ML17194A120

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 810706-09
ML17194A120
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Quad Cities  
Issue date: 08/24/1981
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17194A119 List:
References
50-237-81-21, 50-249-81-15, 50-254-81-16, 50-265-81-16, NUDOCS 8109040151
Download: ML17194A120 (2)


Text

Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Docket Docket Docket No.

No.

No.

No.

50-237 50-249 50-254 50-265 As a result of the inspection conducted on July 6-9, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, states, in part, that "Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents

~** including the changes thereto, which prescribe all activities *affecting quality.

These measures shall assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed*... and. approved

... by authorized personnel and are distributed to and used at the location where the prescrl.bed activity is performed."

Commonwealth Edison Company Topical Report CE-1-A; "Quality Assurance.P'rogram for Nuclear Generating Stations", Revision 9, dated July 16, 1979, states in*..

Section 6, that "A document control system will be used to assure that docu-

  • D1ents such as specifications, procedures, and drawings are reviewed.for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel.

Such documents will be distributed to and used at the locations when~ the prescribed activity is performed.

Changes to these documents will be handled similarly and will be reviewed and approved by the same organization that performed the original review and approval, unless delegated by the originating organization to another responsible organization."

Contrary to operabill.ty components.

procedures.

the above, procedures had not been revised to reflect the criteria for the eva1uation of the installed suspension system In addition, thete were conflicting requirements within the This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

8109040151 810824

!i"J PDR ADOCK 05000237 :

  • _G ___________,. - __ PDR _ _J

~-

Appendix A Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this offi.ce within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) cor-rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

Dated MJG 2 4 \\~.B 1

C. E. Norelius, Directot Division of Engineering and Technical:* Inspection*

J

~