ML17285A347

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 890221-24.Violation Noted: on 890223,radiation Area W/Dose Rates Up to 20 Mrems Per H, Located in Reactor Bldg,Not Conspicuously Posted Since Sign at Access Point Lying Face Down & Could Not Be Read
ML17285A347
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/1989
From: Yuhas G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML17285A346 List:
References
50-397-89-09, 50-397-89-9, NUDOCS 8904040167
Download: ML17285A347 (3)


Text

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Washington Public Power Supply System Washington Nuclear Project Unit 2 Docket No.

50-397 License No.

NPF-21 During an NRC inspection conducted on February 21-24,

1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, (1988),

as modified by 53 Fed. Reg. 40019 (October 13, 1988),

the violation is listed below:

A.

10 CFR 20.203, "Caution signs,

labels, signals and controls," states, in part:

"(b) Radiation areas.

Each radiation area shall be conspicuously posted with a sign or signs bearing the radiation caution symbol and the words:

"Caution..

"Radiation Area" Contrary to the above, at approximately 2:00 p.m.,

PST, on February 23,
1989, a radiation area with dose rates up to 20 mrem per hour, located on the 522'levation of the Reactor Building, was not conspicuously
posted, in that the required sign located at the access point was lying face down on the floor such that it could not be read.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement IV).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Washington Public Power Supply System is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.

S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good cause shown.

3904040 i67 S90"-'i<~

F're AOOCK OSOOO'"r7' PDC

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Dated at Walnut Creek, California, this )fp4lay of March, 1989 Q

Gregory P.g Y has, Chief Emergency Pr paredness and Radiological Protection Branch