ML17201M286
| ML17201M286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 01/11/1989 |
| From: | Greger L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17201M287 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8901180394 | |
| Download: ML17201M286 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000237/1988027
Text
t
.,,
SArEC~ARBS INFOftMAT\\ON
Docket No. 50-237
Docket No. 50-249
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Senior Vice President
Post Office Box*767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
JAN 111989
This refers to the routine safeguards inspection and allegation review
conducted by Messrs. D. E. Funk, Jr., and T. J. Madeda of this office on
December 5-20, 1988, of activities at Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2
and 3, authorized by N,RC Operating Licenses No. DPR-19 and No. DPR-2_5 and to
.-the discussion of our findings with Mr; E. Eenigenburg and members of his
staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspe~tion report identifies areas examined during
the inspection.
Within these area~, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
While no- violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of
this inspection, one program weakne~s was identified concerning your failure to
implement effective corrective action for continuing security badge control
problems.
This weakness is addressed in Section 2.c of the enclosed Insp~~tion
Report.
We request that you intorm us, 1n wr1t1ng within 30 days of the date
of this letter, of your corrective actions for the weakness.
Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt
from disclos~re according to Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 73.21(c)(2).
This information must be handled and protected in
accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21.
Consequently, Enclosure 1
to this letter, our report of the inspect1oh, and your response to the
weakness identified in the enclosure to this letter will not be placed in the
NRC Public Document Room.
The non-Safeguards Information, Enclosure 2*
(Allegation Review), will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Theref6re,
your statement of corrective action regarding the weakness identified in
Enclosure 2 should be submitted ai a separate encloiure to your transmittal
letter in the manner prescribed.
The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance
procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Enclosure Contains
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATIOI
Upon Separation This
Pa~e Is Decontrolled
Corrononwealth Edison Company
2
.
- JAN t 11989
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspecti,on ..
Enclosures:
1. Inspection Reports
No.
50~237/88027(DRSS)~
No~ 50-249/88028(DRSS)
(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)
2. Allegation Review
cc w/enclosures:
H. Bliss, Nuclear
Licensing Manager
J. Eenigenburg, Plant Manager
NRR/DRIS/SGB
NRR/DRIS/SlB
NRR/DLPQ/PEB
cc w/enclosures, w/o
UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS *
INFORMATION:
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Manag~ment Branch
Resident Irispector, RIII
Richard Hubbard
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
Utilities Division
Sincerely,
~
L. Robert Greger, Chief
Reactor Programs Branch
...
, . -----
L
Enclosure Contains
SAFEGUARDS
INFORM.A.TIO~
Tho!!
eparation This
-~
s Doc1ntrolled
SAFEGUARDS lfqFQRMAflON
'{c:s
RIII_p
r?u~7kja
1/"1{81
RIII
/j'J-
Madeda
'/1/q'{
RIII
~ed
RIII
~~
U;;;rl