ML17297B478

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Final Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Rept for Second Cycle Assessment,June 1980-June 1981.Rept Modified to Reflect New Evaluation Criteria
ML17297B478
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  
Issue date: 04/29/1982
From: Engelken R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Van Brunt E
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
Shared Package
ML17297B479 List:
References
NUDOCS 8205040196
Download: ML17297B478 (4)


Text

p,pg 29 882 XEBa zZzg g0~

Docket Nos. 50-528, 50-529, 50-530 S

Q Arizona Public Ser vice Company P. 0.

Box 21666

Phoenix, Arizona 85036 Attention:

Mr. E.

E.

Van Brunt, Jr.,

Vice Presiden Nuclear Prospects Management Gentlemen:

e 1

q%~

C (p

Subject:

Systematic Assessment oF Licensee Performance for the Period of June 1980 through June 1981 In 1980 the NRC instituted a program for Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP).

The NRC staff began collecting available observations

and, based on those observations, evaluating the performance of power reactor licensees (including construction permit holders) with respect to nuclear------

safety.

During the first annual cycle of this program, licensee performance was evaluated in two steps:

First, by a SALP Board in the appropriate NRC Regional Office; and then by a SALP Review Group at NRC Headquarters.

The SALP Review Group produced a single report summarizing its assessments for power reactors throughout the U.S.

This report was issued in November 1981 (NUREG-0834, RFinal Report, NRC Licensee Assessments" ).

Subsequently, a number of changes were made to the progr am.

The new program was published in the Federal Re iste}

on March 22, 1982, and includes the following principal c anges:

(1)

Adoption of regional level evaluations.

This eliminates review by the SALP Review Group at NRC Headquarters with its attendant national report while improving the timeliness of'roviding evaluation results.

(2)

Establishment of new evaluation criteria which are not dependent upon the average performance level.

(3)

Establishment of a process fo} taking licensee comments into account.

criteria.

0 0 (p~

The second annual cycle of the SALP program for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station covered the period of June 1980 through June

1981, and used a combination of old and new assessment process.

The results of the second cycle assessment were discussed with you and members of your staff in a meeting on October 6, 1981.

Enclosure (1) to this letter contains the final report for second cycle assessment.

This report has been modIFIed to reFlect the nenes evaluation ~g(

v OFFICEtI SURNAMEtb DATE)

~ ~

~

~ I ~

/

~

~ ~ ~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

RV/"b BISHOP 4/q~/82 I

ENGELK N

4/s8'/82 7

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o f o ~

NRC FORM 318 IIO/80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY R USGFOI 198~29 824

II s

~

~

II

Arizona Publ ic Service Company APR 2 9 1982 Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed report we will be qlad to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, Urfg4t gqgg p~

R L @gpss R.

H. Engelken Regional Administrator bcc:

DMB/Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Distributed by RV:

Resident Inspector Project Inspector RHE (w/o enc)

lt Ill ip y

I

'p

'I I

=4 r

II h

I,

'I

,V

'C I

C a

iI I %~

I I k

C t