ML17251A385

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That Util Address Generic Ltr 88-17 Re Loss of DHR During Nonpower Operation.Ltr Issued Due to Potentially Serious Consequences Resulting from Inadequacy of Industry Response to Generic Ltr 87-12
ML17251A385
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 12/02/1988
From: Murley T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Briggs P
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
GL-87-12, GL-88-17, NUDOCS 8812120226
Download: ML17251A385 (6)


Text

Docket No. 50-244 DEC.

~ 198B Mr. Paul Briggs Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr. Kober:

SUBJECT:

LOSS OF DECAY HEAT REMOVAL We have just issued Generic Letter 88-17 which addresses loss of decay heat removal (DHR) during nonpower operation.

This letter was issued because of the potential serious consequence of loss of shutdown cooling concurrent with significant core decay heat.

Further, it is our belief that the industry as a whole has not aggressively responded to resolve the concern following its identification in our earlier Generic Letter 87-12.

In particular; the industry's response to the Generic Letter 87-12 was deficient in the areas of ( 1) prevention of accident initiation, (2) mitigation of accidents before they potentially progress to core

damage, and (3) control of radioactive material if a core damage accident should occur.

Generic Letter 88-17 prescribes expeditious actions which should immediately ease the concern; and parallel, but longer term, programmed enhancements which effectively address the root cause of the problems and permit greater flexibilityin operation.

We consider this issue to be of high priority and request that you assure that your organization addresses it accordingly.

Sincerely, ppiginal signed b7, Tl emas E, Muxley Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:

See next page DISTRIBUTION: IDocket F11e, NRCBLoca1

PDRs, SVarga, BBogerr NRosbbrook,
CStahle, OGC, EJordan,
BGrimes, ACRS (10),
RWessman, JSniezek,
TMurley, Crutchfield
  • See previous concurrence

-3

DR
A NAME :*MRushbrook :*CStahle:mw DATE:10/28 88: 10/28 88
  • RWessman
10 28 88
  • BBoger
  • SVarga
10/28 88
11 28 88
":DCrutchfield:*JSniezek
11 09 88
11 17/88 NAME :T DATE 8812120226 urley PDR ADOCK P

BB

~.~

881202 05000244

PDC,

"yd Q

XP 0 I C

Docket No. 50-244 Robert C. Mecredy, General Manager Nuclear Production Rochester Gas 5 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr. Mecredy:

SUBJECT:

LOSS OF DECAY HEAT REMOVAL Me have just issued Generic Letter 88-17 which address loss of decay heat removal (DHR) during nonpower operation.

This letter was issued because of the potential s

ious consequence of loss of shutdown cooling concurrent with significant cor decay heat.

Further, it is our belief that the industry as a whole has no aggressively responded to resolve the concern following its identificat'on in our earlier Generic Letter 87-12.

In particular, the industry's respo e to the Generic Letter 87-12 was deficient in the areas of (1) prevention o

accident initiation, (2) mitigation of accidents before they potentially pro ess to core

damage, and (3) control of radioactive material if a core damag accident should occur.

Generic Letter 88-17 prescribes expeditious ac ions which should immediately ease the concern; and parallel, but longer ter

, programmed enhancements which effectively address the root cause of the probl s and permit greater flexibilityin operation.

Me consider this issue to be of high priority and request that you.assure that your organization addresses i

accordingly.

Sincerely,

,cc:

'See next page Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION:

D cket File, NRC8Local

PDRs, SVarga, BBoger, MRushbrook,
CStahle, OGC,
Jordan, BGrimes, ACRS (10),
RWessman, JSniezek,
TMurley, Crutchfield NAME:t%

b k

DATE :10 I-3

DIR/PDI-3
CStahle:mw
Rwessman
10 88
10 88 D

RP/5EP

BBoger
SVarga

~

~

10/

/88

~10/

88

AD

~

D

DCrutchfield:JSniezek
10 88
10 88

~ ~

NAME :T rley DATE :

0 88

'L l

~

'\\

1 1

h s,

F

Docket No. 50-244

. Mr. Roger Kober, Senior Vice President Production and Engineering Rochester Gas 8i Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr. Kober:

SUBJECT:

LOSS OF DECAY HEAT REMOVAL

,,We have,just issued Generic Letter 88-17 which addresses loss of decay heat removal (DHR) during nonpower operation.

This letter was issued because of the potential seriops consequence of loss of shutdown cooling concurrent with significant core decay heat.

Further, it is our belief that the industry as a whole has not aggressively responded to resolve the concern following its identification/in our earlier Generic Letter 87-12.

In particular, the industry's responseyto the Generic Letter 87-12 was deficient in the areas of (1) prevention of yccident initiation, (2) mitigation of accidents before they potentially progres's to core

damage, and (3) control of radioactive material if a core damage pccident should occur.

Generic Letter 88-17 prescribes expeditious actions which should immediately ease,the concern; and parallel, but longer term,~programmed enhancements which effectively address the root cause of the proble 8 and permit greater flexibility in operation.

We consider this issue to be of hsgh priority and request that you,~sure that your organization addresses it accordingly.

Sincerely, cc:

See next page DISTRIBUTION: Doc et File, NRC&Local

CStahle, OGC, EJ rdan,
BGrimes, ACRS Crutchfield Thomas E. Nurley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
PDRs, SVarga, BBoger, NRushbrook, (10),
RWessman, JSniezek,
TNurley,
  • See previous concur rence

~in NAME:

u DATE:10 8

rook :CSt'Ale:mw

RWessm n

8

10/ 4/88
10/

/88

B o er
10 88 R

~

D S arga~":DCrutchfield: JS

/

88

1

/88

10 NRR zek 88 NAME :TNurley

,. DATE:10 88 F

CIAL C

Y

e I

Nil l S

4

~

~