ML17317B259
| ML17317B259 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 05/02/1979 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Dolan J AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO., INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17317B260 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906140603 | |
| Download: ML17317B259 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1979007
Text
)oe
~~P,II RECIF
Wp0
Iv
I
g
q
F
++**+
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 6013T
MAY 2
879
CENTr;~a nm
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
American Electric Power Service
Corporation
and Michigan Power
Company
ATTN:
Mr. John E. Dolan, Senior
Vice Chairman,
Engineering
2 Broadway
New York, NY
10004
Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection
conducted
by Hr. K. R. Baker of
this offi'ce on April 19 and 20,
1979, of activities at the
Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and
2 authorized
by
NRC Operating Licenses
No. DPR-58 and No.
and to the
discussion of our findings with Mr. Shaller
and others of your
staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed
copy of our inspection report identifies areas
examined during the inspection.
Within these areas,
the
inspection consisted
of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with
personnel.
Areas
examined during this inspection
concern
a sub)ect
matter which is exempt from disclosure
according
to Section
2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10,
Code of Federal Regulations.
Consequently,
the enclosure
to this letter, our report of this inspection,
and your
response
to the noncompliance identified in the enclosure
to this letter will not be placed in the Public Document
Room.
Therefore,
your statement
of corrective action
regarding the noncompliance identified in the enclosure
should be submitted
as
a separate
enclosure
to your trans-
mittal letter.
During this inspection,
certain of your activities. appeared
to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements,
as described
in the enclosed
Appendix A.
. A)TALRt EI>t COr~1AIiS
1O CFR 2.79O:<d) lilFORMAFIOFI
II
c3
haerican Electric Power Service
Corporation
Company
ve'
879
This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of
Section 2.201 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part
2 ~ Title
10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 2.201 requires
you
to submit to this office within twenty days of your receipt
of this notice a written statement
or explanation in reply,
including for each item of noncoaplisnce1
(1) corrective
action taken and the results achieved;
(2) corrective action
to be taken to avoid further noncompliance;
and (3) the date
when full compliance will be achieved.
IE Inspection Reports
No. 50-315/77-10,
No. 50-316/77-12,
No. 50-315/78-20
and Ho. 50-316/78-22
contained similar
%texas.
In your reply to this letter please include any
additional action you are taking to ensure that there will
be no repetitive iteas of noncompliance in this area.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this
inspection.
Sincerely,
R. F. Hcishman,
Chief
Reactor Operations
and
Nuclear Support Branch
Enclosures:
1.
hppendix k, Notice
of Violation
(Part 2. 790 Infonaation)
2.
IE Inspection Rpts.
No. 50-315/79-07
and
Ho. 50-316/79-06
(Part 2. 790(d) Information)
cc <</encls:
D. V. Sheller, Plant Manager
Central FQ.es
Reproduction Unit NRC 20b
OFFIC~
SURNAM~
CC w/o cncls:
4/26/79
RIII~PO
" @+-
Baker/gc
Donahue
RIII~gg
Warnick
RIII
eis
H
an
Masse
NRC Form 3188 (RnZ) (1.78) NRCM 0240
~U. S. OOVERNMSNT PAINTINGOPPICSs
10'I~ 251+IT
Appendix A
American Electric Power
Service Corporation
and Michigan
Power
Company
I
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
Based
on the inspection
conducted
on April 19 and
20,
1979, certain
of your activities appear to be in noncompliance with NRC require-
ments,
as noted below.
This item is an infraction.
The facilities approved security plan and
10 CFR 73 '5(c)(3) require
an isolation zone be maintained.
Contrary to the above,
on April 19,
1979 it was observed
that the
20 foot isolation zone required by paragraph
3 '
~ 2 of the Security
Plan was not maintained
when eight tanks were placed within 16 feet
of the security fence.
.>~~0 2.79Ch'nfo.
S-F3-g t-%<
C<>PZ~oP
F
cagi;
'- DC~u
>f'p IS i ~) T0
i~ IT~AU
>>PROVAL Q.=