ML17209A297
| ML17209A297 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 10/17/1980 |
| From: | Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011030688 | |
| Download: ML17209A297 (4) | |
Text
HEggmtty DLP;(yp()@
0g 1
DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File 'Nattson LB81 Rdg
- JKnight, NRR Rdg RTedesco Docket No.:
50-389 DEisenhut VNoonan RPurple RHartfield, NPA JYoungblood OELD Dr. Robert F. Uhriq RBirkel OIE (3)
Vice President of tluclear NRushbrook and General Engineering 'Check bcc: 'ERA Florida Power and Light Company LRubenstein NRC/PDR Post Office Box 529100 ASchwencer L/PDR Niami, Fl or ida 33152 JNi 1 1 1 er NSIC FNiraglia TIC
Dear Dr. Uhrig:
RVollmer ACRS (16)
'Ross
Subject:
Operating License Review Schedule
, (St. Lucie Plant Unit No. 2)
Me met with you and your staff on September 18, 1980 to discuss the construction schedule for the St. Lucie Plant Unit No.
2 and our operating license review schedule.
A sublunary of this meeting was issued on September 22, 1980.
Re mutually agreed that the pivotal aspect of establishing a realistic review schedule was our estimate as to when actual construction of Unit No, 2 would be completed.
The projection for construction completion made by our Caseload Forecast Panel in.
Felruary 1980, was December 1983 in contrast-to your date of December 1982's a result of our September 18 meeting with you, the Caseload Forecast Panel performed an update projection review during their site visit of September 30 through October 2, 1980.
After careful review and discussion with your staff, we continue to project a construction completion (fuel load) date of December 1983.
This is ref'lected-in the summary of our visit dated October 8, 1980.
In a'etter dated October 3, 1980, you provided us with some additional comments reflecting our September 18 discussions and requested that we meet with you to further discuss the staff review schedule.
In view of the above, our discussions with you and observations made at the plant site, we have accordingly adjusted the review of the St. Lucie Plant Unit No.
2 application to reflect the following:
- Issue Safety Evaluation Report
- ACRS Neeting SER Supplements
- January, 1981
- February, 1983
- Narch, 1983
- Nay, 1983 He consider this to be a realistic schedule which we will periodically reassess to account for any substantive changes that may occur.
kIith regard to your request to schedule design review presentations, we believe that these discussions should be held sometime after your application has been docketed.
Sincerely, OFFICE/
SURNAME OAT L
~
,RA e1./ls" "
B gbtoo sco
'10 1
0 10/I&/89
..................'.....5i Robert L.
f'r L>c Division
- Tedesco, Assi ns'fng"'"'"'.Licenstng ""
stant Oirl.cto...
NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240 AU.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: j979'289 369
If 1
~ 'h>>k f, 4<<a ffffnrS~P~
k ta
>>ffk))4l,f t'
~ '
>> '9>)
I I>>
f, nba k *J>>
>>Pff$ ["II 1",:> -~ff >>ff
>i.'ttfl>>.,
q ~" ~
<<>> I If
~
'U
>k fc f'~j'
>>k>ff>>>>>
C,W>>> '
,">", Cfg<f
~, j >'>>)gal "',4'"">
~y>>.n>> )'(>'
"'I'I I'
1 ~
I
~ 4 I
I 'j,>>
>> ~
L f<<tl H
I II I
C I,
'I
),
~
~
4
>>$ I f>>ff tk
~
I, I
>E, tf II
.,W y>>'ff) r
3 It l>t >t >~6~: ~",'
~
Dr. Robert E. Uhrig, Vice President Advanced Systems a'nd Technology Florida Power 5 Light Company-P. 0.
Box 529100 Miami, Florida 33152 cc:
Harold F. Reis, Esq.
Lowenstein,
- Newman, Reis 8 Axelrad 1025 Connecticut
- Avenue, N. H.
Washington, D.
C.
20036 Norman A. Coll, Esq.
McCarthy, Steel, Hectory 8 Davis 14th Floor, First National Bank Building Miami, Flori da 33131 Mr. Martin H. Hodder 1131 N.
E
~
86 Street Miami, Florida 33138 Dr. David L. Hetrick Professor of Nuclear Engineering The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85?21 Dr.. Frank F. Hooper School of Natural Resources University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 Res ident Inspector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Station c/o U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.
Box 400 Jensen:Beach, Florida 3345?
e 0
a-r El<Xp s'