ML17266A033
| ML17266A033 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1979 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Stello V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-79-37, NUDOCS 7902150385 | |
| Download: ML17266A033 (9) | |
Text
V REGULATORY I NF0BMATION.DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
( R I DS )
)
ACCESSION NBR i 7902 150350 DOC. DATE) 79/02/09 N01%I ZED) Wf QCS DOCKET ¹ FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit I, Florida Power 8 Light Co.
05000335 AUTH.'NAME AUTH()R AFFILI ATION U HB IG, R.E.'lor ida Power 8, Light Co.
BECI P. NA)IE BEC IP I ENT AFFILIATION 0
STELLO,V.,
Divis ion of Operati.ng Reactors
SUBJECT:
Forwards request to amend App A of License DPR-67, in response to condition Q of enclosure I to license. Util 8,'t Lucie Facility Review Group have found no unresolved safety issues in encl safety evaluation.W/o amend request.
DISTRIBUTION CODE)
AOOI S
. COPIES RECEIVED:LTR 3 ENCL +
SIZE) ~
TITLEi GEHFRAL DISTRIBUTION FOR AFTER ISSUANCE OF OPERATING LIC NOTES>
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME
~ ACTION), 05 BC alf'B~
INTERNALS REG FI 1.
15 CORE.PEBF BR 1.7 ENGR BR 1.9 PLANT SYS BR 21 EFLT,TRT SYS i EXTERNAL.t 03 LPDB 23 ACBS COPIES LTTR ENCL 7
7 I
.I 2
2
.I
.I
,I I
.I
.I I
I I
36 16 BECI P IENT ID CODE/NAME
.02 NBC PDB
.14 TA/EDO 16 AD SYS/PROJ 18 BEAC SFTY BR 20 EEB 22 B R INKMAN 04 NSIC COP I ES LTI'R FNCL I
I I
I I
I I
FEB 83. NN TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED'TTR 38 ENCL 38
r A
4t
P.O. BOX 529100, MIAMI,FL 33152 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHTCOMPANY Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Nr. Victor Stello, Director Division of Operating Reactors U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission tlashington, D.
C. 20555 February 9, 1979 L-79-37
Dear ter. Stello:
Re:
St. Lucie Unit 1
Docket No. 50-335 Proposed Amendment to Facilit '0 eratin
'License'DPR-67 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.30, Florida Power 8 Light Company submits herewith three (3) signed originals and forty (40) conformed copies of a request to amend Appendix A of Faci'lity Operating License DPR-67.
This proposal is being. made in response to Condition g of Enclosure 1 to the operating license.
Pa e'6-16b New Specification 4.6,2.2.d is added to require flow path verification testing of the'NaOH containment spray additive system on a once per 5 year basis, The proposed amendment has been reviewed by the St. Lucle Facility Review group and the Florida Power 5 Light Company Nuclear Review Board.
They have concluded that it does not involve an unreviewed safety question.
This submittal supplements our submittal of April 5, 1978; accor'dingly, no license amendment fee is herewith submitted.
Since the proposed amendment provides coplpliance with Condition g of Enclosure 1 to Facility Operating License DPR-67, it is requested that Condition g be deleted as a Condition of License.
Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President REU/NAS:cf Attachment cc:
Nr. James P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire
('f~w I&38~
PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued d.
At least once per 5 years by flow path verification testing.
ST.
L'UCIE - UNIT 1
3/4 6-16b
SAFETY EVALUATION Re:
St. Lucie Unit 1
Docket No. 50-335 NaOH S stem Testin I. 'ntroduction This evaluation supports the proposed addition of Technical Specification surveillance requirement 4.6.2.2.d.
The additional surveillance is being proposed in response to Condition g of Enclosure 1 to Operating License DPR-67."
Condition g was established by Amendment 26 dated t1ay 23, 1978.
II.
Discussion New Specification 4.6.2.2.d is added to require flow path verification testing of the NaOH spray additive system on a once per 5 year'asis.
The details of the testing will be defined by operating procedure.
The flow path verificat'ion would consist of passing water through the appropriate spray additive section of piping to verify that the flow path has remained in an operable condition.
Flow path testing represents
.additional surveillance and provides additional assurance that the spray additive system will maintain operability.
III.
Conclusions The new specification provides additional surveillance and does not alter the existing surveillance procedures.
As such, it provides added reliability for the spray additi ve system and thus tends to increase
'argins of safety.
Based on the considerations discussed above, (1) the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered and does not involve'a significant decrease in a safety margin, (2) 'there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be. endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be.inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
S
STATE OF FLORIDA
)
)
COUNTY OF DADE
)
ss.
Robert E. Uhrig, being first duly sworn, deposes.and says:
That he is a Vice President of Florida Power s Light Company, the Licensee herein; That he has executed the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best o'f his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said Licensee-Robert E. Uhrig Subscribed and sworn to before me this aay o'OTARY
- PUBLlC, State of Florida and for the county of Dade, t!6TA' elV".L!C "M1P:
6".
t'!ORNA St LAICAL rrv cows!".::c'!
rx'~h'-3 re!,i!! n,
!m Mycommission expires:
uo!~a~
i!!iv !e,!xnan aowe!io ir~qrv
(, "'!(<h((tc' pi(
r~
0 P
~i k
S
@89 ~
No~
5 P
t
<<a
~
~
~
I sea'
~
0
~ f, 0
'l'RB84-145/79 w/en&7 Mi".<iam 0. Hiller, Chief-,:'-.'<<-, '
~ -
'Gate". 2 27 License Fee Hanagement Branch.
'. Amended
.I
-e:.
j 1
FACILITY AMEND!!EHT CLASSIFICATION - DOCKET HO(S).
54.
~ ~S )
fcensee:
F)Df'/a tp Pdt~g tgtas'zv Plant Name and Unit(s):
ZU C/e Lk/ 7-
/Vo ~
License No(s):
P 7
Nail Control No: 7 Request Dated: ~
9 7'-
'ee Remitted
'Yesa Assigned TAC No:
//
Licensee's Fee Classification:
Class I
, II
, III
. IY V
, VI None~.
Amendment No.
Gate of Issuance
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
This request has been reviewed by DOR/DPH an accordance with Section 170.22 of Part 170 and is properly categorized.
"~
2.
This request is incorrectly classified and should be properIy cateoorizec as Class Justification for classification or reclassification:
3.
Additional information is required to properly categorize the request:
-< i ~
~
~.
al II P~~/'W~
+P ~QP> ~
gf~PlH v7
~
'V Data. M.
TiAlo. ~.',.~~./..~
~ ~
~
~
"Typ'~Wove'"~ e
~
~ ~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~ era
~ ~ ~ ~
C to....
~ ~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Action Compl..........
g j n of Operating Reactors/Project Management 3'- ~//J i oes has e."n evieved and is exempt from fees.
gftmVVtCD+.
. /d (0, 'I]~L6.(.i) i 1 ) iam 0., Hi 1 ler, Chi ef Date LFYaB 6/78 License Fee ftana()ement Branch
~
~
t". et 4.
This request is a CIass ~'type of action attd is exempt from fees becau it:
~('a)'
'as filed by a nonprofit educational,institutiori, i: Docket File (b) was filed by a Government agency and is not for a I.
LFMB Reactor.File.
power r eactor,
(-I: Exemption'ile R.Rein,ORB-4 (c) ~is for a Class~(can on'ly be a I, II, or III-) ar;.endment tthich results from a written Commission request dated ~Z for the application and the amendment is to simplify or clar ty license, or technical s peci ficati ons, has only minor safety sigmficance, and is being issued for the convenience qf the commission, er klso taur
>D'-
~4am
<Dnvpr~ym~mrt sfezlj (d) ~other (state reason therefor):
~ i
.. ~s.b~
/
~
y (fa
( ~,as<,.jirw
/ a'f
~s tu'4 ti
. +r ter" +
/ r g'~
Q>~+~ate+ ~ /ga'q( C~
g Rgb g 0 d >/0 Pj RECEIVED Y LF 8