turnover of data packages and equipment, by contractors to FPL, is accomplished.

A Project Quality Assurance Engineer is assigned from this group to provide an interface with the Project Management Department and the QA Turkey Point group.

This individual is the QA Project team member for the Turkey Point Project.

The Assistant Manager of QA-Turkey Point is responsible for developing and verifying the execution of the on-site Quality Assurance Program for the Turkey Point Plant.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TOR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER I LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION.

Date March 31 1981 Page 13 of 26 1.2.2 Quality Assurance Department (Contgd) e.

QA Engineering & New Projects Group The QA Engineering and New'Projects Group has responsibility to:

o Review NRC I&EBulletins and develop a quality plan, as appropriate; o Act as the primary interface between the Quality Assurance Department and Project Management, Project Team members and other departments involved in new projects; o Interface with EPP and Power Resources for coordination of QA's involvement in specific projects which involve more than one plant.

f.

Project Quality Assurance Engineer A Project QA Engineer is assigned to each identified major project for coordination of QA related activities.

His responsibilities include:

o Represent the Manager of Quality Assurance at Project Team meetings; o

Assist the Project General Manager and members of his staff in regard to QA activities; o Provide technical guidance on QA questions; a

o Submit periodic reports that willinclude assessments of project plans,

progress, milestones and recommendations for improvement, to the Manager of Quality Assurance.

o Identify and schedule the QA Department support needed to achieve project objectives.

o Prepare project related plans and objectives for QA support of Project Management and measuring the QA performance record against these plans and objectives.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Rev

~ March 31, 1981 Date gage 14 eg 26 1.2.3 Project Management Department The Project Management Department, through the Project General Manager, exercises management control of assigned major projects.

This management control begins when a Project is assigned to the Project Management Department and continues until the facility is accepted for operation or the project is complete.

The Project Management Department organization is shown in Figure 1-1.

The Director of Projects, reporting to the Vice President-Engineering, Project Management and Construction has overall responsibility for the activities of the Project Management Department.

A Project General Manager, reporting to the Director of Projects, is responsible for completing the assigned project in compliance with technical and other project specifications, and for the application of the provisions of the Quality Assurance Manual during the project.

The Project General Manager is responsible for obtaining corrective action from contractor management when corrective action cannot be obtained "at the plant site management level

and, when necessary, can exercise his authority to" stop work on construction activities adverse to quality.

The Site Construction Manager reports to the Project General Manager and is responsible for Plant Construction activities.

He has the authority to stop work on operations adverse to quality, if the need arises.

Project Team Member's are appointed by their home department heads as the departmental representative on the respective project, when requested by the Project General Manager.

Team

Members, other than Quality Assurance, report functionally to the Project General Manager, but continue to receive administrative support and technical direction from their home department.

The QA Department has a representative assigned to each major project, who reports functionally and administratively to the Manager of Quality Assurance.

Team members are responsible to the Project General

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER Ee LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Date March 31 1981 Page 15 et 25 1.2.3 Project Management Department (Cont'd)

Manager for home department support to the Project.

The QA Department interface with Project Management is shown in Figure 1-3.

1.2.4 Corporate Contracts Department The Corporate Contracts Department is responsible for generation, negotiation, and issuance of certain major services and equipment contracts signed by Corporate Officers and is responsible for assuring that technical and quality requirements developed by others are incorporated in such contracts, as appropriate, and that these contracts have the required approvals.

Details of the activities of the department in fulfilling this responsibility shall be delineated in the appropriate Quality Procedures.

The Corporate Contracts department is shown in Figure 1-1.

1.2e5 Environm ental Affairs Environmental Affairs is responsible for obtaining the major federal, state, and local environmental permits required for FPL facilities and operations.

For new nuclear power

plants, Environmental Affairs prepares the Environmental

Report, which is then coordinated within the Advanced Systems 8c Technology Department as a part of the construction permit application to the NRC.

Prior to and during operation of the nuclear power

plant, Environmental Affairs maintains responsibility for overall coordination of environmental monitoring programs.

Some of the activities include:

a) drafting of Environmental Technical Specifications; b) review of proposed changes to Environmental Technical Specifications and investigation of violations; and c) review of proposed plant changes and modifications for effect on the environmental impact evaluation when requested.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWER El LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Rev.

4 March 31, 1981 page ~ee

~ga 1.2.5 Environmental Affairs (Cont'd)

The Manager of Environmental Technical

Services, the Manager of Environmental Planning and Projects and the Manager of Env'ironmental Permitting and Programs report to the Director of Environmental Affairs as illustrated in Figure l-l. The Director of Environmental Affairs has overall responsibility for implementation of the Environmental Technical Specifications in nuclear power plants.

The interface relationship with Quality Assurance is shown in Figure 1&.

The Company Environmental Review Group (CERG) advises the Director of Environmental Affairs and the Chairman of the CNRB on all matters related to environmental quality.

The CERG provides a review of proposed changes to Environmental Technical Specific'ations, and has prime responsibility for investigation of violations, evaluation f corrective actions, and reporting and making recommendations to the Company Nuclear Review Board on matters related to environmental quality.

1.2.6 Power Plant Engineering The Power Plant Engineering. Department (EPP) is responsible for power plant design related aspects of the FPL QA Program throughout all phases of plant life except as specified for the Nuclear Analysis Department in Section 1.2.15.

This responsibility extends from initial engineering evaluations of plant design related site characteristics, through preliminary and detailed design, construction, operation and decommissioning.

EPP performs design related activities and delegates design related activities to qualified contractors.

For activities performed by EPP, the work is governed by FPL's QA Program, and EPP is responsible, for approval of the design output.

Delegated activities are performed in accordance with an'FPL approved QA Program and the contractor is responsible for approval of design output.

EPP is responsible for defining the scope of delegated

~

0

~

~

O 0 ~

S

~0

~

0

~

~

Ql

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ 4

~

~

II

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ -

~.

~ ~

~

~

~ I

~

I ~

~ I

~

~

I

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~ 00

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~ -

~.

I-

~ ~

I

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ - I.

I ~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

I

~

II

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

II

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~ I

~ ~

~

~ ~

~

~

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER EI LIGHT COMPAIIY ORGANIZATlON Rev.

4 March 31, 1981 Page 18 of 1.2.8 Construction The Plant Construction Department is responsible for providing quality control support activities required to assure that construction'ork and activities meet the requirements of plans, specifications,

codes, and corporate standards.

This responsibility extends from inspection of material upon receipt on-site to acceptance of the installed items by Power Resources, and includes the verification of conformance of an item or activity initiated during this period to quality requirements (e.g., records

review, inspection, NDE).

The Superintendent

- Construction Quality Control, the Project Quality Control Supervisor have the authority to stop work or operations adverse to quality if the need arises.

The organizational structure of the Construction Department is illustrated in Figure 1-1.

Implementation of Construction QC activities is the only responsibility of the Project Quality Control Supervisor, who reports functionally to the Site Construction Manager and administratively to the Superintendent Construction Quality Control.

The freedom and independence of the on-site QC organization from the pressures of construction costs and scheduling, is derived from

. the Project QC Supervisor's administrative reporting relationship to the Superintendent Construction Quality Control as shown in Figure 1-7.

The Superintendent

- Construction Quality Control is responsible for directing and administering the Construction Quality Control Program for all plant construction activities.

This includes the development and implementation of policies, plans, codes, requirements, and procedures.

He is also responsible for the technical direction and administrative control (e.g., salary review, hire/fire, position assignment) of all personnel in the Construction Quality Control organization.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1a0 FLORIDA POWER Ea LIGHJ COMPANY ORGANIZAITON Rev.

4 Date March 31 1981 Page 19 1.2e8 Construction (Cont'd)

Reporting to the Superintendent - Construction Quality Control is a program staff of Quality Control Coordinators and the onmite Quality Control organization.

(The structure of the on-site QC organization shall be defined.

in the Quality Assurance Section of the respective plant Safety Analysis Report.)

The Quality Control Coordinators provide administrative support and assistance to the Superintendent - Construction Quality Control.

Each new nuclear project is assigned a site Project Quality Control Supervisor who reports administratively to the Superintendent - Construction Quality Control.

The Project QC Supervisor has a functional reporting relationship to the Site Construction Manager for the purpose of coordinating inspection activities with construction work, corrective action, and scheduling direction.

The functional/administrative reporting role of the Project Quality Control Supervisor provides the necessary independence of the site Quality Control organization, and yet maximizes communications between the Construction staff and the QC staff.

To clarify this dual reporting role at the site, the following definitions are given.

Administrative reporting.'he Superintendent Construction Quality Control shall have responsibility for'a) Final authority for hiring, termination, promotion, and salary action; b) Program control (i.e.,'rocedural and technical direction) 3 c)

Approval of all procedures, instructions and/or checklists used by Construction Quality Control personnel, including requirements (frequency, and revision to these);

d)

Final approval of dispositions of deviation from program, procedure, specification, or other requirements; e) Review all required reports from Project Quality Control Supervisor concerning quality conditions or prog ress.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWER Ea LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATtON ps<<March 31, 1981 Page ~ef~

1.2.8 Construction (Cont'd)

Functional reporting'The Site Construction Manager shall have responsibility for:

a) Day-to-day coordination of inspection'ctivities with construction work; b) Corrective action path to contractors for deficient conditions identified; c) Scheduling direction (Quality Control personnel may not be assigned tasks in non~uality related areas);

d)

Request changes in personnel levels.

The Project QC Supervisor is responsible for first level verification of conformance of construction act'ivities to Quality Assurance requirements, codes, plans, specifications, and local, state, and federal regulations.

He directs onmite implementation of the Construction Quality Control Program which includes supervision and daily coordination of inspection activities, scheduling of QC manpower levels, and reviewing inspection results to assure effective inspection.

To fulfillthis function the Project Quality Control Supervisor performs the following:

o

Planning, supervising, and assignment of all site Quality Control personnel; o Provides on-site management control of inspection contractors; o Provides site resolution of quality problems; o

Review of construction and erection procedures for proper inspection requirements and hold points; o Prepares reports which are sent directly to the Superintendent-Construction Quality Control; and o Reports any situations which he feels may compromise his ability to fulfill his quality responsibilities directly to the Superintendent-Construction Quality Control.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER 8I LIGHT COMPAIIY ORGANIZATION March 31, 1981 Date Page 21 of 26 1.2.8 Construction (Cont'd)

The overall responsibility for Plant Changes and Modifications to operating plants is defined in each plant's Technical Specifications..

However, frequently the work of installation and administration of Plant Changes and Modifications is assigned to FPL Construction.

In these instances,, the reporting relationships between the Site Construction Manager and Project Management are similar to that for new projects.

Activities affecting quality may be performed by PPL, or contracted.

Should any of these functions be contracted, the contractor may perform the activities under his own Quality Assurance

Program, which must have prior approval by FPL Quality Assurance, or the contractor may directly adopt the requirements of the FPL Quality Assurance Manual.

If the contractor implements the Quality Control function directly to the FPL QA Manual requirements, the contractor's Quality Control Supervisor shall have the authority and freedom to administer the Quality Control program.

1.2.9 Power Resources Power Resources'esponsibility for the plant begins with the Department's acceptance of a

system or portion thereof from FPL Construction.

Throughout the remainder of plant life, Power Resources maintains control of and responsibility for the preoperational and start up testing, operation, maintenance, refueling, and modification of the plant in accordance with written and approved procedures.

The organizational structure of Power Resources is shown in Figure 1-1. The

~

Vice President of Power Resources has overall responsibility for Power Resources'c tivities.

0

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE'REPORT TQR PLORIOA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZA'ETON pate March 31, 1981 Page ~of~

1.Z.9 Power Resources The plant manager, through the Manager of Power Resources - Nuclear, is responsible for the onmite activities of the Power Resources D'epartment.

The plant manager is additionally responsible for the establishment and implementation of plant QC policy which implements the quality control aspects of the Quality Assurance Program.

Reporting directly to the plant manager is the plant Quality Control Supervisor who has the authority and freedom to administer'he plant Quality Control program and, when necessary, for stopping activities adverse to quality.

The QC Supervisor, his staff, and personnel performing QC inspection functions are required to be independent of groups or persons performing activities that they may be required to verify or inspect.

QC effort includes preparation and review of plant procedures, PCMs, quality related instructions and procurement documents; the inspection, monitoring, surveillance, and review of plant activities to verify compliance with the provisions of the, facility operating license and the Quality Assurance Manual.

The QC Supervisor shall take corrective action for deficiencies identified, where applicable, and shall follow up on corrective action taken by other organizations until close out.

The interface between Power Resources with Quality Assurance is shown in Figure 1-8.

The Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) or Facility Review Group (FRG) is comprised of key plant management and staff personnel as described in the plant Technical Specifications.

The PNSC/FRG serves the plant manager in a technical advisory capacity for the review of all safety related procedures and activities that impact on plant safety and the facility operating license.

The organizational structure of the plant management is shown in Figure 1-10.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE'REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIOA POWER Ee LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Rev.

4 March 31, 1981 Date Page gg of 1.2.10 Power Supply Within the Power Supply Department, only equipment and services provided by the System Protection group are subject to the requirements of the Quality Assurance Program.

Figure 1-1 illustrates the reporting

, relationship.

System Protection is responsible for the requisitioning, post receipt test, calibration, and maintenance of certain high voltage electrical protective relays for safety related systems of the nuclear plant.

During construction, this group is involved in the review of relay system drawings and specifications.

Activities of System Protection include final wiring connection

checks, and preoperational check-out and test of all system protection devices.

The interface of Power Supply with Quality Assurance is shown in Figure 1-8.

1.2.11 Inventory Resources The Inventory Resources Department is responsible for the receipt, handling, storage, shipping, and issue of items received at the plant site for control by Inventory Resources.

This responsibility encompasses spare and replacement parts and components for plant equipment through all phases of plant life.

During operations, Inventory Resources also performs additional quality related activities such as handling and segregation for nonconforming items received for stores control.

'Ihe Inventory Resources Department and/or Architect/Engineer, Constructor, or other contractors may perform these functions for quality controlled items intended for installation during initial construction activities.

The Director of Procurement and Material Management reports to the Vice President - Corporate Services as shown in Figure 1-1.

The interface with the Quality Assurance Department is shown in Figure 1-9.

TOPICAL QUALiTYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 1.0 FLORIDA POWER a LIGHT COMPAIIY ORGANIZATION March 31, 1981 Date Page 24 ot 1.2.12 Company Nuclear Review Board The Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB) reviews or directs the performance of reviews of activities concerning the technical aspects of the operating nuclear power plant insofar as they impact on plant safety'the environment; the health and safety of the public,'nd laws, regulations, and licensing commitments.

In addition, audits of these areas are performed under the cognizance of the CNRB.

Where necessary, the Board. may use consulting services to perform required reviews.

Membership, and the management level to which the CNRB reports, is illustrated, in Figure 1-1.

Involvement of the CNRB with a particular plant begins when the operating license is issued for that plant, and is limited to those systems which FPL Power Resources has accepted from the Construction Department.

Subjects within the purview of the Hoard are listed in the appropriate plant Technical Specifications.

The CNRB has the authority to carry out its responsibilities by way of written action letters, verbal direction, or minutes of meetings.

1.2.13 General Engineering General Engineering is responsible for the retention of drawings generated by both Power Plant Engineering and General Engineering, and provides drafting and related services for all engineering projects.

This department is responsible for the establishment and implementation of a control program for drawings.

The Chief Engineer - General Engineering reports to the Vice President - Engineering, Project Management, and Construction as shown in Figure 1-1.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY ORGANIZATION Rev.

4 Date March 31, 1981 Page ~of ~Ia 1.2.14 Fuel Resources The Fuel Resources Department has the responsibiHty for procuring and maintaining adequate nuclear fuel supplies and related servi'ces.

The performance of this task includes:

Forecasting FPL's nuclear fuel requirements and the availability and price of nuclear fuel; Determining sources of supply and evaluating alternatives; Making commercial arrangements for acquisition, processing and delivery of nuclear fuel and related services for the nuclear fuel cycle,'dministering and managing contracts for nuclear fuel and related services to assure that contractual obligations are met.

Assuring that technical and quality requirements are incorporated in fuel contracts and letters of authorization and that these documents have the approvals.

Fuel Resources coordinates inputs from other FPL departments

and, incorporates them into contracts; conducts contract negotiations with

vendors, and serves as FPL liaison in all matters of nuclear fuel and fuel related contracts.

The department reports to the Vice President of Fuel Resources and Corporate Development as shown in Figure 1-1.

1.2.15 Nuclear Analysis The Nuclear Analysis Department is responsible for:

a) providing technical support to the Fuel Resources Department for preparing the procurement specifications for components of the nuclear fuel cycle, b) providing technical support to the QA Department for auditing of nuclear fuel and core component suppliers, c) reviewing core related changes to the Safety Analysis Report and Technical Specifications for completeness of technical criteria, d) providing technical support for operating nuclear power plants, e) performing safety and fuel management analyses of nuclear cores to support

TOPICAL. QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR lg0 ORGANIZATION Date March 31> 198.1 FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY 26 of 26 Page gf 1.2.15 Nuclear Analysis (Contgd) plant licensing, and f} review of fuel and nuclear physics designs.

The Nuclear Analysis organization is shown in Figure 1-1.

1.2.16 Corporate Records The Corporate Records Administrator is responsible for locating acceptable quality assurance record storage areas when requested by other departments, storage and retrieval of records as requested, establishing the parameters for the Corporate Computer Record Indexing System, and participating in the evaluation of specifically designated "QA-Approved" storage rooms.

The Corporate Records organization is shown in Figure 1-1.

1.2.17 Exe'cutive and Documentary Files The Supervisor of Executive and Documentary Files is responsible for receiving, maintaining, retrieving and, storing the QA records in connection with licenses and contracts received from other departments.

The Executive and Documentary Files organization is shown in Figure 1-1.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT QUAILINGASSURANCE PROGRAM Date MarCh 31F 1981 FLORIDA POWER a LIGHt COMPANY Page 2.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Florida Power 8c Light Company has established a Quality Assurance Program which complies with the criteria of 10 CFR 50 Appendix 8, and meets "the requirements of Regulatory Guides and Industry Standards referenced in Appendix C of this report.

The Topical Quality Requirements and attached Policy Statement, together with the Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions document the Program and the FPL policy with regard to Quality Assurance.

This Program shall be instituted for each plant site in a schedule consistent with accomplishing the required activity and shall be carried out throughout the life of FPL.nuclear. plants.

This shall include quality related activities initiated prior to submittal of the PSAR, such as design, procurement, preparation of the PSAR, and safety related site preparation activities.

The requirements of the FPL Quality Assurance Program shall only apply to nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components as identified in the Safety Analysis Report for each nuclear unit.

Additionally, the requirements of the FPL Quality Assurance Program shall apply to all FPL, contractor, or consultant organizations performing activities affecting'he quality of safety related structures, systems, and components of FPL nuclear power plants.

Documented procedures shall require and define indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality as necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained.

Periodic program reviews of the status and adequacy of the FPL Quality Assurance Program shall be accomplished by the independent audit team described in Section 1.2.2 and by QA Department audits.

Management of organizations outside Florida Power h Light Company participating in the Program shall be required to regularly review the status and adequacy of that part of the FPL Quality Assurance Program which they are executing.

The FPL Quality Assurance Department shall review and concur in the QA Program of contractors.

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY QUAIZXYASSURANCE PROGRAM Date March 31, 1981 Page 2.2 IMPLEMENTATION 2.2.1 Goals and Objectives As stated in the Policy Statement of the President of Florida Power 8I: Light h

Company, the goal of 'the FPL Quality Assurance Program is to maintain quality levels in an effective and efficient manner, and to assure the high degree of functional integrity and reliability of nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components.

To meet this

goal, the following objectives of the FPL Quality Assurance Program have been defined:

a.

Define through documented procedures and instructions the quality activities that apply to the design', fabrication, procurement, construction,

testing, operation, refueling, maintenance, repair and modification of nuclear power plants; b.

Establish,

assign, and document the responsibilities for those activities affecting quality of safety related structures, systems, and components; c.

Establish confidence that the

design, fabrication, construction, and operation of nuclear power generation facilities are performed in a manner consistent with FPL policies by assuring quality related activities are performed by responsible personnel; d.

Apprise management of unresolved problems and trends which could have a significant effect on nuclear power plant safety; and

/

e.

Prevent schedule delays and high cost due to poor quality.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR ~2.

FLORIDA POWER 4 LIGHT COMPANY QUAL'HVASSURANCE PROGRAM March 31, 1981 Date Page 2.2.2 Program Documentation The Topical Quality Assurance Report, which defines the policy, goals,

and, objectives regarding the Quality Assurance Program, shall be contained in the FPL Quality Assurance

.Manual, and used as guidance for the development of corporate level Quality Procedures which are also contained in the Quality Assurance Manual.

Revisions to the, Topical Quality Assurance Report willbe made, as needed, to reflect current FPL program requirements and descriptions of activities.

These revisions shall be made in accordance with a Quality Procedure.

If a program revision reflects a deviation from the baseline documents contained in Appendix C, an amendment shall be submitted to the NRC 30 'calendar days prior to implementation.

Thirty (30) calendar days after submittal, the NRC shall be notified of FPL's intent to begin implementation of program changes identified in the amendment.

In all other cases, amendments to the Topical QA Report willbe submitted to the NRC to reflect implemented program revisions on an annual or more frequent basis.

Quality Procedures shall be written by the department with major responsibilities for an activity or by the Quality Assurance Department.

These procedures shall be reviewed by all the departments with responsibility for some portion of that procedure, and shall be approved by the major implementing departments

.with co-approval by the Manager of Quality Assurance.

A listing of corporate level Quality Procedures is contained in Appendix E.

As the QA program develops and responds to new or revised requirements and guidance, new procedures may be adopted.

This listing shall be reviewed to reflect these changes on an annual basis.

Each Quality Procedure shall be written to address criteria contained in the Topical Quality Requirements and to further define the FPL policies, plans, and program where action is required by more than one department.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY QVAHTF ASSVRANCE PROGRAM Date March 31, 1981 Page 2.2.2 Program Documentation (Cont'd)

Each department head shall have the responsibility for implementation of the Quality Assurance Program, which includes procedure requirements applicable to his department.

In addition, he shall be responsible for the preparation, approval, and distribution of Quality Instructions, operating procedures, testing procedures, or other instructions where further guidance is necessary for implementation of the QA Program within his department.

Quality Instructions shall be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Department.

2.2.3 Structures,

Systems, and Components The requirements of the FPL Quality Assurance Program shall apply to nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components, as defined in the'AR..

Safety related structures,

systems, and components are listed as those necessary to assure the integrity of the reactor coolant

boundary, the capability to shutdown the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition, or the capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in off-site exposures comparable to the guideline exposures of 10 CFR 100.

Control over activities affecting the quality of safety "related structures,

systems, and components shall be to the extent consistent with their importance to safety.

Such control shall include use of appropriate equipment, establishment of suitable environmental conditions, and assurance that all prerequisites for a given activity have been satisfied.

'Ihe Program shall provide for controls over special processes and skiOs necessary to attain the required quality, and the need for verification of quality by inspection and test.

Advance planning is required, for the control of management and technical interfaces between FPL and contractors, during the phase-out of design and construction and during preoperational testing and plant turnover.

This is achieved through periodic meetings of concerned organizations and the

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT FLORIOA POWER a LIGHt COMPAIIY QUAIZXYASSURANCE PROGRAM Date March 31, 1981 Page 2.2.3 Structures, Systems, and Components (Cont'd) development of procedures which define responsibilities and interfaces, and control the testing and turnover of plant systems to FPL.

2.2.4 Participating Organizations The FPL organizations with responsibilities for activities affecting quality of nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components are identified in TQR 1.0, which also briefly describes their assigned responsibilities.

The Quality Assurance Department shall be responsible for:

a) the development, coordination, and control of the QA Program, including coordination of Quality Procedure review and appr'oval; b) control and issuance of the FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report and the QA Manual as a controlled document (as described in TQR 6.0), and c) review of Quality Instructions written by other departments.

For procedure review requirements see TQR 5.0.

Florida Power 8c Light Company may delegate to,other organizations, such as the Architect/Engineer, Nuclear Steam Supply System

vendor, or other contractors, the work of establishing and executing any portion of the QA t

Program.

However, FPL shall retain overall responsibility for the Program.

S The specific quality related activities performed by these contractor organizations shall be specified in the procurement documents.

The Quality Assurance Department, using qualified personnel, shall review and approve contractor quality assurance programs prior to initiation of contracted activities.

The object of the contractor review shall be to verify that the contractor has an adequate QA Program to meet the applicable requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and the FPL QA Program; or that an acceptable alternative is described and documented.

FLORIOA POWER 4 LIGHt COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT QUAIZIYASSURANCE PROGRAM TQR 2.0 Rev.

2 March 31, 1981 Date 6

8 Page 2.2.4 Participating Organizations (Cont'd)

In addition to the initial review, contractor QA programs shall be periodically audited by the Quality Assurance Department to assure continued implementation of quality requirements.

During operation, FPL does not delegate a major portion of the Quality Assurance Program to contractors.

Contractors are delegated execution of QA functions on a contract-bymontract basis.

These contracts are reviewed and approved in accordance with Topical Quality Requirements.

2.2.5 Indoctrination and Training A program shall be established

~ and maintained for quality assurance indoctrination, and for training which assures that the required level of personnel competence and skill is achieved and maintained in the performance of quality related activities.

Quality Procedures shall delineate the requirements for an indoctrination program to'ssure that personnel responsible for performing quality activities are instructed. in the purpose,

scope, and implementation of the quality related manuals, instructions, and procedures and that compliance to these documents is a mandatory requirement.

The Quality Assurance Department shall be responsible for the indoctrination of supervisory personnel.

Each department head is responsible for the indoctrination of non-supervisory personnel within his department who perform quality related activities.

Quality Procedures shall also require the head of each department (including the QA Department) to be responsible for a training plan which assures that personnel performing quality related activities are trained in the principles and techniques of the activity being performed.

This training shall maintain the proficiency of personnel in the skills necessary for the quality related activities through retraining, requalification or reexamination, as appropriate.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR ~2.

FLORIDA POWER d LIGHT COMPANY QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM Rev.

2 0 te March 31, 1981 Page 2.2e5 Indoctrination and Training (Cont'd) r Quality Procedures shall specify 'he requirements for documenting indoctrination and training sessions, including a course description, attendance, location, and date.

2.2.6 Management Participation In addition to the involvement of department heads in implementing the QA Program within their departments and the involvement oi the Manager of Quality Assurance in the development, coordination, and review of the Program,.the Quality Assurance Committee shall be apprised of the status a'nd adequacy of the Quality Assurance Program on a periodic basis.

The following actions shall be instituted to assure that the Quality Assurance Committee remains informed and meets its Program responsibilities.'.

The Committee shall review the results of management level QA audits of FPL Departments.

b.

The Quality Assurance Department shall circulate monthly reports of quality related activities to members of the QA Committee and affected department heads.

'Ihe monthly reports may include such items as the status of audits, a summary of audit findings, the status of development

projects, and descriptions of policy matters or problems requiring management at tention.

c.

The Quality Assurance Committee shall review the status of the QA Program on a semiannual basis.

The review willinclude assessment of the Program goals, objectives, and accomplishments.

~

~ ~

~

~ ~

0

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~.

~ I -

~

~

~

~

~ II

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~ ~

~ I

~ -

~.

~ ~

~

~ ~

~ I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

e TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 3.0 FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY DESIGN CONTROL Date March 31 1981 Page 3 I GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A Quality Assurance Program for design shall be established to assure that the applicable design requirements, such as design bases, regulatory requirements, e

codes, technical standards and quality standards are identified in design documents and their selection reviewed, approved and controlled in accordance with established procedures.

Such controls shall include review for suitability of application of materials, parts, equipment, and processes that are essential to the safety related functions of the structures,

systems, and components.

Changes to and deviations from specified requirements shall be identified, documented and controlled.

The Florida Power 8c Light Company (FPL) has the responsibility for design control program implementation.

FPL may delegate to other organizations the work of establishing and executing the design and control program, or any part thereof, but shall retain the ultimate responsibility.

The interface controls, both internal and external, for organizations performing design work for safety related

systems, structures, and components shall be identified and implemented in accordance with documented procedures.

This identification shall include those organizations providing

criteria, designs, specifications, and technical direction.

Measures shall be applied to verify the adequacy of design.

The extent of design verification shall be specified and documented by the'responsible organization.

The depth of verification may vary depending upon the importance and complexity of the

design, the degree of standardization, the state-of-the-art, and the similarity with proven designs.

The verification process shall be performed by individuals or groups other than those who performed the original design.

The

.design verification may be performed by the originator's supervisor, provided the supervisor did not specify a singular design approach or rule out certain design considerations and did not establish the design inputs used in the design.

The use of the originator's supervisor for design verification should be restricted to special situations where the supervisor is the only individual within the design

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 3.0 FLOIIIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY DESIGN CONTROL pate March 31, 1981 Page 3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Cont'd) organization competent to perform the verification.

Justification for such use should also be documented along with the extent of the supervisor's input into the design aspect being verified.

Where changes to previously verified designs have been

made, design verification shall be required for the

change, including evaluation of the effects of those changes on the overall design.

Design verification may be accomplished by testing.

Testing shall demonstrate adequacy under adverse design conditions and shall comply with the requirements of TQR 11.0, "Test Control". Design errors and deficiencies which adversely affect safety related structures, systems and components in the design process are documented, and appropriate corrective action is taken.

These design errors and deficiencies shall be documented in accordance with the design change procedures or as defined in TQR 15.0.

3.2 IMPLEMENTATION The Power Plant Engineering Department shall be responsible for the design, design review, engineering approval of design

changes, design evaluation and design control of nuclear power plants.

Power Plant Engineering may delegate to other organizations the performance of design activities, or any part thereof, but shall retain responsibility for overall design.

In all cases, final engineering decisions and ultimate design control of structures, systems and components related to nuclear power plants shall be the responsibility of FPL Power Plant Engineering.

The Nuclear Analysis Department shall have the responsibility for all core related safety analysis and nuclear physics design.

3.2.1 Design Proces's Design control measures shall be applied to design analyses, such as reactor

physics, stress, thermal, hydraulic, nuclear radiation and accident analyses; compatibility of materials; accessibility for inservice inspection, maintenance, and repair; and delineation of acceptance criteria for

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 3.0 FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY DESIGN CONTROL Date March 31 1981 Page 3.Z.1 Design Process (ContId) inspections and tests.

Measures established to control design documents are described in TQR 6.0.

Quality Program Procedures and Quality Instructions define the FPL method for implementing design control measures.

These measures shall require that applicable design requirements, such as design bases, regulatory requirements,

codes, and standards are translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, or instructions.

Quality Instructions shall further require that appropriate quality standards are specified and included in design documents.

All materials, parts, equipment, and processes, including standard "off-the-shelf" commercial or previously approved items essential to the safety related functions, shall be selected and reviewed for suitability of application.

The basis for selection may, include industry standards, material and prototype hardware testing programs, and design reviews.

3.Z.Z Design Change Control Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions governing design change control during construction, modifications to operating plants, control of discrepant or deficient design conditions, and reported unsatisfactory performance provide for the identification of the need for design changes and a

documented method to control these changes.

Design and specification changes shall be subject to design control measures commensurate with those applied during the original design.

During the design and construction

phases, an independent review and approval of design changes shall be performed by the organization that conducted the original design

reviews, unless the originating organization designates another organization to perform this function.

Subject to the approval of the Chief Engineer-Power Plants, or his designee, safety related field design changes or changes in Engineering requirements proposed by FPL

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TOR 3.0 FLORIOA POWER E, LIGHT COMPANY DESIGN CONTROL Rev.

3 Date March 31 1981 Page t

3.2.2 Design Change Control (Cont'd) may be sent directly to the Architect/Engineer.

Such design changes shall be reviewed by the Architect/Engineer for adequacy of quality requirements.

Other safety related design changes proposed by FPL shall be reviewed by Power Plant Engineering prior to transmittal to the Architect/Engineer.

During the operations

phase, proposed safety related design changes/modifications shall be submitted to the operating plant management for processing and re'view.

This review shall include the plant Quality Control review.

Power Plant Engineering is responsible for the design adequacy and design reviews of all operating plant safety related change/modifications (PC/Ms).

The safety related PC/M shall then be reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) or Facility Review Group (FRG). Proposed PC/Ms, which the plant manager judges to have an adverse impact on the environment, shall be reviewed by the Company Environmental Review Group (CERG).

Final review and approval of the design change (PC/M) shall be performed by the Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB), when necessary.

These independent reviews shall be performed to assure that:

ae b.

Ce adequacy of the proposed change is determined; appropriate quality criteria, standards and hold points are specified and included; and nuclear safety requirements have been considered.

3.2.3 Design Interface Control e

Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions provide the method for identification of design interfaces, design interface

changes, and modifications affecting drawings and documents.

Power Plant Engineering is responsible for review and coordination of design interfaces.

Power Plant

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 3.0 FLORIOA POWER 6 LIGHT GOMPAIIY DESIGN CONTROL

Rev, pate March 31, 1981 Page 3.2.3 Design Interface Control (Cont'd)

Engineering assures that, interface problems are resolved and that all design interface changes or modifications are reviewed for interface effects prior to approval.'uring plant design and construction

phases, control of interfaces may be delegated to the Architect/Engineer and/or the NSSS vendor.

Design interface problems encountered during design and construction are discussed among the principals such as FPL Power Plant Engineering, the Architect/Engineer, NSSS

vendor, and other contractors, and shall be documented.

During the operations

phase, design interfaces shall be documented and controlled by Power Plant Engineering.

Resolution of design interface questions between FPL departments shall be documented.

3.2.4 Design Verification Design control measures shall be established to independently verify the design

inputs, design

process, and that design inputs are correctly incorporated into design output.

The design organization shall develop procedures that govern design verification.

These procedures shall require that the design organization identify and document the verification method utilized and that the documentation clearly identify those individuals performing the design verification.

Design verification shall be performed by technically qualified individual(s) or group(s) other than those who performed the design.

The original designers and verifiers may both be from the design organization.

Design verification'y the designer's immediate supervisor shall be limited to those instances where the supervisor is the only qualified individual available within the design organization.

These instances are further restricted to designs where the designs where the supervisor did not specify a singular design approach, or did not restrict design methods or alternatives, or did not specify design

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 3.0 FLOIIIDAPowjII a LIGHT COMPANY DESIGN CONTROL Date March 31 1981 Page 3.2e4 Design Verification (Cont'd) inputs (unless the specified design inputs have already been independently verified). Justification for verification by the designer's immediate supervisor should be documented along with the extent of the supervisor's involvement in the design.

The design organization shall be responsible for determining the extent of design verification and methods to be employed.

The methods may include one or more of the following.'the performance of design reviews, the use of alternate calculations, or the performance of qualification tests.

This shall apply to original design and to changes to approved design output.

Where reverification is not required for a

design change the bases shall be documented by the design organization.

Cursory supervisory reviews and mathematical checks for calculation accuracy do not satisfy the independent design verification requirement.

Design verification shall normally be completed prior to; release of design output for procurement, manufacture or release by the design organization for use in design activities by a participating organization.

Verification shall be conducted based on the status of design at the time of release of design documents..Where this timing cannot be met, verification may be deferred provided that the unverified portion of the design output, and all design output documents, structures, systems and components based on the unverified portion of design are. identified and controlled.

In all cases verification shall be completed prior to relying on any affected items to perform their design functions.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TOR 3.8 FLORIOA POWER b LIGHT COMPANY DESIGN CONTROL 3

Date March 31 1981 Page 3.2.5 Computer Codes Organizations utilizing computer codes as a method for design shall maintain instructions or procedures to effect the following'.

1.

That such codes are verified for their particular use using benchmark

problems, alternate calculations, comparison with other code or experimental results, design review or similar methods, 2.

That such codes have been qualifi'ed for their specific application sufficient to ensure valid results, 3.

That such codes are provided with user instructions sufficient for a technically competent individual to follow, 4.

That configuration controls are provided to assure that such code changes or modifications are documented and controlled.

0

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 4.0 Rev.

FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTCONTROL Date March 31 1981 Page 4.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

't Procurement of items and services shall be performed in accordance with procedures which assure that applicable regulatory requirements, design bases, code requirements, and other requirements necessary to assure quality shall be included or invoked by reference in the procurement document. 'These procedures shall delineate the sequence of actions to be accomplished in the preparation,

review, approval, and control of procurement documents.

Changes to procurement documents shall be subjected to 'the same degree of control as utilized in the preparation of the original documents.

4a2 IMPLEMENTATION 4.2.1 Procurement Document Provisions Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions shall identify the responsibilities and actions required of the organizations originating, reviewing, approving, and controlling procurement documents.

These procedures shall require the procurement documents to specify:

a.

The scope of work to be performed.

b.

Technical requirements (by specifying or referencing) which shall include the applicable components and materials identification requirements, drawings, specifications, procedures, instructions, codes, and regulations and provide for identification of applicable

test, inspection and Ce acceptance requirements, or special process instructions.

QA Program requirements to be imposed on contractors which shall include the applicable portions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

d.

Right of access which provides, as appropriate, for access to contractor facilities and records for inspection or audit by FPL or its designated representative, and to access for events such as witness and hold points.-

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE. REPORT TQR 4.0 Rev.

FLORIOA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTCONTROL Date March 31 1981 Page 2

of 3

4.2.1 Procurement Document Provisions (Cont'd) e.

The documentation required to be

prepared, maintained, and/or submitted to FPL or its representative for review, approval, or historical record.

The time of submittal of this documentation and the retention and disposition. of quality assurance records which will not be delivered to FPL shall be prescribed.

4.2.2 Procurement Document Review Procurement documents shall be reviewed for correctness, and inspectability and controllability of quality requirements in accordance with Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions to assure that the appropriate provisions of Section 4.2.1 are included.

'Ibis review shall be documented and performed by designated technical and quality evaluators, and shall assure that the procurement document was prepared, reviewed and approved as required.

Procurement documents for the purchase of spare or replacement parts for safety related structures,

systems, and components are subject to controls equivalent to those used for the original equipment.

Changes to procurement documents, whether initiated by FPL or their representative, are subjected to the same degree of control as that utilized in the preparation of the original document.

4.2.3 Selection of Procurement Sources The Purchasing, Fuel Resources or Corporate Contracts Department, as applicable, shall verify that the procurement document has been reviewed and

approved, and that the supplier has been approved prior to issuing the purchase order for safety related materials or services.

Supplier approval is not necessary if the important characteristics of the item can be verified by inspection or test.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 4.0 1

PLORIOA POWER a LIGHt COMPANY PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL pate March 31, 1981 Page 4.Z.4 The overall procurement requirements including those related to planning, bid evaluation, and review and concurrence of suppliers QA programs are described in Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions.

I

0 0

0

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 5.0 FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY INSTRUCTIONSF PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS Date March 31, 1981 Page 5.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Activities affecting quality of-nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or., drawings.

These documents shall include appropriate quantitative criteria such as dimensions, tolerances, and operating

limits, and qualitative criteria such as comparative workmanship

samples, to assure that the quality assurance activity has been satisfactorily accomplished.

5.2 IMPLEMENTATION 5.2.1 Quality Assurance Program Documents The FPL, Quality Assurance Manual described in TQR 2.0 contains corporate Quality Procedures which comply with the criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

Quality Procedures and department level Quality Instructions

'provide direction for activities affecting quality.

The Quality Assurance Department reviews and comments on Quality Instructions written by other departments.

Comments concerning compliance with corporate QA commitments and requlatory requirements are resolved prior to issuance.

The Quality Assurance Department receives controlled copies of Quality Instructions issued by other departments.

During the

design, construction, and procurement

phases, the Architect/Engineer or other contractors may be delegated responsibility for maintaining, issuing and verifying the implementation of appropriate program documents.

In this

case, Quality Assurance Department audit and/or Construction Quality Control surveillance activities shall assure that such measures are established and implemented.

Contractor programs shall clearly delineate the actions to be accomplished in the preparation, review and

0 e

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 5.0 Rev.

FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY

, INSTRUC'IIONQ PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS Date March 31, 1981 Page 3

of 3

5.2.3 Drawings The design control and verification measures described in TQR 3.0 are applicable to review and approval of drawings.

Power Plant Engineering has ultimate responsibility for review and approval of drawings.

This department may delegate to other organizations the work of design and review activities, or any part thereof, but shall retain ultimate responsibility for this work.

During the operations

phase, Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions require that Power Plant Engineering shall review and approve all safety related plant modifications and revisions to as-built drawings.

5.2.4 Acceptance Criteria Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions require that quality related instructions, procedures, and drawings include adequate quantitative and qualitative acceptance criteria, as appropriate, for determining satisfactory work performance and quality compliance.

These acceptance criteria requirements apply to important activities such as design, operations, test control, inspection, and plant modifications.

0 0

0 O.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 6.0 FLORIOA POWER E LIGHT COMPAHY DOCUMENT CONTROL Date8eIttember 30 1980 Page 1

et 4

6.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The distribution of documents such as instructions, procedures, and drawings r

which provide guidance, specifications, or requirements affecting the quality of nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components shall be controlled.

These documents shall be prepared, reviewed for adequacy>

and approved for release by authorized personnel in the effected organization.

These documents shall be distributed to locations where the activity is performed.

Changes to controlled documents shall be so identified and shall be reviewed and approved by the same organization that performed the original review and approval unless otherwise specified in the implementing procedures.

In addition, procedures shall provide for coritrolling obsolete documents to preclude the r

possibility of use of outdated documents.

6.2 MPLEMENTATION 6.2.1 Responsibility Quality Procedures shall delineate the control measures for controlled documents including direction for the review for adequacy, approval by authorized personnel, distribution of controlled documents and verification that changes are promptly incorporated.

These control measures shall apply to documents affecting the quality of nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components such as:

a.

design specifications; b.

design, manufacturing, construction, and installation drawings; c.

quality'program manuals, procedures, and instructions;

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 6.0 FLOAIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPAIIY e

DOCUMENTCONTROL Date September 30 1980 Page 6.2.1 Responsibility (Cont'd) d.

inspection, manufacturing, and test procedures and instructions; e.

plant operating and maintenance procedures; f.

plant Safety Analysis Reports and related design criteria documents.

The requirements for control of procurement documents are, contained in TQR 4.0.

During all phases of the plant life, it shall be the responsibility of each organization issuing controlled documents to use document control procedures.

Procedures shall document the responsibility for review, approval, maintenance and distribution of documents, including coordination and control of documents which describe interface relationships.

During the design and construction phase and for operating plant changes under their cognizance, the Architect/Engineer, Nuclear Steam Supply System

vendor, and other contractors shall be responsible for assuring that all revisions required as a result of FPL

comments, nonconformances, or engineering work are incorporated into revised documents.

6.2.2 Distribution of Controlled Documents Quality Procedures shall specify that controlled documents and revisions be distributed to locations where the activity is performed.

6.2a3 Drawing Control During the design and construction

phase, the Power Plant Engineering Department shall be responsible for periodically issuing a master drawing list which includes, as a minimum, those drawings newly issued or revised since

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 6.0

Rev, fLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY DOCUMENTCONTROL Date3eRtember~30 1980 Page 6.2.3 Drawing Control (Cont'd) the last list was promulgated.

During the engineering and contruction phases of the

project, the Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor and the Architect/Engineer may be delegated the function of drawing control and shall furnish periodic status reports listing the latest revision of applicable documents which they issue, including drawings, instructions, and procedures.

During the operations phase, the Power Plant Engineering Department shall retain responsibility for review and approval of drawings, but 'the General Engineering Department shall be responsible for the control of plant drawings and drawing changes.

At plant sites, a system shall be established to provide ready access and availability of drawings.

6.2e4 Instruction and Procedure Control During the design and construction phase, the Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor and the Architect/Engineer shall be responsible for control of quality related instructions and procedures issued by them.

Selected contractor documents are reviewed by at least one or more of the following FPL departments, depending on the nature of the document:

a.

Quality Assurance b.

Plant Construction c.

Power Plant Engineering During all phases of plant life, the originating FPL department shall be responsible for establishing adequate control over quality related instructions and procedures issued by them.

The responsible organization shall also issue periodic status reports or revised indices listing the latest revision of applicable controlled documents issued by them.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 6.0 Rev.

FLORIOA POWER 6I LIGHT COMPANY DOCUMENTCONTROL Date September 30, 1980 I

Page 6.2.5 Obsolete Documents Controls established by Quality Procedures or Quality Instructions shall assure that outdated copies of controlled documents are not inadvertently used.

TOPlCAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 7.0 FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF PURCHASED ITEMS AND SERVICES Date March 31, 1981 Page 7.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Measures shall be established to assure that safety related items or services purchased by or for FPL conform to the requirements of the procurement document.

These measures shall include documented evidence of source selection, verification activities and examination of items or services to assure compliance with the procurement document.

The effectiveness of the control of quality by h

contractors and subcontractors shall be assessed at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity, and quantity of the product or service.

7.2 IMPLEMENTATION 7.2.1 Initial Evaluation of Suppliers Procurement source evaluation and selection measures shall be specified in Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions which shall identify the responsibility of qualified individuals for determining supplier capability. The evaluation may require integrated action involving Quality Assurance and one or more organizations (e.g.,

Engineering, Construction, Power Resources or Purchasing) based upon the item or service being procured.

This evaluation is to ensure that the FPL contractors comply with the applicable portions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

Documented evidence of the evaluation, and the acceptance of the contractor's quality program and procedures shall be retained in the Quality Assurance Department files.

The determination of supplier approval shall be based on such factors as prior performance, historical quality performance data, source surveys or audits, and evaluation of the supplier's. QA Program.

The basis shall be consistent with the importance, complexity, and quality required for the items or services involved.

0 0

0,

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TOR 7.0 Rev.

FI.OAIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF PURCHASED

'ITEMS AND SERVICES Date March 31, 1981

Page, 7.2.3 Receiving Inspection (Cont'd) e.

Measures for identifying, segregating, and handling nonconforming items; f.

Measures to ascertain that inspection records or Certificates of Conformance are available prior to release.

7.2.4 Supplier Furnished Records Records required to be furnished by the supplier are specified in the procurement document.

Certifications or documentation verifying conformance, provided by the supplier shall identify the specific procurement requirements met (either by reference to the purchase order or by delineation).

Such certification shall identify any procurement requirements mhich have not been met and pr'ovide a description of those nonconformances dispositioned "accept as'is" or "repair".

Control of procurement documents is described in TQR 4.0.

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQIt 3.0 FLORIOA POWER E LIGHT COMPANY IDENTIFICATIONAND CONTROL OF MATERXALSyPARTS, AND COMPONENTS Date January 3~31 76 Page I

oi Se1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Materials, parts, and components, including partially fabricated assemblies, shall be identified and controlled as required throughout fabrication,

storage, installation, construction,'nd use of the item.

The identification of the item shall be maintained by heat number, part number, serial number, or other suitable

means, and shall be physically marked on th'e item or on records traceable to the item.

The object of these controls shall be to prevent the use of incorrect or defective materials, parts, and components.

8e2 IMPLEMENTATION Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions shall establish the responsibilities and requirem ents for the identification and control of materials, parts and components.

The procedures and instructions shall assure that identification and control is maintained throughout fabrication,

receipt, handling, storage and installation of items.

Provisions include'.

ae

/

Requirements for traceability to appropriate documentation, such as:

procurement documents, manufacturing documents, drawings, specifications, inspection and test records, and nonconformance reports.

Controls to assure that the correct identification of an item is verified and documented prior to release for fabrication,

assembly, shipping or installation.

Ce d.

Requirements which assure that the method or location of markings do not affect the function or quality of an item.

Establishment of identification requirements by specifications,

drawings, procurement documents, instructions or procedures during initialplanning.

e FPL may delegate any portion of the implementation of the identification and control program to the Architect/Engineer, Constructor, Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor or other contractors.

If delegated, contracts shall require that the contractor establish an identification and control program which meets the requirements of this TQR.

0

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 9.0 FLORIOA POWER 8I LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES Date March 31, 1981 Page 1

of 3

9.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Measures shall be established to assure that special processes such as welding, heat treating, nondestructive examination, and nuclear cleaning are controlled and accomplished by qualified personnel using qualified procedures in accordance with ap'plicable

codes, standards, specifications,

criteria, and other special require ments.

9 2 IMPLEMENTATION The Power Plant Engineering Department shall assure that documents and procedures submitted for approval related to construction and modification of safety related items are properly reviewed to verify adequate identification of special processes and documentation requirements.

Special processes used during operations shall be the responsibility of the plant manager who shall assure that procedures and personnel are qualified.

9.2.1 Identification of Special Processes Special processes are those processes which must be qualified and controlled where quality is highly dependent on close control of process variables or operator

skiOs, and objective verification of end quality (inspection, examination or testing) is difficult.

As a further clarification, special processes identified as such by applicable codes and standards shall be controlled, qualified, and implemented in accordance with those codes and standards.

Examples of special processes include (but are not limited to) welding, heat

treating, nondestructive examination, and special nuclear cleaning.

Flushing, protective coating and plating applications should be reviewed to determine if they are special processes.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 9.0 Rev.

3 Z

FLORIOA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES pate. March 31, 1981 Page 2

et 3

9.2.Z Procedure Qualification and Control Quality Procedures specify that written process control procedures shall be used and qualified as required by 'applicable specifications,

codes, or standards.

Where FPL assigns work to outside contractors, the contractors shall make their procedures and personnel qualifications available to FPL prior to the start of work. The Architect/Engineer, Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor, or other organization designated by FPL shall be responsible for.the evaluation and acceptance of on-site contractor special process procedures, and shall interface with the appropriate FPL department, as necessary, to resolve review comments with the contractor.

The contractor shall also be responsible for the control and approval of sub-contractor procedures.

The review of special process procedures used during construction shall be coordinated by the Plant Construction personnel assigned to the construction site.

9.2.3 Personnel Qualification and Certification Procedures or instructions shall specify personnel qualification/certification requirements.

Personnel responsible for the performance and verification of special processes shall be

trained, tested, and certified as required by applicable specifications, codes and standards.

Requirements for the period of certification, retesting, and recertification of personnel shall also be specified.

Contractors shall quali fy personnel and maintain records of qualified personnel in accordance with applicable

codes, standards, specifications, and contract or procurement document requirements.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 9.0 FLOIIIOAPOWEA a LIGHF COMPANY CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES Date March 31, 1981 Page 9.2.3 Personnel Qualification and Certification (Cont'd)

During construction, the Plant Construction personnel, which includes the Construction QC personnel, shall be responsible for'the certification or qualification, as appropriate, of personnel performing special processes; and to control, maintain and calibrate equipment used for special processes.

The QA Department is responsible to assure, by audit, that current records are maintained on-site for work perform'ed by or for FPL.

During operations, the plant manager or his designee shall be responsible for these records.

9.2.4 Special Process Records Records shall provide objective evidence that special processes were performed in compliance with approved procedures by qualified personnel, and that when required by procedures, specifications, and codes, such performance was verified.

Results of nondestructive examinations shall be recorded in accordance with applicable specifications, codes and standards.

These records shall be retained by the vendor or supplied to FPL as required by contract or purchase orders.

If records are to be retained by the vendor, the contract or purchase order shall specify the retention period and instructions for final disposition of such records.

During construction, the Construction Quality Control organization is responsible for the review of nondestructive examination documents for acceptance, and for assuring that documents for special processes utilized during construction are properly collected,

reviewed, accepted and transmitted for,retention.

During operations, the plant manager is responsible for the review and retention of records.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIOA POWER

@ LIGHT COMP*NY INSPECTION March 31, 1981 Page ~of~

10.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.

A program for inspection shall be established and executed by or for FPL to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for accomplishing an activity. Such inspections shall be performed by individuals or groups other than those who performed the activity being inspected.

Examinations, measurements, and tests of materials or products processed shall be performed for each work operation, where necessary, to assure conformance to established requirements.

If direct inspection of processed materials or products is impossible or disadvantageous, indirect control by,monitoring shall be provided.

Mandatory inspection, witness, or hold points beyond which work shall not proceed without the consent of FPL or a designated representative shall be indicated in the appropriate documents.

10 2 IMPLEMENTATION 10.2.1 Inspection Responsibilities During the construction

phase, a

program for on-site inspection of construction activities affecting quality shall be established and executed by the Construction Department to ensure conformance with documented instructions, procedures and drawings.

During this phase, the Construction Department may delegate the establishment and execution of this program to a contractor or other designated FPL representative, but shall retain ultimate responsibility for the program.

In all

cases, the personnel performing the inspection shall be independent of the group performing the work.

The Construction Department shall also be responsible for performing receiving and, process verification inspections.

The System Protection Department shall perform inspections of equipment within their purview during operations.

Inspections shall be performed in accordance with approved, written procedures by qualified personnel.

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR FLORIDA POWER Te LIGHT COMPANY INSPECTION Date March 31, 1981 Page ~ef~

10.2.1 Inspection Responsibilities (Cont'd)

During the operations

phase, a program for on-site inspection of activities affecting quality shall be established by the Power Resources Department.

Power Resources shall perform inspections, surveillance, and monitoring of.

plant activities during operational and start-up testing, and plant operations as required by established

plans, schedules, and/or procedure's inspection, witness, or hold points.

In all cases, the personnel performing the inspection shall be independent of the group performing the work.

Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions shall be written which delineate the requirements and responsibilities for the performance of inspections.

10.2.2 Inspection Plans and Schedules Documented inspection plans may be either a separate'ocument or an integral part of work instruction documents.

The plans shall be based on design specifications, procurement documents,

drawings, other specifications, or previous experience, as appropriate.

Inspections shall be scheduled to assure that sufficient time and resources are available, and to assure inspections are not inadvertently omitted or bypassed.

10.2.3 Inspec tion Personnel a.

Inspections shall be performed by individuals other than those who performed or directly supervised the activity being inspected.

Inspection personnel shall be qualified and certified in accordance with appropriate

codes, standards, and/or company training programs.

Qualifications and certifications shall be kept current.

b.

Prior to performing inspections, inspection personnel shall have access to the

drawings, procedures, specifications, or other documented criteria necessary for performance of the inspection.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT FLORIOA POWER Ea LIGHT COMPAIIY INSPECTION pate March 31, 1981 Page ~af 4 10.2a4 Inspection Procedures a.

Required inspection, surveillance, or monitoring activities shall be performed and documented according to written, approved instructions or procedures.

Inspection procedures, instructions, or checklists shall contain the following:

o Identification of characteristics to be inspected.

o Identification of the individual or groups responsible for performing the inspection.

o Acceptance criteria.

o A description of the method of inspection.

o Verification of completion and,certification of inspection.

o A record of the results of the inspection.

b.

During the operations phase, inspection procedures shall be reviewed by QC personnel to determine the need for an independent inspection and the degree and method if such an inspection is required, and to assure the identification of inspection personnel and the documentation of inspection results.

For procedure review requirements see TQR 5.0.

c.

Written approved instructions shall specify surveillance or monitoring of processing

methods, or testing and operation of equipment when inspection is impossible, inaccessible or not applicable.

d.

Modification, repair, replacement or rework items shall be inspected in accordance with original inspection requirements or acceptable alternatives.

TOPICAL QUALlTYASSURANCE REPORT PLORIOA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY INSPECTION Date March 31> 1981 Page ~af 4 10.2e5 Inspection, Witness, and Hold Point Identification Appropriate inspection,

witness, or hold points shall appear in process documents (e.g.,

construction,

testing, operating and maintenance procedures).

These process procedures are subject to the review of the appropriate Quality Control organization for adequacy of inspection, witness, and hold points.

Mandatory hold points shall be used when witnessing and inspecting must be performed and signed-off by the responsible personnel before work can proceed.

FPL shall indicate FPL witness or hold points applicable during the manufacture of an item in procurement documents.

A distinction shall be made between witness points and mandatory hold points.

~ \\

~

~

~

~ ~

0

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~

II

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

II

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~ ~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~ ~ ~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~ '

~

~ ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ II

~

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 11.0 PLORIOA POWER b LIGHT COMPANY TEST CONTROL Rev.

0 Date January 23 1976 Page 2

of 3

11.2.2 Test Procedure Preparation and Test Performance Testing shall be accomplished in accordance with written approved test procedures which incorporate or reference the requirements and acceptance limits in the applicable design and procurement documents.

The test procedure or test program documents shall include the following as a

minimum:

a.

Instructions for the testing method used; b.

Required test equipment and instrumentation',

c.

Test requirements and acceptance criteria; d.

Hold, witness, inspection and data collection points; e.

Test prerequisites such as:

calibrated instrumentation;

trained, qualified, and licensed or certified personnel; preparation, condition and completeness of.item to be tested; suitable and controlled environmental conditions.

f.

Methods for documenting or recording test data and results',

g.

Provisions for data collection.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 11.0 Rev.

0 FLORIOA POWER 4 LIGHT COMPAIIY TEST CONTROL Date January 23 1976 Page.

3 of 3

11.2.3 Evaluation of Test Results The documented test results shall be evaluated against the predetermined acceptance criteria by a

group or individual having appropriate quali'fications.

The acceptance status of the test shall be documented.

Deficiencies noted during the evaluation shall be documented and dispositioned in accordance'ith approved Quality Procedures or Quality Instructions.

The evaluation of the test results may be delegated to other organizations;

however, FPL shall retain the responsibility for the evaluation.

The evaluating organization shall be required to use qualified personnel, evaluate the data against predetermined criteria, and document the results of the evaluation and. acceptance status of the test.

0 0

TOPICAI QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 12.0 FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Date March 31, 1981 Page 12 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Tools, gauges, and other measuring and testing equipment used as the basis for acceptance in activities affecting quality shall be properly controlled, periodically calibrated, and adjusted to assure that accuracy is maintained. within limits necessary to verify that design requirements have been met.

It is the responsibility of each department maintaining calibrated instruments to provide for the calibration and control of such instruments.

12.2 IMPLEMENTATION 12.2.1 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Procedures shall be written to delineate the methods and responsibilities for the control, maintenance, and calibration of measuring and test equipment (M8cTE).

M8I:TE control procedures or calibration program documents shall contain the following'.

a.

A listing of M8cTE to be controlled; b., Frequency of calibration of listed M8I:TE.

The frequency may be based, on calendar time or relate to usage, and be based on such factors as experience, inherent stability, instrument purpose, or accuracy required; c.

A method for controlling issue and recall of portable M8cTE; d.

A method to identify controlled M8cTE (e.g.,

labeling) required calibration frequency and calibration test data applicable to the M8TTE; e.

Method to document and maintain the status of M8cTE.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 12.0 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Date March 31, 1981 Page 12.2.1 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment (Cont'd)

FPL may delegate the control and/or calibration of MRTE to other organizations.

FPL, however, retains ultimate responsibility for control and, calibration, and the contractor shall meet the requirements of this TQR or an acceptable alternative program as required by the procurement document for the contracted ser'vices.

12.2.2 Calibration Procedure MhTE shall be calibrated in accordance with written approved procedures.

The calibration procedures shall contain, as a minimum:

a.

Identity of MhTE to which the procedure applies; b.

Calibration equipment and reference standards to be used; c.

Acceptance criteria',

d.

Sequence of operations and special instructions; e.

Documentation and data collection requirements; f.

A requirement that M8cTE be checked and results recorded before adjustments or repairs are made; g.

Calibration frequency required.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 12.0 PLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Date March 31, 1981 Page 12.2.3 Calibration Standards M8tTE shall be calibrated using reference standards whose calibration has a known, documented, valid relationship to nationally recognized standards or accepted values of natural physical constants.

If no national standard exists, the basis for calibration shall be documented.

Standards and reference standards shall have an accuracy

level, range and stability which are adequate to verify that the equipment being calibrated is within tolerance and adequate for the programmatic requirements of the equipment being calibrated.

M8TTE shall be calibrated against reference standards having'tolerances not greater than one fourth (1/4) the tolerance of the M8LTE. Tolerances gre'ater than 1/4 willbe acceptable when limited by the statemf-the art. Reference standards shall be calibrated against higher level reference standards of closer tolerance.

The'eaning of this paragraph may be diagrammed as follows:

NBS/LAB "greater than" tolerance PRIMARY STANDARD (if applicable)

"greater than" tolerance SECONDARY STANDARD (if applicable)

"greater than" tolerance WORKING STANDARD "1:4 ratio" tolerance M8I.TE (installed instruments, measuring equipment used for inspection and maintenance, etc.)

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 12.0 FLOIIIOA POWER b LIGHT COMPANY CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Date March 31, 1981 Page 12.2.3 Calibration Standards (Cont'd)

For projects with limited work authorizations for construction and for plants with operating licenses prior to May, 1976> reference standards shall have a maximum error equal to or less than that required of the M8cTE.

'The accuracies of M%TE and reference standards shall be chosen such that the equipment being calibrated can be calibrated and maintained within the required tolerances.

12.2.4 HOut of Tolerance" Control MhTE and reference standards, when found out of tolerance, shall be so identified and removed from service.

An investigation shall be conducted to determine the validity of previous inspection or test results gained through use of the instrument, and of the acceptability of items previously inspected or tested.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 13.0 Rev.

FLOIIIOA POWER T LIGHT COMPANY HANDLING,STORAGE AND SHIPPING Date Sefftember~30 1980 Pace 1

of 3

13 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Written instructions or procedures shall be established and implemented for the

cleaning, shipping, storage, preservation, packaging, and handling of specified items.

These instructions and procedures shall delineate measures which prevent degrading an item through damage or deterioration.

When necessary for particular

products, special protectiv'e environments such as inert gas atmosphere, specific moisture content levels, and temperature levels shall be specified and provided.

13 2 IMPLEMENTATION 13.2.1 General Instructions or procedures shaH be written to define the requirements and responsibilities for the cleaning, packaging, preservation, handling, storage, and shipping of equipment and material, and shall require implementation of the established design and specification requirements by personnel having appropriate qqali fications.

FPL may delegate any portion of the responsibility for handling, storage and shipping of material and equipment, but shaH retain ultimate responsibility.

Where any of the functions in the section. which follow is delegated to a contractor, the contractor shall be required to adhere to the FPL requirements stated herein.

During the operations

phase, consideration shall be giv'en to the need for special requirements in the preparation and review of procurement documents (see TQR 4.0).

Procedures and instructions shall be prepared and implemented for special on-site handling or storage requirements.

The receiving department shall be responsible for on-site implementation of the special handling, shipping, and storage requirements for items received and controlled by their organization.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 13.0 FLORIOA POWER b LIGHT COMPANY HANDIJNG, STORAGE AND SHIPPING Date September~30 1 80 Ql Page 13.2.2 Establishment of Handling, Storage, and Shipping Requirements Special handling, preservation,

storage, cleaning, packaging, and shipping requirements shall be specified, as appropriate, in the design documents or purchase orders.

The requirements established in the design documents or purchase orders shall be consistent with industry accepted standards, the importance of equipment or material to nuclear'afety, and the material or equipment's sensitivity to damage.

The preparation of these design documents or purchase orders may be delegated by FPL to other organizations.

The preparation and control of design documents and purchase orders is described in TQR 3.0 and 4.0.

13.2.3 Handling, Storage, and Shipping Procedures Materials and equipment which are to be incorporated into a safety related system of a nuclear power plant shall be handled,

stored, and shipped in accordance with written procedures, where necessary, to implement the design document and purchase order requirements.

These procedures shall assure that cleaning, handling, storing, packaging, shipping, and preserving materials, components and systems will preclude

damage, loss, or deterioration by environmental conditions, such as temperature or humidity.

The preparation and/or implementation of these procedures may be delegated to other organizations, but FPL shall retain the ultimate responsibility for proper material handling, storage, and shipping.

13.2.4 r

Verification of Proper Handling, Storage, and Shipping.

The Quality Assurance Department shall be responsible for verification of proper

handhng, storage and shipping at vendor facilities and on the construction site during the construction phase.

Power Resources and the QA Department shall be responsible for verification of proper handling, storage, and shipping at the plant during the operations phase.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 14.0 FLORIDA POWER El LIGHT COMPANY INSPEC'IXON, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS Rev.

1 D'ataSegtember 30 1980 Page 14.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Measures shall be established to indicate by the use of markings such as stamps, tags, labels, routing cards or other suitable means, the status of inspections and tests performed on material, equipment, or systems during the construction and operations phases of nuclear power plants.

These measures shall provide for the identification of items which have satisfactorily passed required inspections and tests.

Measures shall also be established for indicating the operating status of structures, systems and components to prevent inadvertent operations.

a 14 2 IMPLEMENTATION 14.2.1 General During the construction phase, the Construction Department is responsible for establishment and maintenance of a suitable system for identifying the inspection, test, and operating status of materials, equipment, systems, and components.

The system shall be established, implemented and maintained in accordance with written Quahty Procedures.and Quality Instructions.

The Architect/Engineer or Constructor shall develop and implement procedures to comply with contractual responsibilities, and applicable codes, standards, specifications, and criteria governing the status identification of procurement items being

tested, installed, or fabricated.

The Architect/Engineer (where applicable),

suppliers and contractors shall be required to maintain a system for identifying the inspection, test and processing status of materials, parts, and components.

Elements of this system require that suppliers and contractors have a

controlled manufacturing and test operation in order to preclude the inadvertent bypassing of processing, inspections or test, and to provide a positive identification of component status throughout all phases of manufacturing,

testing, and inspecting, by means of tagging, routing

cards, stamping, manufacturing or test reports, labeling or other appropriate methods.

~ '

~

0

~ ~

0

~

~ '

I

~

~ '

~

1

~

~ ~

~

0 Ii I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

a 5

~.

~.

II

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ -

~ -

~

~

~

~ -

~.

I~-

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

II ~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~I

~

~I I ~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

I ~

~I,

~

~

~

~

~

~

4

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I II ~

~

~

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 15.0 Rev; a

FLORIOA POWER Ea LIGHT COMPANY NONCONFORMING MATERIALSF PARTS OR COMPONENTS D.ataSeptember~30 I 80 Page 15.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Measures shall be established to control materials, parts, or components which do not conform to requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use or installation..

These measures shall

include, as appropriate, procedures for identification,'o curn entation, segregation, disposition, and notification to affected organizations.

Nonconforming items shall be reviewed and accepted, rejected, repaired or reworked in accordance with documented procedures.

15.2 IMPLEMENTATION 15.2.1 Program Quality Procedures and Quahty Instructions shall define the responsibilities and methods for identifying, documenting, segregating and dispositioning nonconforming items.

For procedure review, requirements, see TQR 5.0.

Each department shall be responsible for the identification, control, and disposition of nonconformances within the scope of their departmental responsibilities.

Throughout plant life, FPL may delegate any portion of the identification and control of nonconforming items and services to an Architect/Engineer (A/E), constructor, NSSS vendor or other contractors.

In any case, FPL retains the responsibility for assuring that requirements are met, and shall assure that the contractor's actions conform to requirements set by FPL.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 15.0 Rev.

FLORIOA POWER d LIGHT COMPANY NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS Date September 30, 1980 Page 15.2.2 Documenting and Controlling Nonconformances All nonconformances in safety related items shall be documented and reported for corrective action.

Measures shall be delineated in Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions which control further processing, installation, or operation of nonconforming items.

These measures shall include:

a.

Physical identification of the item as nonconforming.

b.

Segregation of nonconforming items until properly dispositioned.

Where physical segregation is not practical, suitable

tags, marking and documentation shall be used to assure control.

15.2.3 Documentation Documentation of the nonconforming item shall: identify the item; describe the nonconformance'show disposition of the nonconformance and inspection requirements; and include the signature of the person approving the disposition.

15.2.4 Evaluation and Disposition The FPL Power Plant Engineering Department shall assure that engineering evaluations of nonconformances are performed, as necessary, and shall selectively review engineering evaluations and dispositions developed by contractor engineering organizations.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT FLORIDA POWER El LIGHT COMPANY NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS Date Se~teteber~gp 1

p Page 3

of~

15.2e4 Evaluation and Disposition (Cont'd)

An evaluation to determine the disposition of nonconforming items shall be performed.

The evaluation shall determine whether an item is to be accepted as-is, repaired, reworked, or rejected.

A technical evaluation shall

. be performed when an item is accepted as-is or is repaired to an acceptable condition.

Records of the disposition of these items shall be made part of the nonconformance report.

This evaluation shall assure that the final condition does not adversely effect safety, operability or maintainability of the item, or of the component or system in which it is installed.

The A/E, or other contractors on-site, shall be required to inform the FPL Construction or Power Resources Department prior to use or installation of a nonconforming item.

The nature and extent of a nonconformance and the reason for proposing its use or installation shall be justified. Nonconforming items dispositioned "accept as-is", or repaired to an acceptable condition, shall be so identified.

Nonconformance reports for those items shall be made part of the item records and forwarded with the material to FPL.

The determination of the need and the advisability of releasing nonconforming materials or items, is made by the Power Plant Engineering,

~

Construction, or Power Resources Departments.

The following factors may be appropriate considerations in making this determination:

a.

Effect on the orderly progress of work if material or items are released; b.

Safety of personnel; c.

Suitability of material or items in "as-is" condition, i.e., probability of eventual satisfactory resolution of the nonconformance without repair, rework, or replacement;

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 15.0 PLORIDA POWER Ea LIGHE COMPANY NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS Date September 30 1980 Page 4

of 4 15.2.4 Evaluation and Disposition (Cont'd) d.

Accessibility of material or items after release; e.

Cost of removal and repair of replacement should material or items eventually have to be removed, repaired, or replaced; 0

f.

Impact: on plant safety.

Items shall be reworked or repaired in accordance with documented procedures and shall be verified by reinspecting the item as originally inspected or by a documented method which is at least equal to the original inspection method.

Quality Assurance or Quality Control personnel shall periodically review nonconformance reports to identify quality trends.

The results of these analyses shall be reviewed with appropriate members of upper level m anagem ent.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 16.0 PLORIOA POWER I LIGHT COMPANY CORRECTWE ACTION pa)e September 30, 1980 Page 16.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Documented measures shall be used to assure that conditions adverse to quality such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances, are promptly identified and corrected as soon as practicable.

In the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the condition shall be determined and action taken to preclude repetition.

The identification of significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the condition, and the corrective action taken shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management.

16.2 IMPLEMENTATION 16.2.1 Corrective Action and Follow-Up Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions shall define responsibilities and methods for identifying and correcting conditions adverse to quality. When an adverse condition is

detected, a determination shall be made by plant supervision, Quality Control, or Quality Assurance personnel as to whether immediate or routine corrective action is required.

ao "Immediate Corrective Action" applies to conditions which pose a threat to plant safety or to the health and safety of the public, which could result in major equipment and material

damage, or could, if not corrected, produce defects of significantly greater consequences than those immediately resulting from the condition.

"Immediate Corrective Action" is

- accomplished through 'top-work requests/orders to appropriate levels of management, requiring that work be stopped, the plant be shut down or other appropriate actions be taken.

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 16.0 FLOAIOA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPAIIY CORRECTOTE ACTION Date September 30, 1980 Page 2

of 3

16.2ol Corrective Action and Follow-Up (Cont'd) b.

"Routine Corrective Action" applies to conditions which do not require immediate corrective action.

Routine corrective action is assured through the distribution and disposition associated with inspection reports, surveillance reports, nonconformance reports, and audit reports; and the investigation analysis and action associated with reportable conditions.

Follow-up to verify implementation of corrective action and close-out of corrective action documentation is accomplished by the QA or QC organization responsible for verifying the corrective action.

The Quality Assurance Department shall

track, follow-up, and closeout open items identified by QA Department audits and vendor surveillances, and shall assure the tracking of unresolved items and violations identified by NRC inspections.

Each department shall be responsible for follows and closeout of corrective action resulting from their departmental inspections, tests, or operations.

If corrective action is inadequate or not timely, the follow-up organization shall request corrective action from management, as delineated in procedures.

The Quality Assurance Committee is the final authority in the event that agreement is not reached at lower levels regarding stop work requests or other corrective action.

Where corrective action is required of contractor personnel, FPL shall define in procedures and contracts the corrective action interface between FPL and the contractor.

FPL shall require the A/E, NSSS vendor, constructor and other suppliers of safety related materials and services to have a documented corrective action system.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 16.0 FLORIOA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY CORRECTXVE ACTION Date September 30, 1980 Page 16.2.2 Recurrence Control It is the responsibility of the organization which identifies the condition adverse to quality (i.e., issues the NCR, Deficiency Report, audit report) to verify that corrective action not only, corrects the immediate condition, but also prevents the condition from recurring.

The organization(s) that provide(s) the corrective action disposition is responsible to assure that the corrective action taken not only corrects the immediate condition, but also prevents the adverse condition from recurring.

16.2.3 Incidents and Reportable Occurrences Reporting During construction, significant deficiencies shall be documented as to cause and corrective

action, and shall be reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and FPL management as required by 10CFR50.55(e).

In all cases when a determination is made that an item is reportable, the NRC will be notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after, that determination and by written report within 30 days.

Operating Reportable Occurrences and reports of incidents shall be investigated, documented as to cause and corrective action, and reported to the NRC in accordance with the applicable plant Technical Specifications.

Reportable Occurrences and reports of incidents that result in damage or are otherwise safety related, shall be forwarded to the Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB) for review.

Conditions adverse to quality are reported to operating plant management through:

distribution of QA audit reports, QC inspection

reports, corrective action

requests, and the investigation and reporting of Reportable Occurrences in accordance with plant Technical Speci fications.

0 0

0

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 17.0 FLOIIIOA POWTTI e LIGHT COMPANY QUAL'HVASSURANCE RECORDS Date January 23> 1976 Page 17.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish documented evidence of the quality of safety related structures,

systems, and components, and of activities affecting their quality.

The records shall include, as appropriate, data such as qualifications of personnel, procedures, and equipment; and other documentation such as inspection or test acceptance criteria, and the action taken in connection with deficiencies noted during inspection.

The records required to furnish documentary evidence of quality, herein called quality assurance records, shall be identifiable and retrievable.

These records shall be maintained in facilities that provide a suitable environment to minimize deterioration or damage and to prevent loss.

The requirements and responsibilities for quality assurance record

control, transmittal, retention, and maintenance shall be established and documented.

These record requirements shall be consistent with applicable

design, manufacturing, and installation codes and standards, and with procurement document requirements.

17.2 IMPLEMENTATION 17.2.1 Records Identification Quality Procedures shall define the quality assurance records necessary to furnish documentary evidence of the quality of safety related structures,

systems, and components; and 'activities affecting quality.

These records shall include plant operating logs; results of design reviews, inspections, tests, audits, and material analyses; qualification of personnel, procedures, and equipment; design records such as drawings and specifications',

procurement documents; calibration records; and nonconformance or

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 17.0 FLOIIIOA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY QUALXTFASSURANCE RECORDS Date January 23 1976 I Page 17.2.1 Records Identification (Cont'd) corrective action reports.

As a minimum, inspection and test records shall identify:

a.

Inspector or data recorder; e

b.

Method or type of observations; c.

Test or inspection results; d.

Statement of acceptability,'.

Date of observation; and f.

Deficiencies and nonconformances, and the action taken in connection with these deficient conditions, either by inclusion or by reference to other documents.

17.2.2 Responsibilities Responsibilities shall be established and documented for the

control, transfer, maintenance, and retention of quality assurance records.

Quality Procedures shall provide guidance for determining the retention requirements of quality assurance records.

Each organization responsible for the conduct of a quality activity shall be responsible for the maintenance of the subsequent quality assurance records unless retention responsibilities have been transferred by a prearranged agreeme'nt.

In any

case, the organization initiating the quality assurance records shall be responsible for their validity and approval.

a TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 17 0 FLORIDA POWER Ea LIGHT COMPANY QUAIZTYASSURANCE RECORDS Date Page ~ef~

17.2e3 Retrieval Quality Procedures shall require that quality assurance records submitted for retention be legible, completely filled out, and adequately identifiable and retrievable for each item.

The records shall be filed in the storage area or facility using a documented system to provide retrievability.

Quality Procedures additionally require control of corrections and supplements issued for quality assurance records that are previously approved and filed, and that documen'ted methods for control and accountability of records removed from the storage area be instituted.

17.2e4 Storage Specified in the Quality Procedures are the construction features and location requirements for record storage facilities which assure that quality assurance records are protected from possible destruction by causes such as

fire, flooding,

theft, tornadoes,.

insects, rodents, and from possible deterioration by a combination of extreme variations in temperature and humidity.

Specific instructions regarding the storage area are given for special records and for temporary storage facilities.

17.2e5 Records Transfer The requirements for transfer of records are specified in Quality Procedures or Quality Instructions which require verifying the completeness of quality assurance records transf erred from external organizations to the FPL department responsible for receipt and acceptance of the record.

The organizations responsible for turnover, and the FPL departments responsible for acceptance of quality assurance records shall be specified in writing.

TOPICAL OUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 17.0 Rev.

0 FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY QUALITYASSURANCE RECORDS Date January 2~31 76 Page 4

of~

17'2.5 Records Trans fer (Cont'd)

Contractors and suppliers that retain quality assurance records at their facilities as required by codes, standards, or contract requirements, shall transfer these records to FPL at the end of the required retention period unless otherwise authorized by written instructions from FPL.

Fabrication and construction documentation originated for FPL by contractors shall be available at the construction site, or as specified by contract or procurement documents.

When records are located at facilities remote from the site, an index or log shall be maintained at the site to identify these records and their location.

Unless otherwise specified in writing, quality assurance records maintained by a manufacturer shall be accessible to FPL for the life of the items involved or until turnover of these records to FPL at the end of the required retention period.

TOPICAL"QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 18.0 Rev.

2 fLORIOA POWTA 6 LIGHT COMPANY AUDITS pate June 30, 1977 Page 18.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits shall be carried out to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program and to determine the effectiveness of the program.

The audits shall be performed in accordance with the written procedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel not having direct responsibilities in the areas being audited.

Audit results shall be documented and reviewed by management having responsibility in the area audited. Follows action, including reaudit of deficient areas, shall be taken, where necessary.

18.2 IMPLEMENTATION A comprehensive program of audits is carried out by the Quality Assurance Department during the design, procurement, construction, and operations phase of nuclear power plants.

These audits are performed to verify that all safety related activities associated with nuclear power plants are carried out in accordance with the requirements of the FPL QA Program, and that the implementation is effective.

18.2.1 Personnel Quality Procedures provide instructions for the training of QA Department personnel who perform audit activities, to assure that they are adequately indoctrinated and trained, and that they are qualified to carry out these activities.

Quality Procedures provide for personnel qualified as Principal Auditors to be formally certified by Quality Assurance Department management.

Certification shall be based on education, experience, training and other specified criteria.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 18.0 Rev.

FLORIOA POWEII b LIGHT COMPANY AUDITS Date June 30, 1977 Page 18.2.2 Planning and Scheduling Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions provide requirements for written audit plans and schedules.

The audits are, planned and scheduled on the basis of the following requirements, as appropriate:

t a.

Activities shall be audited as early in their life as practicable.

Auditing shall be initiated early enough to assure effective quality assurance during the design, procurement and contracting activities.

t b.

Applicable elements of the internal and on-site 'programs shall be audited at least once every two years or once within the life of a quality related activity, whichever is shorter.

c.

An annual evaluation of suppliers'uality performance history shall be performed to determine reaudit requirements.

Reaudit requirements for suppliers shall be based on the supplier's quality performance and the complexity and criticality of the equipment or service being procured.

d.

Audits shall be regularly scheduled for on~oing activities.

e.

Regularly scheduled audits shall be supplemented, as required to cover unforeseen events or changes in requirements.

The scope of audit activities shall include, as a minimum:

a.

The determination of site features which affect plant safety (e.g., core sampling, site preparation, and meteorology).

b.

The preparation, review, approval, and control of the SAR, designs, specifications, procurement documents, instructions, procedures, and drawings.

TOPICAL OUALITYASSURANCE REPORT,,

Rev.

2 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPAIIY AUDITS Date June 30a ~177 Page 3

of tt 18.2.2 Planning and Scheduling (Cont'd) c.

Request for proposals and evaluation of bids.

d.

Indoctrination and training programs.

e.

Receiving and plant inspections.

f.

Operation, maintenance, modification, and repair controls.

g.

The implementation of operating and test procedures.

h.

Allcriteria in Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.

i.

Preplanned sample verification of the validity of Certificates of t

Conform ance.

External audits shall be performed by the Quality Assurance Department on Architect/Engineers, NSSS

vendors, constructors, and other suppliers of safety related materials and services to evaluate their QA programs, procedures and activities.

Procurement documents require that FPL suppliers and contractors in turn perform audits on their sub-tier suppliers and contractors.

18.2e3 Conduct of Audits Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions shall delineate requirements for the conduct of audits. These procedures and instructions shall require that:

a.

Audits be conducted by trained and qualified personnel.

b.

Personnel conducting audits shall not have direct responsibility in the area audited.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 18.0 FLORIOA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AUDITS Date June 30, 1977 Page 4

of 5

18.2.3 Conduct of Audits (Cont'd) c.

Checklists or procedures shall be used to ensure depth and continuity of audits.

d.

Objective evidence shall be examined for compliance with quality assurance program requirements.

This shall include examination of procedures and activities to assure that documented objective evidence is meaningful and in compliance with the overall Quality Assurance Program.

e.

Audits shall include evaluation of work areas, activities, processes and items; and the review of documents and records.

18.2e4 Reporting of Audit Findings Audit findings shall be documented in written reports.

Audit, reports shall be distributed to the responsible management of the audited FPL organization within thirty calendar days after completion of the audit.

18.2a 5 Follow-up Responsible management of the audited organization shall take action to correct the deficiencies identified in the audit report and provide a written response within thirty calendar days after receipt of the report.

This response shall include action taken and/or planned to correct deficiencies and to prevent recurrence of the deficiencies, and commitment dates for actions not yet complete.

The mechanism for evaluation and follow-up of

.corrective action is described in TQR 16.0.

The status of correction of deficiencies shall be followed until the corrective actions have been

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT TQR 18.0 FLORIOA POWER Ey LIGHt COMPANY AUDITS Date June 30> 1977 Page 18.2.5 Follow-Up (Cont'd) accomplished.

Vhen implementation of corrective action cannot be verified by other

means, a

reaudit of deficient areas shall be performed to accomplish verification.

18.2.6 Reports to Management y

Quality Assurance Program status reports are periodically prepared by the QA Department and routed to the members of the QA Committee for their review.

This status report summarizes the results of QA Department audit activities for the period, keeps all Committee members apprised of current conditions and program effectiveness, and when necessary, directs management attention to significant trends and problems.

0

OSMMSAMOt MMOOAAO O<<lf EACCMITVEOffKCO VICE t<<EMOC>>T CC>>tlMATC EEAVKES co>>'ANYMvcafM ACVKMSOAAO CWw VtAA Ees ~

T>>k CWCes t<<e A<<M VItow laa, M<<owVSao. Iles la>>

0 V M>>a<<A>><<>>

fefasa M<<,

CltAao EM.

tW<<WM la<<>> M<<e<<>>owM CMAMACTMMM<<<<

Ce<<oo<<M IISO VKC TAEOCCMT AOVSTC ~ TICK o

v C>>s<<w>>M A>>o>>

ea>>aer Mo>>

OVAEITVASM A>>CC COW%TEES Caow>> Ewwa Vt Weo Vt Vl's>><< ll>>e<<o>>

VfAe Ss ~ T<<A o

ol el>>ao AIM>>

vt Em t>>

aler ~

CMM 4

olf>>ew>>MW VttMlI<<MOot Cao.

M<<al<<VSofar Ao<<MM VfEUEL ACR

~ CCMI'. OCV, VKC<<AEL

~ IKA

~AOA MET. A>>O COOET VICEMCMOCMT CYSTC M ICAMWIIO VICE f<<C CISE MT Ot

~os>>A t ecol>>KEC O<<M>><<C>>

Cw>>M A Meow<<M>> IMs AIAaa>>s<<

Ca wo t>>ssc>>

TOPICALQOAI.ITYATSVRANCE RfPORT ACED A OOOAMSTAnoMot OCTARnECMTS Aft CCTI>>4OUACCIV t<<etl T

t M I

E I

cleat>> Mo<<<<wear so E

~

ll>>solV>>M>>e>> oea I

I a.

J E

E I

I Else>>I w<<wwroo so E

MM<> <<es.

I I

ta>> Mer.tft

~

e i

~

~

~ ~

0

~

~

I

~

~

~ '

~

I

~

~

~

~

o

~

I' I

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Appendix A E

FLORIDA POWER Fa LIGHT COMPANY PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERFACE Figure 1-3 Data

.March 31 1981 Page Preafdent Taacvllre Vtce Preanfen t Vice Ncaident Ady. Sye. dt Tech.

VP ~ hrtfr., Prvj.

MILdt Corlat.

OA Committee Oir actor of ProjK la Dtrector Nvr4ar Affaire Prohct General Manner Meneter ol New Prejecta Manete r Ov all ty Aaav rance Project Team Member AN'.Project General Manayer Pro',atR Terna Manther Aaat. Maneper OA Procvremen 1 h Reliability Ant. Menafter OA Twary POlnt I

Arab 14naper Oat dr eterne dt Avdlta Arab fj4naver OA St. LvcmProjmtt dt te Conmnmtlon Man aper Tean Member'a Home Oept.

Ad*ilnbtiathe Tt Pvnctfenaf Rrportine fvnctionaf Reportino Onfy Arlinilllatra tan Rrpv'Clad Only

~

. Comniv nkatlon Actb Manaocr OA hnptnerrtno h New Projrcn TYPICALPROIFCT hfANAGFhlvNTORGANIZATION PrejKt OA frpneer

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Appendix 3 FLORIDA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERFACE Figure 1-4 Date March 31, 198l Page

'4-

~

of 10 PPL Proaklant Executive Vice President Vice President

'Ady. Sys.

& Tech.

Quality Aatura neo Commlttaa Director Nuclear Affairs Director of Environmental Affairs Manager Quality Assurance Asst. Manager QA Engineering

& New Projects Manager of Envir. Planning And Projects Company Environmental Review Group Manager of Envir Tech Services Manager of Envir. Permitting

& Programs Chief Ecologist Asst. Manager QA Systems

& Audits QA/QC Coordinator Ass't. Manager QA Procurement

& Reliability Asst. Manager QA Turkey Point Ass't. Manager QA St. Lucie Projects QA Representative Operating Plartts QA Representative Operating Plants OFF-SITE ON-SITE nstruction QA Representative

TOPICAl QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Appondd~

FLORIDA POWER Se LIGHT COMPANY ADVANCED SYSTEMS

& TECHNOLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERFACE Figure 1-5 Rev.

Date March 31, 1981 page 5

of 10 PRESIDENT Executive Vice Presfdent OA Corfimitico Vice President Adv. Sys.

snd Tech.

Couipany Nuclear Beeflaw Doai d Director of Environmental Affairs Director of Nuclear Affairs Coo rd.

R&D Manager Quality Assurance Manager Nuclear Licensing Asst. Manager of QA Engineering

& New Projects Asst. Manager of QA Procurement

& Reliability Asst. Manager of Asst. Manager of QA St. Lucis QA Turkey Project Point Asst. Manager of QA Systems

& Audits Miami Staff Miami Staff Onsite Staff bnsite Staff Miami Staff

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT.

Appendix A FLORIDA POWER fs LIGHT COMPANY ENGINEERING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERFACE Figure 1-6 Rev.

4 Date March 31, 1981 Page President Executive Vice President Vice President Adv. Sys.

and Tech.

Oustity Assurance Contrtltteo Director Nuclear Affairs Vice President Engr., Proj, Mgt".'nd Const.

~

"'anager Quality Assurance Chief Engineer Pwr. Plants Chief Engr.

Gen. Engr.

Ass't. Manager QA Engineering &

New Projects QA/QC Coordtnator Ass't. Manager QA Procurement &

Reliability Assistant Chief Engineer Ass't. Manager QA Systems & Audits Project Manager (En ineeriri )

Mechanical/Nuclear Ass't. Manager OA Turkey Point Electrical/I&C Ass't. Manager QA St. Lucie Projects Licensing Civil OFF.SITE Otf4ITE QA Operating Plants Re resentative QA Construction Representative QA perattng Plants Re resentative Site Engineer

'Only assigned for new Construction projects 4

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Appendfx B.

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHt COMPANY CONSTRUCTION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERFACE Figure 1-7 pate March 31, 1981 Page PAESIOSNT Executive Vice President Vice President Adv. Sys. & Tech.

Quality Assurance Committee Directors Nuclear Affairs VP - Engr., Prof.

Mgt. & Const.

Manager Quality Assurance Director of Construction Asst. Manager QA Systems & Audits Asst. Manager QA Procurement

&Reliability Supt Gen Construction Administrativo & Functional Reporting Functional Reporting Only

"'-- Administrative Reporting Only Communication Ass't. Manager QA Engineering

& New Projects Ass't. Manager QA Turkey Point Superintendent Construction Quality Control Ass't. Manager QA St. Lucia Projects QA/QC Coordinator OFF41TE ON.SITE

.QA Construction Representative Site Con'st.'anager Project Quality Control Supervisor

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Appendix A FLORIDA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY POWER RESOURCES 3

POWER SUPPLY 3 AND QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERFACE Figure 1-8 Dare March 31 1981 Page Itl

~Ivaarvat Shecutivo Vsse trash>>nt Vlcc Preslljsnc Acre. Sys. S Tech.

Quality Assurance Cenvruttce

~

TyinKtor Nuclear Altars Visa trrurvet tewar Clrlevrsas l4neger Quail>> Assurance atowcw ef tawcr Cwsevrr wnwvhe Olrec lac ol Power Svooly A>>t. Manager OA Systems gr Auth>>

Manager of Power Resources Fossil Ass"t. Mansger OA

, Procurement gr Retisbllity Scout>>el tower'tesevrsss

~ Sierra>>

lsanaser ot system trotecuon Ass'c. Manager OA Sngtncerlng S Neer Prejrctl Ass% Mv>>ger OA Sh Iarcio Projects.

Mgr. Pwr.

Rescue.

Sary.

Ass'c. l4nager QA Turley Point Asst. Manager twr. R>>. Nuc>>ar OFF4ITS ONSITS S>> M>>m>>r PTP System Protecuon DADccrerlas cunt ~

nrcrcwetauve Ovaruv Crewel Sv>>whar

~last I

1 Ccvrllw a ta

~ ewcrreen eche calvwc 4 garrrv

~neswt clew L

~c>>reeve u>>

Qvsfity Control Suc>>rvtsor Plant Manegn Nuclear Plant Nuclear Safety Comm.

Fecuicy Review Orcwo epecifrc sire organifet'van to I>>

cot f mug an Safety Anetysl ~ Rafters oi the retocctrve si>>

I

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Appendix A FLORIDA POWER Sa LIGHT COMPANY PURCHASING, INVENTORY RESOURCES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERFACE Figure 1-9

Rev, 4

Date March 31, 1981 Page ar ef~

PRESIDENT Executive Vice President Vice president Co rp orate Services Vice President Adv. Sys & Tech.

Director Nuclear Affairs Manager Quality Assurance Asst. Manager of Systems & Audits Oirec or o P rocurement Sa Material Management Asst. Manager QA Procurement

& Reliability Ass't. Manager QA Engineering

& New Projects Manager of Inventory Res.

Mgr. of Purchasing QA/QC Coordinator Asst. Manager QA St. Lucia Projects Mgr. of Pwr.

P Ia nt 5 to res Asst. Manager QA.

Turkey Point QA/QC Coordinator OFF-SITF.

ON.SITE QA Construction Representative Area Stores Supervisor PSL Area Stores; Supervisor PTP QA Operating Plants Representative QA Operating Plants Representative Stores Supcrvigor Stores Supervisor

a TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Appendix A FLORIDA POWER Ea LIGHT COMPANY OPERATING PLANT SITE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS Figure 1-10 Rev.

Date March 31, 1981 Page 10 of 10 SITE MANAGER PLANT MANAGER PLANT MANAGER FOSSIL PLANT MANAGER NUCLEAR QUALITY CONTROL SUPERVISOR QUALITY CONTROL SUPERVISOR PLANT NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMITTEE FACILITY REVIEW GROUP'TAFF STAFF TYPICAL FOSSIL/NUCLEAR SITE MANAGEMENT NUCLEAR SITE MANAGEMENT Florida Power 6 Light designates a Plant Manager for all plant sites.

For those sites which contain both fossil and nuclear power plants, Plant Managers are designated as illustrated in the figures above.

The Quality Control Supervisor and the Plant Nuclear Safety Committee, Facility Review Group, in all cases, shall report to the Plant Manager.

Throughout the text of the Topical Report, plant manager (spelled in lower case letters) shall be used to signify the individual with responsibility for direct control over operating nuclear power plant activities.

This is done for brevity and ease of reading, and should be interpreted to mean Plant Manager or Plant Manager-Nuclear, as appropriate.

e

FLORIDA POVUER 8 LIGHF COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT QUAIJFICATIONAND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FPL QUAILS ASSURANCE PERSONNEL APPENDIX B Rev.

2 pate March 31, 1981 Page EDUCATIONAND BACKGROUND EXPERIENCEe:

Manager of Quality Assurance Shall satisfy the following set of requirements:

Graduate of a four year accredited engineering or science college or university, plus seven years of industrial experience, including five (5) years of managerial experience in industry. At least two (2) years of this five (5) years experience shall be nuclear power plant experience in the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program.

Six (6) months of the two (2) years experience shall be obtained within a Quality Assurance organization.

A masters degree in engineering or business management is considered equivalent to two (2) years of general industry experience.

Assistant Manager of Quality Assurance Shall satisfy one of the following sets of requirements:

Graduate of a four year accredited engineering or science college or university, plus seven years of industrial experience including three years in positions of leadership, such as lead engineer, project engineer, audit team leader, etc.

At least two years of this experience should be associated with nuclear facilities.

A masters degree in engineering or business management is considered equivalent to two years of experience.

Completion of college level work leading to an associates degree in a related discipline plus fifteen years of industrial experience including three years in positions of leadership, such as project

engineer, audit team

leader, supervisor, etc.

At least five years of this experience should be associated with nuclear facilities.

High school

graduate, plus twenty years of industrial experience, including three years of positions of leadership, such as project

engineer, audit team

leader, supervisor, etc.

At least five years of this experience should be associated with nuclear facilities.

The education and experience requirements should not be treated as absolute when similar training or an outstanding record will provide reasonable assurance that a person can perform the required tasks.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCf REPORT APPENDIX C Rev.

4 PLORIOA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31> 1981 Page 1

of 18 The FPL Quality Assurance Program described in this Report meets the requirements provided in the NRC documents:

o "Guidance on Quality Assurance. Requirements During Design and Procurement Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" WASH-1283 Rev.

1 May 24, 1974 o

"Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Operations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" WASH-1284 October 26, 1973 o

"Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" WASH-1309 May 10> 1974 topjo+ report oontains the program requirements for Florida power Ik Light <amp~ Fs I'uality Assurance Program.

The Quality Assurance Program is described in detail in the Florida Power 8I. Light Company Quality Assurance Manual.

The Regulatory Guides, codes, and standards specifically listed in the matrix of this appendix (on page 2) represent the baseline documents used in the preparation of FPL's QA Manual and this topical report.

These documents, therefore, provide the basis for the FPL QA Program, but they are not considered to be part of the QA Program unless specifically addressed in the applicable SAR, technical specifications, etc.

The FPL Quality Assurance Program meets the requirements of the documents referenced in this appendix.

Any alternatives or clarifications made to the requirements contained in these documents are stated. on pages subsequent to the second page of this appendix.

FLOAIOA POWER L LIGHT COMPANY QUALITYASSURANCE MANUAL BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX APPENDIX C Re.,

4 March 31, 1981 Page Regulatory Guide 1.8 Rev.

1 Regulatory Guide 1.28 Regulatory Guide 1.30 Regulatory Guide 1.33 Regulatory Guide 1.37 Regulatory Guide 1.38 Regulatory Guide 1.39 Rev. 2 Regulatory Guide 1.58 Rev.

1 Regulatory Guide 1.64 Rev.

1 Regulatory Guide 1.74 Regulatory Guide 1.94 Regulatory Guide 1.116 Regulatory Guide Regulatory Guide 1.88 Rev, 2 1.144 Regulatory Guide 1.123 Rev. 1 Regulatory Guide 1.146 GOVERNMENTDOCUMENT 10 CFR PART 50, APPENDIX B 10 CFR PART 50.55(e) 10 CFR PART 50.55a DATED REFERENCE INDUSTRY

~ STANDARD 2/19/75 ANSI-N45.2 9/75 6/7/72 ASME B8LPV Code Section 111 8L XI ANSI-N18.1 ANSI-N45.2 9/77 9/80 2/75 2/74 4/76 6/76 10/76 1/79 7/77 8/80 ANSI-N45.2.3 ANSI-N45o2.6 ANSI-N45.2.11 ANSI-N45.2.10 ANSI-N45.2.5 ANSI-N45.2.8 ANSI-N45.2.9 ANSI-N45.2.12

'NSI-N45.2.13 ANSI-N45.2.23 8/11/72 ANSI-N45.2.4 11/3/72 ANSI-N18.7 3/16/73 ANSI-N45.2.1 3/16/73 ANSI-N45.2.2 DRAFT XU?V.

ISSUED DATE 1971 Specified in the SAR document of the respective plant 1971 1971 1972 1972 1973 1972 1973 1978 1974 1973 1974 1975 1974 1977 1976 1978 0

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPEND@~

Rev.

PLORIOA POWER E LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 3~11~

Page ~of~

Florida Power 8~ Light Company position regarding conflicting guidance and exceptions:

Re ulator Guide 1,58 Revision 1/ANSI N45.2.6-1978 ANSI N45.2.6-1978, Paragraphs 1.1, 3.1, 3.2.2(a) and 4 (Table-1) identify requirements which apply to personnel who perform inspections, tests or nondestructive examinations or who participate in the approval of procedures, the handling of data or test results, or the control of reports and records.

FPL proposes an alternative to capability requirements for those who participate in.

(1) the approval of procedures, (2) the handling of data or test results and (3) the control of reports and records.

FPL accomplishes this by having personnel determined to be qualified and competent by management through consideration of education, training, and experience.

The Florida Power 8c Light Company position on the scope of ANSI N45.2.6-1978 is that personnel participating in testing who take data or make observations, where special training is not required to perform this function, need not be qualified. in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6 but need only be trained to the extent necessary to perform the assigned function.

For leak testing conducted as part of the preoperational and operational testing programs, FPL considers that the qualification requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.8 (ANSI N18.1-1971) and ANSI N45.2.6-1978, Paragraph 3.0 to be an acceptable alternative to SNT-TC-1A-1975 requirements for leak testing, except for leak testing defined in and performed under Section III of the ASME Code, where in such cases, the Code shall govern.

For preoperational and operational inspection, examination and testing by Quality Control Inspectors, FPL considers that Position C.l of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1 and ANSI N45.2.6-1978, Paragraph 3.0 are acceptable requirements for training and qualification, except for inspections, tests and examinations defined in and performed under Section Illof the ASME Code, where in such cases, the Code shall govern.

QUALlTYASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX C BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31, 1981 FLOIIIOA POWTA L LIGHT COMPANY 4

f 18 Page For all other preoperational and operational inspection, examination and testing performed by operating plant and support personnel, FPL considers that training and qualification to the requirement of ANSI N18.1-1971 and Regulatory Guide 1.8 are sufficient for the type and scope of activities performed and that qualifica'tions to ANSI N45.2.6"1978 is unnecessary and redundant.

These preoperational and operational inspection, examination tests shall be supervised or directed by

~ personnel qualified to Position Cl of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision l.

FPL shall comply with Position C.10 of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1, effective with Revision 4 of the Topical Quality Assurance Report, in that all new certifications issued for personnel shall meet the education and. experience requirements or shall document objective evidence demonstrating that the individual indeed does have comparable or equivalent competence to that which would be gained from having the required education and experience.

FPL's position on ANSI N45.2.6-1978, Paragraph 2.3 is that an initial and periodic review (not to exceed two years) of personnel shall determine the capabilities in his qualified area. If during this review or at any other time, it is determined that the individual's capabilities are not in accordance with the specified requirements, that individual shall be removed from that activity until the required cap'ability has been demonstrated.

In addition, during this review a

determination shall be made that an individual has been actively involved in the inspection process in his qualified area.

P.e ulator Guide 1.70.6 Regulatory Guide 1.70.6, Paragraph 17.1.12 states that the "PSAR should describe the measures which assure that the error of calibration standards is less than the error of production measuring and test equipment."

For projects with limited work authorizations for construction and for plants with operating licenses prior to May, 1976, FPL has chosen an "equal to or better" requirement for calib'ration standards as stated in TQR 12.0.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT tt,3 APPENDIX C Rev.

FLORIDA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31 1981 Page ANSI N45.2.9-1974 ANSI N45.2.9-1974, Section 3.2.5 requires Quality Assurance records be classified as lifetime or non-permanent and. further defines lifetime and nonpermanent in Section 2.2 of the Standard.

FPL provides the following definitions as an alternative to the above.

Lifetime Records:

Records which are required by the NRC facility operating license, the NRC construction permit, applicable parts of 10CFR, the FSAR, or other NRC commitments to be retained for the life of the plant.

Non-permanent Records:

Records which are required by the NRC facility operating license, the NRC construction permit, applicable parts of 10CFR, the FSAR, or other NRC commitments to be retained for periods of time less than the life of the plant.

ANSI N45.2.9-1974, Paragraph 5.6 requires that records be "classified for fire protection purposes as National Fire Protection Association Class I and, as such, should be afforded the equivalent protection of a NFPA Class A, four hour minimum rated facility." FPL willmeet the requirements of the NFPA Code, 'utilizing those portions which indicate that insulated protection equipment with a rating below Class A may be used if certain building and occupancy conditions are met.

ANSI N45.2.10 - 1973 ANSI N45.2.10 1973 identifies terms and their definitions important to the uniform understanding of the intent of required quality assurance practices for the construction of nuclear power plants.

Regulatory Guide 1.74 (2-74) endorses these terms and definitions and extends them through the operational phase and includes a clarification of procurement documents.

FPL has developed a glossary of terms and their definitions as part of the Quality Assurance Manual which is being used throughout its nuclear construction and operating plant activities.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX C FLOIIIOA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 3~11 81 Page The following de finitions are currently listed in our glossary and are alternatives or clarifications to those listed in the ANSI Standard and Regulatory Guide.

Assembly A combination of subassemblies or components or both, fitted together to form a workable unit.

Audit A

documented activity performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists to verify, by examination and evaluation of objective evidence, that applicable elements of the quality assurance program have been developed, documented and effectively implemented in accordance with specified requirements.

An audit does not include surveillance or inspection for the purpose of process control or product acceptance.

Guidelines Particular provisions which are considered good practice are not mandatory in programs intended to comply with The term "should" denotes a guideline; the term "shall" requirement; and the word "may" denotes permission, requirement nor a recommendation.

but which Standards.

denotes a

neither a

Inspector (Owner's or Installer's)

A qualified inspector employed by the Owner or Installer, whose

. duties include the verification of quality related activities on installations.

Inspection Examination, observation, or measurement to determine the conformance of materials,

supplies, components,

parts, appurtenances,

systems, processes, or structures to predetermined requirements.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX C FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPAIIY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31, 1981 Page Procurement Documents Contractually binding documents, including 'uch documents as contracts, letters of intent, work orders, purchase orders or proposals and their acceptances which authorize the seller to perform services or supply equipment,

material, or facilities on behalf of the purchaser.

Qualification (Personnel)

The characteristics or abilities gained through training or experience or both as measured against established requirements such as standards or tests that qualify an individual to perform a required function.

Quality Assurance All those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a structure, system or component will perform satisfactorily in service.

Quality Assurance includes quality control.

Quality Contr ol Those quality assurance actions related to the physical characteristics or material, structure, component or system, which provide a means to control the quality of the material, structure, component or system to predetermined requirements.

Storage That period following the release of an item for shipment until turnover for start-up preoperational testing.

This would include in-place storage.

System An integral part of a nuclear power plant comprised of electrical, electronic, or mechanical components (or combinations thereof) that may be operated as a separate entity to perform a specific function.

QUALITYASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX C FLOFIIOA POWtII a LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX March 31> 198'1 Date of 18 Page Testing Performance of those steps necessary to'determine that systems or components function in accordance with predetermined speci fications.

"Re uirements" Clarfification for Glossar REQUIREMENT:

A mandatory action, denoted by the word shall.

(See "Guidelines" )

Requirements are generally based on statutes or regulations, but may be internally generated within the company.

"Shall" is therefore used for both

external, legally enforceable actions and internal requirements not enforceable under current NRC practices.

Re lator Guide 1 e144/ANSI N45.2.12-1977 Regulatory Guide 1.144, Positions C.3

a8gb, states in part that applicable elements of an organization's Quality Assurance Program should be audited at least annually or at least once within the life of the activity, whichever is shorter.

\\

ANSI N18.7-1972, Paragraph 4.4 (endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.33) states in part; "Audits of selected aspects of plant operation shall be performed with a frequency commensurate with their safety significance, and in such a manner as to assure that an audit of safety related activities is completed within a period of two years."

FPL has chosen a two year cycle for auditing elements of the internal and onmite QA Program during the operation phase of plant life following initial fuel loading.

FPL's position is that the two year cycle:

(1) allows more in-depth and meaningful audits in each regularly scheduled

area, (2) permits more audits of ongoing activities, and (3) in conjunction with the planning and scheduling requirement of TQR 18e0 provides for a comprehensive audit program.

The audit frequency requirements oi Regulatory Guide 1.144 willbe followed during other piants phases.'n the case of suppliers, an annual evaluation of quality performance history shall be performed to determine reaudit requirements.

Reaudit requirements for suppliers shall be based on the quality performance, and the complexity and criticality of the equipment or service being

TOPICAL QUALITYA'SSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX C PLORIOA POWER El LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31 1981 Page procured.

A facility evaluation (audit) will be performed at least every three years and conducted in accordance with Quality Procedures and Quality Instructions for supplier evaluation.

ANSI N45.2.12, Paragraph 4.3.1 states:

"A brief pre-audit conference shall be conducted at the audit site with cognizant organization management.

The purpose of the conference shall be to confirm the audit scope, present the 'audit plan, introduce auditors, meet counterparts, discuss audit sequence and plans for the post-audit conference, and establish channels of communication."

FPL will not require the pre-audit conference for audits of limited scope and of specific site activities conducted by the Construction and Operations Groups.

This conference is omitted because the day-to-day contact of the auditors and plant management, the awareness on the part of plant management that these audits are conducted without pre-audit conferences, and the limited scope of the audits meet the intent of a pre-audit conference.

ANSI N45.2.13-1976 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Section 1.3 provides a definition of ".procurement document" which is different from the definition contained in ANSI N45.2.10-1973 and Regulatory Guide 1.74.

The Florida Power 5 Light (FPL) Quality Assurance Program uses the definition of "procurement document" contained in ANSI N45.2.10-1973 as modified by Regulatory Guide 1.74.

ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Section 3.3.a requires that procurement documents be reviewed prior to release for bid and contract award.

The FPL Quality Assurance Program requires procurement document reviews prior to bid and contract award for all safety related purchases with the exception of these accomplished by "Confirming Purchase Order".

A "Confirming Purchase Order" is an order which is initially placed verbally with the supplier and then. later confirmed with a written Purchase Order.

A "Confirming Purchase Order" is only used when time restraints would prohibit the normal review and approval cycle.

The following controls are provided in the FPL Quality Assurance Manual to assure that the intent of ANSI N45.2.13 is satisfied for "Confirming Purchase Orders".

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX C FLORIOA POWER 8 LIGHY COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Dafa March 3~11 31 Pago 10 of 13 (1)

Quality Assurance must be contacted prior to contacting the supplier to place the order unless it is an emergency purchase after normal working hours in which case Quality Assurance is contacted the next working day.

(2)

Prior to verbally placing the order, it must be verified that the intended supplier is on the FPL Quality Assurance Approved Supplier List.

(3)

The verbally placed order must be promptly followedmp (confirmed) with a written procurement document which is subject to all reviews and approvals required for safety related purchases.

ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Section 1.1 states that the extent to which the individual requirements of this standard willapply will depend upon the nature and scope of the work to be performed and the required quality of the items or services purchased.

For commercial grade items, FPL has determined that certain of the individual requirements of ANSI N45.2.13 need not apply.

Commercial grade items are those (1) not subject to design or specification requirements that are unique to facilities or activities licensed by the NRC, and (2) used in applications other than facilities or activities licensed by the

NRC, and (3) to be ordered from the manufacturer/supplier on the basis of specifications set forth in the manufacturer's published product description.

These commercial items are subject to varying degrees of control as indicated in the FPL Quality Assurance Manual.

As a minimum, an evaluation is performed by qualified personnel to assure that the commercial item satisfies the necessary technical and quality requirements and the item is checked upon receipt to assure that the item received was the one ordered, damage was not sustained during shipment> and documentation, if required, was received.

Section 8.2 of ANSI N45.2.13 identifies those nonconformances which shall be submitted to the Purchaser.

Florida Power 8L Light's (FPL) position regarding the nonconformances to be reported is as follows'.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT a APPENDIE C FLORIDA POWER Ef LIGHT COMPAIIY BA'SELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31, 1981 page 11 of 18 Suppliers (including A/E's and Contractors) shaH submit aH nonconformances which consist of one or more of the following:

1) 2)

3)

Technical or material requirements are violated.

Requirement in supplier documents which have been approved by the Purchaser is violated.

Nonconformances which would affect the quality of the item in regard to function of safety related features.

In cases where the supplier cannot make this determination, they shall be submitted to the Purchaser for evaluation.

This policy assures that aH nonconformances affecting safety related functions willbe reviewed and approved by FPL.

In aH cases, the supplier's documentation on nonconformances is available for FPL's review.

ANSI N45.2.4-1972 ANSI N45.2.4-1972, Paragraph 2.5.2 requires that equipment be "suitably marked to indicate date of next required calibration".

In lieu of marking equipment, FPL has chosen to control calibration of installed instrumentation and control equipment by maintaining records for each piece of equipment by instrument tag number (or equivalent) to show that established schedules and procedures for calibration have been followed.

ANSI N45.2.11-1974 ANSI N45.2.11-1974, Paragraph 11.4 requires that "audits shall include an evaluation of design quality assurance policies, practices, procedures and, instructions...."

FPL's design quality assurance (and aH other QA elements) policies, procedures and instructions are included in FPL's Quality Assurance Program documentation.

The Quality Assurance Department evaluates aH of this documentation in reviews performed during its development and revision. Accordingly, FPL does not require subsequent (and redundant) evaluations of these Quality Assurance Program policies, procedures and instructions during audits.

FPL audits will include evaluations of the adequacy of the practices which are the implementation of these policies, procedures and instructions.

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX C FLORIDA PottNER Fa LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Rev Date March 3~11 81 Page 12 of ANSI N45.2.2-1972 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 Sections 3.0, 4.0, and the Appendix address all the requirements applicable to the packaging and shipping of material.

FPL in general does not package or ship material governed by this standard.

Suppliers of material are required by purchase order to provide adequate packaging and shipping protection.

Isolated cases of material packaging or shipping are treated on a case-by-case basis and receive protection comparable to that required by the manufacturer of that material.

Loading, rigging and handling precautions identified in Section 4.3 are applied to material unloaded by FPL from a transport vehicle.

ANSI N45.2.2-1972 Section 5.2 requires that specific attributes of material and components received by FPL be inspected.

For plants with operating licenses FPL verifies conformance to procurement documents during receipt inspections.

Any of these attributes identified in these procurement documents are verified during this inspection.

ANSI N45.2.2-1972 Section 2.7 requires that items governed by this standard be classified into one of four levels by the buyer or the contractor.

For plants with operating licenses, FPL intends to consider what care is appropriate for each item individually. rather than generically classifying the material into protection levels and providing care required of that level.

The following shall be considered when determining the

handling, storage, and shipping requirements:

1.

The vendor's recommended handling, shipping, and storage standards.

2.

Environmental requirements which may include such requirements as inert gas atmosphere, humidity limits, temperature limits, chemical requirements, acceleration (g force) requirements.

3.

Special tools or equipment which are provided and controlled as necessary to ensure safe and adequate handling.

These tools or equipment shall be inspected and tested at specified times to verify that they are adequately maintained.

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX C FLOAIOA POWER 6I LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31, 1981 page 13 of 18 4.

Packaging, covering or coatings required to meet environmental requirements such as barrier and wrap material, desiccants, pipe caps, plugs, contact preservatives, etc.

5.

Containeg, crating, skids of sufficient strength to support the item (including stacking).

6.

Cushioning, blocking, bracing, and anchoring to prevent movement during shipment or handling.

7.

Special handling or storage procedures for unique situations.

8.

Marking and identification of the item and its packaging.

9.

Anticipated "shelf life" of the item.

FPL considers this to be a more effective approach since the quantity of spare and replacement a

material, parts and components governed by this standard will be afforded protection commensurate with the recommendations of Section 2.7 of this standard.

ANSI N45.2.2-1972 paragraph 6.4.1 requires the periodic verification of such items as identification and markings, protective covers, coating and preservatives, desiccants, and inert gas blankets, etc.

In lieu of addressing these specific items, FPL (at plants under construction) considers all the necessary prevention maintenance requirements for equipment and/or components on=a case by case basis.

ANSI N45.2.2-1972 Section 5.2, paragraph 5.2.1, requires certain preliminary inspections to be done "prior to unloading" of material which is received.

We believe that the sequence specified in the standard is to facilitate commercial claims, and should these preliminary inspections occur "after unloading" that control of materials quality would not be degraded.

Accordingly, required shipping damage inspections may be performed after unloading.

ANSI N45.2.2-1972, paragraph 7.4 requires that an inspection program be established for handling equipment and rigging, including methods for identifying acceptable and nonconforming items.

In lieu of having a program of periodic, documented inspections of rigging and, handling equipment, FPL's practice is to have the individual user determine the equipment's acceptability

QUALlTYASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX C PLOIIIOA POWtll L LIGHT COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX March 31T 1981 Date 14 18 Page prior to each use.

This prior-torse inspection is exactly the same as that required during periodic inspections, and uses criteria identified in ANSI N45.2.2<<1972, paragraph 7.4.

This practice also precludes the need for a system to indicate the acceptability of rigging and handling equipment.

Implementation of this prior-to-use inspection will be assured through periodic surveillances and audits performed by Quality Assurance and Quality Control.

Cranes are inspected on a periodic basis and wiD not be subjected to this prior-to-use inspection.

Certain mechanical components of the PSL-2 nuclear unit have been designed for a service environment of the site area because portions of the plant are exposed to the temperature, humidity, and ocean salt spray during operations.

Extreme air temperature variations, snow or slush are not encountered during operations or in the outmf&oors storage environment.

As an alternative to the rigid requirements of storage levels B and C in paragraph 6.1 of ANSI N45.2.Z-1972, FPL proposes to store these particular mechanical components outdoors, but within controlled areas, with sufficient periodic surveillances and,inspections to minimize the possibility of damage or lowering of quality due to corrosion, contamination, deterioration, or physical damage.

In cases where special environmental conditions are present (i.e. hurricanes, paint sprays, concrete

pours, etc.) precautions or additional steps will be taken to further protect the items.

The requirements of ANSI N45.2.2, Paragraph 7.2 for items that require special handling k

instructions is clarified by FPL to be limited to those items covered in the scope of NUREG 0612, entitled "Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants".

Re lato Guide 1.33 (Dated 11/3/72)

Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33 lists "typical safety related activities which should be covered by written procedures".

Regulatory Guide 1.33 is invoked by the Technical Specifications at FPL Nuclear Plants.

In order to avoid duplication of requirements invoked in our licensing documents, the FPL Quality Assurance Program does not list those required operating procedures specified in Appendix A.

~

+

I

~

0

~ ~

0 0

~

~

~

OI I

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

I

~

~

~ I

~I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~.

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

II

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

I

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

'I

~

I

~

~

~

~

I

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~ I ~

~ I I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~ '..

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX C FLORIOA POWER E LIGHt COMPANY BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March~31 1 81 Page 16 of 18 ANSI N45.2.1-1973, Paragraph 5 states in part that, "Fitted and tackwelded joints (which will not be immediately sealed by welding) shall be wrapped with polyethylene or other non-halogenated plastic film until the welds can be completed".

The FPL QA Manual shall require that the weld be covered to prevent entry of moisture and contaminants but willnot specify the material to be employed.

Materials employed to cover openings shall meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.37, Position 4.

ANSI N45.Z.1-1973, Paragraph 7.1 states in part, "provisions shall be made to collect leakage and protect insulation from being wetted".

FPL Quality Assurance Program includes the above requirements.

However, FPL's program allows the wetting of metallic type insulations which are not adversely affected by wetting.

ANSI N45.2.3-1973 For FPL's operating nuclear plants, alternative methods are followed to achieve equivalent objectives for the below listed sections of ANSI N45.2.3-1973:

The zone designations of Section Z.l of N45.2.3 and the requirements associated with each zone are not consistent with the FPL Housekeeping requirements at our operating nuclear units.

In lieu of the zone designation, cleanliness is maintained at a level consistent with the work being performed, so as to prevent the entry of foreign material into safety related systems.

Documented cleanliness insp'ections are performed immediately prior to system closure.

Control of personnel, tools, equipment, and supphes is established with approved procedures when the safety function of a system, component> or item may be jeopardized and also while the reactor system is opened for inspection, maintenance, or repair.

ANSI N45.2.4-1972 ANSI N45.2.4-1972, Paragraph Z.3 addresses installation specifications and requires the inclusion of inspection and test objectives.

FPL maintains that test values and inspection scope are inherently contained in the applicable procedures.

0

QUALITYASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX C BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX Date March 31, 1981 FLOIIIOA POWTII & LIGHT COMPANY 17 of 18 oooo af ANSI N45.2.4-1972, Paragraph 6.1.2 requires that the inspection of installed equipment verify that "good and proper workmanship" has prevailed.

FPL maintains that acceptable parameter compliance with codes and standards along with company preference is the verification of "good and proper workmanship".

ANSI N45.2.8-1975 ANSI N45.2.8-1975, Paragraph 4.6 addresses care of items to the extent that temporary use of equipment or facilities to which the standard applies that are to become part of the completed project may be desirable.

The following clarification appHes to the above statement.

For FPL plants in the construction phase (to the point of plant operation license) temporary use of equipment and facilities may be used according to need and/or situation.

In this case, authorization for usage shall be provided along with all the documents, conditions, safeguards and evaluations to verify permanent plant equipment adequacy.

In the operations phase all equipment, including temporary equipment, is subject to identical controls to preclude adverse effects on safety and suitability for use.

ANSI N45.2.8-1975, Paragraph 2.3 requires that Measuring and Test Equipment (M8TTE) used for inspection be identified on the Inspection Report.

FPL may, as an option, employ a M8cTE issue log which provides traceability between M8cTE and the applicable inspections.

Plannin Clarification ANSI N45.2.4-1972, Paragraph 2.1; ANSI N45.2.6-1973, Paragraph 2.1; ANSI N45.2.13-1976, Paragraph 7.2l ANSI N18.7-1972, Paragraph 5.1.6.3; ANSIN45.2.8-1975, Paragraph 2.1 and Paragraph 2.2 include plans and/or planning as required.

The terms plan and/or planning are included in FPL's activities as indicated in the following clarification:

FLORIOA POWER a LIGHt COMPAIIY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT BASELINEDOCUMENTMATRIX APPENDHLC=

IIev.

Date 28 ch 3~~U Page ~ef~

.0 H

Planning is considered to be a management process or analytical tool used as an aid to help develop identification and/or development of program requirements, implemen'tation activities, assignments and staffing, inspections, surveillances and audits, co'ntrols and other activities to assure.

completeness of the requirements.

Planning, as such, is not always documented nor addressed as an end item and is considered to be an integral "process" within the developed item.

Plans which are considered to be end type or output type documents have the term "plan" in the title, such as ISI Master Plan, Audit Plan, Start-up Plan, and others, which as such willreflect directly the requirement of these standards in the appropriate documents.

Plans which are not considered to be end type or output type documents do not have the word plan in the title.

However, certain procedures, instructions, flow charts, schedules and checklists may be considered to be plans reflecting planned actions which especially require step-by-step accomplishments.

In these

cases, the term plan may not appear in the title but considered to be a plan only in the indirect sense and identified as a

procedure or other document.

FPL considers the above practice to be in compliance with the "plan" requirements of these standards.

Re ulator Guide 1.68 (11/73)

Regulatory Guide 1.68 (11/73) entitled "Preoperational and Initial Start-up Test Programs for Water Cooled Power Reactors" is addressed in Section 14.2.1 of the St. Lucie Unit 2 FSAR which states in part, "The start-up test program is developed using the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.68".

To avoid duplication of requirements, FPL will address Regulatory Guide 1.68 in the FSAR.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX D

FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY GRAY) GREEN, AND ORANGE BOOK MATRIXTO QA PROCEDURES Date March 31 1981 Page FPL QUALITYASSURANCE PROCEDURES e

GRAY BOOK PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS NUMBER TITLE 1.

ANSI N45.2-1971 - "Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants" QP 2.2 thru 2.9 Quality Assurance Program 2.

ANSI N45.2.11 "Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants" QP 3.1 thru 3.6 Design, Review, Evaluation and Control 3.

NRC Extracts from ANSI N45.2.13 "Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants" QP 4.1 thru 4.4 QP 7.1 Procurement Criteria "Receipt Inspection of Materials, Parts and Components for Operating Plants" QP 7.2 "Receipt Inspection of Materials, Parts and Components for Plants Under Construction" 4.

ANSI N45.2.12 "Re'quirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants" QP 18.1 8c 18.2 Auditing 5.

ANSI N45.2.9 - "Requirements for Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Ouality Assurance Records for Nuclear Power Plants" QP 17.1 "The Collection and Storage of QA Records for Nuclear Power Plants",

6.

ANSI N45.2.10 - "Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions" Glossary Glossary

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ ~ ~ '

~

~

~

~

'4) 0( ~ I

~

~

~ I

~

~ ~

+p)

~

~ gP

~ ~

I

~

~

I I ~

~

4 N'

~

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

I

~

~ ~

~

0

~

I

~ -

~

~

4 I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I e

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

s ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

44

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

.o.

o

~

5

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

4 ~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~ ~

~

~

I

~

i~-

~

I

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

e

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~ 4

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

4

~

~

~

I~

4 ~

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX D

FLORIOA POWER 5 LIGHt COMPANY GRAYq GREEN, AND ORANGE BOOK MATRIXTO QA PROCEDURES Date March 31~181 Page 3

at tI FPL QUALITYASSURANCE PROCEDURES GREEN BOOK PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS NUMBER (Cont'd) 5.

Regulatory Guide 1.37-

"Quality Assurance Requi rem ents for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants" (ANSI N45.2.1) 6.

Regulatory Guide 1.38-

"Quality Assurance Requirements for Packing, Shipping, Receiving, Storage 8t Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants" (ANSI N45.2.2) 7.

Regulatory Guide 1.39 "Housekeeping Require ments for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants" (ANSI N45.2.3)

QP 2.3 QP 2.4 QP 2.8 QP 2.7" QP 16.1 QP 8.1 QP 13.1 QP 13.2 QP 2.8 QP 2.10 "Preparation 8c Revision of Quality Procedures (QP's)"

"Preparation 8t Revision of Quality Instructions (QI's)"

"Cleanliness Control Methods" "Identification of Safety Related Structures, Systems and Components" "Corrective Action" "Identification 8t Control of Materials, Parts, and Components at the Plant Site" "Handling, Storage 8L Shipping of Materials, Parts and Components at the Site During Construction" "Handling, Storage 8L Shipping of Materials, Parts, 8c Equipment During Plant Operation" "Cleanliness Control Methods" "Housekeeping - Operating Plants" QP 2.11 "Housekeeping - Construction Sites" 8.

Regulatory Guide 1.54-

"Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants" (ANSI N101.4)

QP 9.1 QP 9.2 "Control of Special Processes for Construction" "Control of Special Processes During Operating Phase"

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX D

FLORIOA POWER d LIGHT COMPANY GRAY, GREEN, AND ORANGE BOOK MATRIXTO QA PROCEDURES Date March 31 1981 Page 4

ot 9

FPL QUALIFY%ASSURANCE PROCEDURES GREEN BOOK - PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS NUMBER (Cont'd)

TITLE 9.

Regulatory Guide 1.58 "Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspec tion, Examination 8c Testing Personnel" {ANSIN45.2.6)

QP 2.5 QP 2.9 RQuah ty Assurance Indoctrination 81: Training" "Qualification of QA Audit, QC Inspection and Construction Test Personnel" QP 9 1 "Control of Special Processes for Construction" 10.

Regulatory Guide 1;74-

"Quality Assurance Terms 8E De fmitionsR (ANSI N45.2.10) 11.

Draft Standard N45.2.5-1974-

"Supplem entary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection 8I. Testing of Structural Concrete and Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" Glossary QP91 QP 11.1

~

QP 11.4 QP 18.1 QP 10.2 "Glossary" "Control of Special Processes for Construction" "Test Control Construction" "Test Program Control" "Conduct of QA Department Quality Audits" "Inspection of Plant Construction" 12.

Draft Standard N45.2.8-1974-

"Supplementary Quahty Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection 8L Testing of Mechanical Equipment 8T. Systems for.the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" QP 8.1 QP 9.1 QP 10.2 8E 10.5 QP 11.1 thru 11.4 "Identification 8L Control of Materials, Parts, and Components at the Plant Site" "Control of Special Processes for Construction" Inspec tion Test Control QP 12.1 "Calibration 8c Control of Measuring 8E Test Equipment"

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX,D FLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY GRAY, GREEN, ANDORANGEBOOK MATRIXTO QA PROCEDURES Date March 31 1981 Page FPL QUAGGY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES GREEN BOOK PRINCIPALELEMENTS NUMBER TITLE (Cont'd)

QP 15.1 "Control of Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Component Plants under Construction" 13.

Draft Standard N45.2.9-1974-

"Requirements for Collection, Storage 8c Maintenance of Quality Assurance Records for Nuclear Power Plants" QP 17.1 "The Collection and Storage of QA Records for Nuclear Power Plants" 14.

Draft Standard N45.2.13-1974-

"Quality Assurance Requi rem ents for Control of Procurement of Items 8E Services for Nuclear Power Plants" QP 4.1 thru 4.4 QP 7.1 Procurement Criteria

~

"Receipt Inspection of Materials, Parts, and Components for.Operating Plants" 15.

Draft Regulatory Guide 1.70.xx-

"Additional Information-Quality Assurance During Design h Construction" Requirements implemented as Chapter 17 of the SAR

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX D

FLORIOA POWER d LIGHT COMPANY GRAY, GREEN, AND ORANGE BOOK MATRIXTO QA PROCEDURES Date March 31 1981 Page 6

of 9

FPL QUAIZIY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES ORANGE BOOK-PRINCIPALELEMENTS NUMBER TITLE l.

Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50-

"Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants" Appendix E identifies and describes the quality procedures employed in support of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

2.

Regulatory Guide 1.33 (formerly Safety Guide 33) --

"Quality Assurance Program Requirements {Operation)"

3.

10 CFR Part 55-

"Operators'icenses",

and its Appendix A-

"Requalification Programs for Licensed Operators of Production and Utilization Facilities" QP 2.2 thru 2.7 QP 5.1 QP 2.5 Quality Assurance Program "Operating Plant Procedures" "Quality Assurance Indoctrination and Training" 4.

Regulatory Guide 1.8 (formerly Safety Guide 8) - "Personnel Selection and Training" (ANSI N18.1) 5.

Regulatory Guide 1.58-

"Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspec tion, Examination, and Te'sting Personnel"

'P 2.5 QP 2.5 "Quality Assurance Indoctrination and Training" RQuaii ty Assurance Indoct'rination and Training" 6.

Paragraph 50.55a, "Codes and Standards", of 10 CFR Part 50, "Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities" (ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section X13 1971 Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Coolant Systems)

QP 10.3 thru 10.6 QP 4.1 QP 7.1 Inspec tion "Control of Requisitions 8T.

Issuance of Purchase Orders for Spare Parts, Replacement Items and Services" "Receiving Inspection of Materials, Parts and Components for Operating Plants" QP 7.2 "Receiving Inspection of Materials, Parts and Components for Plants Under Construction"

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT Rev.

APPENDIX D

PLORIOA POVIItR 5 LIGHT COMPANY GRAY, GREEN, AND ORANGE BOOK MATRIXTO QA PROCEDURES pate March 31, 1981 Page 7

of 9

FPL QUALITYASSURANCE PROCEDURES ORANGE BOOK-PRINCIPALELEMENTS NUMBER TITLE (Cont'd)

QP 8.1 "Identification & Control of Materials, Parts and Components at the Plant Site" 7.

Regulatory Guide 1.30-

"Quality Assurance Require-ments for the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment" (ANSI N45.2.4) 8.

Regulatory Guide 1.37-

"Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power

. Plants" (ANSI N45.2;1) 9.

Regulatory Guide 1.38-

"Quality Assurance Requirements for.Packaging, Shipping, Re-ceiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants" (ANSI N45.2.2)

'P 11.2 thru 11.4 QP 12.1

& 12.2 QP 10.2 thru 10.6 QP 2.2 QP 2.3 QP 2.4 QP 2.7 QP 16.1 QP 7.1 QP 7.2 Test Control Calibration

'nspection "Revision of the Topical Quality Assurance Report" "Preparation and Revision of Quality Procedures (QP's)"

"Preparation and Revision of Quality Instructions (QI's)"

"Identification of Safety Related Structures, Systems and Components" "Corrective Action" "Receiving Inspection of Materials, Parts and Components for Operating Plants" "Receiving Inspection of Materials, Parts, and Components for Plants Under Construction"

~

~

0 P ~

~ ~

~

~

0

~ ~

~ '

~ t

'P

~

Ot ~

0 Gl ~ I

~ ~

~

~

f g ~

P

~

s 8

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~I

~ ~

I

~

~

~

~ I

~

~ ~

~ '

~

~

~ ~

a

~

~

~

~ -

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

II

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

i

~

~

~

~

~ '

P

~

~

~ I I

~

~-

~

~

~-

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

1

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

I ~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

I

~

~

~

~ I-

~

~

~

~

~

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX D

FLORIOA POWER E LIGHT COMPANY GRAY, GREEN, AND ORANGE BOOK MATRIXTO QA PROCEDURES Date March 31 1981 Page 9

of 9

FPL QUALITYASSURANCE PROCEDURES ORANGE BOOK PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS NUMBER TITLE (Cont'd)

QP 11.3 QP 11.4 "Test Control - Preoperational and Startup Tests" "Test Program Control"

0 0

0

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX E FLOIIIOA POWEII a LIGHT COMPANY LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES Date March 31, 1981 Page ot I0 QP NUaaaaa/TITLE 1.1 CANCELLED SECTION DESCRIPTION 2.1 CANCELLED (Terms and Definitions contained in the QA Manual Glossary) 2.2 REVISION OF THE TOPICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Provides instructions for the revision of the Florida Power 8c Light Company Topical Quality Assurance Report (FPL TQAR).

2.3 PREPARATION AND REVISION OF QUALITYPROCEDURES 2.4 PREPARATION AND REVISION OF QUALITYINSTRUCTIONS 2-5 QUALITYASSURANCE INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING 2.6 CANCELLED 2.7 IDENTIFICATIONOF SAFETY RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS Describes the instructions and methods used for establishing, preparing, issuing, revising and controlling Quality Procedures employed in supporting quality requirements.

Provides the responsibilities, guidelines and methods used for developing and revising Quality Instructions, based upon QP's, that involve quality activities within a department or organization and are unique to that activity.

Describes the requirements for the indoctrination and training of personnel who perform, or are responsible for activities that affect quality.

Describes the development and approval of documents identifying safety related structures, systems, and components.

FLORIDA POWER Sl LIGHT COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES APPENDIX E Rev.

4 Date March 31, 1981 Page QP NUMBER/TITLE 2.8 CLEANLINESS CONTROL METHODS SECTION DESCRIPTION

'rovides criteria for securing good house<<

keeping.

Assigns responsibilities for assuring that the cleanliness of material,

~

systems and structures is maintained.

2.9 QUALIFICATIONOF QA AUDITAND QC INSPECTION AND CONSTRUCTION TEST PERSONNEL Describes the personnel qualifications that are required to assure that competent QC inspectors, QA auditors, and construction test personnel perform these respective functions.

2.10 HOUSEKEEPING OPERATING PLANTS 2.11 HOUSEKEEPING-CONSTRUCTION SITES Describes the responsibilities and controls for housekeeping at operating nuclear power plants.

Describes the responsibilities and controls for housekeeping at nuclear power plants during construction.

2.12 FPL QA PROGRAM APPLICABILITY FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS s

3.1 EVALUATIONOF CONTRACTOR DESIGN Identifies the applicability of the FPL Quality Assurance Program for Fire Protection Systems.-

Establishes the methods to evaluate the design and analysis of electrical, mechanical, structural and nuclear related systems and components.

It further establishes the documentation of the control and evaluation to be recorded and maintained.

3.2 IDENTIFICATIONAND CONTROL OF DESIGN INTERFACES Describes measures employed for identifying and controlling design interfaces, changes in design interfaces, and modifications that affect documents.

TOPICAI QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX E fLORIOA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES Date March 31, 1981 3

ot 10 Page QP NUMBER/TITLE SECTION DESCRIPTION 3.4 PLANT CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONSFOR OPER ATING PLANTS 3.5 DESIGN CONTROL AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE Establishes measures for controlling design changes or modifications in operating nuclear power plants.

Defines the responsibilities and methods employed for the initiation, review, evaluation, approval and disposition of field initiated design changes and miscellaneous design documents such as field sketches and isometrics.

3.6 CONTROL OF FPL ORIGINATED D ESIGN 4.1 CONTROL OF REQUISITIONS AND THE ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDERS FOR SPARE PARTS, REPLACEMENT ITEMS AND SERVICES 4.2 EVALUATIONOF CONTRACTOR'S BIDS TECHNICAL 4.3 CANCELLED Covers the preparation, review, and approval of design input documents, design analysis specifications, and design verification for safety related design work originated by FPL.

Provides a system to assure that the appropriate technical and quality require-ments are placed upon suppliers who provide materials, equipment, and services for operating nuclear plants.

Provides the basic evaluation factors for technical evaluations of contractor's bids to supply material, equipment, or services to FPL or FPL's Architect/Engineer.

4.4 REVIEW OF PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES OTHER THAN SPARE PARTS Applies to all FPL issued purchase orders and contracts relating to a nuclear power plant, except those originated by operating plant personnel.

I

FLORIOA POWER Ee LIGHT COMPANY TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES APPENDIX E Rev.

4 PsEO March 31~ 1981 page 4

of 10 QP NUMBERS'IXTLE 5.1 OPERATING PLANT PROCEDURES SECTION DESCRIPTION

~ Describes measures which ensure that instructions and procedures used in operating plants are identified, prepared>

reviewed, approved, issued and revised in accordance with regulatory and FPL requirements.

6.1 CONTROL OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CONTRACTOR DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND PROCEDURES 6.2 CONTROL OF DOCUMENTS ISSUED BY FLORIDA POWER 8L LIGHTCOMPANY Defines responsibilities and methods for the control and issue of contractor drawings, specifications and procedures to be used during the construction phase of nuclear power plants.

Instructions are provided for controlling documents issued by FPL which prescribe activities affecting the quality of safety related items.

6.3 CANCELLED 6.4 FPL DRAWING CONTROL 6.5 PTP DRAWING CONTROLS Describes the means to prepare, control, revise and issue engineering drawings>

make changes to vendor drawings, and to maintain a master drawing file.

Provides instructions governing the review, approval, release, distribution, and revisions of drawings of Turkey Point Plant nuclear safety related structures,

systems, and components.

7.1 RECEIPT INSPECTION OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR OPERATING PLANTS Provides instructions for receipt inspection of materials, parts and components which have been obtained for use in nuclear safety applicatioris at the operating plant site.

FLOAIOA POWER Ta LIGHT COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES APPENDIX E Rev.

4 Date March 31 1981 Page SECTION DESCRIPTION 7.Z RECEIPT INSPECTION OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR PLANTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 7e3 CANCELLED Provides the quality requirements

'for receiving, receipt inspection and disposition of nuclear safety related materials, parts, and components received at the plant site or designated off site storage facility.

7.4 EVALUATIONOF SUPPLIERS OF SAFETY RELATED ITEMS OR SERVICES Provides standards,

measures, and guide-lines for the evaluation of QA Programs of contractors or suppliers supplying items or services.

7e5 CANCELLED 7.6 ACCEPTANCE OF ITEMS 8c SERVICES 7.8 REVIEW AND DISPOSITION OF SUPPLIER DEVIATIONNOTICE 8.1 IDENTIFICATION8T, CONTROL OF MATERIALS,PARTS AND COMPONENTS AT THE PLANT SITE Describes the responsibilities and requirements for accepting nuclear safety related items or services that are being procured for nuclear power plants.

Describes the responsibilities and requirements for the review and disposition of nonconformances identified within a supplier's facility which have resulted or willresult in an item which does not fullycomply with the FPL procurement document quality and technical requirements.

Delineates measures for assuring trace-ability, identification and control of items from the time they are received through usage at operating plants.

FLORIOA POWER 6 LIGHY COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES APPENDIX E Rev.

4 Dare March~31 1 81 Page QP NUMBERSTITLE SECTION DESCRIPTION 8.2 IDENTIFICATION4 CONTROL OF MATERIALS,PARTS AND COMPONENTS AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION

, Provides guidance for assuring that contractors provide for identifying and controlling materials, parts, and components, including traceability, from receipt through usage during all phases of construction.

9.1 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES FOR CONSTRUCTION Delineates the responsibilities of organ-izations and personnel, and the control and documentation of special processes that are applied to safety related items.

9.2 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES DURING OPERATING PHASE

. 10.1 MOVED TO 7.2 10.2 INSPECTION OF PLANT CONSTRUCTION 10.3 INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCEOF MAINTENANCEACTIVITIES,OPERATIONS AND FUEL HANDLING Describes measures to assure adequate control over special processes applied to safety related items during the operating phase of nuclear power plants.

Defines the responsibilities and requirements for the planning, performance and documentation of inspection.

Delineates responsibilities and requirements for the inspection and surveillance of safety related plant maintenance activities, operation of safety related systems, and fuel handling activities.

10.4 CANCELLED 10.5 PREOPERATIONAL (BASELINE) EXAMINATION Describes the means for assuring that the physical properties and characteristics of pressure retaining components are tested and measured; and the recorded, analyzed and evaluated results (baseline data) are retained for the life of the plant.

t t

FLORIOA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITF ASSURANCE PROCEDURES APPENDIX E Rev.

4 Date March~31 1 81 Page QP NUMBERJTITLE SECTION DESCRIPTION 10.6 INSERVICE INSPECTION tiSI)

Describes the means for assuring that the physical characteristics of safety related items and systems are inspected in accordance with the provisions of the

'SME and that the BhPV Code-Section XIresults are documented at specified times during the operating life of the plant.

11.1 TEST CONTROL - CONSTRUCTION Establishes measures to assure that contractor testing of safety related material during the plant construction phase is controlled, accomplished, and documented.

11.2 TEST CONTROL OPERATION t

lle3 TEST CONTROL PREOPERATIONAL AND START-UP TESTS A description of the procedures and practices employed by FPL to control testing of plant 'functions and material that are within the scope of the QA Program during the plant operational

.phase.

Defines the procedures and practices employed to demonstrate the capabilities of a nuclear plant to satisfy safety r'elated performance specifications.

11.4 TEST CONTROL PROGRAM Defines the measures for control of proof test prior to installation, construction tests, preoperational tests, startup tests, operational tests and retests following repairs, replacements or modifications for nuclear safety related systems, structures, and components.

12.1 CALIBRATIONAND CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Delineates the responsibilities for implementing the described program for maintenance, calibration and control of measuring and test equipment (M8cTE).

TOPlCAL QUALlTYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX E FLORIDA POWER a LIGHT COMPANY LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY'SSURANCE PROCEDURES Date March 31 1981 Page SECTION DESCRIPTION 12.2 CALIBRATIONCONTROL OF INSTALLED PLANT INSTRUMENTATIONAND CONTROL EQUIPMENT 13.1 HANDLING,STORAGE AND SHIPPING OF MATERIALS,PARTS AND COMPONENTS AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 13.2 HANDLING,STORAGE AND SHIPPING OF MATERIALS,PARTS AND EQUIPMENT DURING

'LANT OPERATION Describes the calibration program, delineates responsibilities, and establishes procedures for control over the calibration of installed instrumentation and plant control equipment.

Establishes responsibilities and procedures to assure that measures are employed by contractors to:

(1) control the handling, shipping and storage of material; (2) protect the quality of material by using proper handling, shipping, and storage techniquesF'3) effectively control the disposition of discrepant items.

Specifies the respective responsibilities of FPL personnel and the measures employed for controlling the handling, shipping and storage of materials during the plant's operational phase.

13.3 CONTROL OF RESERVED CENTRALLYSTORED ELECTRICALCABLE 14.1 INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS DURING PLANT OPERATION 14.2 INSPECTION TEST AND OPERATING STATUS DURING PLANT CONSTRUCTION Provides the requirements for the issuance and controls of centrally stored electrical cable for use in all operating nuclear power plants.

Specifies the respective responsibilities of FPL personnel and the measures employed for identifying the status (Inspection-Test-Operation) of plant structures, systems and components.

Provides requirements and responsibilities for the identification of the inspection, test and operating status of plant equipment up to turnover of the plant to the operating organization.

FLORIOA POWER d LIGHt COMP*NY TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES APPENDIX E 4

Date March 31 1981 Page 9

of 10 QP NUMBER/TITLE 15.1 CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS - PLANTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION SECTION DESCRIPTION Specifies the responsibilities of FPL departments and the process for exercising control over materials,-

structures9 or activities that do not conform to specifications so that inadvertent use or installation does not occur.

15.2 t

CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS - OPERATING PLANTS 16.1 CORRECTIVE ACTION 16.2 CANCELLED (Combined with 16.1) 16.3 CANCELLED Defines the objectives and responsibilities for controlling nonconforming items or services in order to prevent their inadvertent use, installation or application to operating nuclear power plants.

Establishes the respective responsibilities of FPL personnel and the procedure for assuring that conditions identified by the FPL QA Department as being adverse to quality, are corrected.

16.4 EVALUATINGAND REPORTING OF DEFECTS AND NONCOMPLIANCES FOR SUBSTANTIALSAFETY HAZARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR PART 21'6.6 REPORTING OF 10 CFR 50.55(e)

DEFICIENCIES 17.1 THE COLLECTION AND STORAGE OF QUALITYASSURANCE RECORDS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Specifies the measures and responsibilities within Florida Power 8c Light to assure compliance to 10 CFR Part 21.

Specifies measures and responsibilities for the identification and reporting of 10 CFR 50.55(e) type deficiencies to the NRC during the plant construction phase.

Identifies records and documents required to substantiate quality,'nd, describes measures employed for their maintenance, retention and retrieval.

TOPlCAL QUAL!TYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX E e,

e LIST OF CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES Dree March 31 1981 FLORIOA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY Page 10 of 10 QP NUMBER/TITLE 18.1 CONDUCT OF QUALITYASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITYAUDITS SECTION DESCRIPTION Provides instructions for conducting audits of FPL Quality Assurance Program activities.

18e2 SCHEDULING OF QUALITYASSURANCE DEPARTMENT AUDITACTIVITIES Provides the responsibilities and instructions for planning and scheduling audits to be conducted by the FPL Quality Assurance Department.

TOPICAL QUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX F FLORIOA POWER Ef LIGHT COMPANY TOPLCS TO BE ADDRESSED IN SAFETY ANALYSISREPORTS Rev.

0 Date January

$3~~

Page I

of z The FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report is the statement of Florida Power 8c Light Company Quality Assurance Program Requirements which do not vary with plant site.

These stated requirements form a description of the FPL Quality Assurance Program which does not contain identification of the involvement of principal contractors such as the Architect/Engineer, Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor, or Constructor.

The contractor involvement in the Program will be described in the plant Safety Analysis Report.

In addition, other detailed aspects of the Quality Assurance Program vary from plant-to-plant or with plant site.

These aspects will also be described in the plant SAR.

The requirements of the FPL Quality Assurance Program shall apply to the nuclear safety related structures, systems and components as de'fined in the applicable plant SAR.

As a minimum, the Safety Analysis Reports for each nuclear power plant, or'opical Reports referenced therein, willaddress all the elements of the 18 criteria of Appendix B including the following information'.

Section 17.1 2o 3 ~

Organization charts that denote the lines and areas of responsibility, authority, and communication of the FPL site Construction Quality Control organization below the Project Quality Control Supervisor.

Descriptions of the principal contractor organizations (A/E,

NSSS, Constructor) performing QA related activities including.'.

the highest level of management responsible for establishing QA policies, goals and objectives; b.

QA function performed; c.

organization charts that denote lines and areas of authority and responsibility; and lines of communication with FPL organizations; d.

organizational

location, freedom and authority of the individuals or a

gxoups assigned responsibility for checking,

auditing, inspecting, or verifying that an activity has been correctly performed.

The schedule for preparation of required procedures not yet established, if applicable.

TOPICALQUALITYASSURANCE REPORT APPENDIX F FLORIOA POWER 6 LIGHY COMPANY TOPICS TO BE ADDRESSED IN SAFETY ANALYSISREPORTS Date January 23, 1976 Page Section 17.1 (Cont'd) 4.

Identification of the principal contractor organizations executing QA related functions and the safety related structures, systems, and components on which these contractor functions are performed.

The organizational structure, authority, and responsibilities of those positions or groups, within the principal contractor organizations, respbnsible for design controls and verification activities.

6.

70 8.

Provisions which identify those individuals or groups responsible for reviewing, approving, and issuing documents and document revisions within principal contractor organizations.

The organization of contractor groups performing inspections, including their independence from the group performing the activity being inspected.

Identification of individuals or groups who perform receiving and process verifications at the construction site when not performed by FPL.

Section 17.2 20 Organization charts that denote the lines and areas of. responsibility, authority, and communication of the site Quality Control organization below the level of Plant Manager.

Description of the provisions that control the transfer of QA related activities from the principal contractors to FPL during the preoperational testing phase up to fuel loading, including identification of those significant QA related activities performed by contractors as a result of FPL requirements.