ML17276A301
| ML17276A301 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 11/27/1981 |
| From: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Rosolie E AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17276A299 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112020621 | |
| Download: ML17276A301 (4) | |
Text
D TRIBUTION:
w~A Docket File650:397 LBb2 File
- JScinto, GEL'0 DEisenhut/RPurple RTedesco ASchwencer RAuluck HService I&E (.3)
NOV2q $81 egg/p.
Qy o
bcc:
NSI C y,q 0 )ga, TERA NRC PDR e
Dear fir. Rosolie:
Local PDR
~r This will confirm our telephone of November 25, 1981, and a
previous telephone conversation in Octo er relating to Washington Public Power Supply System's request for an extension of the latest date for completion of construction in CPPR-93 for WNP-2.
Hr. Eugene Rosolie Suite 527 408 South West 2nd
Enclosed is a copy of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 10 CFR Part 2.
As you probably know from your prior participation in other NRC licensing proceedings, if you intend to request a hearing in this matter, you should clearly identify your interests in the matter, how they may be affected, and the reasons you believe that a hearing is necessary.
Clarity and specificity are important to assist the Commission in determining whether your request should be granted.
At your request, we have sent a copy of the Washington Public Power Supply System's letter dated September 4, 1981, requesting CP extension for WNP-2.
Sincerely, As we indicated to you on November 25, we are processing this application and expect to issue an order extending the latest date for completion of constructure in the near future, and that while the matter has not been reviewed by NRC staff management,yet, we expect to find "no significant hazards considerations" involved in this amendment.
We-'to1.d you that in such cases we would issue the extension along with a notice that it had been issued (10 CFR 2.106);
we were not planning to issue a pre-notice (notice of proposed action pursuant to 10 CFR 2.105).
You informed us of your intent to request a hearing on this request for extension and indicated that you would do so in writing.
Original signed by A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing B'ranch 82 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated
+~~0+
- SEE PREVIOUS CO R
FOR INITIALS OFFICEI SURNAME/
DATEQ DL:UBP2 *
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ e ~ e ~ e ~ 0 ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~
RAUl u,c k: 1 b
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ use ~ ~ 41A ~I~0M'
~.11/Z7/.Bl--"
DL: LB&'2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e ~ ~ 0 ~
...AR<heailre.
...1.1:/.Z7/81.....
DL:L*
....LTedaa~a..
....1.1./.27+1....,.
OELD*
....%his.anhut.....Bur.tq.........
...1.1A:7I&'l.........1 1/27/1...
NRC FORM 318 (1(MO) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL R EGO R D COPY USGPO: '1981~MO
P'( l!.'~t ~
+V g1
,A ii C )I
~,'
yh~k~
dJ
~ >
~
Hr. Eugene Rosolie uite 527 408 South West 2nd Po tland, Oregon 97204
==Dear
- ==
r. Rosolie:
This w>
1 confirm our telephone discussion of November 25, 1981, and a
previous telephone conversation in October relating to Washington Public Power-Sup ly System for an extension of the latest date for completion of constructihn in CPPR-93 for WNP-2.
As we indicat g to you on November 25, we are processing this application and expect to issue an order extending the latest.date for completion, of construction in 'the near future, and that while the matter has not been reviewed by NRC s4ff management yet, we expect to find "no significant hazards consideratQns" involved in this amendment.
We told you that in such cases we would 'issue. the extension along with a notice that it had been issued (10 CFR 2 106);
we were not planning-to issue a pre-notice (notice of proposed ac ion pursuant to 10 CFR 2.105).
You informed us of your intent to request
<hearing on this request for extension and indicated that you would do so in imari<<ing.
Enclosed is a copy of the C mmission's Rules of Practice, 10 CFR Part 2.
As you probably know from your rior papticipation in other NRC licensing proceedings, if you intend to r guest a hearing in this matter, you should clearly identify your interests i the matter, how they may be affected,-
and the reasons you believe that a
earing is necessary.
Clarity and specificity are important to assist the Comnission in determining whether your request should be granted.
At your request, we have sent you a cop of the Washington Public Power Supply System's letter dated September 4, 1981, requesting CP extension for
. WNP-2.
Sincere.l
Enclosure:
As stated A. Schwencer, hief Licensing Branch P2 Division of Lice% ing OFFICE/
SURNAME/
~ DL:LB 2
- lb DA1'E P
~ ~ oololJiZ2JeePr]o
~ ~ o ~
DL:
~ ~
~ o0 o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. Srinto........
~....UJ.....,g]....
...P.l..
.06Eisanhu.t.
.....11/..../81.
NRC FORM 318 (1040) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1991~$.960
0 t
/
J Ct I
/
I II
),1 I
l I