ML17278B118
| ML17278B118 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 12/02/1986 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17278B116 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-59673, NUDOCS 8612090349 | |
| Download: ML17278B118 (6) | |
Text
gyR REOy (4
0 Cy I
o O ~
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
>> * <<SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.
33 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-21 WASHINGTON PllBLIC POWIER SUPPLY SYSTEM WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NO.
2 DOCKET NO. 50-397
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letters dated September ll, and October 4, 1985, the Washington Public Power,Supplv System (WPPSS) requested a change to the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications for WNP-2.
This proposed change was to revise the composition of the Corporate Nuclear Safety Review Board (Section 6.5.2.2).
2.0 EVALUATION WPPSS proposes to delete the sentence that states "The plant organization and the Directorates of Engineering, Support Services and Licensing and Assurance shall be represented,"
This change would provide increased flexibilityin choosing the best technical representative, independent of organizational constraints.
The staff finds this change acceptable as it meets the acceptance criteria for Independent Review of Section 13.4 of the Standard Review Plan, NUREG-0800.
- 3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment involves a change in the installation and use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that this amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding.
Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Pur-suant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission made a proposed determination that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration which was published in the Federal Register (50 FR 49795) on December 4, 1985, and consulted with the state of Washington.
No public comments were received, and the state of Washington did not have any comments.
8612090349 861202+
PDR kDOCK 05000397 P
f
~ 1 l
M
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there'is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regula-tions and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
Frederick R. Allenspach, NRR Dated:
December 2, 1986
I~
,4 t
~ ~
AMENDMENT NO. 33 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-21
ÃPPSS'NUCLEAR POtlECT NO.
2 DISTRI BtJTI ON:
Docket No. 50-397 NRC PDR Local PDR PRC System NSIC BMD-3 r/f JBradfute (2)
EHylton (1)
EAdensam
- Attorney, OELD Chliles RDiggs JPartlow E.lordan BGrimes LHarmon TBarnhart (4)
ERutcher
~
~