ML17244A359
| ML17244A359 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1978 |
| From: | Kister H, Markowski R, Napuda G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17244A355 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-244-78-24, NUDOCS 7902080091 | |
| Download: ML17244A359 (28) | |
See also: IR 05000244/1978024
Text
Report
No.
50-244 78-24
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE
OF INSPECTION
AND ENFORCEMENT
Region I
Docket No.
50-244
License
No.
Priority
Licensee:
Rochester
Gas
and Electric
Com an
Category
C
89 East Avenue
Rochester,
14649
PZ-5: 78
Inspectors:
date signed
ate signed
2
,5-2Z'ate
signed
Facility Name:
R
E
Ginna Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit No.
1
Ontario,
New York; and
RG&E Corporate Offices and
the Andrews Building, Rochester,
Inspection
conducted:
November 13-16,
1978
R. S.
Mar owski, Reactor Inspector
s4
G
puda,
Reactor
n
ector
D.
Ke o,
eactor
Inspector
Approved by:
. Kister, Chief, Nuclear Support Section
No. 2,
8
NS Branch
a-~ -7F
date
signed
Ins ection
Summar
Ins ection
on November 13-16
1978
Re ort No. 50-244 78-24
~AI d:,
dd
b
by
dd
bb
dd
d
y
b
accepted
Quality Assurance
Program
(QAP) implementation including:
QAP changes;
design
change/modification control; procurement/material
control; records
management;
and,
audits.
The inspection also included followup on previously identified unresolved
items.
The inspection involved 39 inspector-hours
on site
and 54.5 inspector-hours
at corporate
- offices by three
NRC regional
based
inspectors.
Results:
Of .the six areas
inspected,
no items of noncompliance
were identified in five
areas;
one item of noncompliance
was identified in one area (Infraction - fai lure to
store nonduplicated
recorder charts
and
radiographs
in compliance with ANSI N45.2.9,
Section 5.6, Paragraph 6.b.(l)).
7 9 0 2 0 8 0 0
f l
Region I Form 12
(Rev. April 77)
~
)
0
Jf
4I
DETAILS
Persons
Contacted
- C. Anderson,
QA Manager
- J. Arthur, Chief Engineer
S. Bullock, Site
QC Engineer
G. Daniels, Electrical Discipline Manager
G. Davis, Mechanical
Engineer
- K. Easterbrook,
QA Engineer
D. Gannon, Assistant to Drafting Supervisor
- K. Gregory, Project
QC Engineer
- L. Lang, Superintendent
- Nuclear Production
H. Hack,
Document Control Supervisor
- R. Morse, Drafting Supervisor
G. Paris,
I8C Supervisor
- W. Schulze,
Purchasing,
Buyer
- B. Snow, Plant Superintendent
J. St. Martin, Project Liason Engineer
- D. Woodward, Quality Engineering Co-ordinator
- R. Vanderwheel,
Project Manager
Other Accom an in
NRC Personnel
- J. Johnson,
Reactor Inspector
- denotes
those present at exit interview.
Followu
on Previousl
Identified Items
(Closed} Unresolved
Item (244/77-08-01):
Establish correct/preferred
method for making corrections
to quality records.
The inspector
reviewed the revisions to the Quality Assurance
Manual - Section
17, Procedure
QE-1701GS,
and Procedure
QC-1701 that specify the
correct/perferred,metho'd-'for"making:corrections
to quality records
and observed
the established
method to be
a single line through the
error, initialed, with the correction
above.
This item is resolved.
(Closed)
Unresolved
Item (244/77-08-02):
Revise
Procedure
QE-401GS.
The inspector reviewed Revision
4 to QE-401GS
and observed that the
revision eliminated the engineering
department
requirement for the
QA department
to initial the purchase requisition
as part of engineering's
review of the purchase
requisition.
The inspector
reviewed Procedure
gA-402GS
and verified that the appropriate
documentation of QA
review of purchasing
documents
is specified therein.
This item is
resolved,
(Closed)
Unresolved
Item (244/77-08-03):
Revise Procedure
QE-
1701GS.
The inspector
reviewed Revision
4 to QE-1701GS which
contains
a specific method for indexing records.
The inspector
reviewed the records
index and storage
area
and found both to be
consistent with the requirements of QE-1701GS,
Revision 4.
This
item is resolved.
(Closed)
Unresolved
Item (244/77-17-07):
Followup action associated
with CAR 77-2.
The inspector
reviewed revised
drawings transmitted
for installation associated
with supports
SW-69,
SW-70,
SW-73,
SW-
78,.and
SW-83; and, audit report 77-32-CA.
The drawings associated
with SW-69,
SW-73,
SW-78,
and
SW-83 indicated that the support load
values
had
been recalculated.
The drawing associated
with SW-70
indicated that the support
had
been redesianed.
The
RGSE audit
report indicated that the
AE had performed
a review (by audit)
and
additional training in design interface control
and concluded that
no other design interfaces
had been missed.
This item is resolved.
3. ~PCh
The inspectors
reviewed
a sample of revisions
made to the Quality
Assurance
Manual
(0AM), and implementing procedures
of the Quality
Assurance
Department
(QA), Engineering
Department
(QE), Purchasing
'epartment
(QP),. and the Site
(QC) subsequent
to the last
NRC
inspection
during May 1977.
These revisions
were reviewed for
consistency with the licensee's
accepted
Quality Assurance description.
These
procedures
also served
as the basis for inspection of the
areas
discussed
in this report.
During the conduct of this inspection,
discussions
with licensee
personnel
indicated that they were aware
of the, procedural
changes.
The procedures
reviewed were:
- QAM Section 3, Design Control, Revision
7
- QAM Section
6,
Document Control, Revision
5
QAM Section
17, Records,
Revision
6
- QA103GS, Management
Review of the Quality Assurance
Program,
'Revision
4
QA201GS, Quality Assurance
Group Organization
and Responsi-
bilities, Revision
7
QA502GS, Preparation,
Review and Approval of Quality Assur-
ance Procedures,
Revision
4
QA601GS, Quality Assurance
Review of Departmental
Quality
Assurance
Procedures,
Revision
2
QA602GS, Preparation,
Review and Approval of Procedure
Deviation Requests
by Quality Assurance,
Revision
2
- QA1603S, Preparation,
Review and Processing
of Corrective
Action Reports
by Quality Assurance,
Revision
3
QA1801GS, Qualification of Auditing Personnel,
Revision
5
QA1803GS,
Performance of Quality Assurance Audits, Revision
3
- QA1804GS, Reporting
and Follow-up of RG&E Audit Findings,
Revision
5
- QA1806GS, Review of Audit Program,
Revision
2
- QE602GS, Control of Documents
by the List of Current Revisions
Method, Revision
3
QE604GS, Distribution and Control of Documents
by Project
Correspondence
Procedures,
Revision
1
- QE606GS, Receipt,
Control
and Distribution of Drawings
and
Aperture Cards,
Revision
0
QE1701GS,
Records,
Revision
4
QP101GS,
Periodic
Review of Purchasing
Procedures,
Revision
4
QP210GS,
Purchasing
Department Organization
and Responsi-
bilities, Revision
3
- QP401GS, Preparation,
Review, Approval and Issuance of
Purchase
Orders
and Changes
to Purchase
Orders,
Revision
4
- QP701GS, Supplier Evaluation,
Revision
5
- QP702GS,
Establishment
and Maintenance of Qualified Suppliers
List, Revision
5
+QP703GS,
Biennial
Review of Qualified Suppliers,
Revision
1
QP1701GS,
Purchasing
Records,
Revision
3
- QC202, Modification Project Organization,
Revision
0
gC301,
Work
S tart Authorization,
Revi si on 4
qC303, Control of System Modification Activities, Revision
3
gC304, Control of Modification Activities by the Modifi-
'ation
Project,
Revision
0
gC601, guality Control Procedure
Document Control,
Re-
vision
3
gC602, Plant Procedure
Document Control, Revision
12
qC1001,
Inspection
and Surveillance Activities, Revision
6
gC1102,
Performance of Tests,
Revision
3
gC1501,
Control
and Disposition of Deficient Materials,
Revision
3
- gC1701, guality Assurance
Records,
Revision ll
gC1703,
Record Storage Facility and Equipment,
Revision
3
- revised since previous
NRC inspection.
No items of noncompliance
were identified.
4.
Design
Chan es/Modifications
References
ll
Applicable procedures
listed in paragraph
3.
Review
The inspector selected
and reviewed the Station Modifications
(SM) listed below to verify, as applicable,
that they were
accomplished
in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.59
and the licensee's
accepted
gA program description.
The review was conducted
to verify that documentary
evidence
was available to establish
that the following activities were
performed:
technical
and quality verification provisions
specified in engineering
documents
were incorporated into the
modification procedures;
quality verification activities
(inspection and/or testing)
were conducted
concurrent with
and/or subsequent
to installation;
reviews of required records
were conducted
and the installation was accepted prior to
placing the affected
system in operation;
and, prints/drawings
and operating
procedures
were revised.
The station modifications reviewed were:
SM 75-39,
SM 75-58,. Spent
Fuel
Pool Cooling Discharge
Pipe Rerouting
SM 76-24, Air Ejector Radiation Monitor Modification
SM 77-08, Full Length Control
Rod Sampling Resistor
Modification
SM 77-1836,
Pressure
Shielding Steel
Diaphram in the
Turbine Building (work in progress)
No items of noncompliance
were identified.
However, during
this review, the inspector identified the
two items discussed
below.
(1)
During the review of the calibration
(performed August
1977} of the rate meter drawer replaced
during the per-
formance of SM 76-24,
the inspector observed that the
specific test equipment utilized was not identified (e.g.
by serial
number}.
The inspector
reviewed the results of calibrations per-
formed subsequent
to the initial calibration and, cali-
bration records
associated
with the test equipment utilized.
These
documents identified the specific test equipment
.used;
and the acceptability of the rate meter.
Based
on
this review of these
supplementary
documents,
no item of
noncompliance
was identified.
(2)
The below listed inspection/examination
records
were not
retrieved prior to the completion of the inspection:
NDE report 1520, Penetrant
Test of MSIV Seat
(SM 75-
39)
NDE report 132, Ultrasonic Test of MSIV Cover Studs
(SM 75-39)
Radiography reports for welds AC-1008-E2-E20
(SM 75-
58)
Pending retrieval of these
records;
and,
review by RI,
this item is unresolved.
Refer to paragraph
6.b.(2) for
further details.
5.
Procurement .Material Control
a.
Reference
Applicable procedures
listed in paragraph
3.
b.
Procurement
Document
Review
The Purchase
Orders
(PO) listed below were selected for accepted
items which were stored in the station warehouse
area.
The Purchase
Orders
were reviewed to verify that proper approvals
had been obtained, quality control inspection
requirements
were specified,
and traceability from the item to the purchase
order and receipt inspection
records
was established.
The
Purchase
Orders
so reviewed were:
Shock
and
Sway Suppressors,
P.O.
NEG-84686-78-2
(on hold)
Welding Rod,
P.O.
NEG-87493-78-2 (rejected)
Stationary Motor Varidisc for Charging
Pumps,
P.O.
NEG-
87493-78-10
Shifting Motor Varidisc for Charging
Pumps,
P.O.
NGMDNR-
1748
fluke 343A Calibration,
P.O.
NEG-85751-78-1
SS Schedule
40 Pipe,
P.O.
NASC-16133
Heise Pressure
Gage Calibration,
P.O.
NEG-85749
4020-8 Resistor Calibration,
P.O.
NEG-85753
3450A Digital Voltmeter Calibration,
P.O.
NEG-85752
The inspector
reviewed the inspection
records
documenting
the
receipt inspection of the selected
items
and confirmed that:
the inspections
had
been
conducted
and reported
as required;
the items were procured
from vendors
included
on the licensee's
list of approved suppliers;
and, the items were stored
as
required.
No items of noncompliance
were identified, however,
an unre-
solved record item is discussed
in Paragraph
6 and two unre-
solved items are discussed
in Paragraphs
c and
d below.
C.
Stora
e Area Tour
The inspector toured the station warehouse
area,
observing
general
storage conditions,
conforming and nonconforming
material identification and segregation,
and general
house-
keeping practices.
The inspector observed
several
unacceptable
conditions at the
Warehouse
storage location such
as accessability,
pipe protec-
tion and general
cleanliness.
These
and other similar observed
conditions
were identified previously by the licensee
during
a
routine surveillance
and corrective action was initiated.
The
unacceptable
conditions
and request for corrective action are
documented
on PAR-.78.
This item is unresolved
pending review
of the completed
requested
corrective action by RI during
a
subsequent
inspection(s).
(50-244/78-24-01)
Inter-Divisional Services
The inspector noted that the General
Maintenance, Division
performed quality related services
under P.O.
GMDWR-1748.
The
inspector identified a number of interface areas
that were not
clearly described
in governing procedures
such
as what instructions,
records,
inspection
documentation,
etc.
were required.
The
Maintenance
Foreman
provided sketches
and other documents
that
enabled
the inspector to determine that the quality affecting
activities were performed
and inspected
as required.
The
inspector
expressed
concern
about the apparent
weaknesses
in
this area of interface control.
The licensee
stated that'he
.
manner of interface control with respect
to services
provided
by the General
Maintenance
Division would be reviewed
and
appropriate
action taken.
Pending
RI review of completed
action(s)
during
a subsequent
inspection(s)
this item is
unresolved.
(50-244/78-24-02)
6.
Records
and Drawin
s
a ~
Reference
Applicable procedures
listed in paragraph
3.
b.
Record Stora
e and Retention
The inspector selected
the following records in order to
'etermine
the licensee's
capability to store,
control
and
retrieve operating records:
-.--""-<'Reco'rde'r:Char't"-';,".Ooop",Hot'iL'eg:.Pressurizer
Level-
Control
Room (June
1975)
Recorder Chart - Pressurizer
Pressure
(March 1975}
Surveillance Test PT-17.1,
Radiation Monitoring System
(January
through
December
1975)
Flux Map Raw Data
(1976)
I
Daily Generation
Log (May 1978)
Surveillance Test PT-2.1, Safety Injection
Pump Test
(1977}
HEPA Filter Banks
DOP Test Reports
(1975)
Plant Heatups at 100'F/HR (January
1977 through July
1977) (Plant Transient
Log}
~ The inspector
reviewed the following files at the Corporate
Office:
Closed
Out Car's
Superceeded
Engineering
Procedures
OA Procedures
and Manual
Chapters
Design Analysis
The inspectors
also requested
the records listed below at
various times during this inspection
and verified that they
were retrievable
and they were maintained
as required.
Audit Reports Listed in Paragraph
7
Procurement
Records Listed in Paragraph
5
Modification Packages
and Related
Records Listed in Para-
graph
4
In the area of records
storage
and retention
one item of
noncompliance
and two unresolved
items were identified.
These
items are discussed
below.
(1)
The inspector identified that oriainal radiographs of
safety related
systems
(dating to 1968)
such
as Reactor
Coolant and Chemical
Yolume Control were stored within
five cardboard
fi=ling boxes in the Andrews Building.
The
inspector also identified that operations
type recorder
charts,
required to be retained
by Technical Specifications,
were stored within steel filing cabinets
in a vacant
warehouse office.
Neither storage facility meets
the
10
minimum physical
requirements
described
in Paragraph
5.6
of ANSI N45.2.9 for the storage of single type records.
These
two examples constitute
an infraction level item of
noncompliance.
(50-244/78-24-03)
(2}
During the inspection,
the inspectors
requested
the
following records
which were not retrieved prior to the
completion of this inspection.
P,O.
NASC-16633 (duplicate copy,
Andrews Building)
P.O.
GMDWR-1748,(duplicate copy, Andrews 8uilding)
NDE Report
1520 (microfilm}
NDE Report
132 (microfilm}.
Radiographic Test Reports for Welds AC-1008-E2
through
20 - not necessarily
complete numerically
(microfilm}
Pending the retrieval of these
records
and their review
by RI during a subsequent
inspection(s),
this item is
unresolved.
(50-244/78-24-04)
(3).
The microfilm of calibration data sheets
associated
with
P.O.'s
NEG-85751
and
53 were not entirely legible.
The
I8C foreman
had retained
the original documents
in the
respective instruments'History
Files" and the inspector
reviewed
documents
indicating that subject copies of the
data sheets
fiad been
forwarded to the Andrews Building
for duplicate storage.
Therefore,
duplicate storage of
the required records
had been
accomplished.
The inspector
expressed
concern
about the reliability of
the record duplication process
and verification of legi-
bility prior to retention,
The licensee
stated that this
area
and associated
activities would be reviewed
and
appropriate action taken to assure
that microfilm of
records
are legible.
Until the licensee's
action(s) is reviewed during
a sub-
sequent inspection(s}, this 'item is unresolved.
(50-244/
78-24-05)
~
4
~
~
~
~
c ~
Drawin
Control
The inspector selected
the controlled drawings listed below to
determine that the established
controls were implemented
and
that as built drawings are being maintained.
The inspector
compared
the original tracings against
the master
index (station
and corporate}; corporate
central
records
aperture
card deck;
station central. records .aperture
card deck;
and applicable
hard copies distributed to the control
room, test
and results,
the pipe shop,
and station engineering.
~Dnawin
33013-422
33013-424
Revision
33013-425
33013-426
33013-427
- 33013-428.
33013-431
33013-432
33013-433
2
No items of noncompliance
were identified.
However, during
this review, the inspector identified the two items discussed
below.
(1)
The inspector noted that in an isolated instance
(DMG
33013-433 in the pipe shop)
a drawing was not of the
current revision.
During the review of drawing control
and modification document
packages
(paragraph
4) it was
determined that the control of drawings,
drawing revisions
and drawing change
notices
was in accordance
with established
reqpi.rements.'ubsequent
to this inspection it was
verified.'hat the latest- revision of the drawing was
issued to the subject location.
The inspector
had
no further questions.
(2)
The inspector identified that three drawings,
33013-425,
33013-426,
and 33013-433
had
been
stamped
"For Information
Only" prior to issua'nce
to station central
records.
12
These
drawings were subsequently
issued at the station
as
controlled drawings.
The inspector determined that the
drawings were all of the current revision.
The licensee
informed the inspector that
a new revision
to the procedure for issuing the drawings to station
central
records
was forthcoming which would insure that
only drawings identified as
"as built" would be issued to
station central
records.
This item is unresolved
pending implementation of the
new
procedure revision and review by RI (244/78-24-06).
d.
Tests
and
Ex eriments
The licensee
informed the inspector that no tests
or experi-
ments pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59(b)
have
been
conducted
since
May 1977, the date of the last
gA program inspection.
7.
Audits
a.
Reference
Applicable procedures
listed in paragraph
3.
b.
ualit
Assurance
De artment Audits
The inspectors
selected
the sample of reports listed below
from those audits
performed since the last
gA inspection
conducted
during May 1977.
The inspectors
reviewed the audits listed below to verify that
they were conducted
as follows: in accordance
with written
checklists/procedures;
by trained personnel
not having direct
responsibilities
in .the areas
audited; with findings documented
and reviewed
by responsible
management;
with followup actions
initiated/completed;
and, with audit frequencies
and general
audit conduct in accordance
with established
schedules
and
procedures.
77-16, Audit of Ginna
gC Inspection
and Surveillance
77-26, Audit of Ginna Station Handling, Shipping,
and
Storage
77-27, Audit of Engineering
Desizn Control
77-30, Special
Audit of Ginna Modification
77-42,
Ginna Station Modification Project Program
13
77-44, Audit of Ginna Station Modification Control
Activities
78-01, Audit of Catalytic Inc. Design
and Procurement
Services
78-02, Audit of Gilbert/Commonwealth Continuing Services
Activities.
78-03,
Ginna Station Modification Project Organization
78-05, Audit of Engineering
Design Control
78-08, Audit of Bell/Schneider Project Organization
78-13,
Ginna Station Modification Project Organization
78-14, Audit of Bell/Schneider,
A Joint Yenture
78-16, Engineering
Procurement Activities
78-17, Purchasing
Department
Procurement Activities
78-25,
Ginna Handling, Shipping,
and Storage
Control
78-29, Engineering
Design Control
78-30, Audit of Bell/Schneider Project
During the conduct of the above audits,
the licensee identi-
fied 73 items requiring followup action.
The inspector stated that audit reports not reviewed during
this inspection
may be examined during a subsequent
inspection(s).
No items of noncompliance
were tdentified.
8,
Unresolved
Items
Unresolved
items are matters
about which more information is required
in order to ascertain
whether they are acceptable
items,
items of
noncompliance,
or deviations.
Unresolved
items identified during
this inspection
are discussed
in paragraphs
5.c and d, 6.b.(2)
and
(3k, and 6.c.(2),
~
P
14
9.
~tit 9 tt
,
The inspectors
met with licensee
representatives
(denoted in para-
graph
1) at the conclusion of the inspection
on November
16,
1978.
The scope
and findings of the inspection
as stated
-in this report
were presented.