ML17250A681

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Plans,Schedules & Commitments in Response to Re Shift Staffing Interim Criteria.Will Comply W/Shift Staffing Criteria by 820701.Plans Established for Required Licensed Personnel
ML17250A681
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/13/1980
From: White L
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8010160476
Download: ML17250A681 (10)


Text

RE L.ATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8010160476 DOC ~ DATE: 80/10/13 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant~

Unit" iE Rochester G

05000244 AUTH,NAME-AUTHOR AFFILIATION I'JHI TE P L ~ D ~

Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corp.

RECIP, NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION CRUTCHFIELD<D."

Operating Reactors Branch 5

SUBJECT:

Submits plansischedules 8,commitments in response to 800731 ltr r'e shift staffing inter,,im criteria.Nil.l" comply w/shift staffing criteria. by 820701.Plans established for required

, licen'sed personnel.,

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

ABOIS COPIES RECEIVED:LiTR l'NCL' SIZE:

TITLE: Gener al Distribution for after Issuance of Operating License NOTES:1, copy:SEP Sect.

Ldr.,

05000244 RECIPIENT'D CODE/NAME~

ACTION:

CRUTCHF IELD 04 COPIES LiTTR ENCL 13 1

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME>>

COPIES LTTR ENCL~

INTERNAL: D/DIRgHUM FAC08 NRC-PDR 02'R ASSESS BR 10 EXTERNAL,s ACRS 09 NSIC 05 1,

1A 1

16 1

ILE OELD LPDR IL 06 11 01 03 0

qo TOTAL. NUMBER OF COP'IES REQUIRED'TTR

~

ENCL

e lf 14

etc JLC< 0 i

'., teet stkte

!/ SSIIIIII //

////IN//!I/'ee E////,I/

//////Z///F

!ari/IP I!!!!!!!!!!!

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION

~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649 LEON D. WHITE. JR.

Eeecutlve Vice President tKLEPHOMC ARci cooc tie 546-2700 October 13, '1980 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch $5 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Subject:

Shift staffing interim criteria R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No.

1 Docket No. 50-244

Dear Mr. Crutchfield:

This letter is a response to Mr. D. G. Eisenhut's July 31, 1980 letter which provided interim shift staffing criteria and guidelines for scheduling of overtime.

The following plans, schedules and commitments are provided in response to the criteria on shift staffing.

We willcomply with the shift staffing criteria by July 1, 1982.

The following plans have been established to provide the required licensed personnel.

1.

Mid-December, 1980 Three new reactor operator (R. O.)

licenses will be added (dependent'on passing the U.S.N.R.C.

examination),

making a total of 12 Senior Reactor Operator (S.R.O.) licenses and 10 R.O. licenses.

2.

January, 1981 The loss of one S.R.O. license from shift will make a total of ll S.R.O. licenses and 10 R.O. licenses.

3.

Mid-1981 Three new R. O. licenses (dependent on passing the U.S.N.R.C. examination) WITH the removal of three R.O.

licenses for S.R.O. license training.

The net result willbe a total of ll S.R.O. licenses and 10 R.O. licenses.

4.

By July 1, 1982 Three new S.R.O. licenses (dependent on passing the U.S.N.R.C. examination) willmake a total of 14 S.R.O. licenses and 10 R.O. licenses.

This willprovide sufficient S.R.O. and R.O. licenses to meet the interim shift staffing criteria and sufficient extra licenses (4) to cover any unexpected loss of personnel.

I/i.'i '0

(

$00.

g brett,lPS I

II

~

~

)

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELE C CORP.

DATE October 13, 1980 To Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief SHEET NO.

2 It should be noted that the limit on the number of personnel preparing in the program for licenses is based on three factors.

The first is the U.S.N.R.C. training requirement that operators be removed from all shift duties for an extensive period of time prior to taking the U.S.N.R.C. exami-nation.

The second is the lack of qualified Auxiliary Operators to replace the Auxiliary Operators removed from shift.

The third is the large number of personnel enrolled in the Rochester Institute of Technology academic upgrade program described in our December 28, 1979 letter to Mr. D. Ziemann.

This program is presently intended to address the long range criteria on college level achievement for S.R.O. license holders given in Mr. H. R. Denton's March 26, 1980 letter.

Auxiliary,Operators are included in the program.

This program has the effect of interfering with scheduling arrangements to place additional Auxiliary Operators in the license training.

We wish, also, to respond to the portion of the letter concerning overtime work for licensed control room personnel and Shift Technical Advisors.

We intend to develop a work rule administrative procedure which willestablish the following policies.

l.

An individual shall not be permitted to work more than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> straight (not including shift turnover or lunch relief time).

2.

An individual shall not be permitted to work more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in any 48 hour5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> period (not including shift turnover or lunch relief time).

3.

An individual shall not work more than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in any pay week (not including shift turnover or lunch relief time).

4., An individual shall not work more than 14 consecutive days without having two consecutive days off.

5.

The shift working during the change from Eastern Daylight Savings Time to Standard Time willbe considered to have worked 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />.

6.

The hours worked by licensed personnel participating in plant evolution in order to observe completion of the evolution to provide necessary operational experience are excluded from the calculation of the total number of hours permitted.

7.

The hours required for license training, license retraining and the R.I.T. Training Program are excluded from the calculation of the total number of hours permitted.

C 0

~

44'

\\

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

C P

l

~

~

~

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELE C CORP.

DATE 'ctober 13, 1980 TO Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief SHEET NO. 3 8.

The hours worked by licensed Auxiliary Operators that do not require use of their license are excluded from the calculation of the total number of hours permitted.

In other words, time worked by a licensed operator as an Auxiliary Operator will not be included in the total permitted.

We understand the U.S.N.R.C. concern for limiting overtime for these personnel and we are responding to this need.

Since January 1980 we have increased the number of operations shift personnel from 34 to 40.

We willcontinue to endeavor to minimize overtime for these personnel; however, we cannot commit to all the restrictions as given in Mr. Eisenhut's letter for reasons given below.

1.

The total amount of paid days off for our current licensed operators is 275 vacation days and 209 holiday per year for a total of 484 days.

The use of the twelve-hour rule would limit the number of operators able to take off during any given week.

This would have the effect that there would be insufficient overtime available to meet current holiday and vacation benefits during periods normally used for vacation.

The historic corporate policy has been that overtime has been scheduled based on the 16-hour rule.

Our present practice is that when an individual is scheduled to work'more than twelve hours in a day he is relieved from his on-duty station for one hour at about the end of his first eight hours on duty.

This provides the individual with a change of scene and relief as opposed to working more than twelve straight hours at a duty station.

Administrative procedures have been in place to provide temporary relief to an operator by another licensed operator as the need and/or request occurs.

2.

Until increased numbers of licensed personnel are available, increased simulator time requirements willcontinue to create an additional need for overtime replacement.

3.

In order to facilitate the establishment of Operator Requalifica-tion Training in four uninterrupted training days each training period, the shift schedule was changed in 1974 from five con-secutive days each week to one in which the operators work seven days on the 0000-0800 hour shift, seven days on 1600-2400 hour shift, six days on 0800-1600 hour shift and five days from 0800 to 1600 hours0.0185 days <br />0.444 hours <br />0.00265 weeks <br />6.088e-4 months <br /> during their training week.

This schedule is arranged so that no more than 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> straight time is worked each week.

For this schedule the 72-hour restriction is more appropriate in any pay period than in any 7 day period.

~

~

'ROCHESTER GAS AND ELE C CORP.

DATE October 13, 1980 TO Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN: Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief SHEET HO.

4 4.

The current policy of licensed operators participating in plant evolutions on overtime should continue.

Under the 12-hour rule they may be unable to see a complete evolution.

Their overtime would have to be dedicated as a replacement for vacations and holidays.

5.

Those licensed control personnel currently enrolled in the Rochester Institute of Technology Academic Upgrade Program

.discus'sed above are compensated for the time in class as Company policy for this program; however, we willnot consider it as accrued overtime because it is a voluntary educational endeavor conducted by an accredited educational institution.

We wish to express our desire to comply with the intent to limit overtime for control room licensed personnel and Shift Technical Advisors, and we hope you willconsider the above discussion in evaluating our work rule policies.

In order to confirm the acceptability of our plans and to eliminate possible misunderstanding during future inspections by the Office of Inspection and Enforcement, we would appreciate a written response or an opportunity to meet and discuss our plans with you or your staff.

Very truly yours,

P I