ML17279A863

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-397/87-19.Comments on Items Requiring Addl Clarification Encl
ML17279A863
Person / Time
Site: Columbia 
Issue date: 03/02/1988
From: Zimmerman R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
References
NUDOCS 8803080042
Download: ML17279A863 (5)


See also: IR 05000397/1987019

Text

REGULAT

INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION

STEM (RIDS)

1

!

ACCESSION

NBR: 8803080042

DOC. DATE: 88/03/02

NOTARIZED:

NO

DOC)<ET

FACIL: 50-397

WPPSS Nuclear Pro Ject>

Unit 2>

Washington Public

Poee

050003)7

AUTH. NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

ZIMMERMANiR.

Region

5i

Ofc of the Director

REC IP. NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SORENSEN> G. C.

Washington Public Poeer

Supply

System

SUBJECT:

Ack receipt of 880129 ltr informing

NRC of steps

taken to

correct violations noted

in Insp

Rep t 50-397/87-19. Comments

on items requiring addi clarification encl.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE01D

COPIES

RECEIVED: LTR

ENCL

SIZE:

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice

of Violation Response

NOTES:

REC IP IENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD5

PD

INTERNAL:

AEOD

NRR MORISSEAUi D

NRR/DLPG/G*B10A

NRR/DREP/EPB10D

NRR/DRIS DIR9'A2

QE LIEBERMANiJ

EG F~LE

01

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

SAMWQRTH1R

DEDRQ

NRR/DLPG/PEB11B

NRR/DOEA DIR11E

NRR/DREP/RPB10A

NRR/PMAS/ILRB12

OGC 15-B-18

RES/DRPS

DIR

CQP IES

LTTR ENCL

TERNAL:

LPDR

NSIC

NRC

PDR

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

22

ENCL

Docket No. 50-397

Washington Public Power Supply System

P.

0.

Box 968

3000 George Washington

Way

Richland, Washington

99352

Attention:

Mr.

G.

C. Sorensen,

Manager

WNP-2 Regulatory

Programs

Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter dated January

29, 1988, in response

to our Notice

of Violation and Inspection

Report

No. 50-397/87-19,

dated

December

8, 1987,

informing us of the steps

you have taken to correct the items which we

brought to your attention,

As a result of our review of your responses,

we

have determined that additional clarification is needed

addressing

specific

items to Appendix A.

Our comments to these

items are enclosed.

Your

corrective actions will be verified during a future inspection.

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

~ii&(na~>~ '

Attachment:

(as stated)

bcc w/copy of letter dated 1/29/88:

G.

Cook

A. Johnson

B. Faulkenberry

J. Martin

docket file

Resident

Inspector

Project Inspector

State of WA

LFMB

R.

Zimmerman, Chief

Reactor Projects

Branch

bcc w/o copy- of letter dated 1/29/88:

M. Smith

REGION V

WWagner/dot

ic

rds

imme

man

3/ 2/88

3/A /88

3

88

RE/VEST

C

Y ]

RE

EST

COPY ] REQUEST

COPY ]

YES /

0

ES /

NO

YES /

NO

8803080042 '880302

PDR

ADOCK 05000397

G

PDR

S

ND TO

PDR

]

/

NO

g

I

f~

I

0

APPENDIX A COMMENTS

Response

to A. 1:

(Page

2 of 21)

Under "Corrective Action to be Taken" it is stated that

no further corrective action is planned.

Can

we assume

that the actions

discussed

in Appendix

C are intended to

correct the root cause of this violation?

Response

to A.2:

(Page

3 of 21)

Under "Corrective Action Taken" your discussion

does

not

address

those currents

which were too high for the trip

times

documented

in the surveillance tests,

e. g., valve

RRC-V-16A.

Response

to B:

(Page

4 of 21)

The corrective action taken

does not describe

any action

to check for similar problems

on other tanks at the site,

nor is the root cause

addressed,

e. g., the

need for

effective independent

design

review.

Response

to C.2:

(Page

8 of 21)

Same

comment

as to A.l.

Response

to C.3:

(Page

10 of 21)

Your response

states

that the present installation of two

electrical terminations is acceptable

for drain lines.

This appears

contrary to the manufacturer's

(Raychem)

recommendation

that drain line terminations

should

be

covered with Heat Shrinkable

Tubing (HST).

Therefore,

we

request that you provide additional clarification

supporting your position that these drain lines are

acceptable

as currently installed.

Also, include

an

explanation

addressing

how circuit integrity is

maintained if the exposed wire is not properly covered

with HST.

Response

to C.4:

(Page ll of 21)

Your discussion

under "Corrective Steps

Taken"

does not

recognize

the

need for enhanced sensitivity by plant

operators

and supervision to improper plant

modifications.

This is more than

a housekeeping

issue.