ML17329A068
| ML17329A068 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1991 |
| From: | Wright G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17329A069 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9107010040 | |
| Download: ML17329A068 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1991012
Text
Docket No.
50-315
Docket No.
50-316
Company
ATTN:
Mr. E. E. Fitzpatrick
Vice President
Nuclear Operations Division
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus,
Ohio 43216
Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:
SUBJECT:
NRC INSPECTION REPORTS
NO. 50-315/91012 (DRS) I
NO.
50-316/91012 (DRS)
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted
by
Mr. R. A. Langstaff and Ms. V. P.
Lougheed of this office on
June
3 through 7,
1991.
The inspection included
a review of
activities-at the Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units
1 and
2, authorized
by NRC Operating Licenses
No.
and No.
DPR-
74.
At,the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were
discussed
with Mr. A. Blind and others of your staff as
identified in the enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the
report.
This inspection
focused
on your quality verification
program with an emphasis
on your peer inspection process.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of selective
examinations
of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection certain of your activities appeared to be
in v'iolation of NRC requirements,
as specified in the enclosed
Notice.
A written response
is required.
Two unresolved
items
were also identified regarding the independence
of personnel
performing activity verifications and their qualification in
accordance
with Regulatory Guide 1.8 and ANSI N18.1 (1971).
You
are requested
to provide documentation to show how these
two
Quality Assurance
Program Description commitments
are being met.
Your response
should specifically include information in regard
to training of Indiana
& Michigan Power personnel
in the
performance of peer inspections
and the assurance
that personnel
assigned to perform work are not involved in the verification
aspects
for that job.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,
a copy of this letter, the enclosures,
and your response
to this
letter will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
91070l0040
910624
ADOCK 05000315
Q
/8 Gi
'
Company
JUH 3~ 1>>~
The responses
directed by this letter and the enclosed Notice are
not subject to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of
Management
and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1980,
Pub.
L. No. 96.511.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this
inspection.
Sincerely,
ORIGlNAt. SfGttED BY GEOFFREY C. IRt6'HT.
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-315/91012(DRS)
No. 50-316/91012(DRS)
Geoffrey C. Wright, Chief,
Operations
Branch
cc w/enclosures:
A. A. Blind, Plant Manager
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspector, RIII
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
EIS Coordinator,
USEPA
Region
5 Office
Michigan Department of
Public Health
D.
C. Cook,
LPM,
RADII
Lang
aff/cg/jk
06/24/91
RII
R I
I
R I
Lougheed
~ Jorg
sen
Phil zps
rig t
06/gg/91
06+
91
06/g
/91
06/2
/91