ML17180A719
| ML17180A719 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 05/02/1994 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17180A718 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-237-94-05, 50-237-94-5, 50-249-94-05, 50-249-94-5, NUDOCS 9405110178 | |
| Download: ML17180A719 (1) | |
Text
e NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Com~any Dresden Station, Units 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-237; 50-249 License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25 During an NRC inspection conducted on February 23 through April 11, 1994, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, "G~neral Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," the violation is listed below:
Dresden Technical Specification 6-2.A.l states that the applicable prbcedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2 dated February 1978, shall be established, implemented, and maintained.
Regulatory Guide 1.33 Appendix A.l.c included procedures for startup, operation, and shutdown of safety related systems.
- a.
Dresden Operating Procedure (DOP) 6600-M2, "Unit 2/3 Standby Diesel Generator," required the Unit 2/3 diesel generator cooling water pump discharge line vent valve be locked closed.
- b.
Contrary to the above,- on March 29, 1994, the Unit 2/3 diesel generator cooling water pump discharge line vent valve was not locked closed.
Contrary to the above, during the period of June 19 to August 16, 1993, the licensee failed to maintain Dresden Operating Procedures DOP 1400-Ml, "Unit 2 Core Spray System" and DOP 0040-M2 and M3, *Locked Valve List During Operations,~ in that numerous discrepancies were identified between DOP 1400-Hl and DOP 0040-M2 and M3.
Additionally, during a*
walkdown of the Unit 2 Core Spray System, several valves were found to be in positions not in compliance with the requirements of DOP 1400-Ml.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, C~mmonwealth Edison Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Conunission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results *achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the
.date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice~ an order or a Demand for Information may be issued to show cause why the license should not b~
modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Lisle, Illinois this 2nd day of May 1994 9405110178 940502 7:
~DR ADOCK 0500~~~