ML17318A758
| ML17318A758 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook |
| Issue date: | 05/15/1980 |
| From: | Maloney G INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| AEP:NRC:00334D, AEP:NRC:334D, NUDOCS 8005200598 | |
| Download: ML17318A758 (8) | |
Text
1 ~
REGULATORY I RMATION DISTRIBUTION SYS (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR!8005200598 DOC ~ DATE: 80/05/15 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET FACIL:50 315 Donald C,
Cook Nuclear Power Plant~
Unit ii Indiana 8
05000315 50 316 Donald C,
Cook Nuclear Power Planti Unit 2i Indiana 8
05000316 AUTH INANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION MALONEYrG ~ PE Indiana 8 Michigan Electric Co.
RECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONg H j R ~
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
Forwards executive summary of plant sh)elding design 8
.equipment radiation evniron qualification reviewiconducted per 800227 meeting, DISTRIBU'TION CODE:
A001S COPIES RECEIVED!LTR ~
ENCL ~
SIZK4 TITLE: General Distr ibut ion for after'Issuance of Oper ating L'ic L
'C%m W c w~
&W As a
~Me-a
=
~ oe ~
gaFEee wee rr ee mw rr mm esses yseem ~~ ~
awemeeesee REC IP IENT ID CODE/NAME ACTION:'5 BC ~~~~ (
INTERNALe 0
EG F I 12 17 ENGR BR 19 PL'ANT SYS;PR 21 EFLT TRT SYS OKLD EXTERNALS 03 LPDR 23 ACRS COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
7 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 1
1 16
'16 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME 02 NRC PDR 15 CORE PERF BR 18 RKAC SFTY BR 20 'EEB EPB~DOR STS GROUP LEADR 04 NSIC COPIKS LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
i 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 MO TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR ~
ENCL
~
g
~
0 A
8 005300 INDIANA L MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. 0.
BOX 18 BOWLING GR E EN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 AEf:NRL:003340 Ma 15 198Q Donald C,
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1'and 2
Docket Nos.
50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.
DPR-58 and DPR-74 fir. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Denton:
Attached herein is the executive summary of the Plant Shielding Design review and Equipment Radiation Environmental qualification review which were conducted in accordance with the guidance furnished to us in our meeting with your Staff on February 27, 1980.
The detailed report will be.available at the Plant for review by the Staff of the Office of Inspection and Enforcement.
Indiana 8 Michigan Electric Company interprets 10 CFR 170.22 as not requiring that a fee accompany this letter.
Very truly yours, GPM:em P.
Malo Vice Pre d
Attachment cc:
R.
C. Callen R. Charnoff D. V. Shaller - Bridgman R.
S.
Hunter R.
M. Jurgensen
J C
N h 't" II 4'
I
ATTACHMENT TO AEP:NRC'00334D EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
A detailed review was conducted to establish the adequacy of existing shielding to handle post accident fluids containing NUREG-0578 sources and to assess the capability of the systems and components that would handle post-accident fluids to,withstand 'the post-accident radiation environment.
The safety injection system, containment spray
- system, residual heat removal
- system, charging system, and the post-accident sampling system were identified as the systems that would carry post-accident radioactive fluid.
The gaseous radwaste system and the chemical and volume control system were not included in the review since these systems can be promptly isolated and the insta1lation of reactor
.vessel head vents'preempts Ithe use of these systems for degassing.
Radiation dose levels around the post-accident fluid-carrying lines were re-evaluated using NUREG-0578 source terms and as-built shield thick-nesses.
The access requirement for each area surrounding the post-accident fluid carrying lines were reviewed in conjunction with all safety analysis requirements and plant emergency operating procedures.
It was determined that access to the areas around these lines and equipment is normally not expected and that access, if required, will be gained under strict administrative control with proper radiation protection precautionary measures.
Based on this review, it was concluded that no additional shielding is required to bring the personnel exposures within the GDC 19 dose criteria.
Post-accident fluid-carrying lines and their components were further evaluated to determine whether or not these systems and their components are adequate to withstand doses from NUREG-0578 source terms.
Systems and components with radiation environmental qualification were reviewed to establish that the qualification level exceeded the required level.
All the components with radiation environmental qualification are qualified to levels that are higher than the expected dose levels following a design basis accident.
There were certain items which did not have any radiation environ-mental qualification.
The material specifications for these components were carefully reviewed and all;radiosensitive parts were identified.
Radiation doses were calculated for the specific locations using NUREG-0578 source terms.
The doses were then compared to the threshold or allowable doses> for the materials specified in Table C-1 of Appendix C of Enclosure No.
Those radiosensitive parts which could, under the assumptions of the review, experience exposures in excess of the threshold for the materials involved are being considered for replacement.
The components recommended for replacement are the contain-ment sump level indicators and certain components of the interim post-accident sampling system.
The efforts for replacement will be carried out along with the efforts associated with the close-out of IE Bulletin No.79-01B review.
1
Executive Summary For further details of this review, please refer to'he detailed report which will be available at the P1ant and at our Engineering offices.
k
~
I l