ML17286B172

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-397/91-35 on 910918-1022 & Notice of Violation
ML17286B172
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/1991
From: Richards S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Shared Package
ML17286B173 List:
References
NUDOCS 9112100068
Download: ML17286B172 (4)


See also: IR 05000397/1991035

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlSSION

REGION V

1450 MARIALANE. SUITE 210

WALNUTCREEK, CALIFORNIA94696-5366

NOVgg )~

Docket

No. 50-397

k'ashington Public Power Supply System

, P. 0.

Box 968

Richland,

h'ashington

99352

Attention:

Mr. G.

C. Sorensen

Manager,

Regulatory

Programs

Gentlemen:

Subject:

NRC Inspection

This refers to the inspection

conducted

by Messrs.

R.

C. Sorensen,

D. L,

Proulx,

and

R.

C. Barr of this office on September

18 - October 22,

1991 of

activities authorized

by

NRC Operating

License

No. NPF-21,

and to the

discussions

of findings held by the inspectors with Mr. J.

Baker

and other

members of the Supply System staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas

examined during this inspection

are described

in the enclosed

inspection

report.

Within these

areas,

the inspection consisted

of selective

examinations

of procedures

and representative

records,'interviews

with

personnel,

and observations

by the

inspectors.'ased

on the results of this inspection,

one of your activities appeared

to be

in violation of NRC requirements,

as specified in the enclosed

Notice of

Violation (Notice).

This violation involved not following the plant startup

'rocedure

by reopening

main steam line drains before returning to cold

shutdown.

This violation indicated

an apparent'weakness

in the oversight

functions of the Supply System in that, despite

the extensive

management,

Ouality Assurance,

and Operations staff presence

in the control

room during

the occurrence,

the violation was noted only by the

NRC inspector.

In

addition,

management

did not adequately

communicate its concerns

to minimize

(or track) the number of thermal

cycles

imposed

on the main steam line drains.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

ln the enclosed

Notice when preparing your response.

In your response,

you

should document

the specific actions

taken

and

any additional actions

you

plan

to prevent recurrence.

After reviewing your response

to this Notice,

including your proposed corrective actions

and the results of future inspec-

tions, the

NRC will determine

whether further

NRC enforcement

action is

necessary

to ensure

compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance

with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"

a copy of

this letter, its enclosures,

and your response will be placed in the

NRC

Public Document

Room.

9112i00068 Piii2i

PDR

ADDCK 050003~~7

6

PDA

) cot

t

)J

r';

l,'j

t'

The response

directed

by this letter

and the accompanying

Notice are not

subject to the clearance

procedures

of the Office of Management

and Budoet

as

required

by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980,

PL 96.511.

Should you have

any questions

concerning this inspection,

we will'be pleased

to discuss

them with you.

Sincerely,

S. A. Richards,

Chief

Reactor Projects

Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection

Report

No. 50-397/91-35

cc (w/copy of enclosures):

A. L. Oxsen,

Deputy Yianaging Director

G.

D. Bouchey, Director, Licensing

and Assurance

J.

W. Baker,

WNP-2 Plant Yanager

A.

G. Hosier,

WNP-2 Licensing Manager

G.

E.

Doupe,

Esq.

Winston

8 Strawn

State of Washington

bcc w/copy of enclosures

1 and 2:

Docket File

Project Inspector

Resident Inspector

B. Faulkenberry

J. Martin

A. Johnson

P. Johnson

P. Eng,

NRR

G.

Cook

bcc w/enclosure

1 only:

M. Smith

N. Mestern

J. Zollicoffer

REGION V

CSoxenlen

DPPonlx

11/q.(/91

'

1/wK/91

RBarr

ll/w/91

11/>5 /91

11/

/91

YES /

NO

] YES /

0

] YES /

NO

gpt

RZimmerman "

SRichards

11/ ll/91 -

11/Zk /91

S

/

NO

] YES

NO

]

YES /

NO

]

ES

/

NO

]

S

0

S

/

NO

]

" Indicates

review of and concurrence

with Paragraph

5 only.