ML17299A589
| ML17299A589 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1985 |
| From: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| References | |
| TASK-2.K.3.30, TASK-2.K.3.31, TASK-TM TAC-59188, NUDOCS 8509090236 | |
| Download: ML17299A589 (4) | |
Text
aQG ~'I
"'Docket Nos.:
50-528, 50-529 and 50-530 DISTRIBUTION NRC PDR Local PDR PRC System NISC LBA'3 Reading JLee MLicitra OELD, Attorney ACRS (16)
JPartlow BGrimes EJordan Mr. E.
E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Arizona Nuclear Power Project Post Office Box 52034 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034
Dear Mr. Van Brunt:
SUBJECT:
TMI ACTION PLAN ITEM II.K.3.30, SMALL BREAK LOCA ANALYSIS AND II.K.3.31, PLANT ANALYSIS On June 20, 1985, the NRC found acceptable the Combustion Engineering Owners Group (GEOG) submittal, CEN-203, which justified continued acceptance of the CE small break LOCA model (CEFLASH-4AS) in meeting the requirements of TMI Action Item II.K.3.30.
This acceptance, however, is pending a confirmatory benchmark analysis to demonstrate good agreement between CEFLASH-4AS and the data from Semiscale test S-UT-08.
On March 11, 1985, R.
W. Wells as Chairman of GEOG committed to the performance of the validation and projected a
December 1985 schedule for submittal of a report on this effort.
On July 16, 1985, you also provided a letter referencing the GEOG March 11, 1985 letter and committing to the validation of the CEFLASH-4AS agreement with the S-UT-08 test.
Pending the successful validation of the CEFLASH-4AS and based on our understanding that CEFLASH-4AS was used for the Palo Verde
- plant, we find that you have met the requirements of TMI Action Item Action Item II.K.3.30 and a plant specific analysis is not required for TMI Action Item II.K.3.31.
These items are therefore complete.
Please advise this office within 30 days of receipt of this letter, or upon unsuccessful validation of the model, if for any reason our understanding is not correct, and provide you plans and schedule for completing II.K.3.30 and II.K.3.31.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, you should contact Mr. E. Licitra, the Licensing Project Manager.
Sincerely, cc:
See next page 6Akf ORfQfNPL@gNFg ~y George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No.
3 Division of Licensing
~
~
~ MLicitra:dh nighton
~
OSlzelSS OSy)ISS sggqg902M S~gppg28 g5QQ27
>gR AggCK 0 pDR P
4 4 h,
II e
~
lF Il E
N, I'
nr
Mr. E.
E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Arizona Nuclear Power Project Palo Verde CC:
Arthur C. Gehr, Esq.
Snell 8 Wilmer 3100 Valley Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Mr. James M. Flenner,, Chief Counsel Arizona Corporation Goomission 1200 West Washington
- Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Charles R. Kocher, Esq. Assistant Council James A. Boeletto, Esq.
Southern California Edison Company P. 0.
Box 800
- Rosemead, California 91770 Mr. Mark Ginsberg Energy Director Office of Economic Planning and Development 1700 West Washington - 5th Floor
- Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Mr. Wayne Shirley Assistant Attorney General Bataan Memorial Building Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503 Mr. Roy Zimmerman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.
Box 239 Arlington, Arizona 85322 Ms. Patricia Lee Hourihan 6413 S. 26th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Regional Administrator, Region V
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Kenneth Berlin, Esq.
Winston 5 Strawn.
Suite 500 2550 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Ms. Lynne Bernabei Government Accountability Project of the Institute for Policy Studies 1901 gue Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 Ms. Jill Morrison 522 E. Colgate Tempi, Arizona 85238 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.
7910 Woodmont Avenue Suite 1310
- Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Mr. Ron Rayner P. 0.
Box 1509
- Goodyear, AZ 85338
t S