ML17258A333

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Scope of SEP Topic IX-1 Re Fuel Storage Has Been Adequately Covered in Various Independent Analyses. Topic Is Complete
ML17258A333
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 11/24/1981
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Maier J
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
TASK-09-01, TASK-9-1, TASK-RR LSO5-81-11-050, LSO5-81-11-50, NUDOCS 8111300218
Download: ML17258A333 (10)


Text

REOUL'AEORA INFORMATION OZSTRESUT'ION<>STEM (RIOS>>

ACCKSSIOVi VBR:81 1 13002%9 DOCODATEI: 81/11/24 iVOTAR'IZED:: NO DOCKElll 0 FACILi:50-244 Robert>>

KIn~pt>> Ginnai Nucl cari Plant< Uhit 1 P Rochester" G

050902'44 A UT "Pl!, N ANEI AUTHORI AF FILI'ATiION CRUTCHF IELO'g D<,

04 e r a t ing, R'eac tora'i anch 5

REC IP", VA TIKI RECIIPZKNTI AFFILiIAiTIONi PIAIERig J(, E!8 Rocheste'r Gas II Electrilc" Corp.;

SUB'JKCX;: Adviseis'h'ati scopei of SEP Topic TX 1

r et fueili stor agel hbs" bebni adequately coveretIA ini variious independenti enamel ysehs" T'opi c i s>> coop l cite',

~

OESTRE SOT'ION COOEt' OAS'OPIES'ECEEVEO::LITR J' ENCL

'IZESI ' X

'!I<<TLKI::

SEP Disti (Dr aft or~ Finali SERO NOTES".:I Aopy:SEP S<<<<Lgg LUF..

R+

t<<Ai i>>N

+A,>>A>>

05090244 RECiIPIKt>>ITI IQt CODEF/I4AMKI ACiT!ION::

AD'/SA ORBI 05-L'Al COPIES I.>>T'TR EiVC Lt fA 1

1 RECIPIENT!

IO'ODE'/N AMEI ORB. u5, Bct S N A'ID ER~p Ri, COPIKB'iT!TRI ENCL.t 1

f 1

1 INTERNALi: AD'/SA/VRRI ELOi ARRI CIAIAL>>INAi NRR'/DLt DIR'

~

SEPB BCI SEPB SKCTI LDRI 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 2i 2>>

AEDDt IKI iilRRI/DLt DEPY VR R~/D L~/A0 Li SKP,'LANT! FILKI SKPBii READING 1=

<<3I 1

1 1

1 fi 3I 1

~

EXTERNALi: ACRS O'I8 T' X ( 2/ 09 )

VRCI PORt NT'IS 16 16 11 11 1

1 1

~

1 DISTI EX (2'/ }g 8 )

25 25!

LPORi 1-1 VGIC'.

1 1

D<<oa

)9 TOiTAL'VU~iBERt OF COPIES'EQUIRED:: LiTTR L8'IVCLt

A R

P ll d

I'

November 24, 1981 Docket No. 50-244 LS05 11-050 Mr. John E. Maier Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr,

Maier:

SUBJECT; SEP TOPIC IX-l, FUEL STORAGE (R, E,

GINNA)

<ova F tS81~

Vi$4 88lafAE 880Ugggg lggg lI

'bi We have completed our evaluation of SEP Topic IX-l, "Fuel Storage" for the R,

E. Ginna facility, As part of our evaluation we have reviewed the spent fuel pool modifications as described in Amendment ll to Provisional Operating License DPR-18 issued November 15, 1976.

We have determined that the Safety Evaluation supporting the Amendment was performed in accordance with current licensing criteria.

This review satisfies the aspects of Topic IX-1 relating to criticality and the structural capability of the storage

racks, By letter dated November 3, 1981 the staff issued a Safety Evaluation (SE) regarding the proposed Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System (SFPCS) modifications, The evaluation concluded that the proposed SFPCS modification and the exist-ing backup systems were found to be acceptable.

That SE also resolved the concerns identified in questions 1 and 2 of our March 31, 1981 request for additional information regarding SEP Topic IX-l, Therefore, we have determined that the November 3, 1981 SE satisfies the aspect of Topic IX-1 with regard to cooling capability, gueqtion 3 of our March 31, 1981 request for information pertained to the handling and consequences of dropping heavy loads over the spent fuel pool, Control of heavy loads is being reviewed as an Unresolved Safety Issue (USI A-36, Control of Heavy Loads Near Spent Fuel, NUREG-0649) and as such, is independent of the SEP program.

The structural response of the R.

E, Ginna plant with respect to seismic capability has been reviewed and presented in NUREG/CR-1821, "Seismic Review of the Robert E.

Ginna Nuclear Power Plant as Part of the Systematic Evalua-tion Program,"

Although the seismic review did not specifically evaluate the spent fuel pool structure, the overall conclusions was that the Ginna plant structures and structural elements are adequately designed to withstand the postulated earthquake.

g~oq PDR13002f8 aiii24 5 i/(

~~0CK 05000Pyyj) pg Ii msa cosy o<

OFFICEP SURNAME/

DATE0 NRC FORM 318 u0-80) NRCM 0240

~

~

~ 0 ~ 000 ~ 0 ~ 0 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY F 0'

~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 00 ~

~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~i~I~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 USGPO'I &81~880

r'I

1 John E. Naier Based on the above, we have determined that the scope of SEP Topic IX-1 has been adequately covered in various independent analyses.

Therefore, we conclude that Topic IX-1 is complete.

Sincerely, cc:

See next page Dennis N. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.

5 Division of Licensing OFFICE/

SURNAME/

DATE$

....MP9.',......

GC Aa : d 1////81 t1//

1 1.1/Z//.8.1 B:DL ORB15l5:

L:

0 BI55:D:C WRusse11 JShea DCrutchfield

SA:DL 8

inas

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

7.7.ILO./87 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RE ORD COPY USGPO! 1981

%5 960

64

~

~

~

P

~

pe RK0y (4

"o

++*++

Docket No. 50-244 LS05-81-11-050 UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 November 24, 1981 Mr. John E. Maier Yance President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas

& Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr,

Maier I

. SUBJECT; SEP TOPIC IX-1, FUEL STORAGE (R, E,

GINNA)

We have completed our evaluation of SEP Topic IX-1, "Fuel Storage" for the R,

E. Ginna facility, As part of our evaluation we have reviewed the spent fuel pool modi.fications as described in Amendment ll to Provisional Operating License DPR-18 issued November 15, 1976, We have determined that the Safety Evaluation supporting the Amendment was performed'in accordance with current licensing criteria.

This review satisfies the aspects of Topic, IX-1'elating to criticality and the structural capability of the storage

racks, By letter dated November 3,

1981 the staff issued a Safety Evaluation (SE) regarding the proposed Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System (SFPCS) modifications, The evaluation concluded that the proposed SFPCS modification and the exist-ing backup systems-were found to be acceptable, That SE also resolved the concerns identified in questions 1

and 2 of our March 31, 1981 request for additional information regarding SEP Topic IX-l, Therefore, we have determined that the November 3, 1981 SE satisfies the aspect of Topic IX-1 with regard to cooling capability, question 3 of our March 31, 1981 request for information pertained to the handling and consequences of dropping heavy loads over the spent fuel pool, Control'of heavy loads is being reviewed as an Unresolved Safety Issue (USI A-36, Control of Heavy Loads Near Spent Fuel, NVREG-0649) and as such, is independent of the SEP program.

4 The structural response of the R.

E, Ginna plant with respect to seismic capabtl.ity has been reviewed and presented in NUREG/CR-1821, "Seismic Review of the Robert E, Ginna Nuclear Power Plant as Part of the Systematic Evalua-tion Program,"

Although the seismic review did not specifically evaluate the spent fuel pool structure, the overall conclusions was that the Ginna plant str uctuIes and structural elements are adequately designed to withstand the postulated earthquake,

John E. Maier Based on the above, we have determined that the scope of SEP Topic IX-1 has been adequately covered in various independent analyses.

Therefore, we

'onclude that Topic IX-l is complete.

Sincerely,

'c:

See next page Dennis H, Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.

5 Division of Licensing

'P Mr. John E. Maier CC Harry H. Yoigt, Esquire

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N. W.

Suite 1100 Washington, D. C.

20036 Mr. Michael Slade 12 Trailwood Circle Rochester, New York 14618 Ezra Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 New York State Energy Office Swan Street Building Core 1, Second Floor Empire State Plaza Albany; New York 12223 Director, Bureau of Nuclear Operations State of Hew York Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza

Albany, Hew York 12223 Rochester Public Library 115 South A'venue Rochester, New York 14604 Supervisor of the Town of Ontario 107 Ridge Road West
Ontario, Hew York 14519

~ Resident Inspector R.. E. Ginna Plant c/o U. S.

NRC 1503 Lake Road

Ontario, New York 14519 Mr. Thomas B. Cochran.

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

1725 I Street, N. W.

Suite 600 Washington, D. C.

20006

~ 5 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Office ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007 Herbert Grossman, E;sq.,

Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr.

Emmeth A.-Luebke Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coamission Washington, D. C.

20555