ML17311A678
| ML17311A678 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1995 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17311A676 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-528-94-35, 50-529-94-35, 50-530-94-35, NUDOCS 9503010336 | |
| Download: ML17311A678 (2) | |
Text
FEB 15 '95 12:SS C(NPLIAHCE P.6 Restatemen of otice af Violation 50-52S/529/530/9445-01 During an NRC inspection conducted on November 15 through November 17, 1994, November 29 through December 2, 1994, and in-office review until December 16, 1994, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
fn accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
Criterion V of appendix 8 to 10 CFR 50 requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instruction, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Procedure 90AC-01PD4, Revision 2, effective November 2, 1992, and Revision 3, effective January 3, 1994, describes the condition reporting process.
Section 1.1.3 of the procedure identifies applicable conditions, for
- example, human errors; procedure deficiencies and technical inadequacies; use or generation of incorrect or inaccurate documents such as specifications, procedures, or instructions; conditions that could result in reports to external agencies; and any other problems that may adversely affect the safe operation of the plant. Section 3.1.2 of the procedure requires if the condition described indicates immediate action or may have adverse or immediate impact on the operation of plant systems or equipment, then the originator shall initiate any required immediate actions and complete the condition report/disposition request in accordance with its instructions to complete the applicable sections of the form as soon as practical.
Contrary to the above, a condition report/disposition request was not initiated in November 1993 nor in February 1994 when licensee personnel identified and discussed an applicable condition involving the need for both a boron concentration restriction and core protection calculator operability to be maintained during plant operation in Modes 3, 4, and 5 in order to ensure satisfaction of assumptions of the design basis safety analysis.
This is a Severity Level IVviolation (Supplement I) applicable to Units 1, 2, and 3.
Page 1 of 1 95030i0336 950228 PDR ADQCK 05000528 8
l i
1 l
'l I
(
j l
J l
I I