05000269/LER-1917-001, Regarding Loss of Both Keowee Hydroelectric Units Due to Human Error

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML17256A516)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Regarding Loss of Both Keowee Hydroelectric Units Due to Human Error
ML17256A516
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/09/2017
From: Dunton C
Duke Energy Carolinas
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ONS-2017-054 LER 17-001-00
Download: ML17256A516 (7)


LER-1917-001, Regarding Loss of Both Keowee Hydroelectric Units Due to Human Error
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications
2691917001R00 - NRC Website

text

ONS-2017-054 August 9, 2017 Attn: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-27 46 Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Numbers: 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 Renewed Operating Licenses: DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55 Carrie T. Dunton Director, Nuclear Site Support Oconee Nuclear: Station Duke Energy ON01VP j 7800Rochesterf/wy Seneca, SC 29672 o. 864.873,3477 f: 864.873.4208 carrie.dunton@duke-energy.com 10 CFR50.73

Subject:

Licensee Event Report 269/2017-001, Revision 0 - Loss of both Keowee Hydroelectric Units Due to Human Error Licensee Event Report 269/2017-001, Revision 0, is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50. 73 to provide notification of the subject event.

There are no regulatory commitments associated with this LER.

If there are questions, or further information is needed, contact Stephen C. Newman, Regulatory Affairs Lead Nuclear Engineer, at (864) 873-4388.

Sincerely, CaMAL~

Carrie ~D 1

1ton Director, Nuclear Site Support Oconee Nuclear Station Enclosure DQ~~3 v\\.doi.

~s Cl(ij\\~l ~r ALk.

1 0/13/t1-'

CAu&.l["B--../ Ktew)

ONS-2017-054 August 9, 2017 Page2 cc:

Ms. Catherine Haney, Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Ms. Audrey L. Klett, Project Manager (by electronic mail only)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

. 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop 0-08B1A Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. Eddy Crowe NRC Senior Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station INPO (Word File via E-mail)

NRCFORM366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 31511-0104 EXPIRES: 03/31/2020

{04-2017) '

Estima~ bwtlen per response to aimply wl1h this mandatory collection request BO hours.

  • ~"'

LICENSEE EVE!'fT REPORT (LER)

Reported lessons learned are lncoipora!ed Into the licensing process and fed back to Industry.

Send comments regardlng burden estimate to the Information Services Branch (T-2 F43),

ti (See Page 2 for required number of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washlnglon, DC 20555-0001. or by e-mail ID Ii

~c

~

I dlglts/characters for each block) lnfocol/ects.Resource@nrc.gov. and ID the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory

~

./'

Alfa!Js, NEDB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budge~ Washington, DC 20503. If (See NUREG-1022, R.3 for Instruction and guidance for completing lhls fonn a means used ID Impose an lnfonnation collection does not display a CUlll!lltiy valld OMB control hltg://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nur~sfstaff/sr1022/r31) number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person Is not requlied ID respond to, Iha lnfonnalion coUectlon.

3.PAGE Oconee Nuclear Station Unit 1 5000269 1 of 5

4. TITLE:

Loss of Both Keowee Hydroelectric Units Due to Human Error

5. EVENT DATE
6. LER NUMBER
7. REPORT DATE
8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR ISEQUENTIAL~E\\i MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER NUMBER NO.

Oconee Unit 2 5000 270 06 16 2017 2017 ".'

001

- 00 08 09 2017 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER Oconee Unit 3 5000 287
9. OPERATING MODE 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check all that apply) 0 20.2201(b)

O 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 0 50. 73(a)(2)(il)(A) 0 50. 73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 1 0 20.2201(d) 0 20.2203(a)(3)(1i) 0 50. 73(a)(2)(li)(B) 0 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 0 20.2203(a)(1)

D 20.2203(a)(4) 0 50.73(a)(2}(11i) 0 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A) 0 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 0 50.36(c)(1 )(i)(A) 0 50. 73(a)(2)(iv)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10. POWER LEVEL O 20.2203(a)(2)(1i) 0 50.36(c)(1 )(ii)(A) 181 50. 73(a)(2)(v)(A) 0 73.71(a (4)

O 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 0 50.36(c)(2) 181 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) 0 73.71(a (5) 0 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 0 50.46(a)(3)(ii) 181 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) 0 73.77(a)(1) 100 0 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) 181 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D}

0 73.77(a)(2)(i) 0 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 181 50. 73(a)(2)(i)(B) 0 50.73(a)(2)(vii) 0 73.77(a)(2)(ii) 0 50. 73(a)(2)(i)(C) 0 OTHER Specify In Abstract below or In NRC Form 36BA

12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER LICENSEE CONTACT

.,TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Araa Code)

Stephen C. Newman, Regulatory Affairs Lead Nuclear Engineer (864) 873-4388 CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU-REPORTABLE

CAUSE

SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU~

REPORTABLE FACTURER TO ICES FACTURER TOEPIX A

EK 52 E332 y

14. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED
15. EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR 0 YES (ff yes, complete 15. Expected Submission Date) 181 NO SUBMISSION DATE ABSTRACT (Umlt to 1400 spaces, I.e.. approximately 15slng/fHPaced typewritten fines)

On June 16, 2017, during implementation of a modification to Keowee Hydroelectric Station Governor Actuator Cabinets 1 and 2, breakers were inadvertently repositioned in each of the governor control system for Keowee Hydroelectric Units 1 and 2 (KHU1 and KHU2), rendering both units inoperable. The condition was discovered following an unsuccessful start of KHU2 for commercial operation. The KHUs are the onsite emergency power source for the Oconee Nuclear Station.

It was concluded that this constituted a loss of safety function from the time when both KHUs were inoperable until the dedicated offsite power source was aligned to the emergency busses; a period of approximately 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />. This condition is reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 73(a)(2)(v)(A-D).

  • Technical Specifications (TS) were followed based on time of discovery; however, a subsequent review of c:omputer logs provided firm evidence that both KHUs were inoperable for longer than allowed by TSs based cm "past inoperability," requiring this event to be reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as a condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications.

The direct cause of this event was attributed to the reposition due to inadvertent contact of two 24 VDC breakers. The risk impact of this event was determined to be insignificant and corrective actions are planned ti:> prevent recurrence.

NFtC =

BACKGROUND

6. LER NUMBER YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I NUMBER 2017 -

001 REV NQ 00 At Oconee Nuclear Station {ONS), the Keowee Hydroelectric Station (KHS) [EllS:EK] serves the emergency power function typically performed by diesel generators [EllS: DG] at other nuclear facilities.

The KHS consists of two (2) hydroelectric turbine/generator units (KHUs) and associated support equipment and auxiliaries. Each KHU is provided with its own automatic start equipment and both

  • KHUs undergo simultaneous automatic emergency starts during an emergency. Either KHU may be aligned to either of two emergency power paths, with the underground path being preferred if only one KHU is available. In addition to Keowee, a 100 kV transmission line from a nearby plant with dedicated combustion turbines [EllS: TUR] can provide power to the Stand-by Buss (the emergency buss that supplies emergency loads on all three Oconee units).

Governor [EllS: 65] Actuator Cabinets [EllS: CAB] GAC1 and GAC2 contain control circuitry and components for KHU1 and KHU2 respectively, including breakers [EllS: 52] K1 GCS BK0001 and K2 GCS BK0001 as part of the Governor Control System for KHU1 and KHU2 respectively. These breakers are small, 'plug in' type, 10 amp breakers with the actuating power switches [EllS: JS]

protruding into an open space inside their respective cabinets. These breakers provide 24 VDG to a distributing valve [EllS: V] assembly and shutdown solenoid valve [EllS: SV] which are both required to actuate for Keowee to start. The shutdown solenoid is a fail-safe valve that requires energization to open during turbine operation. Without power, the solenoid valve closes.

EVENT DESCRIPTION

On June 16, 2017, at approximately 0740 hours0.00856 days <br />0.206 hours <br />0.00122 weeks <br />2.8157e-4 months <br />, workers were implementing a modification to Governor Actuator Cabinets 1 and 2 located within the Keowee Hydroelectric Station. The investigation showed thatat approximately 0907 hours0.0105 days <br />0.252 hours <br />0.0015 weeks <br />3.451135e-4 months <br />, Operator Aid Computer (OAC) alarm [EllS: ALM] indications for K1 GCS BK0001 breaker for KHU1 Channel A and B Governor Critical Alarm were received on the OAC alarm screens located in the Keowee Control Room (KCR). These alarms were not observed by the Keowee operator since he was still on rounds and not in the KCR. Normally, when a Governor Critical Alarm is received, Stat-Alarms in both the Keowee and Oconee ~unit 2 Control Rooms are generated. Additionally, a governor critical alarm condition triggers an emergency lock-out of the unit, which would also normally generate Stat-Alarms. However *. in this-instance, no Stat-Alarms were

!generated and no emergency lock-out conqition was triggered due to the failure mode design of the repositioned breaker defeating the signal sent to the Stat-Alarms. Had a Stat-Alarm been received, the

!Protocol of Stat-Alarm management would have been followed by the Oconee Unit 2 Control Room, the Oconee Unit 2 Senior Reactor Operator and the Keowee Control operators, potentially reducing the probability for this single incident to have escalated further. At 1020 hours0.0118 days <br />0.283 hours <br />0.00169 weeks <br />3.8811e-4 months <br />, similar OAC alarm indications were received in the KCR associated with the KHU2 K2 GCS BK0001 breaker. *

!\\t 1321 hours0.0153 days <br />0.367 hours <br />0.00218 weeks <br />5.026405e-4 months <br />, while attempting to start KHU2 for commercial generation, an "incomplete start" alarm was received in the KCR. Investigation into the matter subsequently revealed that the two (2) repqsitioned breakers were open and both KHUs were non-functional. Each KHU was declared inoperable at 1635 hours0.0189 days <br />0.454 hours <br />0.0027 weeks <br />6.221175e-4 months <br />.

In Mode 1, KHU operability is required by TS 3.8.1, "AC Sources-Operating," and TS 3.7.10, "Protected Service Water." The appropriate TS conditions were.entered and the Required Actions completed within the allowed Completion Times. As required by TS Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.8.1, Condition I, due to the loss of both KHUs, Standby Buses were energized from a dedicated Lee Combustion Turbine and an isolated power path at 1715 hours0.0198 days <br />0.476 hours <br />0.00284 weeks <br />6.525575e-4 months <br />. An NRC Emergency Notification System (ENS) call was made at 0032 hours3.703704e-4 days <br />0.00889 hours <br />5.291005e-5 weeks <br />1.2176e-5 months <br /> on June 17, 2017, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A-D), reporting the event as a loss of safety function (Ref.: EN 52812). The reporting premise for the loss of safety function was that there was a 40 minute period, between when both KHUs were declared inoperable and when the LCTs energized the standby busses, when the station was without its normal onsite emergency power sources.

REV NO.

00 Subsequent troubleshooting efforts concluded that the two KHU1 and 2 breakers were mechanically and electronically sound and operating properly, but due to work activities being performed in the vicinity of these breakers, had probably been inadvertently repositioned. Both breakers were returned to the closed position and a KHU1 functional run was conducted. KHU1 was declared operable at 2150 hours0.0249 days <br />0.597 hours <br />0.00355 weeks <br />8.18075e-4 months <br />. A KHU2 functional test run was then performed, the unit declared operable at 2351 hours0.0272 days <br />0.653 hours <br />0.00389 weeks <br />8.945555e-4 months <br />, and the associated TS Conditions related to this event were exited.

Based on a review of OAC data, it was subsequently determined that a loss of safety function existed between 1020 hours0.0118 days <br />0.283 hours <br />0.00169 weeks <br />3.8811e-4 months <br /> (the time when both KHUs were rendered inoperable due to the inadvertent breaker repositioning) and 1715 hours0.0198 days <br />0.476 hours <br />0.00284 weeks <br />6.525575e-4 months <br /> (when the offsite Lee Combustion Turbines were aligned to the standby busses);

a period of -7 hours. A loss of safety function is reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 73(a)(2)(v)(A-D) as "Any event or condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are need to: (A) Shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition; (B) Remove residual heat; (C) Control the release of radioactive material; or (D) Mitigate the consequences of an accident."

From the time KHU inoperability was initially declared at 1635 hours0.0189 days <br />0.454 hours <br />0.0027 weeks <br />6.221175e-4 months <br /> on June 16, 2017, TS LCOs 3.8.1 and 3.7.10 were appropriately entered and the Required Actions completed within the stated Completion Times. However, a review of OAC data revealed that the first KHU was actually inoperable on June 16, 2017, beginning at 0907 hours0.0105 days <br />0.252 hours <br />0.0015 weeks <br />3.451135e-4 months <br /> and as such, the 1-hour TS LCO 3.8.1 Required Action Completion Time (per Required Action C.1) was not satisfied. Consequently, this event is also reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as a condition prohibited by the planfs Technical Specifications.

CAUSAL FACTORS The direct cause of this event is attributed to the two (2) 24 VDC breakers K1 GCS BK0001 and K2 GCS BK0001, being out of position and rendering both KHUs inoperable due to human error.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

1. Completed Verified governor control system integrity on both units which allowed restoration of KHU operability in accordance with TS LCO 3.8.1.
2. Planned a. Enhance Governor Control System (GCS) lesson plans to address this event.

b. Enhance protective measures (e.g., physical I passive I extra signage) requirements for the GCS panels as well as other KHU repositionable components that may be susceptible to a similar event.

c. Improve Work Management controls to address (1) the potential consequences.of working on both KHUs at the same time and (2) limiting work on a KHU that is in service.

The planned corrective actions indicated above are NOT considered NRC Commitment items.

SAFETY ANALYSIS

A probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) evaluation was conducted for the period of KHU inoperability to determine the significance of this event. It was determined through a quantitative analysis that the event had a negligible effect on the delta Core Damage Frequency {CDF) and delta Large Early Release Fraction (LERF), resulting in an insignificant impact on the health and safety of the public. This was largely due to the sustained availability of the lee Combustion Turbine and the Standby Shutdown Facility as well as the Protected Service Water system in a.Loss of Offsite Power situation. These additional options for preventing core damage further reduce the impact of the event on CDF and LERF.

Another major driver in the negligible risk impact was the historical lack of any threat of severe weather over the duration of the KHU unavailability. When KHU failures show up in the risk model as being significant, it is almost exclusively paired with an occurrence of a loss of Offsite Power due to severe weather. When severe weather is not expected and does not occur, the importance of the KHUs in the risk model drops significantly. Finally, the short time frame the condition existed results in an insignificant risk impact.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Similar Events:

For the preceding three (3) year period, ONS has submitted three (3) LERs which reported under either 10 CFR 50.73{a)(2)(v)(A-D) or 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) criteria (but not both).

1. LER 287/2015-002 Revision O: Described the discovery of a broken conductor related to the Unit 3 startup transformer which created a temporary loss of the power paths required by TS 3.8.1 and was reported under 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A-D) as a condition that could have prevented.the fulfillment of-a safety function.
  • 2. LER 287/2016-001 Revision O: Described the discovery of a Unit 3 inoperable reactor building cooling unit in which had existed longer than the time allowed by the Technical Specifications and reported per 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B). It was also revealed that Unit 3 had entered the mode of applicability which with the inoperable cooling unit which is prohibited by TS 3.0.4.
3. LER 269-2016-002 Revision O: Described the discovery of inoperable containment high range radiation monitors due to the potential effects of thermally induced currents during a HELB event in a containment penetration room. It was concluded that the inoperable condition had existed longer than the time allow by the Technical Specification and was reported under 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).

A review of the aforementioned LERs did not point toward a similar cause or corrective actions that could have prevented this event.

APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES 3/31/2020 (See fonn 366 above for burden esumate)

6. LER NUMBER 2017
  • 001 REV NO.

00 Energy Industry Identification System (EllS) codes are identified in the text as [XX].

This event is considered INPO Consolidated Events System (ICES) Reportable rather than EPIX reportable (refer to LER line 13 on page 1 ). There were no releases of radioactive materials, radiation

  • exposures in excess of limits or personnel injuries associated with this event. Page 5 of 5