ML17319B044
| ML17319B044 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17319B043 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-315-81-19, 50-316-81-22, NUDOCS 8109150298 | |
| Download: ML17319B044 (4) | |
Text
~
~
L
~Aendiz A
NOTICE OF VIOLATION American Electric Power Service Corporation Docket No. 50-315 Docket No. 50-316 As a result of the inspection conducted on August 10-12,
- 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violations were identified:
1 10 CFR 50 p Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part, that "Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed in documented instructions, procedures, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."
AEP Design Division Organization and Procedures lfanual, General Design Procedure No. 8, Revision 2 dated October 31, 1980, "Cal-culations," under "Computer Calculations" Paragraph 2 states, "The engineer or designer responsible for the problem shall stamp the first sheet of output containing the input data and review it for accuracy against the input data.
The assigned "Checker" shall also check the input data in the same manner.
After checking, the originator and checker shall sign and date the stamp."
Contrary to the above, during a review of IE Bulletin No. 79-14 evaluation packages, it was observed that AEP Calculation 2-258, "From Pump 2-RC-20 to Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger, 2-CS-670,"
dated December 3,
1979 had not been signed and dated by the checker.
This is a Severity Ievel V violation (Supplement I).
2.
The D.
C.
Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifica-tion, Amendment No. 23 "Prompt Notification with Written Followup."
Section 6.9.1.8 states, "The types of events listed below shall be reported within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> by telephone and confirmed by telegraph, mailgram, or facsimile transmission to the Director of the Regional Office, or his designate no later than the first working day follow-ing the event, with a written followup report within 14 days.
The written followup report shall include, as a minimum, a completed copy of a licensee event report form.
Information provided on the licensee event report form shall be supplemented, as needed by additional narrative material to provide complete explanation of the circumstances surrounding the event."
Section 6.9.1.8.i. states, q 8 r
8109150298 810831 PDR ADOCK 05000315 PDR
I
~
i q
5r 0-h r
I e
Appendix A "Performance of structures,
- systems, or components that requires remedial action or corrective measures to prevent operation in a manner less conservative than assumed in the accident analyses in the safety analysis report or technical specification bases; or dis-covery during unit life of conditions not specifically considered in the safety analysis report or technical specifications that require remedial action or corrective measures to prevent the existence or development of an unsafe condition."
Contrary to the above, during a review of IE Bulletin No. 79-14 evaluation packages, two instances were identified where stresses in excess of Code allowables were calculated and repairs were made to the affected systems without written reports being submitted to the NRC Region III office.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of'10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) cor-rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoi'd further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
- amended, this 'response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
AUG 5-~
~g8~
Dated e s. e~ fJ>>Pi Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection
0 r
1 A'