ML17311A285

Summary of 940815 Meeting W/Util in Arlington,Tx to Discuss Changes to Engineering & Maint Programs at Plant Which Resulted from Licensee Reengineering Efforts.List of Attendees Encl

ML17311A285
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	09/20/1994
From:	Beach A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
NUDOCS 9409270048
Download: ML17311A285 (57)

Text

X ~j.~~J.

J.

X (NUDOCS OFFSITE FACILITY)

REGUDY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI~ SYSTEM (RIDE)

ACCESSION NBR:9409270048 DOC.DATE: 94/09/20 NOTARiZED:

NO

'OCKET FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi -05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BEACH,A.B.

Region 4 (Post 820201)

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION P.

Region 4 (Post 820201)

SUBJECT:

Summary of 940815 meeting w/util in Arlington,TX to discuss changes to engineering

& maint programs at plant which resulted from licensee reengineering efforts. List of attendees encl.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE45D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Summary of Significant Meeting 'with Licensee (Part 50)

NOTES:STANDARDIZED PLANT Standardized plant.

Standardized plant.

05000528 I

05000529'5000530 T

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME HOLIAN, B COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME TRAN,L COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 INTERNAL: DEDRO NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E OGC/ROED RGN4 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: NOAC 1

FILE CENTER 0.

1 UDOCS-ABSTRACT 1

RES/DSIR/EIB 1

NRC PDR 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 D

0 C

u NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACTTHE DOCUMENTCONTROL DESK, ROOM PI-37 (EXT. 504-2083 ) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAMEFROM DISTRIBUTIONLI~FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDI TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR ll ENCL'l

I 'ti

t UNITED S'I ATES NUCL'EAR REGULATORY COMMI N

R 6 G ION IV 011 RYAN PLAZA DR'~~E SVITE '00 ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76011 8064 SEP 20 ISS4 Dockets:

50-528 50-529 50-530 Licenses:

NPF-41 NPF-51 NPF-74 Arizona Publ i c Servi ce Company ATTN:

William L. Stewart Executive Vice President, Nuclear P.O, Box 53999 Phoen>x, Ar>zona 85072-3999

SUBJECT:

PUBLIC MEETING WITH ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (APS)

This refers to the management

meeting, open to public observation, conducted on August 15, 1994, at the Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, concerning activities authorized by NRC Licenses NPF 41, NPF 51, and NPF 74 for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.

Attendees at the meeting are listed in Attachment 1 to this letter.

The purpose of this meeting was to discuss changes to the engineering and maintenance programs at Palo Verde, which resulted from your re-engineering efforts.

The descriptions of your new organization and management expectations of the new re-engineered work processes in these areas were very beneficial to the NRC staff.

We will review the effects of your organizational changes in our future inspections.

The slides presented during the meeting are provided as Attachment 2 to this letter.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"

a copy of

-this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss then with you.

Sincerely,

. Bill Beach, Director Division of Reactor Projects Attachments:

1.

Attendance List 2.

Presentation Slides 9409270048 940920 PIN

,ADOCK 05000528 P

PDR

Arizona Public Service Company CC:

Arizona Corporation Commission ATTN:

Nr. Steve Olea 1200 W. Washington Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Southern California Edison Company ATTN:

T.

E. Oubre, Esq.

P.O.

Box 800

Rosemead, California 91770 ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power ATTN:'harles B. Brinkman, Nanager Washington Nuclear Operations 12300 Twinbr ook Parkway, Suite 330 Rockville, Naryland 20852 Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency ATTN:

Aubrey V. Godwin, Director 4814 South 40 Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Naricopa County Board of Supervisors ATTN:

Chairman 111 South Third Avenue

Phoenix, Arizona 85003 NeWman

& Holtzinger, P.C.

ATTN:

Jack R.

Newman, Esq.

1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C.

20036 Palo Verde Services ATTN:

Curtis Hoskins, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 2025 N. 3rd Street, Suite 220

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer and Feld El Paso Electric Company ATTN:

Roy P.

Lessey, Jr.,

Esq.

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, Suite 400 Washington, D.C.

20036

r 1

Arizona Public Service Company Arizona Publ ic Servi ce Company ATTN:

Angela K. Krainik, Hanager Nuclear Licensing P.O.

Box 52034

Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034

Arizona Public Service Company SEP 2G lggg bcc to DNB (IE45) bcc distrib.

by RIV:

,L. J. Callan DRSS-FIPB Branch Chief (DRP/F,, WCFO)

RIV File Leah Tremper, OC/LFDCB, HS:

Resident Inspector HIS System Project Inspector (DRP/F, WCFO)

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

NNBB 4503 C:DRP/F HJWong;df +~

D:WCFO KEPerkins D

B ch 9~/94 g)rv g 9/go/94 9

/94

Arizona Public Service Company SEP 20 Sgd bcc to DMB (IE45) bcc distrib.

by RIV:

L. J. Callan DRSS-FIPB Branch Chief (DRP/F, WCFO)

RIV Fi 1 e Leah Tremper, OC/LFDCB, NS:

Resident Inspector NIS System Project Inspector (DRP/F, WCFO)

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

NNBB 4503 C:DRP/F HJWong;df +~

9~/94 D:WCFO KEPerkins 9/pe/94 DDP AB ch 9

/94

ATTACHMENT I ATTENDANCE LIST Arizona Public Service Com an J. Bailey, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering D. Mauldin, Director, Maintenance D. Garchow, Director, System Engineering J.

Hesser, Director, Design and Projects Engineering B. Chapin,

Manager, Mechanical Maintenance R. Lucero, Manager, Electrical Maintenance A. Krainik, Manager, Nuclear Licen'sing NRC Re ion IV J.

Montgomery, Deputy Regional Administrator A. Beach, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)

T.

Gwynn, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)

H.

Wong, Chief, Project Branch F,

DRP D. Powers, Chief, Maintenance

Branch, DRS C. Paulk, Acting Chief, Engineering

Branch, DRS E. Collins, Team Leader, DRS NRC NRR B. Holian, Project Manager Others F.

Gowers, Site Representative, El Paso Electric

A.

I j

h

'='.",: 'Pa!o

, p, V'%

~;0%."igloo.

0 c<

8+c fR

.c

q.,"; -.:;:j",w".,appal;.,".:,::waggly>,,gg~gg+@f+~~~ggyo4~/Q+

p 9@y+~A~M

&WE'M "~~4'j'@

uc eat n ineerin Mission and Organization Jack Bailey Reengineering Update John Kesser Engineering Self-Assessment Dave Garchow Engineering Strengths and Weaknesses Jack Bailey

Nuclear Engineering 8 Projects 1994 Strategic Plan Mission - 1998 NE&P is the PVNGS design authority, and willbe recognized as the leader in the nuclear industry in providing responsive, high quality, cost-effective design and technical solutions for Nuclear Production that enhance the safe and reliable operation of.PVNGS.

This willbe accomplished by an innovative winning team of professionals which is focused on results in the areas of:

~ Regulatory performance

~ Establishment, control and communication ofplant design bases

~ Human performance and strategic development

~ System and component performance monitoring that optimizes reliabilityand availability

~ Configuration management

~ Euel management and safety analyses

~ Project design and management Our culture emphasizes integrity, open and effective communication, responsible risk-taking, and individual accountability and recognition.

Palo Verde Engineering Nuclear Production Vlcc'President Nttctltr,Pioduction JhnI;eve Nuclear Engineering Vice President Nuclear Engineering Jack Bailey Nuclear Support Vice President hbclear Sogfe~

Bert Simpson Department er OCS Steve 7hfsf Sectfon Leader Valve Services Steve Coppock Sectfon Leadls, Naint. Engr.

Nark Hypse Kevin Jones Steve Penick Naik VanQop Nike Wlnsor Dfrector System Engineering Dave Garchow Director Nuclear Fuels Paul Craw/ey Director Design Engineering John Hesser Dept. Leader Information Technology HweJa Marks Dept. Leader Steam Generate Project Rich Schalier Section Leader Qeslgn Basis Jihad Za hloul Dept Leader Nuclear Records Management Janet Te Section Lairs Procurement Engineering/

VlMs Steve Garrett Jeff Hillary

g Technical self-sufficient':

~ 100/. of routine technical support in-house

~ Utilize contractors for infrequently performed or specialized support and peak project work

~ In-bouse consultants g involvement of Vendors/OEMs ice ui ment roblems:

~ Verify latest guidance being utilized

~ Achieving agreement on selected course of action

~ Challenge vendor when necessary P Industr involvement:

~ Owner's groups, EPRI, UtilityWorking Committee's Standards and Codes Commmittee's

~ Region V Engineering Forum now expanded to include IV and V utilities

p

at is oo n ineerin g Abilityto identify, analyze and solve technical problems g Rigorous application of engineering principles and analysis P Effective communication of technical issues P Preservation of design basis P Application of new technologies P Technical conscience focused on safe and efficient operation P Good project management g Strong technical program management

Major Chan es Im lemented to Date 4 Modification Process 4 Roles of:

~ Design Engineering

~ Maintenance Engineering

~ System Engineering

"Re-Engineered" Design Modification Process p 4 types of modifications

~ Major design change

~ Maintenance (minor) modification

~ Equivalency modification

~ like-for-like modification

-ier i er

~ 1st: initiator's Management

&. Engineering

~ 2nd: Technical Review Committee

~ 3rd: Plant Review Committee P Site wide commitment P Cross organizational teams

~ Ciadie to grave ownership

~ Effective resource allocations e uc iono ac o

oriro enum ero mo s on ran e

annin orou a enon-ou a e

r p

4 New process in place P Training completed 4 Modification pilot/Lesson learned k> Review and eliminating backlog Filter - early results positive

Modifications Challen es E

P Cross-organization design team consistency P Skills cross-training of design team members P Commitment to schedule P Continued effective use of filters 4 Balancing modification solutions

. versus administrative solutions

Desi n En ineel'in Res onsibilities o

i ica ions on i ura ion ana emen Desi n Bases Ownershi

~ Support

~ Evaluations e-oca e onsi e

~ Available for support to emergent issues

~ Enhance team relationships Design requirements, specifications and standards roec mana emen

Old Organization New Organization Site Technical Support (System Engineering)

Miinteiiance Enjliimrs.:

..- liitejjrited

-, lnto';-;-;::-,-

Maiiitenarice-Orjariliitlon::

System Engineering within Engineering Organizations-.

~r p

Integrated into Maintenance Teams Engineering Section Leader reports to Maintenance Department Leader P

Work focuses on component availability and reliability Support day-to-day maintenance activities

Maintenance En ineerin

{Continued) 4 Technicall su

~sot orts issues on the

~ Technical evaluations

~ Troubleshooting

~ Corrective action plans Execution of minor modifications Input to PM Bases Work within existing engineering ro rams

S stem En ineerin p System Expert for risk significant. systems focusing on increased availability i reliability v i ii an r

i ii m niorin i"

systems (Maintenance Rule based) n e

nnin I n A

P Leader for major equipment root cause of failure analysis P Brings industry experience to maintenance teams

System En ineer Results 4 Building system teams

't 4 Implementing system performance goals I tracking k> Performing system walkdowns i system reports 4 Productive in users and industry groups

Ma or Self-Assessment ACt I Yl ties Com leted Last Year k> Internal evaluation utilizing SALP criteria Engineering assessment of corrective action follow-up Implementation of Performance Assessment Cards (EPAC

Im rovement Aleas Identified P Technical rigor in evaluations Attention to detail in engineering document preparation Self improvement culture.

P Timeliness of corrective actions Ownership of problems through solution implementation 4 COMMUNICATION

Im rovement Initiatives sa is men o

n ineerin Assessment Program Manager uc ear ssuranee a i ne functional area to provide single focus for oversight ana emen riein scorn ee

,regarding expectations for engineering rigor, ownership and need to be open arid self-critical coepLETE with internal and external oversight organizations

I

k Im rovement Initiatives f> Development and implementation of engineering self-assessment guideline 4 Enhancements to engineering performance assessment cards

4

)

Engineering Performance Assessment Cards EPAC ssessmen oo or ec ion ea ers an eers to evaluate performance in "real time" esu sare a ua e an ren s ro uce or categories io ro ramim emen e esu s in icate t at too can e e ec ive More work needed on engineering principles to ensure trends meaningful a e ories o

e assesse o

e revise as art o e

Assessment Program 4 Communication effort with frontline employees to ensure firml anchored

Selected Programmatic Strengths and Weaknesses 4 Stren ths:

~ Focused team performance for functional groups:

- Design Bases

- Valve Services

- Steam Generators

- OCS

~ Flexible, qualified staff committed to continuous improvement

- Nuclear Fuels

- Fire Protection

- PRA

- ISI 4 Weaknesses:

~ Large number of technical issues with interim solutions

~ Inter-departmental and organizational interfaces

k> Organization and functional responsibilities k> Reengineered Maintenance Group k> Reengineering efforts and results 4 Material condition 4 Self assessments 4 Performance and communications 4 Challenges

P p k

Palo Verde Maintenance

. Director Maintenance Mechanical

~ Cooling Towers

~ Turbines / Generators

~ Steam Generators

~ Reactor Coolant Pumps

~ Refueling Activities

~ Machine Shop

~ Nelding

~ Rigging and Cranes

~ Mechanical Engineers

~ -Unit Mechanical Maint.

nstruments Controls-

~ l & C Support

~ Electronic Rework Facility

~ I & C Engineers

~ Surveillance Testing

~ Unit l & C Maint.

omputer Systems

~ Operations CPU Systems

~ Rad Monitoring Systems

~ Security Systems

~ Electrical Engineers Electrical

~ Electrical Rework

~ HYAC

~ Protective Relays

~ Protective Controls

~ Electrical Engineers

~ Unit Electrical Maint.

, Facl it/';.-,

Services

~ Scaffolding

~ Carpentry

~ Coatings / Painting

~ Security Doors

~ Locksmiths

~ Janitorial Services

~ Decontamination

~ Measuring / Test Equipment

~ Tool Rooms

~ Engraving / Signs

~ Surveying

~ Fire Protection Maint.

~ Civil Engineers

~ Insulation

~ Metrolo

-.;~SUpport

~ Component Trending

~ Systems Interface

~ PM Basis Program

~ Maintenance Rule

~ Maintenance Assessments

~ Procedure Control

~ Performance Trending

~ Predictive Maintenance

~ Lube Oil Program

~ Failure Data Trending

~ NPRDS Ya ve Services

~ AOV Rework

~ MOV Maint. /Testing

~ SOY Maint.

~ Maintenance Engineers

~ MOY Diagnostics and Performance Trending

Palo Verde Maintenance Director Maintenance Daie Mauldin Dept. Leader Mechanical BillChapin Dept. Leader I8C Rick Myilck Dept. Leader Computer Systems Steve Troisi Dept. Leader Electrical Ron Lucero Dept. Leader-

. facility Services Dick Gouge.

-'ept. Leader Support Pat Brandjes Dept. Leader Valve Services Mike Salazar (Act)

Palo Verde Electrical Maintenance

'Dept; eader.

+ Eiectricai,

='aintenance

'bn.'LUcero

,'-:Section.'.

',".".Leaclei'.",;,

-;-:8'.;Rimirex:;.'-

Team Leader W. Weems Systems:

AS, CY) DS, DW, GH, MA, MB, NN,PN Team Leader F. Padllla Systems:

CL, GA, GR, LR, NH, PA, RL, SR, SS Team Leader J. Daniel Systems:

AF, HP, tA, NK) NQ, PK QF, QH, SK, NK, NQ

Sectian

=":,Leader '..

'-..'8;-VfBliams-Team Leader R. Llndsa Systems:

PROC Team Leader D. Martin Systems:

AR, DF, DG, FT, LO, NB, OS,PB,PF RE,RF Team Leader R. Clark Systems:

CE, CH, CO, FW, SF, GS, GT, HA, IrtT, NE, RD, SO Section Leader Mark Hypse Maintenance Engineers

= 'Sectton-- "

K

-... -;Leader.=--'-

-. -'R:.:Manica;;

Team Leader T. Fitz trick Systems:

NG, PG, SA, SC, NZ,OW, ZA, ZG, ZF Team Leader B. Roberts Systems:

CD, CI, CW, ED, EW, NC)

PW, RC, SP,K,ZY,ZZ Team Leader P. Fras ulllo Systems:

CQ) QA, A8, QC, QO,OJ, QM, RJ, Il, 88, SD, Sl,ZJ,ZT,2R

.'" Section

=

"'Le)ider

,--'H.---Neison':.

Team Leader C. Armstron Systems:

FP, HA, HJ, HR, NC RL, SC, WC Team Leader F. Weaver Systems:

AR) AS, CFCP, GA, HC, HH HP, HT, ZZ, Filter/HEPA Team Leader J. Edwards Systems:

ED) EW, DG, DS, HD, HF HS, MA,SQ, SS

Maintenance Reengineering Effort and Results P Roles of maintenance engineers

~ Maintenance engineering charter

~ Engineering responsibilities Changes in process and responsibilities P Personnel development and training

~ Procedure writing

~ Work order development

. ~ Technical skills s em co onen wners i

~ PM program

~ Work order backlog

~ System walkdowns

O

1. The Maintenance Engineers shall be active members of the maintenance teams.

2. The Maintenance Team Leaders are the focal point for maintaining the health of the systems. The Team Leaders willprovide day to day system priorities to the Maintenance Engineers.

The Maintenance Engineers willcommunicate all issues Mission:

Engineeri support t needs of Pa safe, rel operation is meet regulatory requirements and provide engineering support to station maintenance while prudently managing costs, effectively utilizingresources and continually improving our overall mairi tenance program through critical self-assessment.

4. Maintenance Engineering shall live within the confines of the Engineering programs and procedures.

5. Other engineering The Maintenance organizations shall be Involved early In Issues, not he maintenance only after problems escalate lo Yerde to ensure In importance. Strong iable, efficient commuiiications between the actBeved. Ne will engineering organizations is vital to our success.

concerning the reliability, --3:-'.;,The'. IItiaIntenatice':Engineer shoiild and availability of

.,:;.;-'.r'esolye.basic,iss'Oes r'apldly, as soon as the the system to

.. ';;.lsstieh become:know'ti; The Maintenance Engineer-the Team

...'..'- -'hould,become,'a:master ht-= involving expertise ln othe)

Leaders, organtzatlorls (l.e:.PED,-EQ, Design).=to resolve complex, program'rnattc,

...;or, sj'etialized technical 'iss'ues. As an englneeiing team, we willprovide, rigorous

'1 0

Plant Material Condition earn owners i

~ Plant walkdowns

~ Responsiveness ersona owners i

isi i i communica ions

~ Management daily involvement (Tue-Fri.)

0745 daily site meeting

. 0830 daily maintenance meeting

~ Management command and control Level one actions Monthly goal performance report eveo in ri e ins a iona earance

~ Signage program

~ Coatings program

~ Yard area cleanup

e

k> Systematic approach More than 20 in last two years 4 Maintenance assessment program (MAP) and results 4 Pre/Post job briefing worksheet

~l C

MAIIQENANCEDEPARTMENT AWSSMENTS REPORT NO.

367-00008 368-00040 368-00044 368-00045 368-00046 368-00047 368-00048 368-00050 368-00051 368-00062 368-00063 368-00075 368-00082 368-0011 7 368-00142 431-00001 431-00002 431-00003 431-00004 431-00005 431-00006 431-00007 TITLE PMs EXCEEDING GRACE PERIOD, UNIT "A" MAINTENANCERULE) IMPACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS CENTRALIZED OTN EVALUATIONS-PROPOSAL TRAINING COORDINATION, MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCESUPPORT DEPARTMENT, PERSPECTIVE MITE CONTROL PROGRAM, PVNGS QC WORK ORDER REJECTION RATES, ASSESSMENT IRC REWORK FACILITY,PERSPECTIVE FIRE PROTECTION WORK BACKLOG, ASSESSMENT SCAFFOLDING PROGRAM, ASSESSMENT QAR 91-012-05 EVALUATION QA REJECT RATIO, ASSESSMENT MET LAB OTN BOOK, ASSESSMENT CHARGING PUMP PERFORMANCE, ASSESSMENT.

SNUBBER TEST PROGRAM EVALUATION SITE MAINTENANCE CRDR EVALUATIONS, ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT MITE 34 SERIES PROGRAM, ASSESSMENT RETESTING, ASSESSMENT S.T.A.R. SELF-CHECKING PROGRAM, ASSESSMENT SALP SELF-EVALUATION-'AINTENANCEiSURVEILLANCE CONTROL OF OVERTIME, ASSESSMENT PLANT MATERIALCONDITION, ASSESSMENT

c Vhy p

fytzf(o $ $

cc/c hd'AINTENANCE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SERVED UNIT NUMBER; SERVFR UNIT NUMBER:

SERVER'XT':

>IGIT ID// OF OBSERVER fE:

)RK TYPE CM LCM PM WR

)RK ORDER tto.

DFWO PC TE EQ PL ST OCEOURE No.

INTENANCEACTIVITYOBSERVED ERALL EXPECTATIONS:

EXCEEDED MET BELOW ien Ihe observation is compteted. forwatd the form lo:

i>nn s TREND IVfailStation 7965 TRUCTIQNS: During the use of the check list, selecl (+) for

/ items where expectations were exceeded, select

() for any ns where expectations were not met and select (<) foc any items

.ire expectations were met. Additional written justigcation can be

>plied in the space provided on the back.

+ < -

1.SAFETY 000

1. Required safety permits obtained and adhered to (e g.

Hot Work, Confined Space. elc),

000 2 Clearances verified prior to work 000

3. Injuries promptty reported to Maintenance Supervision.

000 4 Workers cognizant of the Job's Safety tequirements 000 5 BLANK.

000 6 BLANK.

000 7, Chemicals being properly disposed of.

000 8 Proper protective clothing being used (face shields, gtoves etc ).

QOO

9. Pecsonnel have lhe appropriate Safely Fquipment, (e g safety betts. hfe jackets elc) and it is being used correclly.

QOO 10 Unsafe conditions properly controlled (e g barricades around openholes. etc,).

000 11. Flash shields in place for welding activities.

QOO 12. Combustibles stored properly.

000 13 Gas cylinders properly labeled/secured.

000 14. Hot work petmits signed and being adhered to.

000 15. Fire watches present during welding/cutting activities.

000 16. Propet communication being used (e g hand signals.

radios etc.) for tigging and f>Aing, 000 f7. Heat Stress guidelines reviewed.

000 18 Proper clearance tagging for Iroubteshooling or testing.

000 19. Products in use have proper labels affixed.

000 20. Periodic verifications are perfotmed for correct product labeting infoimation.

000 21. Chemicals are used in accordance with CUP insltuctions.

000 22, CUP labels are clear and legible 000 23. Products are stored in accordance with MSDS/CUP instructions.

000 24. Containers containing chemicals aie intact and sound 000 25. CUP label Information is correct and in accordance with MSDS.

000 26. Personnel are knowfedgeable of CUP/MSDS requirements when using chemical producls.

000 27. Chemical product information is readily available lo petsonnel using chemical products.

+ v' 2, GENERAL MAINT NANCE PRACTICES 000 I, Correct revision of all documents being used 000

2. Pcoper FME procedures folfowed for the job.

000

3. Correct drawings in use (e g. APS Techmanual drawing).

000

4. AIIMaterial control requirements observed (e.g shelf life, traceabilily, etc).

000

5. Appropriate pre.cleaning or securing of loose debris, solid contaminates and solid objects been completed 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 I.Work instructions were followed as written. or pa~

modilications were implemented prior lo proceedi

2. AIIwork steps cunent for the job status (e g siqned of(

for work performed. QC hold points cnmpteled. etc )

3. Proper authorizing signatures obtained 4 Allnotifications been made and documented as applicable,

5. Secucity notilied of activities that result in degiadahon of security barriers, and present for activities requiring compensation.

6.AIIwork activ>ties adequately documenled in the work package.

7. Action laken to correct identilied procedure probfems

8. Work package degciencies identified and corrected 9, Wotk documents. other than problems with referenced procedures. adequate for job peilormance w>tt>out correclions.

000 10. Procedures used in the work document adequate

+v 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 4.SELF -VERIFICA ION t

I, Crew using STAR verification method

2. AIIrigging v>suatiy inspected poor to use

3. Debris removed from Ihe equipment prior lo close oul

4. Wiring properly trained and supported 5.AIIcovers. ptates, etc. installed with ail fasteneis in place and tight.

6,AII fasteners have the proper thread engagement

7. Lubricants at proper level.

8. Allverifications performed.

For example-Independenl verification 2"

party verification Determ / reterm veri%cations Equipment configuration verifications (e g posilioiiing swilched. breakers. valves, hfling/landing leads.

connection of,ATE, removing/installing luses. elc )

000 6 Clear and appropriate hnes of communication estabhshed.

000

7. Plant configuration testored at Ihe conclusion of all woik activities.

000 8 Maintenance Supervision aware of and in control of all work evolutions.

000 9 Petsonnel aware. ol the complete scope of lt>eii work 000 10 Lanyards used on tools which were smatter than the opening of Ihe component/system to prevent inadvertent entry.

000 11. Thorough and complele turnover conducted at the change of shiit.

3. PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTATION

000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 1, Contaminated rad materials being properly fabeled and bagged.

2. Hazardous materials properly stored and handled.

3.Personnel practicing good ALARA(e g. standing in cold areas, tools and M&TEprotected from contamination, etc.),

4. Indivisr66 '-. nol sitting. kneeling or climbing in potentially contamfnated areas without proper RP.

5. Prolectrve clothIng being properly worn.

6, Personnel removing protective clothing in the correct manner.

7. Personnel aware of Radiological work practices related fo their job.

8. Main!enance Supervision notified of all personnel contaminalions and significant exposures,

+ v'.

000 000 000 000

7. TRAININGAND UALIFICATIONS

1. Personnel compteted the required training /

qualifications

2. Qualigcations current for Ihe. Iask.

3 Performer is having no difficultyperforming Ihe lask.

4. OJT being properly conducted during the performance of Ihe task.

t 66'.

000 000

1. M&TE properly handled and correct for Ihe application.

2. Equipment properly labeled and lagged.

S. PLANT MATERIALCONDITION 000

1. Materials/vehicles are properly stored within an isolation zone.

000 2 Components were bee of leaks/damage.

000 3 Loose items were removed from the area 000 4 No parts missing at Ihe completion of work (e g.

screws. covers, vent caps and drain lines) 000

5. No condrtions were left at Ihe end ol a job that could affect equipment perlormance(e.g.

scaffolding, test cables. etc,)

000

6. Thermal insutalion properly removed. stosed and replaced.

000 7 Lighting adequate for job performance.

000

8. Passageways free horn ohstructions.

000

9. Tags removed when work Is commenced. (e g MNCR.

Maintenance required. etc.)

000 10. Components, parts and material not installed being properly maintained (e g bagged. lagged, stored etc,).

000 11. Work area returned lo lhe proper level of housekeeping.

000 12. Alltransient material removed from the work area (e g, ladders. carts, tools. etc )

000 13. Maintenance Shops and laydovm areas well maintained.

6.RAOIOLOGICALPRO~TAG ION 000 3 M&TE wilhin rts cakhration due dite 000

4. M&TE recorded in lhe implementing document, 000

5. Lillingequipment adequate for the job at hand.

000 6 Rigging of( approved structures.

000 7.Using sofleners on sharp comers, 000 8, Ladders at lhe proper angle. tied off and proper for the task.

000 9,11and loots being properly used 000 10 Appropriate tosquing techniques being foi(owed 000 11. Were M&TEand tools checked in/out propesly.

+ < -

9 RISK JUDGMENTS 000

1. Low risk judgments have been made when performing actions that could place the planl at risk, for example:

Lifiing/riggingover sensitive components Jumper placement Lifting/landing leads 000 2.MDG-25 used lo assess personnel and safety risks 000 3 Overhead lines clear of the crane's reach.

000

4. Area under the load Is free of personnel.

000

5. Communications are adequate to prectude problems (e g line of sight).

000

6. An "Operator In attendance in control of equipment and point of control prevents remote or automatic operation of the alfected equipment.

000

7. Requirements of Sensitive Issues Manual met.

+ P' 10 PROFESSIONALISM IN MAINTENANCE 000

1. Good work practices being fotlowed 000

2. Professional appearance and attitude being exhibited.

000

3. The total job well organized and personnel taking responsibility for all aspects,

+ < - 11.JOB PLANNING 000

1. A person designated as fn charge of Ihe planned work activities.

000 2.A Pre.job checklist used in!he briefing 000

3. MDG-24 used for pre.job planning and pre job briefing, 000 4 ALARAissues been addressed.

000 5 Work process and documentation reviewed prior to starting work.

000

6. FME/Zone controls established.

000

7. Support Groups present / involved as required.

000

8. Iiazardous Conditions identilied and compensated for.

000

9. Work Document prerequisites/precaulions

adequate, 000 10, Contractor indoctrination prior lo working.

000 1 tCtearance prepared for lhe work being performed.

000 12. Type of clearance correct for the job.

000 13. Required permits/clearances (hot work. open door. etc.)

reviewed prior to wosk.

000 14 Joh planning ( e g work order step seqrs srcei ad6 qIrate for lhe performance ol the task 000 15. Work group had al'I the required too'is to perform the

task, 000 16 Work group had all Ihe required documents available lo successfully perform lhe task 000 17Work group trad all Ihe required materials avarribt to successfully perform the task 000 18 Planning included Ihe correct documents as implementing references 000 19 Quality of the work order/Vrork documents suItahk 000 20 Documentation required for work per formance IeqIhl 000 21. Posl maintenance test requirements appropriate

+ < - 12. SCHEDULING AND COORDI G

MAINT EN AN C E 000 I Work performed in an efficient manner to allow minimum equipment oui of service tirrre and / or ALARA.

000

2. Work started / finisired In accordance wrth the schedu'ie.

Additional Comments

4 Backlog Management P Human Performance k> Predictive Maintenance 4 Communications

Rc'11$ IOD 'UDc A. 1994 PRE/POSO-JOB BRIEFINGG 43RKSHEET Provide an overriew of the work activity:

STATE THE woRK QRDER

.'iL'stBER ~

4AMEPERSO!i 6 CHARGE DETAILSOF THE ACTIVITY.

~

Unit

~

Train.

Component Number.

~

Notifications/Communicauons.

~

Critical Worl; Steps.

~

Safety

~

Verificauon Requu ements.

~

Retest Requirements.

~

Questions.

Use the STAR Program Use the STAR Program Use tbe STAR Program

..Make Assignments: Who/What/When Ensure a Complete Understanding Special Equipment/Precautio'ns

'ake Assignments: Who/What/When

.Ensure a Complete Understar.

utg Resolve all Questions Prior to Performance ofWork Pro a~

. Present tbe Details from the Manual Time Restrictions and Communications Discuss Requirements

. Infrequent work needs a more detailed r'eview Ensure an Understanding Communications with the Control Room:

vide details of the following information:

Importance of the work activity:

~

Sensltlve Issues Manual

~

Tech Spec Related

~

Quality Classification...............................................

~

Frequency of the Acuvity.

Overview/Prerequisites:

~

Clearances

~

Taggillg.

. Go over the boundaries

~

Permits Ensure Permits are Obtained and Understood

~

Radiation W'ork Permit."-.":"""'"

':,...';~ "....REP&umber: and details of the REP

~

Hot Work i

~

Open Door

~

Confined Space............................:...........................

".'..'..Safety Manual (Section XIV)

~

Security (Doors md Man-Holes)...........

Contact Phone 0 824471 or 82-6473 Precautions (From W&rkDocumentfLessois.Limned)

~a)'n Special instructions from she Control Room

".'....."..'".............. Ensure an Understanding

~ Safety...,

...................................~......'=............Special Equipment/Precautions

~

Overtime Limitations.

.Ensure Limits are not Exceeded

~

Heat Stress.

Safety Manual (Section IV)

~

Hazardous Material.

Safety Manual (Section X)

~

Electrical Hazards.

Safety Manual (Section X) MDG 24 E;25

~

Overhead Loads..

~

Operable Equipment.

~-

Impact on Other Equipment.

~

Repeat Back Communications siCh

~

Equipment Numbers

~

Scope of the work ac&~ty

~

Changes during the work acuvity.

~

Problems encountered-

'ompletion of work actii~ty.

~

Retest scope and schedule.

the Control Room

.ZgllTrain. Equipment and Clearance Numbers Ensure a Complete Understandmg-Wbo to contact and Phone w

Who to contact and Phone 0 Wbo to contact and Phone <

..h1ake Assignments: Wbo/WhatfWhen

Backlogged Corrective Maintenance March 1993 - 5ppp May 1992 - 3ppp 1993-23pp August 1994 - ippp

r~

e f

lk> Significant HUman Error CRDRs

~ 1992 August = 25

~ 1993 August = 21

~ 1994 August = 16 Year Ending = 42 Year Ending = 21

Challenges Five outages in next sixteen months Monitor human performance in teams with new processes 4 Ongoing assessments of program(s) implementation P Post maintenance testing ontinuin inter ace wit o eratIons, on station nee s

P Control of contractors n ineerin ro es an o timum uti ization o istics om onent er ormance monitorin P Resolution of longer term reiiability issues

0

~

MATERIALCONDITION LEVEL 1 - 23 items RKM o

Instrument Air Compressors reliability MDS o

Solenoid valve reliability and PM revision RKM

~

FWCS reliability evaluation with Garchow WDC

~

Four way valve (FWIV, MSIV) reliability RKM o

Pzr. spray valve reliability (100 EEF)

WDC

~

Pzr. safety valves - resolve seat leakage WDC

~

FW pump seal leakage

- resolve MDS

~

Valve pressure locking/thermal binding MDS

~

53 MOVs near margin - resolve WDC

~

Leak containment PLB

~

PM optimization DL's

~

Work order closure DL's o

Work order backlogs MDS o

SG 134 ABB - resolution of reliability issues WDC o

BD heat exchanger repair of replacement RJL

~

Generrex cabinet components reliability WDC

~

DG reliability RJL

~ 'CP motors - long range maintenance plan REG

~

RJL

~

WDC

~

Fire protection backlog progress Raychem installation practices

- followup Valve packing program - review status REG

~

Establish station coatings program and plan PLB

~

Evaluation programs (CFAR, NPRDS, FDT, CPT, Pdm)

1