ML17303B106
| ML17303B106 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 05/03/1988 |
| From: | Licitra E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| References | |
| TAC-67778, TAC-67779, TAC-67780, NUDOCS 8805160079 | |
| Download: ML17303B106 (5) | |
Text
May 3, 1988 Docket Nos.:
50-528, 50-529 and 50-530 Mr. E.
E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Arizona Nuclear Power Project Post Office Box 52034 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034
Dear Mr. Van Brunt:
DISTRIBUTION NRC 5 LPDRs PD5 Reading DMCrutchfiel d GMHolahan JLee GKnighton EALicitra MJDavis OGC EJordan JPartlow ACRS (10)
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE, LPSI FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR PALO VERDE (TAC NOS. 67778, 67779 and 67780)
By letter dated March 16, 1988, you submitted a proposed change to the Technical Specifications for Palo Verde, Units 1, 2 and 3.
Specifically, the change would revise the flow requirements. for each LPSI loop from 4900
+ 100 gpm to 4800
+ 200 gpm.
Based on our preliminary review of your request, we conclude that you have not provided sufficient justification to permit us to complete our evaluation.
Specifically you have not addressed whether the proposed reduction in flow rate affects the assumptions that had been used in ECCS analysis of record for Palo Verde.
If the assumptions are affected, the changes should have been identified and a revised analysis should have been provided.
Therefore, we plan to take no further action on the subject request.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please let me know.
Sincerely, original signed by E. A. Licitra, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate V
Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects CC:
See next page DRSP/PDV/gg DRSP/D:PDV EALicitra:dr GWKnighton 5/g /88 5/p /88
~gpQf60079 OSoOO52 a@0503 gDOCK p91 P
(A I
I FJ F
W g
Mr. E.
E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Arizona Nuclear Power Project Palo Verde CC:
Arthur C. Gehr, Esq.
Snell 8 Wilmer 3100 Valley Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Mr. James M. Flenner, Chief Counsel Arizona Corporation Commission 1200 West Washington
- Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Charles R. Kocher, Esq. Assistant Council James A. Boeletto, Esq.
Southern California Edison Company P. 0.
Box 800
- Rosemead, California 91770 Mr. Mark Ginsberg Energy Dfrector Office of Economic Planning and Development 1700 West Washington - 5th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Mr. Wayne Shirley Assistant Attorney General Bataan Memorial Building" Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503 Mr. Tfm Polfch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.
Box 97
- Tonopah, Arizona 85354-0097 Regional Administrator, Region V
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, Californfa 94596 Ms. Lynee Bernabei Government Accountabil fty Project of the Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 Mr. Ron Rayner P. 0.
Box 1509
- Goodyear, AZ 85338 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.
7910 Woodmont Avenue Suite 1310
- Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Arizona Nuclear Power Project Palo Verde CC:
Chairman Arizona Corporation Commission Post Office Box 6019 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency ATTN:
Ms. Clara Palovic, Librarian 4814 South 40 Street
- Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Mr. Charles Tedford, Director Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency 4814 South 40 Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Chairman Maricopa County Board of Supervisors ill South Third Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85003
gp,S 4Egy P0 Cy 0
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 Docket Nos.:
50-528, 50-529 and 50-530 May 3, 1988 Mr. E.
E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Arizona Nuclear Power Project Post Office Box 52034
- Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034
Dear Mr. Van Brunt:
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE, LPSI FLOM REQUIREMENTS FOR PALO VERDE (TAC NOS.
- 67778, 67779 and 67780)
By letter dated March 16, 1988, you submitted a proposed change to the Technical Specifications for Palo Verde, Units 1, 2 and 3.
Specifically, the change would revise the flow requirements for each LPSI loop from 4900
+ 100 gpm to 4800
+ 200 gpm.
Based on our preliminary review of your request, we conclude that you have not provided sufficient justification to permit us to complete our.evaluation.
Specifically you have not addressed whether the proposed reduction in flow rate affects the assumptions that had been used in ECCS analysis of record for Palo Verde.
If the assumptions are affected, the changes should have been identified and a revised analysis should have been provided.
Therefore, we plan to take no further action on the subject request.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please let me know.
Sincerely, E. A. Licitra, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate V
Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects CC:
See next page