ML17221A441
| ML17221A441 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 10/09/1987 |
| From: | Berkow H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-60890, NUDOCS 8710150037 | |
| Download: ML17221A441 (6) | |
Text
~'ocket No. 50-389 Mr. C. 0.
Woody Group Yice President Nuclear Energy Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408
Dear Mr. Woody:
DISTRIBUTION C~~
NRC PDR Local PDR PD22 Rdg SVarga GLainas DMiller ETourigny, OGC-Bethesda EJordan JPartlow CYCheng ACRS (10)
Gray File
SUBJECT:
ST.
LUCIE PLANT, UNIT NO.
2 - USE QF INSTRUMENTED INSPECTION TECHNIQUE (IIT) (TAC NO. 60890)
By letter dated February 14, '1986, you requested NRC approval to use an alternate inspection technique'o 'satisfy the inservice pressure testing requirements of the ASME Code,Section XI, as permitted by 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3).
Your letter also contained a list,of systems for,'which the alternate inspection techniques could be implemented.
The details of this alternate inspection technique, instrumented inspection technique
( IIT),, are the subject of a H.A.F.A. International, Inc., Topical Report HAFA 135(N).
The topical report was.approved by the NRC on November 7, 1985.
We have performed a preliminary review of.your request and we have concluded that you may utilize the IIT to satisfy the'nservice pressure testing require-ments of the ASME Code,Section XI.
- However, we are not prepared at this time to give approval of the IIT for all the systems listed in your letter for the remainder of the first 10-year inspection interval, which ends on August 8, 1993.
We anticipate completing our detailed review by June 30, 1988, at which time we plan to forward our plant-specific safety evaluation to you.
Therefore, the staff approves the use of the alternate inspection technique for the inservice pressure testing requirements for the St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, until June 30, 1988.
Of course, our approval is predicated upon your meeting the conditions contained in the topical report and our safety evaluation of the topical report.
Sincerely, Original signed by cc:
See next page Herbert N. Berkow, Director Project Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II er 9
/87 EaFg:
p MEB-Oungny CYCIGhg 9+/87 jd / ~ /87 87 1 0 1 50037 8 5000'9 87iOO9 PDR ADOCK 0 pgR 8
OGC D:P i
a'I 1
lit (4
I s'"
(
I
'I t
I'
~ ~
~~R RE00, c~'p.
+<
o n
C O
I0+
O~
Cy Cy
/f +a*++
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 9, 1987 Docket No. 50-389 Mr. C. 0.
Woody Group Yice President Nuclear Energy Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408
Dear Mr. Woody:
SUBJECT:
ST.
LUCIE PLANT, UNIT NO.
2 - USE OF INSTRUMENTED INSPECTION TECHNIQUE (IIT) (TAC NO. 60890)
By letter dated February 14, 1986, you requested NRC approval to use an alternate inspection technique to satisfy the inservice pressure testing requirements of the ASME Code,Section XI, as permitted by 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3).
Your letter also contained a list of systems for which the alternate inspection techniques could be implemented.
The details of this alternate inspection technique, instrumented inspection technique (IIT), are the subject of a H.A.F.A. International, Inc., Topical Report HAFA 135(N).
The topical report was approved by the NRC on November 7, 1985.
We have performed a preliminary review of your request and we have concluded that you may utilize the IIT to satisfy the inservice pressure testing require-ments of the ASME Code,Section XI.
- However, we are not prepared at this time to give approval of the IIT for all the systems listed in your letter for the.
remainder of the first 10-year inspection interval, which ends on August 8, 1993.
We anticipate completing our detailed review by June 30, 1988, at which time we plan to forward our plant-specific safety evaluation to you.
Therefore, the staff approves the use of the alternate inspection technique for the inservice pressure testing requirements for the St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 2, until June 30, 1988.
Of course, our approval is predicated upon your meeting the conditions contained in the topical report and our safety evaluation of the topical report.
Sincerely, erbert N. Her kow, Director Project Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II cc:
See next page
am>
.3
~,
'r. C. 0.
Woody Florida Power 8 Light Company St. Lucie Plant CC:
Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Resident Inspector c/o U.S.
NRC 7585 S.
Hwy A1A Jensen Beach, Florida 34957 State Planning 5 Development Clearinghouse Office of Planning 5 Budget Executive Office of the Governor The Capitol Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Harold F. Reis, Esq.
Newman 5 Holtzinger 1615 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 John T. Butler, Esq.
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Florida 33131-2398 Adminis trator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. Weldon B. Lewis, County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 104 Fort Pierce, Florida 33450 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington - Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.
7910 Woodmont Avenue
- Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Jacob Daniel Nash Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Flor ida 32399-0700 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Executive Director for Operations 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
f