ML17300A198
| ML17300A198 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1986 |
| From: | Miller L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17300A197 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-528-86-16, 50-529-86-17, NUDOCS 8606300292 | |
| Download: ML17300A198 (2) | |
Text
8606300292 860613 PDR ADOCK 05000528 6
PDR APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Arizona Nuclear Power Project Post Office Box 52'034
- Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 Docket Nos. 50-528/529 License Nos.
NPF-41 and NPF-51 As a result of the inspection conducted on April 14, 1986 - May 26,
- 1986, and in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the following violation was identified:
1.
Technical Specification 6.8.1.c requires that written procedures be established and implemented for surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment.
PVNGS Manual Procedure 73ST-9CL03, Containment Airlock Seal Leak Test, Revision 1 (through procedure change notice number 3), effec-tive February 7,
1986, paragraph 10.0, Contingencies, states that when the inner door fails the seal leak test and requires repair, the outer door shall remain closed until repair and retest have been satisfactorily completed.
Contrary'o the above, on April ll, 1986, the Unit 2 140'ontainment airlock inner door failed a seal leak test performed using procedure 73ST-9CL03, and the outer door was opened prior to satisfactory repair and retest of the inner door.
This is a Severity level V Violation applicable to Unit 2.
(Supple-ment I)
I il Pursuant to the provisi'ons of 10 CFR 2.201, Arizona Public Service Company i.s hereby required to submit, to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) the" co'rrective steps which have been taken and the results achi'eved; (2) corrective st'eps which will be taken to avoid further items of nunc'omplia'n'ce; and (3) the date. when full compliance will be achieved.
Consideration may be. given to extending your response time for good cause shown."
f 1
L.
. ii er, Jr., Chief Reactor Projects Section No.
2
I l
"h N
j
'I I
k l
W b
t T