ML17278A950
| ML17278A950 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1986 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Sorensen G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17278A951 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608070361 | |
| Download: ML17278A950 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000397/1986012
Text
<ikk.
~
gL,m
~~8 AEONS~Cgp
O~
Op
- nO
I
+a*++
Docket No. 50-397
UNITEDSTATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
July 30,
1986
84'ashington
Public Power Supply System
ATTN:
Mr. G.
C. Sorensen,
Manager
Regulatory
Programs
Post Office Box 968
3000 George Washington
Way
Richland, Washington
99352
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION NO. 50-397 86-
Enclosed is the report of the
team inspection
conducted
by Mr. R.
C. Wilson
and other
NRC representatives
on April 28 to May 2, 1986, at Washington Nuclear
Project
No.
2 of activities authorized
by NRC License
No. NPF-21.
The team's
findings were discussed
with members of your staff at the conclusion of the
inspection.
The inspection
reviewed your implementation'of
a program as required
by 10 CFR 50.49 for establishing
and maintaining the qualification of electric
equipment within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49.
Within these areas,
the inspection
consisted of examinations
of selected
procedures
and records,
interviews with
personnel,
and observations
by the inspectors.
The inspection
determined
that you have
implemented
a program to meet the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.49.
Five deficiencies in your program implemen-
tation,
summarized
in Appendix A, are classified
as Potential
Enforcement/
Unresolved
Items
and will be referred
to the
NRC Region
V office for further
action.
The most serious deficiencies
involve unqualified installations of
three
Rosemount
1151 transmitters
and
numerous
Limitorque operators.
A gener-
ic violation was also identified involving inadequate
implementation of proce-
dural controls for the documentation
or installation of four types of equip-
ment, including undocumented
modifications to one of the Rosemount
trans-
mitters.
Two other files failed to fully document
component qualification
for Rockbestos
cable
and Westinghouse
containment penetrations.
Three addi-
tional concerns
are classified
as
Open Items,
and
a future
NRC inspection
will review your actions
concerning
them.
Details of all the deficiencies
and concerns
are discussed
in the enclosed
inspection report.
Your letter of Aly 10,
1986 provides descriptions of actions
you have taken
to address
the inspection
concerns.
Subject to future verification, it appears
that all identified equipment deficiencies
were corrected
by these actions,
but
that not all procedural
concerns
are resolved.
8608070361
860730
ADOCK 05000397
I
Mashington Public Power
Supply System
July 30,
1986
Me are available to discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspec-
tion
Sincerely,
Robert
F. Heishman,
Chief
Vendor Program 8ranch
Division of guali ty Assurance,
Vendor
and Technical Training Center
Programs
Office of Inspection .and Enforcement
Enclosure:
Inspection
Report
No. 50-397/86-12
0
APPENDIX A
Potential
Enforcement/Unresolved
I tems
As
a result of the special
equipment qualification inspection
on April 28 to
May 2, 1986,
the following items
have
been referred to
NRC Region
V as Potential
Enforcement/Unresolved
Items (paragraph
references
are to detailed portions of
. the inspection report).
1.
Contrary to paragraphs
(f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49
and section 5.0 of NUREG-
0588 Category II, at the time of the inspection,
Washington Public Power
Supply System's
(WPPSS's) installation of three
Rosemount
1151 transmitters
was not qualified because
spare
cable entrance
huis were not sealed.
(Para-
graph 4.D.(1), Item 50-397/86-12-1.)
2.
Contrary to paragraphs
(f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49 and section 5.0 of NUREG-
0588 Category II, at the time of the inspection,
WPPSS's files did not
adequately
document qualification of Limitorque operators
because
various
internal parts and.materials
and installation features
had not been iden-
tified and documented
to be qualified.
(Paragraph
4.D.(2), Item 50-397/
86-12-2.)
3.
Contrary to paragraphs
(f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49
and section 5.0 of NUREG-
0588 Category II, WPPSS's files did not adequately
document qualification
of two types of Rockbestos
cable
because
documentation of qualification of
type 780 polyethylene
compound.was
not available.
(Paragraph 4.0.(3), Item
50-397/86-12-3.)
4.
Contrary to paragraphs
(f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49
and section
1-.4 of NUREG-
0588 Category II, WPPSS's files did not adequately establish qualification
of Westinghouse
low voltage containment
because
the plant total
integrated radiation
dose
was not enveloped
by referenced
test conditions.
(Paragraph
4.D.(4), Item 50-397/86-12-4.)
5.
Contrary to Criterion
Y of Appendix
B to 10 CFR 50,
WPPSS did not adequately
implement procedures
and instructions f'r the qualification documentation
or component installations of the following equipment:
a.
Victoreen high range radiation monitor, documentation
b.
Conax connectors for HRRM, documentation
c.
Barber
Coleman motor, documentation
d.
Rosemount
1151 transmitter, installation
and non-Eg-file documentation
and instructions
(Paragraph-4.D.(5),
Item 50-397/86-12-5.)
),
L