ML17297B637
| ML17297B637 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1982 |
| From: | TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17297B636 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8208110133 | |
| Download: ML17297B637 (8) | |
Text
O.
Xt'DEFL1'DE11T QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF PALO VERDE !HJCLE,".R GENERATING STATXOh U>'XTS 1 g 2 AND 3 BZ-11J HKLY STATUS REPORT 0 2 for the Period Ending July 30, 1982 g>> ~>u~t1 n gf'inc~ ggga~f.n~en
~~n~z~~
This task i
~ about 95~<
complete and the information gather ed is being evaluated.
Thi task is about 90~ complete.
The information gathered is being evaluated.
Two potential finding reports (PFHs) were initiated, PFH:2426:007 and OOG (see attached listing).
/K'}f.g. - ~usaf;v ~s,vX."pS,Q ~~v "Kick The evaluation of the hPS audit program was initiated at the APS office complex and is 20$ complete.
Thc review of construction inspection procedures is complete except for preparation and processing of potential finding reports.
Thc.review of inspection records has involved four different engineering disciplines as follows:
o Civil -
One potential finding initiated.
- report, PFR:2426:009 was o
Instruments - Two PPRs, PFR:2426:012 and 014, were initiated.
o Piping Spools, Valves, Pumps-One
- PFR, PFH:2426:016, was iniatcd.
o Nc'chanical - One PFR
, PFR:2426:010 vas iniated.
Thc review of APS nonconformance system was completed with the exception of the summary report.
Twenty (20) deficiency evaluation reports (DERs) were reviewed to the requirements of the hPS and Bcchtel procedure."..
2 = Rc~n Xz~fssMtm WxX~m Review of Bechtel design procedures is essentially complete.
Three procedural errors were detected.
Pertinen PFHs were.
- prepared, processed and a> c in tbe review cycle.
8208ii0133 820803 PDR ADOCK 05000528 R
The review of CE documents is not complete, Position response to a letter sent to CE request'ing them to clarify that the quality procedure documents for PVNGS are identical to those for thc San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) indicates that several CE documents have been modified and/or are superseded by other documents.
The actual procedure review ard implementation of those procedures at CE will commence on August 10, 1982 ~
/ghana k +
Checklists for implementation of this Subtask for Bechtel items were comp3.eted in San Diego.
Actual implementation of the Subtask at Bechtel began on July 19, and it is expected that the review of all "dditional design documents identified under this Subtask for Bechtcl will be completed by August 6, 1982.
Four PFRs under Subta"k D2 have been identified.
Significant, but not complete documentation, has been received on all items from both Bechtel and CE to date.
The review status of each feature is summarized in Table 1.
X~S=C
'P 'M J~
Procedure review on Field Design Control Change is complete.
Review of implementation of the procccures for control of field de ign changes is presently underway.
Jg:
Procedure review on As-Built Drawing Control is complete.
~l ~:
The procedure for preparing verification documentation
- packages, performing the
- walkdown, and asser bling repor ts is under review.
The wa3.kdown is expected to begin August 16.
Documentation for the wallcdown is being assembled and members of the walkdown team have been instructed in the use of the procedure.
As of July 30, 21 potential finding report numbers have been issued.
Pro PFRs were sent to the APS and the remairder are in preparation.
The attached table lists the PFHs which have been identified to date.
r The overall effort; remains about two weeks behind schedu3.e sho~n in the program plan because:
1) documents have been received later than ez>>ected, particularly for the C-E comporents, ard 2) full efforts were not appl'ed while awaiting NRC approval of the p3.an and feature selection.
/
/r Pertinent, manpower applied to the project is shown in Figure 1.
TABLE 1
STATUS OF FEATURE REVIEM ig S~eg~igo Documentation received appear adequate and the review is'n progress.
Design documentation appears adequate.
may bc
- required, The review is in m~pg So~ JlKR kh~)
Additional qualix ication data propress.
~8h ~1~~ ~~n
~cap,
.h e
is being reviewed for adequacy.
I The technical review is in progress.
~~ezzg3~,4Q~o~
- g. ~a~!..Considerable documentation has been received, but additional items appear necessary to complete to review.
One PFR has been initiated, PFR:2426r021.
+~~@~a g~ggli~~~c~
p~~gg Documentation received to date appears complete and the review is-underway.
Qeq4ug~g~ ~p ~~
Design documentation received appears adequate.
Qualification documentation is being reviewed for adequacy.
+~t~~ y~ ~~>>~~
g~+~n
~s.erg ~i~~~
Considerable documentation has been received but more has been requested to.verify interface information.
Two PFR's have been filed to date.
~~gqZ
~an Jb~u~d~w
~~l~n
~~~~~ ~~.~R~~~ot~s'hree suppor ts have been
- reviewed, and the design found adequate.
Some documentation for three other supports ha been received and more has been requested.
~uZ;~i'Z jg~c'~~g~e Hg~4n 'onsiderable documentation has been received and the review is underway.
+~~ ~e@.~g~ J~n~ 5u~~no ~
Documentation has the review is scheduled to begin in August.
ge~fgg J~e~ +Q ~ad ~C!li~d~o.'~)og ~g~ /~~3.q'pg~
been received and is being reviewed for adequacy.
been received and Documentation has
~<~~~ J~r'Oaten'g'".gcy g>~~g:
Documentation has been r eceived and is being reviewed for adequacy.
g~ Qs~~ ~~5g~
Documentation has been received and is being reviewed for adequacy.,
ese TABLE.1.(continued)
,~ar
~ g'~ee ~tg~~~
Documentation has been received and 'is under review.
ggZ5~~M ~~~~ Jun~ )~~"
Documentation has been received and is under review.
or 9ZcZ&Me Xa.'lm Ko>im~.
under review.
Documentation has bedn received and is 59tgZ Q>k~3. 9~~> f0973 Documentation has been received and is under review.
.'aZ +359~
Documentation has beer.
received and is under review.
~sg~ig~e~~~.fgg ~g go~t~~
Considerable design documentation has been
- received, but qualification data are incomplete for many items.
Tf adequate qualif'ication data cannot be obtained, the review wil'ave to be limited to thc adequacy of the technical specifications and will-not address vendor compliance with these specifications.
Supports for trays between a) the containment spray pum>>
ard switchgear and b) the auxiliary feedwater.
flow transmitter and control room have been selected for review.
(Considerable documentation for these supports has been requested.)
~assur' Considerable 'documentation bas been received and is under review.
X~Q>>~'e.
gag~~>
The auxiliary feedwater pump connection to the foundation has been reviewed.
Some documertation has been received on the shutdown cooling that exchanger and pro surizer supports and more has been requested.
Documentation has al"o been received on the containmert spray pump support and is under review.
~ZJ~Q~m.4. J~~ ~~~~r. s.
Design documentation has been received which covers pipe rupture
- events, Analyses for event not involvinc pipe rupture have been requested.
~ Zeg~tJ'gXL g~~u~ o~
Only CE non-proprietary documentation has been received.
Becau e
of the reported incomplete status of this design and the proprietary nature of much of the information, it may not be possible to perform the review of the CPC as originally pl-nned.-
Ve are reevaluating, the plan in view of the design status and will propose a
> evised CFC review plan in Auust.
//
r
- tANNOUI< STATUS As 01'
7(30/82
" INDEPENDENT QA EVAL. QP PVHGS 1,2 5:
3 16 15 13 12 "11 o
5 o10
~~r 0
Sd 7
6 BUDQET ACTUAL"--"-
PERIOD FNDINt:
mS 19 21 20 Q
11 1U 25 2 9
16 23 3
JULY o 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 2
AUG ~
SEPT.
815 22 2)
OCT.
PLANNED (1 00) ll'CTUAL (1 00 )
Z.o 0.i C3 3.S 6.X 9:7 IK.2 l<R l0.1 f'kS'h 29.Q f'7.3 2il8
%15 5~.~
3V" CS'f
'63 -f; 5'7.y ro.v rrz.y Hf8 1993 ISr~F Pi>g !:-7.8 le%.3 C.
VARIAVCI'..(1 PP )
.5 17 8
2.7 6'l 8D
Page 1
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORTS (PFR)
SUBJECT DATE COUNTS 2426:PFR:001 Control of Design Criteria - Licensing Contr5.bution 7/20 In Preparation 2026:PFH:002 Significant Corrective Action Report 7/26 In Pr eparation 2426 PFR 003 Design as As-Built Conformance Checklist 7/26 In Preparation 2426:PFR:000 Non-existent Design Verification Pro-cedures Referenced 7/26 In Preparation 2>326 PFR:005 Ibrg CN Incorporation=Time Limit Exceeded 7/26 In Pr eparation 2426:PFH:006 SDDR Disposition Variance 7/26 In Preparation 21l26: PFR: 007 APS QA Staffing 7/26 Transmitted to APS on 7/30/82 2026:PFR:008 Salary Ranges of APS/>lA Dept.
7/26 Transmitted to APS on 7/30/82
Page 2
POTENTIAL FINDING HEPORTS (PFR)
SUBJECT DATE COMMENTS 2426:PFH:009 Condensate Storage Tank (CTE-T01; SS Liner) 7/27 In Preparation 2426:PFH:010 Shutdown HE, PO 9061519, gag No. IH-SIB-E01 7/27 In Preparation 2426 PFR 011 Aux. Feedwater Transmitter - Incorrect Dwg.
Rev. Flow Transmitter 01-J-AFB-FT41B 7/27 In Preparation
'2426: PFR: 012 Aux. Feedwatcr Flow Transmitter J-AFB-FT 7/27 41B No. CIP
/
In Pr eparation 2426:PFR 013 COblP - Press.
Transmitter 1-J8CD-PT352D 1-J8CD-PT351D, CIP Dated 4/29/82 7/27 In Preparation 2426:PFR:014 Flow Transmitter 1-J-AFB-FT41B (unqualified inspector) 7/27 In Preparation 2426:PFR:015 Flow Transmitter 1-J-AFB-FT41B (M lding) 7/27 In Preparation 2426: PFH: 016 Aux. Fccdwater System Valve 01J-AFB-BHV-031 7/27 In Preparation
Page 3
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORTS (PFR)
MJMBER SUBJECT DATE COt MENTS 2026-PFR-017 Small Bore Piping BPC Piping Anal. Calc S1516D 7/28 In Preparation 2426:PFR:018 BPC Design Spec 13-P>f-102 Comments 7/28 In Preparation 2426:PFR:019 Calculatiors not llarked Prel.
Per Procedure 7/29 In Preparation 2026 PFR 020 Calculations not Initialed by Grp Leader per Procedure 7/29 In Preparation 2426 PFR 021 Condensate Storage Tank Gale 13-CC-CT-015 7/29 In Preparation 2426 PFR 022 Or'g. Calcs not in File 7/30 In Preparation