ML17207A691
| ML17207A691 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1979 |
| From: | Cunningham A, Jenkins G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17207A686 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-389-79-20, NUDOCS 7912310086 | |
| Download: ML17207A691 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000389/1979020
Text
~8 RKay
~o
~i
0O
sf
+0
qO
+a*++
UNITEDSTATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303
Report No. 50-389/79-20
Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company
9250 West Flagler Street
Miami, Florida
33101
Approved by:
G.
Inspection at St.
c
ite near Ft.
erce, Florida
Inspector:
A. L. Cunningh
li
r ~~
~e i s,
Ac ing Sect'
Chief,
FFMS Branch
Date Signed
a 23
Date Signed
SUMMARY
Inspection
on November 1-2,
1979
Areas Inspected
This ins ectio
p
n involved 12 inspector hours onsite in the areas of environmental
protection control program;
site drainage
and erosion control; spoil storage
and land fillmanagement;
concrete
batch plant; storage of hazardous
chemical
wastes.
Results
Of the five areas
inspected,
no apparent
items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified in four areas;
one apparent
item of noncompliance
was found in
one area (failure to follow procedures;
50-389/79-20-01).
DETAILS
1.
Persons
Contacted
Licensee
Employees
-B. J. Escue,
Site Manager
-W. M. Ha'yward, Quality Assurance
Engineer
- W. R. Truew, Environmental Control Engineer
(EBASCO)
>>S.
M. Robinson,
Contract Administrator
J. J. King, Environmental Coordinator
+Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection
scope
and findings were summarized
on November 2,
1979, with
those persons indicated in Paragraph
1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
No previous inspection findings were disclosed.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Control Program
a
~
Section
3G(2) of the Construction Permit requires
implementation of a
control program by the licensee to provide for periodic review of all
construction activities to assure
conformance
to the
environmental
conditions
and commitments defined in the Permit.
In response
to the
subject
requirement,
the
licensee
established
and
implemented
the
following controls:
(1) annual
QA audit of site environmental protec-
tion requirements
as
detailed
in the
Construction
Permit
and all
references
cited therein;
(2) development of approved, detailed written
procedures,
including maintenance of daily log of environmental surveil-
lance of construction activities,
and preparation of periodic reports;
(3) assignment
of a construction site environmental control engineer
to coordinate
and implement site environmental
commitments
and controls.
b.
Inspection
included
a detailed
review and discussion of Audit Report
Nos.
QAC-PSL-2-78-20
and
QAC-PSL-2-79-12.
Inspection disclosed
the
following:
(1)
The audits addressed'll
environmental
conditions,
commitments
and
controls
defined in the Construction
Permit;
(2)
corrective action was promptly implemented in response
to the finding
disclosed in Report No. QAC-PSL-2-78-20 regarding environmental orien-
tation
and training program.
There
were
no questions
regarding this
item.
P
J
Cs
Inspection of the control program included
review and audit of the
licensee's
environmental
procedures
SQP-15,
monthly reports
and daily
log entries
for the period
May 1,
1978,
through
October 31,
1979.
Inspection disclosed that all monthly reports were submitted in accord-
ance with the assigned
procedure.
Inspection also disclosed,
however,
that the licensee
failed to follow Section
8.12.4 which defines
the
requirement for maintenance of a daily log of environmental surveillanc5
activities.
No log was maintained during the period October 15-17,
1979
and October 25, 1979.
Licensee representatives
were informed that failure
to implement the subject procedure constituted
an item of noncompliance
(50-389/79-20-01).
A licensee representative
stated that an appropriate
response to the citation would be submitted as required.
6.
Site Inspection
a
~
The following items were included in the site inspection:
(1) drainage
and erosion control; (2) spoil storage
and construction waste management;
(3) management of hazardous
chemicals.
b.
Site drainage
and construction wastewater
was diverted to the east
and
west holding ponds.
The above
ponds overflow was diverted to
a south
holding
zone, viz.,
the
dead
mangrove
arear'll
wash
and process
effluent
from the site
batch plant is also
diverted
to the south
holding zone.
Inspection disclosed
no apparent site drainage,
runoff,
or erosion problems.
C.
Inspection of the spoil storage
area-immediately
west of the dunes
and
adjacent
to the
mangrove
area,
disclosed
neither
major runoff nor
siltation in the mangrove area.
Inspection of the landfill and incin-
erator west of the plant disclosed
no apparent
problems.
There were
no questions
regarding this item.
d.
Hazardous
Chemicals Management
Site
inspection
disclosed
a
diked storage
area
containing
packaged
waste
PCB's
and
PCB-contaminated
equipment
and materials
recovered
from Unit 2 auxiliary building transformers
damaged
as
a consequence
of the
recent
Hurricane
David.
Although the
contaminated
contents
appeared
adequately
packaged
and labeled,
the natural drainage of the
general
storage
area
was directed into
Mud Creek.
The inspector
contacted
the
FPM, Corporate
Environmental Coordinator
and informed
him of these
findings.
The subject
licensee
representative
stated
that the
above cited waste
would be promptly removed
from the plant
site.
This item will be
reviewed
during
a
subsequent
inspection
(50-389/79-20-02).