ML17298A733

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Info Re Backfitting Issue Concerning Source Range Neutron Flux Monitor in Remote Shutdown Panel Per App R to 10CFR50.Util Latest Response Must Be Revised
ML17298A733
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  
Issue date: 12/29/1983
From: Licitra E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8401090174
Download: ML17298A733 (3)


Text

Docket Nos.:

50-528 50-529 and 50-530 pygmy 9 $83

'RIBUTION ument=Control=(50=928/529/53 0)

N C

PDQ PRC System LB¹3 Reading JLee MLici tra GHKnighton TNovak

Attorney, OELD MEMORANDUM FOR:

Darrell G. Eisenhut.

Director Division of Licensing THRU:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing George Ll. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No.

3 Division of Licensing Emanuel A. Licitra, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.

3 Division of Licensing BACKFITTING ISSUE ON PALO VERDE The attachment provides information regarding the "backfitting" issue that has been identified for Paulo Verde.

Attachment:

As stated Orfglftal al~.l.",1 by:

George tK linlgl:tan

~

~

~

~

~

p Emanuel A. Licitra, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.

3 Division of Licens'>Wg 8401090174 831229 PDR ADOCN 05000528 PDR L;LB¹3......

ML>citra ft DATE P

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o'Y

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~

0 ~

ghton

'~pcs NRG FORM 818 uo-80) NRCM 0240 L

~ ~ ~ tO i

~

)i

~\\ ~ ~ ~ ~

TPI

~ ~ ~\\

~i~ ~ O~+fgP 0 ~ ~ ~ ~

)~ /pjY

~Il~ ~ ~ t ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ I~

~ ~ ~

~

OF i= IC IAL R ECOR D COPY USGPO: 1981~@960

0 v>

t 1

BACKFITTIHG I'SSOES I. D. 0:

L-83-6 Plant:

Palo Verde Pro'ect Mana dr Branch E. Licitra (LB-3)

Backfit Issue:

Applicant should provide a source range neutron flux monitor in the remote shutdown panel for direct indication of reactivity to satisfy Appendix R requirements.

Licensee s Position:

Applicant disagrees with requirement.

Feels that Appendix R does not apply to OLs.

Milestones:

- 7/ll/82; NRC sent requirement letter to applicant

- 5/17/83; Applicant responded that it disagreed w/requirement

- 7/28/83; Staff replied by stating position again

- ll/23/83; Applicant responded that it is not required

- Applicant will revise response because of error A

licabilit to other facilities:

May be applicable to other facilities Next Scheduled Action:

Applicant to revise latest response.

Schedule date unkown.