ML17178A265

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
After Action Report/Improvement Plan Held 04/11/2017
ML17178A265
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/2017
From:
US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
References
Download: ML17178A265 (149)
v • d • e


Text

Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station After Action Report/

Im.provement Plan Exercise Date - April 11, 2017 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Published June 19, 2017

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station This page is intentionally blank.

2

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station After Action Report/Itnprovetnent Plan Published June 19, 2017 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

.......................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW ..................................................................................... 6 1.1 Exercise Deta_ils ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership ................................................................................. 6 1.3 Participating Organizations .................................. ~ ............................................................ 7 SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN

SUMMARY

.................................................................... 12 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design ........................................................................................... 12 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities ............................................................. 13 2.3 Scenario Summary ............................................................................................................ 14 SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES ....................................................................... 15 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results ................................................. ~************************************ 15 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation ....................................................................... 15 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries ....................................................................................... 28 3.3.l State Jurisdictions ....................................................................................................... 28 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions ........................................................................................................ 30*

3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions ....................................................................... ~ .......................... 63 3.3.4 Private Jurisdictions ................................................................................................... 67 SECTION 4: CONCLUSION .................................................................................................... 69 APPENDIX A: EXERCISE TIMELINE ............................................................................ ~ ...... 70 APPENDIX B: EXERCISE EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS ................................ 74 APPENDIX C: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..... :.................................................. 83 APPENDIX D: EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENT ............................................................. 86 3

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station This page is intentionally blank.

4

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

On April 11, 2017, a full-scale Plume Exposure Pathway exercise was demonstrated and evaluated for the 10 Mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) around the Three Mile Island (TMI)

Nuclear Generating Station by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Region III. The previous full-scale exercise at this site was evaluated on April 14, 2015.

Out-of-Sequence demonstrations were conducted on February 6th & gth, 2017, March 7, 2017, and April gth & 12th, 2017. The purpose of the Exer.cise and Out-of-Sequence demonstrations was to assess the capabilities of State, counties, and local jurisdictions to implement Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERP) and procedures to protect the property and lives of residents and transients in the event of an emergency at TMI. The findings in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluation team, with final determinations made by the FEMA,

  • Region III Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Chairperson, and approved by FEMA Headquarters. These reports are provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and participating States. State and local governments utilize the findings contained in these reports for the purposes of planning, training, and improving emergency preparedness.

The evaluation of this Exercise determined that there were no Level l Findings, one (1) Level 2 Finding, successfully re-demonstrated, and two (2) Plan Issues (PI). A Levell Finding is defined by the FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual as follows: 11 An observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that could cause a determination that offsite emergency preparedness is not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken in the event of a radiological emergency to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP). 11 A Level 2 Finding is defmed as: 11 An observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that is not considered, by itself, to adversely impact public health and safety. 11 Finally, a Planning Issue-is: 11 An observed or identified inadequacy in the ORO's emergency plan/implementing procedures, rather than that of the ORO's performance. 11 FEMA wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals in the Cornrrionwealth of Pennsylvania; the (5) risk jurisdictions of Cumberland, Dauphin, Lancaster, Lebanon and York, counties; the three (3) support counties, Adams, Franklin and Schuylkill; and the eleven (11)

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania participating municipalities. Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities. Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants were evident during the exercise 5

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name Plume 2017-04-11 Type of Exercise Plume Exercise Date April 11, 2017 Program Department of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Scenario Type Minimal Release 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership Christopher Nemcheck Technological Hazards Program Specialist DHS/FEMA Region III One Independence Mall, 6th Floor 615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA, 19106 (202) 709-0688 christopher.nemcheck@fema.dhs.gov Laurin Fleming Emergency Management Specialist Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency 1310 Elmerton Avenue Harrisburg, PA, 17110 (717) 651-2119 laufleming@pa.gov 6

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies* and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station exercise:

State Jurisdictions Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

  • Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development
  • Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
  • Cumberland County
  • Cumberland County Department of Public Safety
  • Cumberland County Special Hazards Operations Team
  • Lower Allen Township Department of Public Safety
  • New Cumberland Borough
  • Shippensburg University
  • Shippensburg Fire Department
  • West Shore Bureau of Fire 7

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Dauphin County

  • Dauphin County Department of Public Safety
  • Dauphin County Information Technology I GIS

.- Dauphin County Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities

  • Dauphin County Amateur Radio Operators
  • Dauphin County District Attorney's Office Criminal Investigation Division
  • Dauphin County Hazardous Material Response Team
  • PA National Guard 193rd Special Operations Wing
  • American Red Cross Susquehanna Valley
  • NDC4 Regional EMA
  • Dauphin County Ag I Penn State Extension
  • Halifax Area School District
  • Halifax Fire Department
  • Harrisburg City Fire Department
  • Harrisburg City Mayor's Office
  • Harrisburg City Police Department
  • Harrisburg City Public Works Department
  • Highspire Borough Council
  • Highspire Borough Emergency Operations Center
  • Highspire Borough Highway Department
  • Highspire Borough Mayor
  • Highspire Borough Police Department
  • Lower Paxton Township Emergency Management Agency
  • Lower Paxton Township Police Department, including the Public Safety Director
  • Lower Paxton Township Fire and Rescue Services, including EMS
  • Lower Paxton Public Works Resources Services
  • *Lower Paxton Township Departme.nt of Transportation
  • Lower Paxton Township Radiological Protection Services
  • Millersburg Area School District
  • Upper Dauphin Area School District
  • Williams Valley School District Lancaster County
  • Lancaster County Amateur Radio
  • Lancaster County Clerk's Office
  • Lancaster County Commissioners
  • Lancaster County Communications Center
  • Lancaster County External Affairs/PIO 8

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

  • Lancaster County GIS Division
  • Lancaster County Hazardous Material Emergency Response Team
  • Lancaster County Public Safety Training Center (ESP 4)
  • Lancaster County Radiological Officer
  • Lancaster County VOAD
  • Drumore Township
  • East DonegafTownship Manager
  • East Donegal Township Supervisor
  • East Hempfield Emergency Services
  • Franklin and Marshall College Lebanon County
  • Annville-Cleona Fire Department
  • Campbelltown Volunteer Fire Company
  • Lawn Fire Company
  • Lawn Fire Company EMS G Lebanon County Amateur Radio
  • Lebanon County Commissioners
  • Lebanon County Communications Center
  • Lebanon County PIO
  • Lebanon County Hazardous Materials and Special Operations Response Team
  • Lebanon County Radiological Officer
  • Lebanon County Sheriffs Office
  • Life Lion EMS
  • Palmyra Area School District
  • South Londonderry Township Police Department
  • Western Lebanon County Regional Emergency Management Agency York County
  • York County EMA Staff
  • York Adams Disaster, Crisis, Outreach and Referral Team
  • York Adams Transportation Authority
  • York ARES RACES Skywam
  • York City Bureau of Health
  • York County 911
  • York County Commissioners
  • Y o:rk County Department of Emergency Services
  • York County HazMat Team
  • York County Human Services
  • York County Parks and Recreation 9

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

  • York County Penn State Extension
  • York County Sheriffs Office
  • USDA Farm Service Agency - York
  • W ellspan York Hospital
  • Hanover Hospital
  • Memorial Hospital .
  • American Red Cross of Central PA
  • Monaghan Township Volunteer Fire Company
  • Glen Rock Hose and Ladder
  • Dover Township Volunteer Fire Department
  • Dover Township Emergency Management
  • Fairview Township Emergency Management
  • Fairview Township Fire Department
  • Northeastern Area Emergency Management
  • Northeastern EMS
  • Northeastern Regional Police Department
  • Northern Regional Police Department
  • York Area Emergency Management
  • York Area United Fire and Rescue
  • Warrington Township
  • Newberry Area Regional Emergency Management
  • Northeastern School District
  • Central York School District
  • West Shore School District
  • Dover Area School District
  • Eastern York School District
  • Northern York County School District Support Jurisdictions Adams County
  • Adams County Emergency Operations Center Franklin County
  • Franklin County Commissioners
  • Franklin County Administrators .
  • Franklin County Department of Emergency Services
  • Franklin County Emergency Management Coordinator
  • Franklin_County Emergency Operations Center 10

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP).

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

  • Franklin County Risk Management
  • Franklin County Information Technology Services
  • Franklin County Human Resources
  • Franklin County Geograplµc Information Systems
  • Franklin County Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (RACES)
  • Girl Scout Troop #80855
  • Greene Township Emergency Management Coordinator
  • Guilford Township Emergency Managern,ent Coordinator
  • Medic 100 - Holy Spirit Emergency Medical Services
  • New Franklin Volunteer Fire Company
  • . Orrstown Borough Emergency Management Coordinator
  • Southampton Township Emergency Management Coordinator
  • St Thomas Township Volunteer Fire and Rescue Schuylkill County
  • Schuylkill County Emergency Operations Center 11

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile IslandNnclear Generating Station SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN

SUMMARY

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design On December 7, 1979, the President directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assume the lead responsibility for all off-site nuclear planning and response. FEMA' s activities were conducted pursuant to 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 350, 351 and 352. These regulations are a key element in the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)

Program that was established following the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station accident in March 1979.

44 CFR 350 establishes the policies and procedures for FEMA's initial and continued approval of State and local governments' radiological emergency planning and preparedness for commercial nuclear power plants. This approval is contingent, in part, on State and local government participation injoint exercises with licensees. FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency planning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:

A. Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures developed by State and local governments; B. Determining whether such plans and.procedures can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises conducted by State and local governments; C. Responding to requests by the U.S.-Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the NRC and FEMA dated December 7, 2015 (Federal Register, Vol. 81, No. 57, March 24,2016); and D. Coordinating the activities of the following Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:

- U.S. Department of Commerce,

- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

- U.S. Department of Energy,

- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,

- U.S. Department of Transportation,

- U.S. Department of Agriculture,

- U.S. Department of the Interior, and

- U.S. Food and Drug Administration Representatives of these agencies serve on the Region III Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by FEMA. A REP Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise was conducted during the week of April 10, 201 7, to assess the capabilities of State and local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their RERPs. and procedures to protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (TMI). The purpose of this exercise report is to present the exercise results 12

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station and findings on the pei-formance of the off-site response organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency. The findings presented in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluation team, with final determinations made by the FEMA Region III RAC Chairperson and approved by FEMA Headquarters.

These reports are provided to the NRC and participating States. State and local governments utilize the findings contained in these reports for the purposes of planning, training, and improving emergency response capabilities.

The criteria utilized in the FEMA evaluation process are contained in the following:

  • NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, "November 1980;
  • Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual, January 2016; Section 1 of this report, entitled "Exercise Overview," presents the "Exercise.Planning Team" and the "Participating Organizations."

Section 2, of this report entitled "Exercise Design Summary", and includes the "Exercise Purpose and Design", "Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities", and the "Scenario Summary".

Section 3 ofthis report, entitled "Analysis of Capabilities", presents detailed "Exercise Evaluation and Results" information on the demonstration for each jurisdiction or functional entity evaluated in a jurisdiction-based, issue-only format (Criteria Evaluation Summaries). This section also contains:

The appendices, present supplementary information:

Appendix A - Exercise Timeli~e. A taqle that depicts the times when an event or notifications were noted at participating agencies and locations.

Appendix B - Exercise Evaluators and Team leaders. A table listing the evaluator names, organizations, and responsibilities of the evaluators and management.

Appendix C - Acronyms and Abbreviations. An alphabetized table defining the forinal names used in this report.

Appendix D - Extent of Play Agreement 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Acth;ities The objectives of the 2017 Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (TMI) Plume Exercise were to demonstrate the capabilities of State and local emergency management agencies to mobilize emergency management and emergency response personnei, to activate emergency 13

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station operations centers and support facilities, and to protect the health, lives, and property of the citizens residing within the 10 mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ).

To demonstrate the ability to communicate between multiple levels of government and provide timely, accurate, and sufficiently detailed information to the public, the emergency management agencies use a variety of resources, including radios, telephones, the Internet, the media, the Emergency Alert System (EAS), and the utility Alert and Notification System (ANS) Sirens. All of these communication resources were employed and evaluated. The EAS and ANS were simulated and media information was prepared but not actually released.

An essential capability of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REPP) is to evacuate, monitor and decontaminate, if necessary, and provide temporary care and shelter to displaced residents from the EPZ. The ability of the risk/support counties to mobilize personnel and resources to establish reception, monitoring and decontamination, and mass care centers was demonstrated.

The protection of ~chool children is also a vital mission of the REPP. School districts and selected schools demonstrated the capability to communicate and coordinate the collection, evacuation, transportation and shelter of students attending schools within the EPZ. Provisions for students who live within the EPZ, but attend school outside were also evaluated.

2.3 Scenario Summary DHS/FEMA Region III Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 2017 Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise-April 11, 2017.

Meteorological conditions are wind direction from 305 degrees with a wind speed of 8 miles per hour (mph) and a "C" stability class. The wind direction varies throughout the exercise from 305 to 315 degrees.

At 1624, TMI declared a Notification of an Unusual Event Emergency based on reactor coolant system leak.

At 165 5, the Shift Manager declared an Alert Emergency based on inability to shut the reactor down.

At 1818, the Station Emergency Director declared a Site Area Emergency based on Loss of Containment barrier.

At 1909, a General Emergency was declared based on loss of two fission product barriers.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health and county and local agencies implemented protective response strategies based on recommendations from utility representatives*and State dose/accident assessment teams.

14

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report!Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results Contained in this section ru;e the results and findings of the evaluations or all jurisdictions and

  • locations that participated in the April 11, 2017, biennial Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Exercise, and the Out of Sequence Exercise evaluations conducted on February 6th & 8th, 2017, March 7, 2017, and April gth & 12th, 2017.

The exercise was conducted to demonstrate the ability of the Offsite Response Organizations of State and local government to protect the health and safety of the public in the 10 mile Emergency Planning Zone surrounding the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station.

  • Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on the basis of its demonstration of the Exercise Evaluation Area Criteria contained in the REP Exercise Evaluation Methodology.

Detailed information on the exercise evaluation area criteria and the Extent of Play Agreement can be found in the Exercise Plan. .

3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation The matrix presented in Table 3 .1; on the following pages, presents the status of the exercise evaluation area criteria from tlw REP Program Manual that was scheduled for demonstration during this exercise by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. Exercise evaluation area criteria are listed by number and the demonstration status of the criteria is indicated by the use of the following letters:

(D) Demonstrated Strength: an observed action, behavior, procedure, and/or practice that is worthy of special notice and positiv~ recognition, Note: this is already a common practice that many Regions employ when identifying demonstrated strengths.

(Ll) Level 1 Finding: an observed or identified inadequacy or organizational performance in an exercise that could cause a determination that offsite emergency preparedness is not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken in event of a radiological emergency to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP).

(L2) Level 2 Finding: an observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that is not considered, by itself, to adversely impact public health and safety.

(P) Plan Issue: an observed or identified inadequacy in the offsite response organizations' (OROs) emergency plan/implementation procedures, rather than that of the ORO's performance.

(N) Not Demonstrated: term applied to the status of a REP exercise Evaluation Area Criterion indicating that the ORO, for a justifiable reason, did not demonstrate the Evaluation Area Criterion, as required in the extent-of-play agreement or at the two-year or eight-year interval required in the FEMA REP Program Manual.

15

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (M) Met: The jurisdiction or functional entity performed all activities under the Demonstration Criterion to the level required in the Extent-of-Play Agreement, with no Level 1 or Level 2 Findings assessed under that criterion in the current exercise and no unresolved prior Level 2 Findings.

16

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear G:enerating Station Tables 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation Table 3.la - Exercise Evaluation by Classification Date: 4/1112017 LeCo EWivIDS AUHFD Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel p YCDTEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al L2 YCRMDSSCHS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel p Table 3.lb -Exercise Evaluation- Criteria Met Dat~: 4/11/2017

~?i¥~~g£I~¥'.\!t\9!Ei~~

ACEOC ACEOC ACEOC Site: Three Mile Island Nuclear Generatin Station

"'.' '.Cit'; ~111Wi[{

Mobilization Facilities Direction and Control

,,i\:

- lal lbl lcl ACEOC Communications Equipment ldl ACEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel ACEOC Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl BRPR3V Mobilization lal BRPR3V Communications Equipment ldl BRPR3V Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel BRPR3V Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al BRPR3V Field Team Management 4a2 CuCoEOC Mobilization lal CuCoEOC Communications Equipment ldl CuCoEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel CuCoEOC P ADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl CuCoEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 CuCoEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl CuCoEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al CuCoEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 CuCo EOC Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System Sal CuCoEOC Direction and Control lcl CuCoEOC Implementation of Kl PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl CuCoEOC Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media

  • Sbl CuCoEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl CuCoEOC Implemenfation of PADs for Schools 3c2 CuCo EWivIDS WSBFS#13 Direction and Control lcl CuCo EWivIDS WSBFS#13 Communications Equipment ldl CuCo EWivIDS WSBFS#13. Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al CuCo EWivIDS WSBFS#13 Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency Workers/Equipment/Vehicles 6bl CuCoLATBuRA Mobilization lal 17

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station CuCoLATBuRA Communications Equipment ldl CuCoLATBuRA Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel CuCoLATBuRA Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al.

CuCoLATBuRA Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3

  • CuCoLATEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl CuCoLATEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people . 3cl CuCoLATEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 CuCoLATEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl CuCoLATEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 CuCoLATEOC Mobilization lal CuCoLATEOC Direction and Control lcl CuCoLATEOC Communications Equipment ldl CuCoLATEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel CuCoLATEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS .5a3 CuCoLATEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al CuCoLATwpTACP Communications Equipment ldl CtiCoLATwpTACP Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel CuCoLATwpTACP Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al CuCoLATwpTACP Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl CuCoMCCSU Communications Equipment ldl CuCoMCCSU Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel CuCoMCCSU Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl CuCoRMDCSU Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel CuCoRMDCSU Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al CuCoRMDCSU Direction and Control lcl CuCoRMDCSU Facilities lbl CuCoRMDCSU Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al DaCoCDEHS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoCDSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoCDSDSMS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2

. DaCoCDSDTCE Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoDTHIE Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoDTSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoDTSDHMS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoEOC PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl DaCoEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl DaCoEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 DaCoEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl DaCoEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 DaCoEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl DaCoEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools

  • 3c2 DaCoEOC Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System 5al DaCoEOC Mobilization lal 18

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station DaCoEOC Facilities lbl DaCoEOC Communications Equipment ldl DaCoEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCo EOC Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl DaCoEOC Direction and Control lcl DaCoHCtyEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl DaCoHCtyEOC Mobilization lal DaCoHCtyEOC Implementation of P ADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl DaCoHCtyEOC Facilities lbl DaCoHCtyEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoHCtyEOC Direction and Control lcl DaCoHCtyEOC Communications Equipment ldl DaCoHCtyEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoHCtyEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoHCtyEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl DaCoHCtyEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 DaCoHCtyEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 DaCoHSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoHSDHHS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoHSDSS Implementation of PADs for Schools .3c2 DaCoHspr:BEOC Mobilization lal DaCoHsprBEOC Facilities lbl DaCoHsprBEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoHsprBEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 DaCoHsprBEOC Direction and Control lcl DaCoHsprBEOC Communications Equipment ldl DaCoHsprBEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl DaCoHsprBEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoHsprBEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 DaCoHsprBEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl DaCoHsprBEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl DaCoHsprBEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoLdryTEOC Facilities lbl DaCoLdryTEOC Communications Equipment "ldl DaCoLdryTEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 DaCoLdryTEOC Direction and Control lcl DaCoLdryTEOC Mobilization lal DaCoLdryTEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoLdryTEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl DaCoLdryTEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoLdryTEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 DaCoLtlfYTEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoLdryTEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl DaCoLdryTEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl 19

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station DaCoLDSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoLDSDLDH Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoLDSDPB Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoLDSDSHE Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoLPaxTwpBuRA Mobilization lal DaCoLPaxTwpBuRA Communications Equipment ldl DaCoLPaxTwpBuRA Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoLPaxTwpBuRA Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoLPaxTwpBuRA Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 DaCoLPaxTwpTACP Communications Equipment ldl DaCoLPaxTwpTACP Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoLPaxTwpTACP Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoLPaxTwpTACP Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl DaCoLPxtnTEOC Mobilization lal DaCoLPxtnTEOC Facilities lbl DaCoLPxtnTEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoLPxtnTEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals!Public 3bl DaCoLPxtnTEOC Direction and Control lcl DaCoLPxtnTEOC Communications Equipment ldl DaCoLPxtnTEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoLPxtnTEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 DaCoLPxtnTEQC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl DaCoLPxtnTEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoLPxtnTEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl DaCoLPxtnTEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 DaCoMASD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoMASDMH Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoMCCEFES Facilities lbl DaCoMCCEFES Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl DaCoMCCMMHS Communications Equipment ldl DaCoMCCMMHS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoMCCMMHS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl DaCoMCCUDHS Facilities lbl DaCoMCCUDHS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl DaCoMCCUDMSESC Facilities lbl DaCoMCCUDMSESC Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl DaCoMHS Implementation of P ADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoPxtgBEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl DaCoPxtgBEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 DaCoPxtgBEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoPxtgBEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl DaCoPxtgBEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl DaCoPxtgBEOC Mobilization lal DaCoPxtgBEOC Facilities lbl 20

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report!Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station DaCoPxtgBEOC Direction and Control lcl DaCoPxtgBEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoPxtgBEOC Communications Equipment ldl DaCoPxtgBEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 DaCoPxtgBEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoRMDCWVHS Facilities lbl DaCoRMDCWVHS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel DaCoRMDCWVHS Direction and Control lcl DaCoRMDCWVHS Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al DaCoRMDCWVHS Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al DaCoRMDCWVHS Communications Equipment ldl DaCoSHSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoSHSDSHE Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 DaCoTS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 EJIC Communications Equipment ldl EJIC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel EJIC Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl ExelonEOF Communications Equipment ldl ExelonEOF Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel ExelonEOF Accident Assessment and PARs for the Emergency Event 2bl.

FrCo EOC (S) Mobilization lal FrCo EOC (S) Facilities lbl FrCo EOC (S) Direction and Control lcl FrCo EOC (S) Communications Equipment ldl FrCo EOC (S) Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel FrCo EOC (S) Emergency Infortnation & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl FrCoMCCCMS Communications Equipment ldl FrCoMCC CMS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel FrCoMCC CMS Temporary Care of Evacuees* 6cl FrCoMDCCMS Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al FrCoMDCCMS Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al FrCoMDCCMS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel FrCoMDCCMS Direction and Control lcl LaCo DSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LaCoDSDDHS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LaCoEASD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LaCo EASD EAMS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LaCo EASD EHSES -Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LaCoEDglTTACP Communications Equipment ldl LaCoEDglTTACP Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoEDglTTACP Implementation of Emergency Worker Expost.ire Control 3al LaCoEDglTTACP Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl LaCoEDgTBuRA Mobilizatiorr lal LaCoEDgTBuRA Communications Equipment ldl 21

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station LaCoEDgTBuRA Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoEDgTBuRA Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LaCoEDgTBuRA Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 LaCoEDgTEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LaCoEDgTEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl LaCoEDgTEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl LaCoEDgTEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LaCoEDgTEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl LaCoEDgTEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2

  • LaCoEDgTEOC Mobilization lal LaCoEDgTEOC Facilities lbl LaCoEDgTEOC Direction and Control lcl LaCoEDgTEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 LaCoEDgTEOC. Communications Equipment ldl

. LaCoEDgTEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoEOC Mobilization lal LaCoEOC Facilities lbl LaCoEOC Communications Equipment ldl LaCoEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoEOC Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl LaCoEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl LaCoEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 LaCoEOC Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System Sal LaCoEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 LaCoEOC Direction and Control lcl LaCoEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LaCoEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl LaCoMCCHHS Communications Equipment ldl LaCoMCCHHS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoMCCHHS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl LaCoMDCHHS Direction and Control lcl LaCoMDCHHS Equipment and. Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoMDCHHS Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LaCoMDCHHS Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al LaCoPFCEWMDS Direction and Control lcl LaCoPFCEWMDS Communications Equipment ldl LaCoPFCEWMDS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoPFCEWMDS Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LaCoPFCEWMDS Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency W orkers/EquipmentNehicles 6bl LaCoRCPCtyMl Communications Equipment ldl LaCoRCPCtyMl Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LaCoRCPCtyMl Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LeCoEOC Mobilization lal LeCoEOC Facilities lbl 22

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station LeCoEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LeCoEOC Implementation of KIPAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl LeCoEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LeCoEOC CoIIllilunications Equipment ldl LeCoEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LeCoEOC ,. Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl LeCoEOC PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl LeCoEOC Direction and Control lcl LeCoEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl LeCoEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 LeCoEOC Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System* Sal LeCoEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 LeCoEOC Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl LeCo EWMDS AUHFD Direction and Control lcl LeCo EWMDS AUHFD CoIIlillunications Equipment ldl LeCo EWMDS AUHFD Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LeCo EWMDS AUHFD Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LeCo EWMDS AUHFD Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency Workers/Equipment/Vehicles 6bl LeCo MCC NLHS CoIIllilunications Equipment ldl LeCo MCC NLHS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl LeCo MCC NLHS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LeCoPASD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LeCoPASDLAES Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LeCoPASDP AM Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LeCoRMDCLCCTC Facilities lbl LeCoRMDCLCCTC Direction and Control lcl LeCoRMDCLCCTC CoIIllilunications Equipment ldl LeCoRMDCLCCTC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LeCoRMDCLCCTC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LeCoRMDCLCCTC Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al LeCoSLTEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LeCoSLTEOC Implementation of KIPAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl LeCoSLTEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 LeCoSLTEOC CoIIllilunications Equipment ldl LeCoSLTEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl LeCoSLTEOC Mobilization lal LeCoSLTEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 LeCoSLTEOC Direction and Control lei LeCoSLTEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LeCoSLTEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3d1 LeCoSLTEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 LeCo SLTwp BuRA Mobilization lal LeCo SLTwp BuRA CoIIllilunications Equipment ldl LeCo SLTwp BuRA Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lei 23

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile lslanc_I Nuclear Generating Station LeCo SLTwp BuRA Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control *3al LeCo SLTwp BuRA Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 LeCo SLTwp TACP Communications Equipment ldl LeCo SLTwp TACP Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel LeCo SLTwp TACP Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al LeCo SLTwp TACP Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl PAAACCRCCBRP Mobilization lal PAAACCRCCBRP Emergency Worker Exposure Control Decisions 2al PAAACCRCCBRP Accident Assessment and PARs for the Emergency Event 2bl PAAACCRCCBRP PAD decision-making process and coordination for the General Public 2b2 PAAACCRCCBRP Communications *Equipment ldl PAAACCRCCBRP Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel PAAACCRCCBRP Direction and Control lcl PACRCC* Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 PACRCC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel PACRCC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al PACRCC Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System Sal PACRCC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl PACRCC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl PACRCC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl PACRCC Emergency Worker Exposure Control Decisions 2al PACRCC Accident Assessment and PARs for the Emergency Event 2bl PACRCC PAD decision-making process and coordination for the General Public 2b2

.PACRCC PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl PACRCC Direction and Control lcl PACRCC Communications Equipment ldl PACRCC Mobilization lal PA TIC/RumCon Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl PA TIC/RumCon Mobilization lal PA TIC/RumCon Communications Equipment ldl PA TACP SPBH Mobilization lal PA TACP SPBH Communications Equipment ldl PATACPSPBH Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel PA TACP SPBH Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al PA TACP SPBH Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl PA TACP SPBH Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 ScCo EOC (S)

  • Facilities lbl ScCo EOC (S) Communications Equipment ldl ScCo EOC (S) Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel ScCo EOC (S) Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl ScCo EOC (S). Mobilization lal ScCo EOC (S) .Direction and Control lcl ScCo MCC BMHS Communications Equipment ldl ScCo MCC BMHS Equipment and. Supplies to Support Operations lel 24

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station ScCo MCC BMHS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl ScCoMCCBMMS Facilities lbl ScCoMCCBMMS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl ScCoMCCDHHLMS Facilities lbl ScCoMCCDHHLMS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl ScCoMCCPAHS Facilities lbl ScCoMCCPAHS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl ScCo~CCPSSC Facilities lbl ScCoMCCPSSC Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl ScCoMCCSHAMS Facilities lbl ScCoMCCSHAMS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl ScCoMCCSHHS Facilities lbl

\

ScCoMCCSHHS Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl ScCoRMDCBMHS Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al ScCoRMDCBMHS Direction and Control lcl ScCoRMDCBMHS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel ScCoRMDCBMHS Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al SFMT ASCR Mobilization lal SFMTASCR Communications Equipment ldl

  • SFMT ASCR Equipment and Supp~ies to Support Operations lel SFMTASCR Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al SFMT ASCR Plume Phase Field Measurement, Handling, & Analyses 4a3 SFMTB SCR Mobilization lal SFMTB SCR Communications Equipment ldl SFMTB SCR Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel SFMTB SCR Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al SFMTB SCR Plume Phase Field Measurement, Handling, & Analyses 4a3 YCCYSD Implementation of P ADs for Schools 3c2 YCCYSDCYM Implementation of P ADs for Schools 3c2 YCCYSDHE Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCCYSDRE Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCDASD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCDASDDIS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCDTEOC Mobilization lal YCDTEOC Facilities lbl YCDTEOC Impediments to Evacuation '

3d2 YCDTEOC Direction and Control lcl YCDTEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control. 3al YCDTEOC Communications Equipment ldl YCDTEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl YCDTEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel YCDTEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl YCDTEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 YCDTEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl 25

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station YCDTEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl YCDTEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCEMDMFD Direction and Control lcl YCEMDMFD Cominunications Equipment ldl YCEMDMFD Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel YCEMDMFD Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al YCEMDMFD Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency Workers/Equipment/Vehicles 6bl YCEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al YCEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl YCEOC Mobilization lal YCEOC Facilities lbl YCEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl YCEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl YCEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCEOC Communications Equipment ldl YCEOC PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl YCEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 YCEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel YCEOC Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System Sal YCEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 YCEOC Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl YCEOC Direction and Control lcl YCEYSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCEYSDKCE Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2

~

YCMCCSSC Communications Equipment ldl YCMCCSSC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel YCMCCSSC Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl YCNEAEOC Mobilization lal YCNEAEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl YCNEAEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 YCNEAEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCNEAEOC Facilities lbl YCNEAEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl

'- YCNEAEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl YCNEAEOC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al YCNEAEOC Direction and Control lcl YCNEAEOC Communications Equipment ldl YCNEAEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel YCNEAEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 YCNESD SBIS Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCNSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCNSDNEM Implementation of PADs for Schools. 3c2 YCNSDSFI Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCNYCSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 26

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station YCNYCSDNH Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCRMDSSCHS Direction and Control lcl YCRMDSSCHS Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lei YCRMDSSCHS Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al YCRMDSSCHS Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al YCSTTACP Communications Equipment ldl YCSTTACP Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel YCSTTACP Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al

  • ycsTTACP Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl YCWSSD Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCWSSDAM Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCWSSDCCH Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCWSSDHES Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCWSSDNCM Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCYUEMAEQC Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al YCYUEMAEOC Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lei YCYUEMAEOC Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl YCYUEMAEOC Communications Equipment ldl YCYUEMAEOC Facilities Ibl YCYUEMAEOC Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3cl YCYUEMAEOC Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 YCYUEMAEOC Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl YCYUEMAEOC Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 YCYUEMAEOC Mobilization lal YCYUEMAEOC Direction and Control lcl YCYUEMAEOC Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 YCYUEMASBuRA Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel YCYUEMASBuRA Mobilization lal YCYUEMASBuRA Communications Equipment ldl YCYUEMASBuRA Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 YCYUEMASBuRA Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al 27

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island* Nuclear Generating Station 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 3.3.1 State Jurisdictions 3.3.1.1 PA State Field Monitoring Team A, South Central Region In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the State jurisdiction is as foUows:

a. MET: l.a.l, l.d.l, l.e.1, 3.a.l, 4.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.1.2 PA State Field Monitoring Team B, South Central Region In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the State jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 4.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE.

3.3.1.3 Pennsylvania Accident Assessment Center, CRCC-Bureau Rad Protection In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the State jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.a.l, 2.b.l, 2.b.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 28

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.1.4 Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection, Radiological Rapid Response Vehicle In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the State jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 4.a.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.1.5 Pennsylvania Commonwealth Response Coordination Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the State jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.c.l, l.d.1, l.e.l, 2.a.l, 2.b.l, 2.b.2, 2.c.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.d.l, 3.d.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.1.6 Pennsylvania Joint Information Center/Rumor Control In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the State jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, Ld.l, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 29

Unclassified lI Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.1. 7 Pennsylvania State Traffic and Access Control Points, State Police Barracks, Harrisburg In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the State jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.1, 3.d.l, 3.d.2.
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 3.3.2.1 Cumberland County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.c.1, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.l, 5.a.3, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.2 Cumberland County Emerg,ency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station, West Shore Borough Fire Station In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FIND~GS: NONE 30

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.3 Cumberland County Mass Care Center, Shippensburg University In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.4 Cumberland County Reception Center/Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Shippensburg University In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b.l, l.c.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLV~D: NONE 3.3.2.5 Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, 1.c.l, l.d.l, 1.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3~c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3 31

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL I FINDINGS: NONE *
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.6 Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township Traffic and Access Control In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.I, Le.I, 3.a.I, 3.d.I
b. LEVEL I FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE

')

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.7 Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township, Back-up Route Alerting In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: I.a.I, l.d.I, Le.I, 3.a.l, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL I FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.8 Dauphin County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: I.a.I, Lb.I, l.c.I, l.d.I, Le.I, 2.c.I, 3.a.I, 3.b.I, 3.c.I, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.I, 5.a.3, 5.b.l 32

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.9 Dauphin County Mass Care Center, Enders-Fisherville Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b. l, 6.c. l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.10 Dauphin County Mass Care Center, Millersburg Middle/High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, 1.e.l, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN.ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.11 Dauphin County Mass Care Center, Upper Dauphin High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b.l, 6.c.l 33

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. . PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.12 Dauphin County Reception Center/Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Williams Valley High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 1.b.l, 1.c.l, 1.d.l, 1.e.1 3.a.l, 6.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.13 Dauphin County Technical School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: . 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 34

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 3.3.2.14 Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE d.. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.15 Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District,-Central Dauphin East High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.16 Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, Swatara Middle .School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 35

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 3.3.2.17 Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, Tri Community Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.18 Dauphin County, Derry Township School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a.
  • MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.19 Dauphin County, Derry Township School District, Hershey Intermediate Elementary In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE 36

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.20 Dauphin County, Derry Township School District, Hershey Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
  • e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.21 Dauphin County, Harrisburg City Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE e; PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.22 Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE 37

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.23 Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District, Harrisburg High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE :"
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.24 Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District, Scott Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.25 Dauphin County, Highspire Borough Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE 38

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.26 Dauphin County, Londonderry Township Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.27 Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin.School District, South Hanover Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.28 Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE *
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE 1
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 39

Unclassified _

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island-Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.29 Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, Lower Dauphin High School -

In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.30 Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, Price School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction - ,

is as follows:

a. .MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.31 Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Backup Route Alerting In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 40

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.32 Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Traffic and Access Control In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.1, 3.d.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.33 Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE

. f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.34 Dauphin County, Middletown Area School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 41

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.35 Dauphin County, Middletown Area School District, Middletown High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.36 Dauphin County, Milton Hershey School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL11 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.37 Dauphin County, Paxtang Borough Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: Ta.l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3.
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE 42

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

d. PLANISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.38 Dauphin County, Steelton-Highspire School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.39 Dauphin County, Steelton-Highspire School District, Steelton-Highspire Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.40 Dauphin County Mass Care Center Upper Dauphin MS/ES Complex In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b.l, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE 43

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSuES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.41 Lancaster County Emergency Operations ~enter In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction i.s as follows:
a. MET: I.a.I, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.c.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.42 Lancaster County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station, Pioneer Fire Company, Marietta PA In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.43 Lancaster County Mass Care Center, Hempfield High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 6.c.1
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE 44

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REI')

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES:* NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.44 Lancaster County Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Hempfield

-High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: 1.c.1, 1.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOtVED: NONE 3.3.2.45 Lancaster County Reception Center, Park City Mall In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.l, 1.e.1, 3.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.46 Lancaster County, Donegal School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2 45

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report!Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
  • c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.47 Lancaster County, Donegal School District, Donegal High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. l\IBT: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.48 Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Back-up Route Alerting In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. l\IBT: 1.a.l; 1.d.l, 1.e.l, 3.a.l, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.49 Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Emergency Operation Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.l, 1.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3 46

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan* Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.50 Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Traffic and Access Control, Northwest Regional Police Department In summary, the .status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.1, l.e.1, 3.a.l, 3.d.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.51 Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District, East High Street Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows: 1
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE.

47

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 3.3.2.52 Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.53 Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District, Elizabethtown Area Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE I

f PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.54 Lebanon County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.l, 1.e.1, 2.c.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE 48

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/lmpr9vement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.55 Lebanon County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station, Annville Union Hose Fire Department In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

. a. MET: 1.c.l, 1.d.l, 1.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.b.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: ONE LOCATION: Lebanon County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station, Annville Fire Department ISSUE NO: 64-17-lel-P-01 CRITERION: Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations CONDITION: The Hazmat Team Leader at the Lebanon County, Union Hose Fire Company performed a source check on the Ludlum Model 2241-3 survey meter using the Cs-137 source attached on the side of the instrument. He obtained as value that was much less than the reference value of plus or minus 20% on .a sticker attached to the side of the meter. He stated that any meter deflection when using a check source indicated a satisfactory source check.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: This was caused by a failure to clearly place acceptance criteria (range of acceptable readings) for a source check on the side of the instrument or in a checklist or procedure that was readily available.

REFERENCE:

NUREG H.10 ANSI Standard (N323A-1997), Instrument Tech Manual for the Ludlum Model 2241-3 survey ratemeter.

EFFECT: Without proper procedures, a survey meter could be used when it is not operating properly.

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.56 Lebanon County Mass Care Center, Northern Lebanon Jr./Sr. High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is.as follows:
a. MET: 1.c.l, 1.d.l, 1.e.l, 6.c.l 49

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.57 Lebanon County Reception Center/Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Lebanon County Career & Tech Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Riskjurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIORISS.UES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.58 Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.59 Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District, Lingle Avenue Elementary School
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE 50

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.60 Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District, Palmyra Area Middle School
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE

/

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.61 Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.c.1, l.d.1, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.62 Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township Traffic and Access Control In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.d.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE 51

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.63 Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township, Back-Up Route Alerting In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.64 York County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station, Monaghan Township Fire Department In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.65 York County Mass Care Center, Southern School District Complex In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.1, l.e.1, 6.c.l 52

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRJOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRJOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.66 York County Reception Center!Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Southern School District Complex In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.c.l, l.e.l, 3.a.1, 6.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 ;FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE LOCATION: York County Reception Center/Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Southern School District Complex ISSUE NO: 64-17-lel-P-02 CRITERION: Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations CONDITION: The Monitoring/Decou Team Leader at the Yark County, Susquehannock High School performed a source check on the Ludlum Model 2241-3 survey meter using the Cs-137 source attached on the side of the instrument. He obtained as value that was much less than the reference value of plus or minus 20% on a sticker attached to the side of the meter. He stated that any meter deflection when using a check source indicated a satisfactory source check.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: This was caused by a failure to clearly place acceptance criteria (range of acceptable readings) for a source check on the side of the instrument or in a checklist or procedure that was readily available.

REFERENCE:

NUREG H.10 ANSI Standard (N323A-1997), Instrument Tech Manual for the Ludlum Model 2241-3 survey ratemeter.

EFFECT: Without proper procedures, a survey meter could be used when it is not operating properly.

53

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.67 York County, Central York School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.68 York County, Central York School District, Central York Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.69 York County, Central York School District, Hayshire Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 54

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report!lmprovement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e.
  • PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: :NONE 3.3.2.70 York County, Central York School District, Round town Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for .the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.71 York County, Dover Area School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.72 York County, Dover Area School District, Dover Area Intermediate School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 55

Unclassified Radiological Emergency*Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2. 73 York County, Dover Township Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.b.1, l.c.1, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: ONE LOCATION: York County, Dover Township Emergency Operations Center ISSUE NO: 64-17-3al-L2-01 CRITERION: Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control CONDITION: The Radiological Officer (RO) only issued each Emergency Worker (EW) a Direct Reading Dosimeter (DRD) and sent them into the field without a Permanent Record Dosimeter (PRD) or Potassium Iodide (KI). The Dover Township Radiological Emergency Response Procedures (RERP) states that upon notification of an Alert (or higher Emergency Classification Level (ECL), the equipment will be inventoried and prepared for distribution (reference attachment K of the RERP). Reference K attachment states that each EW will receive (1) Permanent Record Dosimeter (PRD), (1) DRD, and (2) Potassium Iodide (KI) tablets POSSIBLE CAUSE: Insufficient training of new radiological officer.

REFERENCE:

NUREG 0654 Section J.10.e and K.3.a.l.

EFFECT: Emergency Workers could have received unnecessary radiation exposure.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Radiological Officer re-briefed the Emergency Workers on dosimetry and KI, and each were issued the appropriate equipment consisting of ((1) DRD, (1) PRD and (2) tablets of KI).

The Emergency Workers were interviewed and were aware of their exposure limits, logging and recording dosimetry readings, ingestion of KI, and reporting requirements. -

d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE 56

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.74 York County, Eastern York School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2. 75 York County, Eastern York School District, Kreutz Creek Elementary S~o~ . .

In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Riskjurisdicti<?n is as follows:

a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDJ:NGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.76 York County, Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.b.1, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.c.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.al, 5.a.3, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 57

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan *Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE I
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.77 York County, Northeast Area (Mt. Wolf/East Manchester/Manchester/

Conewago Township) Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.l, l.b.1, l.c.1, l.d.l, l.e.1, 3.a.l, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS:*NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.78 York County, Northeastern School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLANISSUES:NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.J.2.79 York County, Northeastern School District, Northeastern Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. .PLAN ISSUES: NONE

. 58

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan . Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.80 York County, Northeastern School District, Shallow Brook Intermediate School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is.as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.81 York County, Northeastern School District, Spring Forge Intermediate School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3 .c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.82 York County, Northern School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Riskjurisdiction is.as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE 59

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.83 York County, Northern School District, Northern Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.84 York County, Springettsbury Township Traffic and Access Control, Springettsbury Police Department In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.l; Le.I, 3.a.1, 3.d.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.85 York County, West Shore School District In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE 60

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

  • After Acti.on Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.86 York County, West Shore School District, Allen Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.87 York County, West Shore School District, Cedar Cliff High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.88 York County, West Shore School District, Highland Elementary School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE 61

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program {REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.89 York County, West Shore School District, New Cumberland Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2

.b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.90 York County, York United EMA Backup Route Alerting In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.d.1, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2.91 York County, York United Emergency Management Agency/Manchester Township/Springettsbury Township, Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Risk jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a:l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.3
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE 62

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRJORISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRJOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions 3.3.3.l Adams County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRJORISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR.ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.2 Franklin County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLANISSUES:NONE
e. PRJOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRJOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.3 Franklin County Mass Care Center, Chambersburg Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 6.c.l 63

unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report!lmprovement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.4 Franklin County Reception Center/Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Chambersburg Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.c.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.5 Schuylkill County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 64

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportllmprove.ment Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 3.3.3.6 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Blue Mountain Middle School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: l.b.l, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE

, f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.7 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Pottsville Area DHH Lengel Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA )criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: l.b.1, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.8 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Penn State S<;huylkill Complex In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b.1, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 65

Unclassified l I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station 3.3.3.9 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Pottsville Area High School

  • In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b.l, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.10 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Schuylkill Haven Area Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.b.l, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.11 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center, Blue Mountain High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.1, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 66

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 3.3.3.12 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center, Schuylkill Haven High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria.for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:

a. MET: Lb.I, 6.c.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.3.13 Schuylkill C01.1:nty Reception Center/Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Blue Mountain High School In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Support jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.c.l, l.e.1, 3.a.l, 6.a.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.4 Private Jurisdictions 3.3.4.1 Exelon Emergency Operations Facility In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Private jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE 67

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.4.2 Exelon Joint Information Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for the Private jurisdiction is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.l, 1.e.l, 5.b.l
b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE
c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE
d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE
e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE
f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 68.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station SECTION 4: CONCLUSION The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and local jurisdictions, except where noted in this report demonstrated knowledge of their Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERP) and procedures were adequately implemented during the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Plume exercise evaluated on April 11, 2017.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) evaluators provided analyses of six assessment areas. These analyses resulted in a determination of no Level 1 Findings, (1) One Level 2 Finding, and (2) two New Plan Issues.

"Based on the results of the exercise and a review of the offsite radiological emergency response plans, and procedures sub!I!-itted, FEMA Region III has determined they are adequate (meet the planning and preparedness standards ofNUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, Revision 1, November 1980, as referenced in 44 CFR 350.5) and there is reasonable assurance they can be implemented, as demonstrated during this exercise."

An After Action Implementation Plan (IP) will not be developed as part of this report.

69

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station APPENDIX A~ EXERCISE TIMELINE This section contains the Exercise Timeline. A table that depicts the times when an event or notifications were noted at participating agencies and locations.

70

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station .

~>: * . .. ,._, .. ., ".' Time That Notification Was Received at the Listed Location Jl:niergency Time Lower South Cfassification Utility Londonderry Paxton Paxtang Lancaster East Donegal Lebanon York ,, Dover Londonderry Level or Event Declared Township Borongh County Township Connty County Township Township Township

- EOC EOC EOC EOC EOC EOC EOC EOC EOC Unusual Event 1624 NIA NIA NIA 1634 NIA 1640 1649 1634 NIA iAiert 1655 1732 1714 1.719 1705 1708 1710 1719 1709 1730 Site Area Emergency 1818 1834 1829 1835 1827 1843 1846 1848 1828 1830 General Emergency 1909 1928 1928 1927 1922 1936 1942 1944 1937 1940 Simulated Radiation Release Started 1624/1909 1732 1806 1852 1634 1727 1640 NIA 1909 1940 Simulated Radiation On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going

!Release Terminated

!Facility Declared Operational 1740 1730 1739 1709 1732 1735 1700 1728 1730 Governor's Declaration of State of Emergency 1901 1918 1908 1842 1853 1933 NIA 1842 1909

!Exercise Terminated 2031 2033 2030 2039 2021 2105 2030 2112 2050 IFirst Precautionary/Protective 1908 1851 1916

!Actions: Describe Livestock on stored feed and Water I 1916 1859 1914 1855 1858 1850 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA 10 mile waterway restriction; 1916 1859 1914 1850 NIA 1851 1925 NIA NIA 1851 IO-Mile Rail Restriction 1916 1859 1914 1850 NIA 1925 Other Evac Parks 1905 1905 Siren Sounding 1905 1905 1905 1905 1905 1905 1908 1905 1905 I

EAS Message Broadcast 11 1908 1908 1908 1908 1908 1908 1908 1908 1908 I

Second Precautionary/

Protective Actions: Describe II ?001 2005 2002 1954 2000 1952 NIA 1954 2023 Air 5 mile 5000 2001 2005 2002 1947 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Other Rec & Evac Farmers 2001 1950 2000 1957 2004 Siren Sounding 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004' 2004 2004 2004 2004 EAS Message Broadcast 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2006 2007 2007 Decision to take KI:

2001 1959 2002 1954 2000 1952 2000 1954 2023 EWs Decision to take KI:

I 2001 1959 2002 1954 2000 1952 2000 1954 2023 Public 72

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

  • . ~y:fefgeiicy.

" 'T~*<* *,.

D>pe' c~l~ a:,ir*;.'.e'd* ** * *,

Manchester/

Northeast Adams Franklin Schuylkill Classifkaticiri *.* pringettsbury

  • ie~~i 'rii ::Everit . York United Area County County County EOC EOC EOC EOC EOC 1624 NIA NIA 1651 1655 1649 1655 1713 1714 1729 1724 1712 1818 1854 1853 1848 1846 1844 eneral Emergency 1909 1940 1939 1942 1926 1930 imulated Radiation elease Started 1624/1909 1940 1939 1848 NIA 1624 On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going On-going acility Declared Operational 1957 1829 1736 1724 1728 State 1905 1908 1856 1850 1852 xercise Terminated 2058 2100 2017 NIA 2019 irst Precautionary/Protective 1915 1938 1859 1848 1850 ctions: Describe ivestock on stored feed and 1915 1938 1859 1848 1850 10 mile waterway restriction; 1925 1927 1859 1848 1850 10-Mile Rail Restriction 1925 1903 1859 1848 1850 Other Closed Parks 1925 1903 NIA NIA NIA Siren Sounding ..___.._______ ________ ,, ,,

1905 1905 1905 1905 1905 EAS Message Broadcast 1908 1908 1908 1908 1908 Second Precautionary/

Protective Actions: Describe 023 2023 2004 1951 1950 Air 5 mile 5000 2039 2039 2004 NIA 1957 Other Rec Evac Farmers 2004 2004 NIA NIA NIA Siren Sounding 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 EAS Message Broadcast 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 Decision to take KI:

EWs 3 2007 2007 NIA 1950 Decision to take KI:

Public 2003 2007 2007 NIA 1950 73

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station APPENDIX B: EXERCISE EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS The following is the list of Evaluators and Team Leaders for the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station 2017 Plume Exercise evaluated on April 11, 2017. The following also constitutes the managing staff for the Evaluation:

  • Thomas Scardino, DHS/FEMA, Regional Assistance Committee Chairman
  • Christopher Nemcheck, DHS/FEMA, Technological Hazards Program Specialist/Site Specialist DATE: 4/11/2017, SITE: Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

~~lf~Jj~t~~~~~f~ii~J¥-fil:sf-i~~~~~r~t~fli~fE]f~~~I~i~fi~J~~~~~ {~~~R~ff4I~~tr~~/W~R'~##::.~~§5~ ~~~~~i1~~t~ti~t1Q~~~~?tt~~~r~:~t&~~~~;

Adams County Emergency Operations Center Patricia Gardner FEMA Region 3 Cumberland County Emergency Operations Center Tina Lai-Thomas FEMA Region 3 Cumberland County Emergency Worker M&D Station, Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 West Shore Borough Fire Station Cumberland County Mass Care Center, Shippensburg Barton Freeman FEMA Regiqn 3

  • University Cumberland County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Center, Shippensburg University Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township Tina Lai-Thomas FEMA Region 3 Emergency Operations Center Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township Traffic and Tina Lai-Thomas FEMA Region 3 Access Control Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township, Back-up Tina Lai-Thomas FEMA Region 3 Route Alertirig Dauphin County Emergency Operations Center Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County Mass Care Center Upper Dauphin Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 MS/ES Complex Dauphin County Mass care Center, Enders-Fisherville Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Elementary School Dauphin County Mass Care Center, Millersburg Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Middle/High School Dauphin County Mass Care Center, Upper Dauphin Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 High School Dauphin County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Center, Barton Freeman .* FEMA Region 3 Williams Valley High School Dauphin County Technical School William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Central Dauphin East High School Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Swatara Middle School Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, Tri William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Community Elementary School 74

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station Dauphin County, Derry Township School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Derry Township School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Hershey Intermediate Elementary Dauphin County, Derry Township School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Hershey Middle School Dauphin County, Harrisburg City Emergency Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Operations Center Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District, Harrisburg William McDougall FEMA Region 3 High School Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District, Scott William McDougall FEMA Region 3 School Dauphin County, Highspire Borough Emergency Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Operations Center Dauphin County, Londonderry Township Emergency .

Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Operations Center Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, South William McDougall . FEMA Region 3 Hanover Elementary School Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District

  • William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Lower Dauphin High School Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, Price William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Building Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Backup Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Route Alerting Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Traffic and Lee Tm:res FEMA Region 3 Access Control Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Emergency Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Operations Center Dauphin County, Middletown Area School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Middletown Area School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Middletown High School Dauphin County, Miltori Hershey School W-illiam McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Paxtang Borough Emergency Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Operations Center
Oauphin County, Steelton-Highspire School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County, Steelton-Highspire School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Steelton-Highspire Elementary Exelon Emergency Operations F~cility and Technical Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 Support Center Exelon Joint Information Center John Price FEMA Region 3 Franklin County Emergency Operations Center Patricia Gardner FEMA Region 3 Franklin County Mass Care Center, Chambersburg Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Middle School Franklin County Monitoring and Decontamination Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Center, Chambersburg Middle School Lancaster County Emergency Operations Center William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Lancaster County Emergency Worker Mon/Decon
  • Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 Station, Pioneer 75

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Lancaster County Mass Care Center, Hempfield High Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 School Lancaster County Monitoring and Decontamination Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Center, Hempfield High School Lancaster County Reception Center, Park City Mall Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Lancaster County, Donegal School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Lancaster County, Donegal School District, Donegal William McDougall FEMA Region 3 High School .

Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Back-up William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Route Alerting Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Emergency William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Operation Center Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Traffic and William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Access Control Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 East High Street Elementary Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Elizabethtown Area Middle Lebanon County Emergency Operations Center Nicholas Buls FEMA Region 3 Lebanon County Emergency Worker Monitoring &

Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 Decontamination Station Annville UniOn Hose FD Lebanon County Mass Care Center, N orthem Lebanon "

Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 High School Lebanon County Reception Center/Mon/Decou Center, Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Lebanon Co Career & Tech Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School Dis~rict, Lingle William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Avenue Elementary School Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Palmyra Area Middle School Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township Nicholas Buls FEMA Region 3 Emergency Operations Center .

Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township Traffic Nicholas Buls FEMA Region 3 and Access Control Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township, Back-Nicholas Buls FEMA Region 3 Up Route Alerting PA State Field Monitoring Team A, South Central Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 Region * .

PA State Field Monitoring Team B, South Central Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 Region Pennsylvania Accident Assessment Center, CRCC-Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Schuylkill County Emergency Operations Center Patricia Gardner FEMA Region 3 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center.Blue Mountain Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Middle School Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Dlffi Lengel Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Middle School Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Penn State Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3

  • Schuylkill Complex Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Pottsville Area Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 High School Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Schuylkill Haven Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Area Middle School Schuylkill County Mass Care Center, Blue Mountain Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 High School Schuylkill County Mass Care Center, Schuylkill Haven Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 High School Schuylkill County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Center, Blue Mountain HS York County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 Decontamination Station, Monaghan Fi York County Mass Care Center, Southern School Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Complex York County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Center, Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Southern School Complex High York County, Central York School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York County, Central York School District, Central William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York Middle School York County, Central York School District, Hayshire William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Elementary School York County, Central York School District, Roundtown William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Elementary School York County, Dover Area School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York County, Dover Area School District, Dover William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Intermediate School York County, Dover Township Emergency Operations Joseph Suders FEMA Re~ion 3 Center York County, Eastern York School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York County, Eastern York School District, Kreutz William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Creek Elementary School York County, Emergency Operations Center Joseph Suders FEMA Region 3 York County, Northeast Area, EOC (Mount Wolf, Joseph Suders FEMA Region 3 Manchester Borough, E Manchester Township York County, Northeastern School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York County, Northeastern School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Northeastern Middle School York County, Northeastern School District, Shallow William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Brook Intermediate School, York County, Northeastern School District, Spring FEMA Region 3.

William McDougall Forge Intermediate School York County, Northern York County School pistrict William McDougall FEMA Region 3 77

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station York County, Northern York County School District, William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Northern Middle School York County, Springettsbury Township Traffic and Joseph Suders FEMA Region 3 Access Control York County, West Shore School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York County, West Shore School District, Allen Middle William McDougall FEMA Region 3 School York County, West Shore School District, Cedar Cliff William McDougall FEMA Region 3 High School York County, West Shore School District, Highland William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Elementary School York County, West Shore School District, New William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Cumberland Middle School York County, York United EMA, Springettsbury Twp Joseph Suders FEMA Region 3 Backup Route Alerting York County, York United Emergency Management Agency/ Manchester Township/ Springettsbury Joseph Suders FEMA Region 3 Township Emergency Operations Center

~;~~~~~~~f~t~~~~~~~~i~Jl~~&k~fB~~!!9:H~i~~::~~}J~3~tg11l~~~~i~1Rli~~.f~J~~1~~~~1 *!£~ii£~~R&tt{~J:l~~~t~i ~~~~~[ig§,~~~;t~~~~~~~~

Adams County Emergency Operations Center Patricia Gardner FEMA Region 3 Cumberland County Emergency Operations Center Miriam Weston FEMA Region 2 Cumberland County Emergency Operations Center Linda Gee FEMA Region 6 Cumberland County Emergency Operations Center Larry Broockerd FEMAHQ Cumberland County Emergency Operations Center Tina Lai-Thomas FEMA Region 3 Cumberland County Emergency Worker M&D Station, West Shore Borough Larry Broockerd FEMAHQ Fire Station Cumberland County Mass Care Center, Shippensburg University Bruce Swiren ICF Cumberland County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Center, Shippensburg Carol D. Shepard ICF University Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township Emergency Operations Center Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township Emergency Operations Center Gary Goldberg ICF Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township Traffic and Access Control Jon Christiansen ICF Cumberland County, Lower Allen Township, Back-up Route Alerting Gary Bolender ICF Dau_phin County Emergency Operations Center Lee Torres FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County Emergency Operations Center Brad DeKorte FEMA Region 6 Dauphin County Emergency Operations Center Timothy Pflieger FEMA Region 6 Dauphin County Emergency Operations Center Matthew Celia FEMAHQ Dauphin County Mass Care Center Upper Dauphin MS/ES Complex Christopher Nemcheck FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County Mass care Center, Enders-Fisherville Elementary School Christopher Nemcheck FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County Mass Care Center, Millersburg Middle/High School Clark Duffy ICF Dauphin County Mass Care Center, Upper Dauphin High School Christopher Nemcheck FEMA Region 3 Dauphin County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Center, Williams Valley High Nicholas Buis FEMA Region 3 School Dauphin County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Center, Williams Valley High Christopher Nemcheck FEMA Region 3 School Dauphin County Technical School Rosemary Samsel ICF Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District Bruce Swiren ICF 78

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, Central Dauphin East High Bruce Swiren ICF School Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, Swatara Middle School Carol D. Shepard ICF Dauphin County, Central Dauphin School District, Tri Community Elementary Brenda Rembert ICF School Dauphin County, Derry Township School District Thomas Reynolds ICF Dauphin County, Derry Township School District, Hershey Intermediate Thomas Reynolds ICF Elementary Dauphin County, Derry Township School District, Hershey Middle School Lynn Steffensen ICF Dauphin County, Harrisburg City Emergency Operations Center Cheryl Weaver ICF Dauphin County, Harrisburg City Emer~ency Operations Center James Greer ICF Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District Kent Tosch ICF Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District, Harrisburg High School Kent Tosch ICF Dauphin County, Harrisburg School District, Scott School Debra Schneck ICF Dauphin County, Highspire Borough Emergency Operations Center Michael Burriss ICF Dauphin County, Highspire Borough Emergency Operations Center Ronald Bonner ICF Dauphin County, Londonderry Township Emergency Operations Center Brian Clark ICF Dauphin County, Londonderry Township Emergency Operations Center Frank Cordaro ICF Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, South Hanover Elementary John Zeidler ICF School Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District Richard Smith ICF Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, Lower Dauphin High Robert Walker ICF School Dauphin County, Lower Dauphin School District, Price Building Richard Smith ICF Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Backup Route Alerting Clark Duffy ICF Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Traffic and Access Control Mark Dalton ICF Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Emergency Operations Center Kevin Malone FEMA Region 2 Dauphin County, Lower Paxton Township Emergency Operations Center Rebecca Thomson ICF Daaphin County, Middletown Area School District Mario Vigliani ICF Dauphin County, Middletown Area School District, Middletown High School Mario Vigliani ICF Dauphin County, Milton Hershey School Michael Pettillo ICF Dauphin County, Paxtang Borough Emergency Operations Center Robert Duggleby ICF Dauphin County, Paxtang Borough Emergency Operations Center Thomas Gahan ICF Dauphin County, Steelton-Highspire School District Henry Christiansen ICFI Dauphin County, Steelton-Highspire School District, Steelton-Highspire Henry Christiansen ICFI Elementary Exelon Emergency Operations Facility and Technical Support Center John Wills ICF Exelon Joint Information Center Roger Kowieski ICF Franklin Colinty Emergency Operations Center Bill Webb FEMA Region I 0 Franklin County Mass Care Center, Chambersburg Middle School Thomas Reynolds ICF Franklin County Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Chambersburg Brenda Rembert ICF Middle School Lancaster County Emergency Operations Center Barbara Thomas FEMA Region 1 Lancaster County Emergency Operations Center

  • John Rice FEMA Region 1 Lancaster County Emergency Operations Center Bonnie Sheffield FEMA Region 8 Lancaster County Emergency Operations Center William McDougall FEMA Region 3 Lancaster County Emergency Worker Mon/Decon Station, Pioneer Michael Howe FEMAHQ 79

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station Lancaster County Mass Care Center, Hempfield High School Lynn Steffensen ICF Lancaster County Monitoring and Decontamination Center, Hempfield High Kent Tosch ICF School Lancaster County Reception Center, Park City Mall Lynn Steffensen ICF Lancaster County, Donegal School District Gary Bolender ICF Lancaster County, Donegal School District, Donegal High School Gary Bolender ICF Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Back-up Route Alerting James Hickey ICF Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Emergency Operation Center Carl Wentzell ICF Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Emergency Operation Center Thomas Hegele ICF Lancaster County, East Donegal Township Traffic and Access Control David Stuenkel ICF Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District, East High Street Robert Lemeshka ICF Elementary Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District Jon Christiansen ICF Lancaster County, Elizabethtown Area School District, Elizabethtown Area Jon Christiansen ICF Middle Lebanon County Emergency Operations Center Helen Laforge FEMA Region 1 Lebanon County Emergency Operations Center Chris Cammarata FEMA Regfon 2 Lebanon County Emergency Operations Center Nicholas Buis FEMA Region 3 Lebanon County Emergency Operations Center Michael Howe Lebanon County Emergency Worker Monitoring & Decontamination Station Korkean Dulgerian FEMA Region 2 Annville Union Hose FD Lebanon County Mass Care Center, Northern Lebanon High School Richard Smith ICF Lebanon County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Center, Lebanon Co Career &

Debra Schneck ICF Tech Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District Cheryl Weaver ICF Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District, Lingle Ave Elementary James Greer ICF School Lebanon County, Palmyra Area School District, Palmyra Area Middle School Cheryl Weaver ICF Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township Emergency Operations Center Nicholas Buis FEMA Region 3 Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township Emergency Operations Center Joseph Lischinsky ICF Lebanon County, South Londondeny Township Emergency Operations Center DavidKayen ICF Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township Traffic and Access Control Michael Petullo ICF Lebanon County, South Londonderry Township, Back-Up Route Alerting Danny Loomis ICF PA State Field Monitoring Team A, South Central Region Cristina Schulingkamp BRP PA State Field Monitoring Team B, South Central Region Nan Calhoun FEMA Region 6 Pennsylvania Accident Assessment Center, CRCC-Bureau Rad Protection Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 Pennsylvania Accident Assessment Center, CRCC-Bureau Rad Protection Reggie Rodgers ICF.

Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection, Radiological Rapid Response Kenneth Wierman FEMAHQ Vehicle Pennsylvania Commonwealth Response Coordination Center Marcy Campbell ICF Pennsylvani_a Commonwealth Response Coordination Center . Clayton Spangenberg ICF Pennsylvania Commonwealth Response Coordination Center John Price FEMA Region 3 Pennsylvania Joint Information Center/Rumor Control Steve Ward FEMA Region 3 Pennsylvania State Traffic and Access Control Points, State Police Barracks Mark Dalton ICF Harr Schuylkill County Emergency Operations Center Kathy Duran FEMA Region 3 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Blue Mountain Middle School

  • Christopher Nemcheck FEMA Region 3 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center DHH Lengel Middle School Christopher N emcheck FEMA Region 3 so*

Unclassified .

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program. (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Penn State Schuylkill Complex Christopher N emcheck FEMA Region 3 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Pottsville Area High School Christopher N emcheck FEMA Region 3 Schuylkill County Mass Care Center Schuylkill Haven Area Middle School Christopher N emcheck FEMA Region 3 Schuylkill Cm,mty Mass Care Center, Blue Mountain High School Mario Vigliani ICF Schuylkill County Mass Care Center, Schuylkill Haven High School Christopher Nemcheck FEMA Region 3 Schuylkill County Reception Center/Mon/Decon Center, Blue Mountain HS Robert Walker ICF York County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station, Marcy Campbell ICF Monaghan Fire Department York County Mass Care Center, Southern School Complex John Wills ICF York County Reception/Mon/Decon Center, Southern School Complex John Zeidler ICF York County, Central York School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York County, Central York School District, Central York Middle School Christopher N emcheck FEMA Region 3 York County, Central York School District, Hayshire Elementary School Patricia Gardner FEMA Region 3 York County, Central York School District, Roundtown Elementary School John Price FEMA Region 3 York County, Dover Area School District Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 York County, Dover Area School District, Dover Intermediate School Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 York County, Dover Township Emergency Operations Center LaShawn Halsey FEMAHQ York County, Dover Township Emergency Operations Center Christopher N emcheck FEMA Region 3 York County, Dover Township Emergency Operations Center Bridget Ahlgrim ICF York County, Eastern York School District Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 York County, Eastern.York School District, Kreutz Creek Elementary School Michael Shuler FEMA Region 3 York County, Emergency Operations Center Taneeka Hollins FEMA Region 1 York County, Emergency Operations Center Joseph Suders FEMA Region 3 York County, Emergency Operations Center Anthony Defelice FEMAH!

York County, Emergency Operations Center Ingrid Pierce FEMA Region 1 York County, Northeast Area EOC (Mount Wolf, Manchester Borough, E Henry Christiansen ICF Manchester Township York County, Northeast Area EOC (Mount Wolf, Manchester Borough, E Roy Smith ICF Manchester Township York County, Northeastern School District l Ronald Bonner ICF York County, Northeastern School District, Northeastern Middle School Ronald Bonner ICF York Courity, Northeastern School District, Shallow Brook Intermediate Brian Clark ICF

School, York County, Northeastern School District, Spring Forge Illtermediate School Michael Burriss ICF York County, Northern York County School District William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York Coill!-ty, Northern York County School District, Northern High School William McDougall FEMA Region 3 York County, Springettsbury Township Traffic and Access C9ntrol Kevin Reed ICF York County, West Shore School District John Price FEMA Region 3 York County, West Shore School District, Allen Middle School Patricia Gardner FEMA Region 3 York County, West Shore School District, Cedar Cliff High School John Price FEMA Region 3 York County, West Shore School District, Highland Elementary School Barton Freeman FEMA Region 3 York County, West Shore School District, New Cumberland Middle School Christopher Nemcheck FEMA Region 3 York County, York United EMA, Springettsbury Twp Backup Route Alerting Rufus Mobley FEMAHQ York County, York United Emergency Management Agency/

Manchester Township/ Springettsbury Township Emergency Robert Lemeshka ICF Operations Center 81

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station York County, York United Emergency Management Agency/

Manchester Township/ Springettsbury Township Emergency Rosemary Samsel ICF Operations Center 82

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station APPENDIXC:ACRONYMSAND ABBREVIATIONS No acronyms and abbreviations added.

Acronym Meaning ACP Access Control Point ALC Annual Letter of Certification ANS Alert and Notification System ARC American Red Cross ARD Automatic Ring Down ARES Amateur Radio Emergency Services ATWS Anticipated Transit Without SCRAM BRP Bureau of Radiation Protection CERT Community Emergency Response Team CFR Code of Federal Regulations CRCC Commonwealth Resource Coordination Center CST Civil Support Team DHS Department of Homeland Security DRD Direct Reading Dosimeter EAL Emergency Action Level EAS Emergency Alert System ECL Emergency Classification Level EMC Emergency Management Coordinator EMD Emergency Management Director EMS Emergency Medical Services EOC Emergency Operations Center EOF Emergency Operations Facility EOP Extent of Play .

EPT Exercise Planning Team EPZ Emergency Planning Zone ESF Emergency Support Function EW Emergency Workers ExPlan Exercise Plan FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation FD Fire Department FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMT Field Monitoring Team FRMAC Federal Radiological Monitoring Assessment Center FSE Full Scale Exercise FTC Field Team Coordinator 83

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station GE General Emergency GIS Geographic Information Systems GPM Gallons Per Minute GPS Global Positioning System HAB Hostile Action Based HazMat Hazardous Materials ITC Joint Information Center JPIC Joint Public Information Center KI Potassium Iodide LCD Liquid Crystal Display LOA Letter of Agreement MOU Memorandum of Understanding MSEL Master Scenario Events List NPP Nuclear Power Plant NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission oos Out of Sequence ORO Offsite Response Organization OSD Optically Stimulated Dosimeter PAD Protective Action Decision PAG Protective Action Guide PAR Protective Action Recommendation PAZ Protective Action Zone PEMA Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency PI Planning Issue PIO Public Information Officer PPE Personal Protective Equipment PRD Permanent Record Dosimeter RAC Regional Assistance Committee RACES Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Services REA Radiation Emergency Area REP Radiological Emergency Plan REPP Radiological Response Plans and Procedures RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan RO Radiological Officer SAC Staging Area Coordinator SAE Site Area Emergency SAIC Science Applications International Corporation SAV Site Assistance Visit SEOC State Emergency Operations Center SEVAN State Emergency Voice Activation Network 84

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station SED Station Emergency Director TCP Traffic Control *Point TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent TMI Three Mile Island UE Unusual Event (Notification of Unusual Event NUE)

VOAD Voluntary Organizations Active in Disasters 85

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station AJ?PENDIX D: EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENT The 2017 Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Plume Exercise Extent-of-Play was negotiated and agreed upon by FEMA Region III, PEMA, and the Emergency Management Agencies of the Risk Counties.

86

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/ImprovementPian . Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 2017 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE 87

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station TABLE OF CONTENTS METHOD OF OPERATION ...................................................................................................................... 89 I. Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (TMI) .................................................................. 89 II. Bureau of Radiation Protection (BRP) ......................................................................................... 89 ill. PEMA Operations at Commonwealth Resource Coordination CenterIP EMA Headquarters ...... 89 IV. PEMA Area Office Operations ................................................................................................... 900 V. Counties Designated to Participate ............................................................................................. 900 VI. PEMA Liaison Officers .............................. ~ ............................................................................... 900 VII. Controllers .................................................................................................................................. 900 Vill. PEMA Observers ........................................................................................................................ 911 IX. Demonstration Windows .......................... :................................................................................. 922 X. Stand-down ........................................................................................................... :..................... 933 XI. General Concepts ........................................................................................................................ 933 XII. Re-demonstrations ................................................. :.................................................................... 933 EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENT ........................................................................................................... 95 EVALUATION AREA 1 ........................................................................................................................ 95 EVALUATION AREA2 .................................................................................................................... 1022 EVALUATION AREA 3 .................................................................................................................... 1111 EVALUATION AREA 4 .................................................................................................................... 1222 EVALUATION AREA 5 .................................................................................................................. 12727 EVALUATION AREA 6 .................................................................................................................... 1333 AMERICAN RED CROSS SUPPORT COUNTY CHAPTERS ...................... ;.................................. 13939 ATTACHMENT A-DEMONSTRATION TABLES .............. :.............................................................. 142 I. Plume Phase Exercise ............................................................................................................ ~ ..... 1422 School Districts ............................................................................................................................... 1422 County Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs) ............................................................................. 1433 Municipal Emergency Operations Centers (EOC) .......................................................................... 1444 Back-up Route Alerting ................................................................................................................... 1455 Traffic I Access Control Points .............. , ........................................................................................ 1455 Pennsylavania State Police Traffic and Access Control ................... :................................................. 146 Reception Centers (Out of Sequence) ............................................................................................. 1456 Monitoring I Decontamination Centers (Out of Sequence) ............................................................. 1466 Mass Care Centers (Out of Sequence) ............................................................................................ 1466 Emergency Worker Monitoring I Decontamination Stations ........................................................ 1474 7 II. Post Plume Exercise .................................................................................................................. .14747 ATTACHMENT B -LISTING OF PRIOR ISSUES ........................................................................... 14848 88

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 2017 RADIOLOGICAL El\fERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE METHOD OF OPERATION Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station (TMI)

The facility normally uses off-watch section personnel to participate in the exercise. The plant's simulated events, radiation readings, and emergency classifications will trigger offsite exercise actions. A pre-approved exercise scenario will be used. TMI will notify the Commonwealth Watch and Warning Center and risk counties of emergency classifications.

Bureau of Radiation Protection (BRP)

Personnel from the Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection (BRP) will be present and participate in the following aspects of the exercise:

Plume Exercise - Commonwealth Resource Coordination Center Plume-Exercise - Exelon Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) and Technical Support Center (TSC).

Field Sampling Teams & Command Vehicle BRP personnel will be evaluated as participants in all areas.

In the event the scenario has no radiological release a report of Background Radiation by the Field Monitoring Team would be considered successful demonstration of the criterion.

PEMA Operations at Commonwealth Resource Coordination Center I PEMA Headquarters This "Method of Operation" Document includes activities for the Full-Scale Plume Exercise (April 11, 2017), and the "Out-of-Sequence Activities (April 11 and April 12, 2017).

Plume Exercise - April 11, 2017 PEMA Staff and Agency Representatives (AREPs) from designated state departments I agencies will comprise initial operations at the Commonwealth Resource Coordination Center (CRCC).

The CRCC will be evaluated during this exercise.

Plume Exercise - "Out-of-Sequence" Activities - April 11, 2017 The PEMA staff will disseminate exercise-related messages to the participating counties for dissemination to the participating school districts during the morning of April 11, 2017. The CRCC and County EOCs will participate, but will NOT be evaluated during the "Out-of-Sequence" component. PEMA personnel will serve as "observers" at the identified school districts.

"Out-of-Sequence" Activities -April.12, 2017 89

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan. Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station PEMA personnel will serve as "Observers" at the various field exercise locations during the "Out-of-Sequence" components the exercise. An exercise coordinator will remain in the CRCC.

The CRCC and counties will NOT be evaluated during the evening "Out~of-Sequence" component.

PEMA Area Office Operations The PEMA Area Offices (Hamburg -Eastern Area and Harrisburg- Central Area) will not be activated nor evaluated during this exercise. Selected staff of the Area Offices will serve as Liaison Officers to risk and support Counties as assigned or to the Command Post / Tactical Operations Center- Near Site. Liaison Officers are exercise participants.

Counties Designated to Participate Plume Phase Exercise April 11, 2017 The five risk counties (Cumberland, Dauphin, Lancaster, Lebanon, and York), .in coordination with PEMA, will demonstrate the capability to mobilize appropriate staff, activate their respective EOCs and implement emergency response operations to include sheltering and/or evacuation.

County government will provide direction and coordination to risk municipalities. The three .

support counties (Adams, Franklin, and Schuylkill) will participate in their assigned support roles. Actual sheltering or evacuation of the general public will be simulated.

Local Emergency Management All affected local municipalities, along with supporting agencies, will participate in the plume exercise. On a rotating basis, local municipalities will be federally evaluated as coordinated by PEMA and their associated county (once per 8 year cycle). They will demonstrate mobilization of staff, activation of their EOC, and implementation of emergency response operations. Some

  • municipalities may be evaluated on Back-up Route Alerting or Traffic and Access Control Point Operations (TCP/ACP). See Attachment A .section 1.A.2, 1.A.3, and 1.A.4 for those locations being federally evaluated.

PEMA Liaison Officers Liaison officers will be present at the participating risk I support county EOCs, the TMI Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), and the TMI Joint Information Center (TIC) to provide assistance, guidance, and support. These liaison officers will participate as players in the plume phase exercise on April 11, 2017.

Controllers A lead controller will be present in the CRCC. Controllers are not players. Controllers will provide pre-approved injects and information to the players, as appropriate, including radiological readings during the monitoring of personnel. Live radioactive sources will not be used.

Exception: Individuals tasked with the setup of portal monitoring equipment (if used) will use a 90

Unclassified Radio_logical Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station standard 1 micro curie Cesium 13 7 source for the purpose of conducting operational tests.

Additionally, appropriate test sources will be available and used to verify the operation of the monitoring/survey instruments per manufacturers' recommendations.

April 11, 2017 School Exercise-The offsite lead controller will provide injects to the CRCC who will provide the exercise injects to the schools via the counties.

April 11, 2017 Plume Exercise -The offsite lead controller will be located in the CRCC and will coordinate the exercise with the onsite lead controller to facilitate the exercise and determine when objectives have been met for termination.

April 12, 2017 Support Exercise.:__ The utility will provide controllers to the decontamination exercise locations.

Other locations will be controlled by PEMA Observers and I or county representatives as applicable.

PEMA Observers PEMA staff, qualified county emergency management personnel, and/or nuclear power plant personnel will b~ assigned, as required, to key locations for the purpose of observing, noting response actions and conditions, and recording observations for future use. Observers will not .

take an active part in the proceedings, but will interact with staff members to the extent necessary to fulfill their observer responsibilities. Coaching of players by observers is not permitted except to provide training to participants awaiting a re-demonstration. (Refer to paragraph XIV)

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Evaluators Federal evaluators will be present atthe risk and support count)' EOCs, identified risk municipal EOCs, and at appropriate field locations to evaluate player response to the actual and simulated events in the exercise scenario. FEMA will evaluate about one-fourth of the risk municipalities in Risk Counties as identified in this document.

It is agreed that for those agencies I organizations approved for exercise exemption, that full or limited participation is acceptable. However, their level of participation must be sufficient to ensure their respective evaluated partners (i.e. counties or municipalities) have the overall ability to perform their evaluated objectives. If through error or omission by the exempt agency/organization a serious performance issue results which negatively affects the play of the evaluated participant(s), the performance issue will be included in the After Action Report. In some instances, the exempted agency I organiz~tion may accept the issue rather than the evaluated participant if the fault lies with tp.e exempted agency I organization not fulfilling their obligation(s) relative to the level ofrequired participation.

Plume Exercise 91

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Out-of-Sequence Period (Morning of April 11, 2017): Federal evaluators will be present at the identified "out-of-sequence" demonstration sites to evaluate the ability of the public schools to respond to an exercise scenario. (Attachment A,Section I.A.I).

Plume Phase Exercise (Evening of April 11, 2017): Federal evaluators will be present at the CRCC and identified risk and support county EOCs to evaluate player response to the actual and simulated events in the exercise scenario. Additionally, one-quarter of the risk municipalities will be federally evaluated. As required, a "floating-evaluator" will be made available for the purpose of evaluating any ORO locations not scheduled to have a federal evaluator; but having a prior issue (Attachment A,Section I.A.2 thru I.A. 7).

Out-of-Sequence Period (Morning of April 12, 2017): Federal evaluators will be present at the identified PSP Access Control Point I Traffic Control Point (ACP I TCP) location, as identified in Attachment A,Section I.B.l.

Out-of-Sequence Period (Evening of April 12, 2017): Federal evaluators will be present at participating Reception Centers, Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Stations, Mass Care Shelters, and Monitoring and Decontamination Centers, as identified in Attachment A,Section I.B.2 thru I.B.5.

Other Out-of-Sequence Activities: Federal Evaluators will be present at the Mass Care Walk-Down locations on February 6, 2017 for Schuylkill County locations and on February 8, 2017 for the Dauphin County locations. In addition, an Out-of-Sequence demonstration is scheduled for March 7th for a number of York County School Districts.

Post Plume Exercise No post-plume phase exercise is scheduled during this evaluation.

Demonstration Windows In order to provide for more effective demonstrations, as well as to permit the release of volunteers from exercise play at a reasonable hour, periods of time (Demonstration Windows) have been designated during which specified actions will be accomplished I demonstrated.

The "demonstration windows" for this exercise are:

Plume Phase Exercise The federally evaluated out-of-sequence MS-1 hospital demonstrations were held as follows:

Good Samaritan Hospital-March 24, 2016, Hanover Hospital-June 23, 2016, Carlisle Regional Medical Center-May 24, 2016, and Gettysburg Hospital- October 12, 2016. Ephrata Hospital is an MS-1 Hospital for both 'FMI and Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station and will demonstrate on October 18, 2017.

The out-of-sequence exercise window for school demonstrations will be from 9:00 - 11 :00 a.m.

on April 11, 2017 except for locations with alternate demonstration windows Locations are specified within Attachment A,Section I.A.1.

92

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportllmproyement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station The out-of-sequence demonstration of reception centers, mass care centers, monitoring I

  • decontamination centers and emergency worker stations will be conducted from 7:00- 9:30 p.m.

on April 12, 2017 except for locations with alternate demonstration windows. Locations are specified within Attachment A,Section I.B.2 thru I.B.5.

The out-of-sequence interview of PSP ACPs I TCPs will be from 10:00 a.m. -12:00 noon on April 12, 2017. Locations are specified within Attachment A, Section LB .1.

State, County and Municipal BOC operations will be conducted on the evening of April 11, 2017.

(Please refer to the Extent of Play Attachment A,Section I.A.2 and I.A.3).

All demonstrations will commence promptly and, barring any complications, not continue beyond the time of the designated demonstration. window (Demonstration Tables, Attachment A). Any Municipal TCP demonstrations will occur in conjunction with Municipal BOC operations.

Post Plume Ingestion Exercise No post-plume phase exercise is scheduled during this evaluation.

Stand-Down All jurisdictions will request approval on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis prior to stand-down.

Upon completion of all requirements and confirming with the federal evaluator that all evaluation areas have been demonstrated and/or completed, the risk municipality EOCs may request approval from their county BOC to "stand-down."

Support counties may likewise request approval from the Commonwealth Resource Coordination Center to terminate the exercise upon completion of all evaluated objectives.

The risk county EOCs will remain operational until the exercise is officially terminated by the State in consultation with the federal evaluator. The Commonwealth Resource Coordination Center will issue an Exercise Termination Message. If county exercise components are demonstrated and completed portions of the BOC may be able to stand-down.

General Concepts An emergency plan is drafted to address the generally expected conditions of an emergency. Not everything in the emergency plan may be applicable for a given scenario. The main purpose of an emergency plan is to assemble sufficient expertise and officials so as to properly react to the events as they occur. The responders should not be so tied to a plan that they cannot take actions that are more protective of the public. Therefore, if, by not following the plan, the responders protect the public equally, as well as provided in the plan, it should be noted for possible modification of the plan, but not classified as a negative incident. Furthermore, if, by following the plan there is a failure to protect the public health and safety, it should be noted so that the plan can be modified and the appropriate negative assessment corrected.

Re-demonstrations Any activity that is not satisfactorily demonstrated may be re-demonstrated by the participants during the exercise, provided it does not negatively interfere with the exerciSe. Refresher training 93

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

Mter Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station may be. provided by the players, observers, and/or controllers. Evaluators are not permitted to provide refresher training. Re-demonstrations will be negotiated between the players, observers, controllers, and evaluators. PEMA may advise the RAC Chair prior to initiating any re-demonstrations. It is permissible to extend the demonstration window, within reason, to accommodate the re-demonstration. Activities corrected from a re-demonstration will be so noted.

94

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Gen~rating Station THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING. STATION 2017 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENT EVALUATION AREA 1 Emergency Operations Management Sub-element 1.a - Mobilization INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency personnel, and activate and staff emergency facilities.

Criterion l.a.1: OROs use effective procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency personnel and activate facilities in a timely manner (NUREG,;,0654 I FEMA-REP-1, A.I.a, e; A.3, 4; C.1, 4, 6; D.4; E.1, 2; H.3, 4)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual event, out of sequence evaluation, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to receive notification of an incident from the licensee; verify the notification, and contact, alert, and mobilize key emergency personnel in a timely manner, and demonstrate the ability to maintain and staff 24-hour operations. Twenty-four hour operations can be demonstrated during the exercise via rosters or shift changes or otherwise in an actual activation. Locafresponders and/or Tribal responders rriust demonstrate the ability to receive and/or initiate notification to the licensees or other respective emergency management organizations of an incident in a timely manner when they receive information from the licensee or alternate sources.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the activation of facilities for immediate use by mobilized personnel upon their arrival. Activation of facilities and staff, including those associated with the ICS, must be completed in accordance with ORO plans/procedures. The location and contact information for facilities included in the incident command must be available to all appropriate responding agencies and the NPP after these facilities have been activated.

Pre-positioning of emergency personnel is appropriate, in accordance with the Extent of Play Agreement, at those facilities located beyond a normal commuting distance from the individual's duty location or residence. This includes the staggered release of resources from an assembly area. Additionally, pre-positioning of staff for out-of-sequence demonstrations may be used in accordance with the Extent of Play Agreement.

The REP program does not evaluate Incident Command System tactical operations, only coordination among the incident command, the utility, and all appropriate OROs pursuant to plans I procedures.

Initial law enforcement, fire service, HAZMAT, and emergency medical response to the NPP site may impact the ability to staff REP functions. The ability to identify and request additional resources or 95

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station identify compensatory measures must be demonstrated. Exercises must also address the role of mutual aid in the incident, as appropriate. An integral part of the response to an HAB scenario at an NPP may also be within the auspices of the Federal Government (e.g., FBI, NRC, or DHS). Protocols for requesting Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement support must be demonstrated, as appropriate.

Any resources must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they can be contacted during an incident, if needed.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Pre-positioning of state emergency personnel (Liaison Officers) at the Emergency Operations Facility *

(EOF), the Utility Joint Information Center (TIC) and risk and support Counties is appropriate due to the commuting distance from the individual's duty location or residence. Risk counties I municipalities and support counties will conduct call-outs to demonstrate the mobilization of key personnel. The utility TIC will be evaluated for this drill.

  • in all instances, the demonstration of a shift change is NOT required. Twenty-four hour staffing will be demonstrated by means of a roster or staffing chart.
  • Actual calls (or pager notifications) will be made to the county I municipal EOC personnel for the Plume Phase exercise, April 11, 2017 per plans and procedures.

11 All out-of-sequence players will be pre-positioned and equipment will be demonstrated or shown to be in inventory (School District personnel, PSP TCP I ACP, Reception Centers, Emergency.

Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Stations Mass Care I Sheltering Centers and Monitoring and Decontamination Centers).

  • Individuals working in state facilities and county EOCs may be pre-positioned for the plume phase.
  • Other locations, including Municipal EOCs, will not pre-stage but will wait for notification of the emergency before staffing their duty location.

Sub-element 1.b - Facilities INTENT This sub-element derives from NUREG-0654, which provides that Offsite Response Organizations (ORO) have facilities to support the emergency response.

Criterion 1.b.l: Facilities are sufficient to support tlte emergency response.

(NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, H.3; G.3.a; J.10.lt; J.12; K.5.b)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual*

event, SAVs, or by out of sequence evaluations.

96

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Responsible OROs must demonstrate, no less than every eight years, the availability of facilities to support accomplishment of emergency operations. This includes all alternate and backup facilities.

Evaluations are typically performed for EOCs and ITCs, as well as other facilities such as reception/relocation centers._ Some of the areas evaluated within the facilities are adequate space,

. furnishings, lighting, restrooms, ventilation, access to backup power, and/or alternate facilities if required to support operations. Radio stations, laboratories, initial warning points and hospitals are not evaluated under l.b. l.

In addition, facilities will be evaluated for this criterion during the first biennial exercise after any new or substantial changes in structure, equipment, or mission that affect key capabilities, as outlined in respective emergency plans/proce.dures. A substantial change is one that has a direct effect or impact on emergency response operations performed in those facilities. Examples of substantial changes include modifying the size or configuration of an emergency operations center, adding more functions to a center, or changing the equipment available for use in a center.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Municipalities will demonstrate this criteria during each federal evaluation they receive (generally once per 8 year cycle) and counties will demonstrate this criteria once in each 8 year cycle unless new or substantial improvements occur.

Sub-element 1.c - Direction and Control INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to control their overall response to an emergency.

Criterion 1.c.1: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction and control to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible.

(NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, A.1.d; A.2.a, b; A.3; C.4, 6)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion niay be accomplished in a biennial or tabletop exercise.

Leadership personnel must demonstrate the ability to carry out the essential management functions of the response effort (e.g., keeping staff informed through periodic briefings and/or other means, coordinating with other OROs, and ensuring completion ofrequirements and requests). Leadership must demonstrate the ability to prioritize resource tasking and replace I supplement resources (e.g., through MOUs or other agreements) when faced with competing demands for finite resources. Any resources identified through LOA I MOUs must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they may be contacted during an incident, if needed.

97

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

None Sub-element 1.d - Communications Equipment - NIA INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs establish and oper~te reliable primary and backup communication systems to ensure communications with key emergency personnel at locations such as contiguous governments within the EPZ, Federal emergency response organizations, the licensee and its facilities, EOCs, fucident Command Posts, and FMTs.

Criterion J.d.J: At least two communic,ation systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriate locations. Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, F.J, 2)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion is accomplished initially in a baseline evaluation and subsequently in periodic testing and drills. System familiarity and use must be demonstrated as applicable in biennial and tabletop exercises, or iftheir use would be required, during an actual event OROs must demonstrate that a primary system, and at least one backup system for fixed facilities, is fully functional at all times. Communications systems are maintained and tested on a recurring basis throughout the assessment period and system status is available to all operators. Periodic test results and corrective actions are maintained on a real time basis. If a communications system or systems are not.

functional, but exercise performance is not affected, no exercise issue will be assessed.

Communications equipment and procedures for facilities and field units are used as needed for transmission and receipt of exercise messages. All facilities, FMTs, and incident command must have the capability to access at least one communication system that is independent of the commercial telephone system. Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to manage the communication systems and ensure that all message traffic is handled without delays that might disrupt emergency operations. OROs must ensure that a coordinated communication link for fixed and mobile medical support facilities exists.

Exercise scenarios may require the failure of a communication system and use of an alternate system, as negotiated in the Extent of Play Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

98

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

The plant will communicate to the risk counties and Commonwealth Watch and Warning Center (CRCC) utilizing the Automatic Ring Down (ARD) Telephone System (primary) and the commercial telephone system (secondary). Risk and support counties will intercommunicate with the CRCC via the commercial telephone system (primary), SEVAN (secondary) and other systems. In the event that the plant is unable to contact the CRCC via the Dedicated Automatic Ring Down Telephone, the Power Plant will contact the CRCC via the commercial telephone system. If the plant cannot contact the CRCC, the Power Plant will contact the Dauphin County EOC and Dauphin County EOC fulfill the role of primary contact until such time as communications with the CRCC can be made.

Risk counties will communicate with .their risk municipalities via public safety radio frequencies (EMA Radio), commercial telephone, fax, or Amateur Radio Communications (ARES I RACES) or other available means.

Bureau of Radiation Protection Field Teams will demonstrate two or more forms of communications.

Sub-element 1.e - Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations INTENT This sub-element derives from NUREG-0654 '; FEMA-REP-1, which provides that OROs have emergency equipment and supplies adequate to support the emergency response.

Criterion 1.e.J: Equipment, maps, displays, monitoring instruments, dosimetry, potassium iodide (KI) and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.

(NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-d, H. 7, JO; L 7, 8, 9; J.10.a, b, e; J.11, 12; K.3.a; K.5.b)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion is accomplished primarily through a baseline evaluation and subsequent periodic inspections.

A particular facility's equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with that facility's assigned role in the ORO's emergency operations plans. Use of maps and other displays is encouraged.

For non-facility based operations, the equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with the assigned operational role. At locations where traffic and access control personnel are deployed, appropriate equipment (e.g., vehicles, barriers, traffic cones, and signs) must be available, or their availability described.

Specific equipment and supplies that must be demonstrated under this criterion include KI inventories, dosimetry, and monitoring equipment, as follows:

KI: Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to maintain inventories of KI sufficient for use by: (1) emergency workers; (2) institutionalized individuals, as indicated in capacity lists for facilities; 99

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station and (3) where stipulated by the plans I procedures~ members of the general public (including transients) within the plume pathway EPZ. In addition, OROs must demonstrate provisions to make KI available to specialized response teams (e.g., civil support team, special weapons and tact.ics teams, urban search and rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified in plans I procedures. The plans I procedures must include the forms to be used I for documenting emergency worker ingestion of KI, as well as a mechanism for identifying emergency workers that have declined KI in advance. Consider carefully the placement of emergency workers that have declined KI in advance.

ORO quantities of dosimetry and KI available and storage locations(s) will be confirmed by physical inspection at the storage location(s) or through documentation of current inventory submitted during the exercise, provided in the Annual Letter of Certification (ALC) submission, and/or verified during a Site Area Visit (SAV). Available supplies of KI must be within the expiration date indicated on KI bottles or blister packs. As an alternative, the ORO may produce a letter from a certified private or state laboratory indicating that the KI supply remains 'potent, in accordance with U.S. Pharmacopoeia standards.

Dosimetry: Sufficient quantities of appropriate direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry and dosimeter chargers must be available for issuance to all emergency workers who will be dispatched to perform an ORO mission. In addition, OROs must demonstrate provisions to make dosimetry available to specialized response teams (e.g., civil support team, Special Weapons and Tactics Teams, urban search and rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified in plans I procedures.

Appropriate direct-reading dosimetry must allow an individual(s) to read the administrative reporting limits and maximum exposure limits contained in the ORO's plans I procedures.

Direct-reading dosimeters must be zeroed or operationally checked prior to issuance. The dosimeters must be inspected for electrical leakage at least annually and replaced when necessary. Civil Defense Victoreen Model 138s (CD V-138s) (0-200 mR), due to their documented history of electrical leakage problems, must be inspected for electrical leakage at least quarterly and replaced when necessary. This leakage testing will be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/or through an SAV.

Operational checks and testing of electronic dosimeters must be in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/or through an SAV.

Monitoring Instruments: All instruments must be inspected, inventoried, and operationally checked before each use. Instruments must be calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

Unmodified CDV-100 series instruments and other instruments without a manufacturer's -

recommendation must be calibrated annually. Modified CDV-700 uistruments must be calibrated in accordance with the recommendation of the modification manufacturer. A label indicating such calibration must be on each instrument or calibrated frequency can be verified by other means. In addition, instruments being used to measure activity must have a sticker affixed to their sides indicating the effective range of the readings. The range ofreadings documentation specifies the acceptable range of readings that the meter should indicate when it is response-checked using a standard test source.

For Field Monitoring Teams (FMTs), the instruments must be capable of measuring gamma exposure rates and detecting beta radiation. These instruments must be capable of measuring a range of activity and exposure, including radiological protection I exposure control of team members and detection of 100

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action ReporUlmprovement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station activity on air sample collection media, consistent with the intended use of the instrument and the ORO's plans I procedures. An appropriate radioactive. check source must be used to verify proper operational response for each low-range radiation measurement instrument (less than IR/hr) and for high-range instruments when available. If a source is not available for a high-range instrument, a procedure must exist to operationally test the instrument before entering an area where only a high-range instrument can make useful readings.

In areas where portal monitors are used, the OROs must set up and operationally check the monitor(s).

The monitor( s) must conform to the standards set forth in the Contamination Monitoring Standard for a Portal Monitor Used for Emergency Response, FEMA-REP-21(March1995) or in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

Mutual Aid Resources: If the incoming resources arrive with their own equipment (i.e., monitors and/or dosimetry), they will be evaluated by REP Program standards. FEMA will not inventory equipment that is not part of the REP Program. If an agency has a defined role in the REP Plan, they are subject to the planning process and standards, as well as the guidance of the Manual.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Radiological Survey Instruments are calibrated per manufactures recommendations. Support counties do not have DRDs, or KI, but those responsible for reception centers and/or monitoring' and decontamination centers will have PRDs. Simulated PRDs may be used for the evaluation.

Neither CDV-700 nor CDV-138 instruments are in use in the area.

Evaluation of KI quantities will be verified using inventory sheets. KI will not be removed from storage locations and boxes I packages will not be opened, however, lot numbers and expiration dates should be visible for inspection. KI questions will be addressed through interviews.

Annual Direct Reading Dosimeter leakage testing verification will be available to the evaluator.

Reception Centers shall be evaluated on their ability to use maps or other documentation to direct evacuating persons to the correct Monitoring I Decontamination Centers and/or Mass Care Centers (as Applicable). If Reception Centers are collocated with Monitoring I Decontamination centers and Mass Care Centers the use of maps or documents to provide direction does not apply.

101

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station EVALUATION AREA2 Protective Action Decision-Making Sub-element 2.a - Emergency Worker Exposure Control INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-l, which requires that OROs have the capability to assess and control the radiation exposure received by emergency workers and have a decision chain in place, as specified in the ORO's plans I procedures, to authorize emergency worker exposure limits to be exceeded for specific missions.

Radiation exposure limits for emergency workers are the recommended accumulated dose limits or exposure rates that emergency workers may be permitted to incur during an emergency. These limits include any pre-established administrative reporting limits [that take into consideration Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) or organ-specific limits] identified in the ORO's plans I procedures.

Criterion 2.a.1: OROs use a decision-making process, considering relevant factors and appropriate coordination, to ensure that an exposure control system, including the use of KI, is in place for emergency workers, including provisions to authorize radiation exposure in excess of administrative limits or protective action guides. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, C.6; J.10. e,f; K.4)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be assessed concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise.

OROs authorized to send emergency workers into the plume exposure pathway EPZ must demonstrate a capability to comply with emergency worker exposure limits based on their emergency plans I procedures.

Participating OROs must also demonstrate the capability to make decisions concerning authorization of exposure levels in excess of pre-authorized levels and the number of emergency workers receiving radiation doses above pre-authorized levels. This would include providing Kl and dosimetry in a timely manner to emergency workers dispatched onsite to support plant incident assessment and mitigating actions, in accordance with respective plans I procedures.

As appropriate, OROs must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the distribution and administration of Kl as a protective measure for emergency workers, based on their plans I procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established PAGs for Kl administration.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

102

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action ReporUimprovement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Radiological briefings (which may be. supported by video) will be provided to address exposure limits, procedures to replace those personnel approaching exposure limits and how permission to exceed limits is obtained from the municipality and county. Emergency workers will also be briefed on when to take KI and on whose authority. Distribution of KI to emergency workers will be simulated. The Commonwealth, under direction of the Department of Health, will authorize use of KI when radiological conditions warrant its use. If the scenario has no potential for a radiological release, the decision on the distribution and administration of KI as a protective measure for emergency workers and the authorization process for emergency workers to exceed pre-authorized levels can be addressed through an interview.

The completion of one "Dosimetry-KI Report Form" will be demonstrated at locations issuing dosimetry.

The decision regarding protective actions and KI is made at the state level and implemented by downstream organizations.

Bureau of Radiation Protection (BRP) field monitoring and Radiation Rapid Response Vehicle teams will demonstrate emergency worker exposure control as per their procedures.

Sub-element 2.b. - Radiological Assessment and Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) and Decisions (PADs) for the Plume Phase of the Emergency INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to independently project integrated dose from projected or actual dose rates and compare these estimates to the PAGs. *

  • OROs rn,ust have the capability to choose, among a range of protective actions, those most appropriate in a given emergency. OROs base these choices on PAGs from their plans I procedures or EPA's Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents and other criteria, such as plant conditions, licensee PARs, coordination of PADs with other political jurisdictions (e.g., other affected OROs and incident command), availability of in-place shelter, weather conditions, and situations, to include HAB incidents, the threat posed by the specific hostile action, the affiliated response, and the effect of an evacuation on the threat response effort, that create higher than normal risk from general population evacuation.

Criterion 2.b.1: Appropriate PAR.s are based on available information on plant conditions, field monitoring data, and licensee and ORO dose projections, as well as knowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions. (NUREG-0654IFEMA-REP-1,110 and Supplement 3) 103

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

  • Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise.

During the initial stage of the emergency response, following notification of plant conditions that may warrant offsite protective actions, the ORO must demonstrate the capability to use appropriate means, described in the plans /*procedures, to develop PARs for decision-makers based on available information and recommendations provided by the licensee, as well as field monitoring data, if available. The ORO must also consider any release and meteorological data provided by the licensee.

The ORO must demonstrate a reliable capability to independently validate dose projections. The types of calculations to be demonstrated depend on the data available and the need for assessments to support the PARs must be appropriate to the scenario. In all cases, calculation of projected dose must be.

demonstrated. Projected doses must be related to quantities and units of the PAG to which they will be compared. PARs must be promptly transmitted to decision-makers in a pre-arranged format.

When the licensee and ORO projected doses differ by more than a factor of 10, the ORO and licensee must determine the source of the difference by discussing input data and assumptions, using different models, or exploring possible reasons. Resolution of these differences must be incorporated into the PARs if timely and appropriate. The ORO must demonstrate the capability to use any additional data to refine projected doses and exposure rates and revise the associated PARs.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMANegotiated Extent of Play:

BRP will validate plant dose projections and coordinate resolution of differences if more than a factor of 10. If the scenario has no radiological release, or potential of a radiological release, the decision-making process used to make PADs can be addressed through an interview.

The decision regarding protective actions and KI is made at the state level and implemented by downstream organizations.

Criterion 2. b.2: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriate factors and necessary coordination is use,d to make PADs for the general public (including the recommendation for the use of Kl, if ORO policy}. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1,A.3; C.4, 6; D.4; J.9; J.10.f, m)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise.

104

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station OROs must have the capability to make both initial and subsequent PADs. OROs must demonstrate the capability to make initial PADs in a timely manner approprfate to the incident, based on information from the licensee, assessment of plant status and potential or actual releases, other available information related to the incident, input from appropriate ORO authorities (e.g., incident command), and PARs froin the utility and ORO staff. In addition, a subsequent or alternate PAD may be appropriate if various conditions (e.g., an HAB incident, weather, release timing and magnitude) pose undue risk to an evacuation, or if evacuation may disrupt the efforts to respond to a hostile action.

OROs must demonstrate the ability to obtain supplemental resources (e.g., mutual aid) necessary to implement a PAD iflocal law enforcement, fire service, HAZMAT, and emergency medical resources are utilized to augment response to the NPP site or other key infrastructure.

Dose assessment personnel may provide additional PARs based on the subsequent dose projections, field monitoring data, or information on plant conditions. In addition, incident command must provide input regarding considerations for subsequent PARs based on the magnitude of the ongoing_threat, the response, and/or site conditions. The decision-makers must demonstrate the capability to change protective actions based on the combination of all these factors.

If the ORO.has determined that KI will be used as a protective measure for the general public under offsite plans I procedures, then it must demonstrate*the capability to make decisions on the distribution and administration of KI to supplement sheltering and evacuation. This decision must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established PAG for KI administration. The KI decision-making process must involve close coordination with appropriate assessment and decision-making staff.

If more than one ORO is involved in decision making, all appropriate OROs must communicate and coordinate PADs with each other. In addition, decisions must be coordinated I communicated with incident command. OROs must demonstrate the capability to communicate the results of decisions to all the affected locations.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

The Commonwealth, in developing a PAD, will base the decision upon plant recommendation and condition, confirmation and advice ofBRP, environmental data, impediments, and other factors that may impact the decision. If the scenario has no radiological release, or potential of a radiological release, the decision-making process used to make PADs or KI decisions can be addressed through an interview.

The decision regarding protective actions (by the Senior State Official) and KI (by the Secretary of the Dept. of Health) is made at the state level and implemented by state agencies and downstream organizations. Decisions are coordinated with the affected counties.

105

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Sub-element 2.c - PAD Consideration 'for the Protection of Persons with Disabilities and Access I Functional Needs INTENT This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, which requires that OROs have the capability to determine precautionary and/or protective action decisions, including evacuation, sheltering, and use of KI, if applicable, for groups of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs (e.g.,

hospitals, nursing homes, correctional facilities, schools, licensed daycare centers, mobility-impaired individuals, and transportation-dependent individuals). The focus is on those groups of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs that are or potentially will be affected by a radiological release fromanNPP.

Criterion 2.c.1: Protective action decisions are made, as appropriate, for groups ofpersons with disabilities and access /functional needs. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, D.4; J.9; J.10.d, e)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise that would include the use of plant conditions transmitted from the licensee.

Usually it is appropriate to implement evacuation in areas where doses are projected to exceed the lower end of the range of PAGs, except for incidents where there is a high-risk environmental condition or where high-risk groups (e.g., the immobile or infirm) are involved. In these cases, factors that must be considered include weather conditions, shelter availability, availability of transportation assets, risk of evacuation versus risk from the avoided dose, and precautionary school evacuations. In addition, decisions must be coordinated I communicated with the incident command. In situations where an institutionalized population cannot be evacuated, the ORO must consider use of KI.

Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify all public school systems I districts of emergency conditions that are expected to or may necessitate protective actions for students.

Demonstration requires that the OROs actually contact public school systems I districts during the exercise.

In accordance with plans I procedures, OROs and/or officials of public school systems I districts must demonstrate the capability to make prompt decisions on protective actions for students. The decision-making process, including any preplanned strategies for protective actions for that Emergency Classification Levels (ECLs ), must consider the location of students at the time (e.g., whether the students are still at home, en route to school, or at school).

Since other agencies place requirements on hospitals to prepare for contaminated patients, the REP Program has no need to evaluate host hospitals, nor does the ORO have the responsibility to provide training or dosimetry. Additionally, hospital evacuation plans do not need to be reviewed or tested by the REP program.

106

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station All activities must be based on the ORO 's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

PEMA will provide decision making regarding special populations. Risk counties and/or state agencies will provide by interview or simulation the notification to the special populations regarding the decision.

If the scenario has no radiological release, or potential of a radiological release, the decision-making process used to make P ARs can be addressed through an interview.

The decision regarding protective actions and Kl is made at the state level and implemented by downstream organizations .

. Sub-element 2.d. - Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making for the lng~stion Exposure Pathway INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the means to assess the radiological consequences for the ingestion exposure pathway, relate them to the appropriate PAGs, and make timely, appropriate PADs to mitigate exposure from the pathway.

During an incident at an NPP, a release ofradioactive material may contaminate water supplies and agricultural products in the surrounding areas. Any such contamination would likely occur during the plume phase of the incident and, depending on the nature of the release, could impact the ingestion pathway for weeks or years.

Criterion 2.d.l: Radiological consequences for the ingestion pathway are assessed and appropriate PADs are made based on the ORO's planning criteria. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, A.3; Cl, 4; D.4; J.9, 11)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licen*see exercise and may be demonstrated in a full-scale, functional or tabletop exercise that would include the use of plant conditions transmitted from the licensee.

OROs are expected to take precautionary actions to protect food and water supplies, or to minimize exposure to potentially contaminated water and food, in accordance with their respective plans I procedures. Often OROs initiate such actions based on criteria related to the facility's ECLs. Such actions may include recommendations to place milk animals on stored feed and use protected water supplies.

107

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile- Island Nuclear Generating Station The ORO must use its procedures to assess the radiological consequences of a release on the food and water supplies, such as the development of a sampling plan. The ORO's assessment must include evaluation of the radiological analyses ofrepresentative samples of water? food, and other ingestible substances oflocal interest from potentially impacted areas; characterization of the releases from the facility; and the extent of areas potentially impacted by the release. During this assessment, OROs must consider use of agricultural and watershed data within the 50-mile EPZ. The radiological impacts on the food and water must then be compared to the appropriate ingestion PAGs contained in the ORO' s plans I procedures. The plans I procedures contain PAGs based on specific dose commitment criteria or on criteria as recommended by current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. Timely and appropriate recommendations must be provided to the ORO decision-makers group for implementation decisions. OROs may also include a comparison of taking or not taking a given action on the resultant ingestion pathway dose commitments.

The ORO must demonstrate timely decisions to minimize radiological impacts from the ingestion pathway, based on the given assessments and other information. Any such decisions must be communicated and, to the extent practical, coordinated with neighboring OROs. These decisions include tracking agricultural products entering and leaving the EPZ. Demonstration of plans and procedures which use traffic access control points to track agricultural products entering and leaving the EPZ may be conducted through interview.

OROs will use Federal resources., as identified in the Nuclear/Ra~iological Incident Annex of the NRF and other resources (e.g., compacts or nuclear insurers), as necessary. Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other participating resources.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

This sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. This element was demonstrated during the Post Plume Exercise conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

Sub-element 2.e. -Radiological Assessment and Decision Making Concerning Post-Plm~1e Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to make decisions on post-plume phase relocation, reentry, and return of the general public.

These decisions are essential for protection of the public from direct long-term exposure to deposited radioactive materials from a severe incident at an NPP.

108

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Criterion 2.e.1: Timely post-plume phase relocation, reentry, and return decisions are made and coordinated as appropriate, based on assessments of the radiological conditions and criteria in the ORO's plan and/or procedures. (NUREG-06541 FEMA-REP-1, LIO; J.9; K.3.a; M.1)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstrated in a biennial or tabletop exercise that would include the use of plant conditions transmitted from the licensee.

Relocation: OROs must demonstrate the capability to estimate integrated dose in contaminated areas and compare these estimates with PAGs; apply decision criteria for relocation of those individuals in the general public who have not been evacuated, but where actual or projected doses are in excess of relocation PAGs; and control access to evacuated and restricted area~. OROs will make decisions for relocating members of the evacuated public who lived in areas that now have residual radiation levels in excess of the PAGs. Determination of areas to be restricted must be based on factors such as the mix of radionuclides in deposited materials, calculated exposure rates versus the PAGs, and analyses of vegetation and soil field samples.

Reentry: Decisions must be made on location of control points and policies regarding access and exposure control for emergency workers and members of the general public who need to temporarily enter the evacuated area to perform specific tasks or missions.

Examples of control procedures are the assignment of, or checking for, direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry for emergency workers; questions regarding an individual's objectives, locations expected to be visited, and associated timeframes; availability of maps and plots of radiation exposure rates; and advice on areas to avoid. Control procedures also include monitoring of individuals, vehicles, and equipment; the implementation of decision criteria regarding decontamination; and proper disposition of emergency worker dosimetry and maintenance of emergency worker radiation exposure records.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to develop a strategy for authorized reentry of individuals into the restricted zone(s), based on established decision criteria. OROs must demonstrate the capability to modify those policies for security purposes (e.g., police patrols), maintenance of essential services (e.g., fire protection and utilities), .and other critical functions. They must demonstrate the capability to use decision-making criteria in allowing access to the restricted zone by the public for various reasons, such as to maintain property (e.g,, to care for farm animals or secure machinery for storage) or retrieve important possessions. Coordinated policies for access and exposure control must be developed among all agencies with roles to perform in the restricted zone(s). OROs must demonstrate the capability to establish policies for provision of dosimetry to all individuals allowed to reenter the restricted zone(s). The extent to which OROs need to develop policies on reentry will be determined by scenario events.

Return: OROs must demonstrate the capability to implement policies concerning return of members of the public to areas that were evacuated during the plume phase (i.e., permitting populations that were previously evacuated to reoccupy their homes and businesses on an unrestricted basis). OROs must base decisions on environmental data and political boundaries or physical I geological features, which allow identification of the boundaries of areas to which members of the general public may return. Return is permitted to the boundary of the restricted area(s) that is based on the relocation PAG.

109

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

  • After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Other factors that the ORO must consider ip. decision-making include conditions that permit caricellation of the ECL and relaxation of associated restrictive measures. OROs must base return recommendations on measurements of radiation from ground deposition. OROs must-have the capability to identify services and facilities that require restoration within a few days and to identify the procedures and resources for their restoration. Examples of these services and facilities are medical and social services, utilities, roads, schools, and intermediate-term housing for relocated persons.

All' activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

This sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. This element was demonstrated during the Post Plume Exercise conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

110

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station EVALUATION AREA 3 Protective Action Implementation Sub-element 3.a-Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to provide for the following: distribution, use, collection, and processing of direct-reading dosimetry and permanent record dosimetry; reading of direct-reading dosimetry by emergency workers at appropriate frequencies; maintaining a radiation dose record for each ¥mergency worker; establishing a decision chain or authorization procedure for emergency workers to incur radiation exposures in excess of the PAGs, and the capability to provide KI for emergency workers, always applying the as low as is reasonably achievable principle as appropriate.

Criterion 3.a.1: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, Kl, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans I procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. OROs maintain appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI to emergency workers. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, J.1 O.e; K.3.a, b; K.4)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial or tabletop exercise.

Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that would fully demonstrate technical proficiency.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide emergency workers (including supplemental resources) with the appropriate direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry, dosimeter chargers, KI, and instructions on the use of these items. For evaluation purposes, appropriate direct-reading dosimetry is defined as dosimetry that allows an individual(s) to read the administrative reporting limits that are pre-established at a level low enough to consider subsequent calculation o{TEDE and maximum exposure limits, for those emergency workers involved in lifesaving activities, contained in the ORO's plans I procedures.

Each emergency worker must have basic knowledge of radiation exposure limits as specified in the ORO's plans I procedures. If supplemental resources are used, they must be provided with just-in-time training to ensure basic knowledge ofradiation exposure control. Emergency workers must demonstrate procedures to monitor and record dosimeter readings and manage radiological exposure control.

During a plume phase exercise, emergency workers must demonstrate the procedures to be followed when administrative exposure limits and tum-back values are reached. The emergency worker must report accumulated exposures during the exercise as indicated in the plans I procedures. OROs must demonstrate the actions described in the plans I procedures by determining whether to replace the worker, authorize the worker to incur additional exposures, or take other actions. If exercise play does not require emergency workers to seek authorizations for additional exposure, evaluators must interview at least two workers to determine their knowl~dge of whom to contact in case authorization is needed, and at what 111

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station exposure levels. Workers may use any available resources (e.g., written procedures and/or coworkers) in providing responses.

Although it is desirable for all emergency workers to each have a direct-reading dosimeter, there may be situations where team members will be in close proximity to each other during the entire mission. In such cases, adequate control of exposure can be achieved for all team members using one direct-reading dosimeter worn by the team leader. Emergency workers assigned to low-exposure rate fixed facilities (e.g., EOCs and communications center within the EPZ, reception centers, and counting laboratories) may have individual direct-reading dosimeters or they may be monitored using group dosimetry (i.e., direct-reading dosimeters strategically placed in the work area). Each team member must still have his or her own permanent record dosimetry. Individuals authorized by the ORO to reenter an evacuated area during the plume _(emergency) phase, must be limited to the lowest radiological exposure commensurate with completing their missions.

OROs may liave administrative limits lower than EPA-400-R-92-001 dose limits for emergency workers performing various services (e.g., life saving, protection of valuable property, all activities). OROs must ensure that the process used to seek authorization for exceeding dose limits does not negatively impact the capability to respond to an incident where life saving and/or protection of valuable property may require an urgent response.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish distribution of.KI to emergency workers consistent with decisio.ns made. OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of emergency workers who have ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s) they did so. Ingestion of KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is voluntary. For evaluation purposes, the actual ingestion of.KI shall not be performed. OROs must demonstrate the capability to formulate and disseminate instructions on using KI for those advised to take it. Emergency workers must demonstrate basic knowledge of procedures for using KI whether or not the scenario drives the implementation of.KI use. This can be accomplished by an interview with the evaluator.

All activities must be.based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Radiological briefings will be provided to address exposure limits, procedures to replace personnel approaching limits, and how permission to exceed limits is obtained from the municipality and county.

Emergency workers will also be briefed on when to take KI and on whose authority: Distribution of KI will.

be simulated.

OROs should also demonstrate the use of all applicable dosimetry forms. The completion of one "Dosimetry-KI Report Forqi" will be demonstrated.

At any time, players may ask other players or supervisors to clarify radiological information.

In Pennsylvania, emergency workers outside of the EPZ do not have tum back values.

112

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Evaluation of emergency worker KI quantities will be verified using inventory sheets. KI will not be removed from storage locations and boxes will not be opened. KI questions will be addressed through interviews.

Personnel assigned to operate Monitoring I Decontamination centers and stations are not issued DRDs or KI since the centers I stations are located outside the EPZ. Personnel who may come into contact with contaminated persons, equipment, and vehicles should be issued PRDs._Simulated PRDs with mock serial numbers may be used to simulate issue.

Emergency workers who are assigned to low exposure rate areas, e.g., at counting laboratories, emergency operations centers, and communications centers,,may have individual permanent record

.dosimeters or they may be monitored by area dosimeters strategically placed in the work area. In Pennsylvania this will be accomplished through the use of an area kit. The area kit process is explained in state, county and municipal plans.

Standard issue of dosimetry and potassium iodide for each category of emergency worker is as follows:

Category A: 1 PRD, 1 DRD, and 1 unit of KI Category B: 1 PRD and 1 unit ofK1 (Area Kit includes 2 DRDs)

Category C: 1 PRD All locations that have dosimetry equipment indicated within their Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP), will make the dosimetry equipment (and KI) available for inspection by the Federal Evaluator. In order to demonstrate an understanding of the use of the dosimetry equipment, KI and associated forms; the location need only remove and distribute I issue a maximum of six (6) units of dosimetry from their inventory. Simulation PRDs with mock serial numbers and simulated KI may be issued. The location will demonstrate filling out a minimum of one (1) Dosimetry I KI Report Form.

Sub-element 3.b - Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the General Public INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to provide KI for institutionalized individuals, and, if in the plans I procedures, to the general public for whom immediate evacuation may not be feasible, very difficult, or significantly delayed.

While it is necessary for OROs to have the capability to provide KI to institutionalized individuals, providing KI to the general public is an ORO option and must be reflected as such in ORO plans I

'procedures. Provisions must include the availability of adequate quantities, storage, and means of distributing KI.

Criterion 3.b.l: KI and appropriate instructions are available if a decision to recommend use of KI is made. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration ofKI for institutionalized individuals and the general public is maintained. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, J.10.e,j) 113

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial or tabletop exercise.

Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that would fully demonstrate technical proficiency.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to make KI available to institutionalized individuals, and, where provided for in their plans I procedures, to members of the general public. OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish distribution of KI consistent with decisions made. OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of institutionalized individuals who have ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s) they were instructed to ingest KI. Ingestion of KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is voluntary. For evaluation purposes, the actual ingestion of KI shall not be performed. OROs must demonstrate the capability to formulate and disseminate instructions on using KI for those advised to take it.

If a recommendation is made for the general public to take KI, appropriate information must be provided to the public by the means of notification specified in the ORO's plans I procedures.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted ~hove or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Within Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Department of Health is responsible for distribution of KI to the general public located within the EPZ. Pre-distribution is accomplished on an annual basis.

Pennsylvania does not distribute KI at reception centers.

Counties which do not have institutionalized individuals ate not evaluated for this criterion.

Sub-element 3.c - Implementation of Protective Actions for Persons with Disabilities and Access I Functional Needs INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement PADs, including_ evacuation and/or sheltering, for all persons with disabilities and access I functional needs. The focus is on those persons with disabilities and access I functional needs

. that are (or potentially will be) affected by a radiological release from an NPP.

Criterion 3.c.1: Protective action decisions are implementedfor persons with disabilities and access I functional needs other than schools within areas subject to protective actions. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, J.10.c, d, e, g) 114

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify (i.e., provide PARs and emergency information and instructions to) persons with disabilities and access I functional needs, including hospitals I medical facilities, nursing homes, correctional facilities, and mobility-impaired and transportation-dependent individuals. OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide for persons with disabilities and access I functional needs in accordance with plans I procedures.

Contact with persons with disabilities and access I functional needs and reception facilities may be actual or simulated, as agreed to in the Extent of Play. Some contacts with transportation providers must be actually contacted, as negotiated in the Extent of Play. All actual and simulated contacts must _be logged.

Since other agencies place requirements on hospitals to prepare for contaminated patients, the REP Program has no need to evaluate host hospitals, nor does the ORO have the responsibility to provide training or dosimetry. Additionally, hospital evacuation plans do not need to be reviewed or tested by the REP progi:am.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Lists of persons with disabilities and access I functional needs including name, address, contact information, and description of need shall be maintained at their respective municipal BOC (based upon residential jurisdiction). Copies of these lists will not be provided to the evaluators; however, evaluators will be allowed to inspect the lists during the exercise.

Evaluators may ask, by interview, about the transportation plans concerning transportation, staging, source of vehicles, radiological protection of the drivers/emergen\)y workers, and routes or assignments of vehicles for transportation dependent individuals and transportation of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs. No buses or drivers will be mobilized.

Initial contact, by the county, with special populations (hospitals, nursing homes and county correctional facilities) may be actual. All subsequent calls will be simulated. Actual contacts (up to two per Risk County) will be made with transportation providers per the county. All actual and simulated contacts should be logged.

115

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Criterion 3.c.2: OR Os I School Officials implement protective actions for schools. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, J.10.c, d, e, g)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial or tabletop exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

School systems I districts (these include public and private schools, kindergartens, preschools, and licensed day care) must demonstrate the ability to implement PADs for students. The demonstration must be made as follows: each school system I district within the 10 mile EPZ must demonstrate implementation of protective actions. At least one school per affected system I district must participate in the demonstration. Canceling the school day, dismissing early, or sheltering in place must be simulated by describing to evaluators the procedures that would be followed. If evacuation is the implemented protective action, all activities to coordinate and l?Omplete the evacuation of students to reception centers, congregate care centers, or host schools may actually be demonstrated or accomplished through an interview process.

  • If accomplished through an interview, appropriate school personnel including decision-making officials (e.g., schools' superintendent I principals and transportation director I bus dispatchers), and at least one bus driver (and the bus driver's escort, if applicable) must be available to demonstrate knowledge of their role(s) in the evacuation of school children. Communications capabilities between school officials and the buses, if required by the plans I procedures, must be verified.

Officials of the school system(s) must demonstrate the capability to develop and provide timely information to OROs for use in messages to parents, the general public, and the media on the status of protective actions for schools.

If a school facility has emergency plans as a condition of licensing, those plans may be submitt~d to FEMA review in place of demonstration or interview pursuant to the ORO' s plans I procedures as negotiated in the Extent of Play Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

School students will not be involved during the exercise. Actions and activities associated with the demonstration of Criterion 3 .c.2 will be limited to the School District Administration key personnel, evaluated schools, and the applicable county. Evacuation of students will be conducted through an interview process with School District personnel or the building principal. School administration will receive notifications of the incident from the county and will make appropriate decisions for and coordinate the responses of their schools.

Although a bus driver should be available for interview the role of the bus driver may be conducted through an interview with school or transportation officials (or designee) if a bus driver is not available.

Actual demonstration of the bus route is not required and will not be demonstrated. Maps or route descriptions will be available for illustration purposes.

Risk county school plans do not require communications between the school and vehicles. Bus drivers are not considered emergency workers and therefore do not require dosimetry.

Private schools, private kindergartens, and day care centers do not participate in REP exercises. However, OROs will be prepared to show evaluators lists of these facilities that they will contact in the event of an emergency in accordance with plans and procedures. Any simulated contacts will be logged.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement_ Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Sub-element 3.d. - Implementation of Traffic and Access Control INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement protective action plans I procedures, including relocation and restriction of access to evacuated I sheltered areas. This sub-element focuses on selecting, establishing, and staffing of traffic and access control points, and removal of impediments to the flow of evacuation traffic.

Criterion 3.d.I: Appropriate traffic and access control is established Accurate instructions are provided to traffic and access control personnel. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.J, 4; J.10.g,j)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual event, staff assistance visit, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to select, establish, and staff appropriate traffic and access control points consistent with current conditions and PADs (e.g., evacuating, sheltering, and relocation) in a timely manner. OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide instructions to traffic and access control staff on actions to take when modifications in protective action strategies necessitate changes in evacuation patterns or in the area(s) where access is controlled.

Traffic and access control staff must demonstrate accurate knowledge of their roles and responsibilities, including verifying emergency worker identification and access authorization to the affected areas, as per the Extent of Play Agreement. These capabilities may be demonstrated by actual deployment or by interview, in accordance with the Extent of Play Agreement.

In instances where OROs lack authority necessary to control access by certain types of traffic (e.g., rail, water, and air traffic); they must demonstrate the capability to contact the state or Federal agencies that have the needed authority, as agreed upon in the Extent of Play Agreement'.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

State and Municipal Traffic and Access control will be demonstrated by interview at the applicable Barracks or EOC of jurisdiction and include instruction to staff appropriate for plans and conditions (PAD). The traffic I access control personnel will not be deployed to the traffic I access control point(s). If the designated assignment is a location within the EPZ, a radiological briefmg will be provided to the assigned individuals. .

Reception Centers shall provide a traffic control plan for the location being evaluated.

117

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Criterion 3.d.2: Impediments to evacuation are identified and resolved. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, J.10.k)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual event, staff assistance visit, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to identify and take appropriate actions concerning impediments to evacuation. In demonstrating this capability, the impediment must remain in place during the evacuation such that re-routing of traffic is required, and must result in the decision-making and coordination with the JIC to communicate the alternate route to evacuees leaving the area. Where, due to the specifics of the scenario or jurisdiction, the impediment cannot be located on an evacuation route, it must be located so as to impact the evacuation. Where not possible, actual dispatch of resources need not be physically de1llonstrated; however, all contacts, actual or simulated, must be logged.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

County EOCs will demonstrate the ability to identify and take appropriate actions concerning impediments to evacuation by inject or interview. Actual dispatch ofresources to deal with impediments, such as tow trucks, need not be demonstrated; however, simulated contacts will be logged. If the scenario does not lead to evacuation the criteria shall be deemed complete ifthe ORO can describe to the evaluator the actions they would take to overcome a major traffic impediment during an evacuation and how such actions would be communicated to the public and affected OROs.

(Risk counties only)

Sub-element 3.e - Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 / FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement protective actions, based on criteria recommended by current FDA guidance, for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ (i.e., the area within an approximate 50-mile radius of the NPP).

This sub-element focuses on those actions required for implementation of protective actions.

Criterion 3.e.1: The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use of adequate information regarding water, food supplies, milk, and agricultural production within the ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone for implementation ofprotective actions. NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.l, 4; J.11) 118

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to secure and use current information on the locations of dairy farms, meat and poultry producers, fisheries, fruit growers, vegetable growers, grain producers, food processing plants, and water supply intake points to implement protective actions within the EPZ.

OROs use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear I Radiological Incident Annex, and other resources (e.g., compacts, nuclear insurers), if available. Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Th~s sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. This element was demonstrated during the Post Plume Exercise conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

Criterion 3.e.2: Appropriate measures, strategies, and pre-printed instructional material are developed for implementing protective action decisions for contaminated water, food products, milk, and agricultural production. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, G.l, J.9, 11)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

OROs must demonstrate the development of measures and strategies for implementation of ingestion exposure pathway EPZ protective actions by formulating protective action information for the general public and food producers and processors. Demonstration of this ci:iterion includes either pre-distributed public information material in the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ or the capability for rapid reproduction and distribution of appropriate reproduction-ready information and instructions to pre:..

determined individuals and businesses.

OROs must also demonstrate the capability to control, restrict, or prevent distribution of contaminated food by commercial sectors. Exercise play must include demonstration of communications and coordination among organizations to implement protective actions. Field play of implementation a9tivities may be simulated. For example, communications and coordination with agencies responsible for enforcing food controls within the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ must be demonstrated, but actual communications with food producers and processors may be simulated.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

119

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

This sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. This element was demonstrated during the Post Plume Exercise conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

Sub-element 3.f - Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement plans, procedures, and decisions for post-plume phase relocation, reentry, and return. Implementation of these decisions is essential for protecting the public from direct long-term exposure to deposited radioactive materials from a severe incident at a commercial NPP.

Criterion 3.f.l: Decisions regarding controlled reentry, relocat!on, and return of individuals during the post-plume phase are coordinated with appropriate organizations and implemented. (NUREG-06541 FEMA-REP-1, E.7; J.10.j; J.12; K.5.b; M.1, 3)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial or tabletop exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

Relocation: OROs must demonstrate the capability to coordinate and implement decisions concerning relocation of individuals located in radiologically contaminated areas who were not previously evacuated.

Such individuals must be relocated to an area(s) where radiological contamination will not expose the general public to doses that exceed the relocation PAGs. OROs must also demonstrate the capability to provide for short- or long-term relocation of evacuees who lived in an area(s) that has residual radiation levels above the (first-, second-, and 50-year) PAGs.

Areas of consideration must include the capability of OROs to communicate with other OROs regarding timing of actions, notification of the population of procedures for relocation, and notification of, and advice for, evacuated individuals who will be converted to relocation status in situations where they will not be able to return to their homes due to high levels of contamination. OROs must also demonstrate the capability to communicate instructions to the public regarding relocation decisions and intermediate-term housing for relocated persons.

Reentry: OROs must demonstrate the capability to control reentry and exit of individuals who are authorized by the ORO to temporarily reenter the restricted area during the post-plume (i.e.,

1, intermediate or late) phase to protect them from unnecessary radiation exposure. OROs must also demonstrate the capability to control exit of vehicles and other equipment to control the spread of contamination outside the restricted area(s). Individuals without specific radiological response missions, such as farmers for animal care, essential utility service personnel, or other members of the public who 120

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station must reenter an evacuated area during the post-emergency phase must be limited to the lowest radiological exposure commensurate with completing their missions. Monitoring and decontamination facilities will be established as appropriate. .

Examples of control procedures are: (1) assignment of, or checking for, direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry for emergency workers; (2) questions regarding the individuals' objective(s), location(s) expected to be visited, and associated timeframes; (3) maps and plots ofradiation exposure rates; (4) advice on areas to *avoid; (5) procedures for exit, including monitoring of individuals, vehicles, and equipment; (6) decision criteria regarding contamination; (7) proper disposition of emergency worker dosimetry, and (8) maintenance of emergency worker radiation exposure records.

Return: OROs must demonstrate the capability to implement policies concerning return of members of the public to areas that were evacuated during the plume phase. OROs must demonstrate the capability to identify and prioritize services and facilities that require restoration within a few days, and to identify procedures and resources for their restoration. Examples of these services and facilities are medical and social services, utilities, roads, and schools.

Communication among OROs for relocation, reentry, and return may be simulated. All simulated or actual contacts must be documented. These discussions may be accomplished in a group setting.

OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear I Radiological Incident Annex, and other resources (e.g., compacts or nuclear insurers), if available. Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

This sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. This element was dem.onstrated during the Post Plume Exercise conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

121

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Pian Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station EVALUATION AREA 4 Field Measurement and Analysis Sub-element 4.a - Plume Phase Field Measurements and Analyses INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to deploy FMTs with the equipment, methods, and expertise necessary to determine the location of airborne radiation and particulate deposition on the ground from an airborne plume. In addition, NlJ1IBG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1 indicate that OROs must have the capability to use FMTs within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to detect airborne radioiodine in the presence of noble gases and radioactive particulate material in the airborne plume. hi an incident at an NPP, the possible release of radioactive material may pose a risk to the nearby population and environment. Although incident assessment methods are available to project the extent and magnitude of a release, these methods are subject to large uncertainties. During an incident, it is important to collect field radiological data to help characterize any radiological release. Adequate equipment and procedures are essential to such field measurement efforts.

Criterion 4.a.1: [RESERVED]

)

Criterion 4.a.2: Field teams (2 or more) are managed to obtain sufficient information to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, C.1; H.12; L7, 8, 11; J.10.a)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise. Other means may include drills that would fully demonstrate technical proficiency.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to brief FMTs on predicted plume location and direction, plume travel speed, and exposure control procedures before deployment. During an HAB incident, the FieldTeam management must keep the incident command informed of field monitoring teams' activities and location. Coordination with FMTs and field monitoring may be demonstrated as out-of-sequence demonstrations, as negotiated in the Extent of Play Agreement.

Field measurements are needed to help characterize the release and support the adequacy of implemented*

protective actions, or to be a factor in modifying protective actions. Teams must be directed to take measurements at such locations and times as necessary to provide sufficient information to characterize the plume and its impacts.

If the responsibility for obtaining peak measurements in the plume has been accepted by licensee FMTs, with concurrence from OROs, there is no requirement for these measurements to be repeated by ORO monitoring teams. If the licensee FMTs do not obtain peak measurements in the plume, it is the ORO's

  • decision as to whether peak measurements are necessary to sufficiently characterize the plume. The sharing and coordination of plume measurement information among all FMTs (licensee, Federal, and ORO) is essential. OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear I Radiological 122

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Incident Annex and other resources (e.g., compacts or the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Field Team control will be performed near the 10 mile EPZ using the DEP Radiological Rapid Response Vehicle (R3V). Field Team control is expected to initially be out-of-sequence with the plume timeline. During the exercise the field teams will be directed to take measurements in locations to provide information sufficient to characterize the plume and impacts. In addition to field team measurements, remote detectors will be deployed by the field teams near the expected plume pathway.

These detectors will automatically transmit data to the R3V. These detectors will be used to keep field teams dose ALARA. A FEMA Evaluator(s) will meet the R3V and field teams at the South Central Regional Office (located at 909 Elmerton Ave, Harrisburg PA 17110) for initial equipment checks at 1:30 PM on April 11, 2017. In the event the scenario has no radiological release a report of background radiation by the FMT will signify successful demonstration of the criterion.

The Field Teams and R3V will be evaluated during this exercise. Note that field operations will be controlled from a Field Team Command Post in the building instead of the R3V.

In order to facilitate those times where the plume comes out late in the exercise, BRP field teams will demonstrate air sampling prior to leaving the meeting location. The field team will verbalize their air sampling actions while in the field and utilize controller data to simulate the counting of the sample and relay the information to the R3V.

Criterion 4.a.3: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded at appropriate locations, and radioiodine and particulate samples are collected. Teams will move to an appropriate low background location to determine whether any significant (as specified in the plan and/or procedures) amount of radioactivity has been collected on the sampling media. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, C.1; H.12:

LS, 9; J.10.a)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise. Other means may include drills that would fully demonstrate technical proficiency.

Two or more FMTs must demonstrate the capability to make and report measurements of ambient radiation to the field team coordinator, dose assessment team, or other appropriate authority. FMTs must also demonstrate the capability to obtain an air sample for measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates, and to provide the appropriate authority with field data pertaining to measurement. If samples have radioactivity significantly above background, the authority must consider the need for expedited laboratory analyses of these samples. Coordination concerning transfer of samples, including a chain-of-custody form(s), to a radiological laboratory (ies) must be demonstrated.

123

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear. Generating Station OROs must share data in a timely manner with all other appropriate OROs. All methodology, including contamination control, instrumentation, preparation of samples, and a chain-of-custody form(s) for transfer to a laboratory (ies), will be in accordance with the ORO's plans I procedures.

OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear I Radiological Incident Annex and other resources (e.g., compacts or the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Measurements will be made by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Bureau of Radiation Protection (BRP), in accordance with the BRP Standard Implementing Procedures. (IPs).

Two mobile monitoring teams from BRP will demonstrate ambient radiation monitoring and radioiodine and particulate sampling. Field teams will be equipped with appropriate dosimetry and KI.

Both teams will be evaluated by FEMA. Each team will be directed to monitoring location and perform actual radiation measurements at each location. Measurements may consist of truck installed radiation monitor or hand-held radiation instruments. The field team will demonstrate taking an air sample at the first location where a probe would be dropped, regardless of radiation level. The team will explain by interview the procedures they follow for air sampling. Teams will then take additional simulated air samples as directed at additional locations, if conditions are appropriate for radioiodine sampling and relay information to the R3V. In place of silver zeolite cartridges, charcoal cartridges will be used for the exercise. All measurements will be forwarded to the R3V immediately upon obtaining data. Evaluators will meet the field teams at the South Central Regional Office (located at 909 Elm:erton Ave, Harrisburg PA 17110) on April 11, 2017 at 1:30 PM. Note that field operations will be controlled from a Field Team Command Post in the building instead of the R3V Sub-element 4.b-Post-Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-l, which requires that OROs have the capability to assess the actual or potential magnitude and locations of radiological hazards to determine the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ and to support relocation, reentry; and return decisions. This sub-element focuses on collecting environmental samples for laboratory analyses that are essential for decisions on protecting the public from contaminated food and water and direcfradiation from deposited materials.

Criterion 4.b.1: The field teams (2 or more) demonstrate the capability to make appropriate measurements and to collect appropriate samples (e.g., food crops, milk, water, vegetation, and soil) to support adequate assessments and protective action decision making. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, C.1; LB; J.11) 124

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial or tabletop exercise.

Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that would fully demonstrate technical proficiency.

The ORO's FMTs must demonstrate the capability to take measurements and samples, at such times and locations as directed, to enable an adequate assessment of the ingestion pathway and to support reentry, relocation, and return decisions. When resources are available, use of aerial surveys and in-situ gamma measurement is appropriate. All methodology, including contamination control, instrumentation, preparation of samples, and chain-of-custody form(s) for transfer to a laboratory (ies), will be in accordance with the ORO's plans I procedures.

The FMTs and/or other sampling personnel must secure ingestion pathway samples from agricultural products and water. Samples in support of relocation and return must be secured from soil, vegetation, and other surfaces in areas that received radioactive ground deposition.

OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear I Radiological Incident Annex and other resources (e.g., compacts, the licensee, or nuclear insurers). Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

This sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. This element was demonstrated during the Post Plume Exerdse conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

Sub-element 4.c - Laboratory Operat!ons INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-06~4 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to perform laboratory analyses of radioactivity in air, liquid, and environmental samples to.

support protective acti?n decision making.

Criterion 4.c.1: The laboratory is capable ofperforming required radiological analyses to support protective action decisions. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, Cl, 3; J.11) 125

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial or tabletop exercise.

Other means may include drills, seminars or training activities that would fully demonstrate technical proficiency.

The laboratory staff must demonstrate the capability to follow appropriate procedures for receiving samples, including logging information, preventing contamination of the laboratory(ies), preventing buildup of background radiation due to stored samples, preventing cross contamination of samples, preserving samples that may spoil (e.g., milk), and keeping track of sample identity. In addition, the laboratory staff must demonstrate the capability to prepare samples for conducting measurements.

The laboratory (ies) must be appropriately equipped to provide, upon request, timely analyses of me.dia of sufficient quality and sensitivity to support assessments and decisions anticipated in the ORO's plans I procedures. The laboratory instrument calibrations must be traceable to standards provided by the

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. Laboratory methods used to analyze typical .

radionuclides released in a reactor incident must be as described in the plans I procedures. New or revised methods may be used to analyze atypical radionuclide releases (e.g., transuranics or as a result of a terrorist incident) or if warranted by incident circumstances. Analysis may require resources beyond those of the ORO.

The laboratory staff must be qualified in radio-analytical techniques and contamination control procedures.

OROs mustuse Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear I Radiological Incident Annex and other resources (e.g., compacts, the licensee, or nuclear insurers). Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plaris I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

This sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. This element was demonstrated during the Post Plume Exercise conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

126

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station EVALUATION AREA 5 Emergency Notification and Public Information Sub-element 5.a - Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System INTENT This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to provide prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ. Specific

  • provisions addressed in this Sub-element are further discussed in Section V, Part A of this Manual, Alert and Notification Systems.

Criterion 5.a.1: Activities associated with primary alerting and notification of the public are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initial instructional message to the public must include as a minimum the elements required by current REP guidance. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 6, 7)

Assessment I Extent of nay Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, drills, or operational testing of equipment that woul,d fully demonstrate capability.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to sequentially provide an alert signal followed by an initial instructional message to populated areas (permanent resident and transient) throughout the 10-mile plume EPZ. Following the decision to activate the alert and notification system, OROs must complete system activation for primary alert I notification and disseminate the information I instructions in a timely manner. For exercise purposes, timely is defined as with a sense of urgency and without undu<;J delay. If message dissemination is identified as not having been accomplished in a timely manner, the evaluator(s) will document a specific delay or cause as to why a message was not considered timely.

Procedures to broadcast the message must be fully demonstrated as they would in an actual emergency up to the point of transmission. Broadcast of the message(s) or t~st message(s) is not required. The procedures must be demonstrated up to the point of actual activation. The alert signal activation should be simulated, not performed. Evaluations ofEAS broadcast stations may also be accomplished through SAVs.

The capability of the primary notification system to broadcast an instructional message on a 24-hour basis must be verified during an interview with appropriate personnel from the primary notification system, including verification of provisions for backup power or an alternate station.

The initial message must include at a minimum the following elements:

  • Identification of the ORO responsible and the official with authority for providing the alert signal and instructional message;
  • Identification of the commercial NPP and a statement that an emergency exists there;
  • Reference to REP-specific emergency information (e.g., brochures, calendars, and/or information in telephone books) for use by the general public during an emergency; and 127

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

  • A closing statement asking that the affected and potentially affected population stay tuned for additional information, or that the population tune to another station for additional information.

If route alerting is demonstrated as a primary method of alert and notification, it must be done in accordance with the ORO's plans I procedures and the Extent of Play Agreement. OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish the primary route alerting in a timely manner (not subject to specific time requirements). At least one route needs to be demonstrated and evaluated. The selected route(s) must vary from exercise to exercise. However, the most difficult route(s) must be demonstrated no less than once every 8 years. All alert and notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast) as negotiated in the Extent of Play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted at an agreed-upon location.

OROs may demonstrate any means of primary alert and notification included in their plans I procedures as negotiated in the Extent of Play Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual .

emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has implemented a Statewide BAS Control System in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Association of Broadcasters per the State Emergency Communications Committee and Pennsylvania Emergency Alert System State BAS Plan (September 23, 2010 and revised on November 2, 2011 ). The State CRCC (PEMA) is the initiating point for the activation of the BAS. Risk counties have the control equipment for activation of sirens. Coordination will occur between the State CRCC and the affected counties with respect to the Alert and Notification System (ANS) Process as to when the sirens and BAS messages will occur. Sirens will be coordinated and the sounding simulated at the appropriate time with the simulated activation of BAS taking place approximately three minutes following the simulated activation of the sirens. Regular broadcasting will not be interrupted on the BAS stations. All subsequent actions to broadcast stations will be simulated. Broadcast of the message(s) or test message(s) is not required and not requested. Counties may elect to provide Subsequent News Bulletins or County Specific BAS messages to their BAS stations.

Following the decision to activate the alert and notification system, in accordance with the ORO's plan and/or procedures, ANS activation should be accomplished in a timely manrier for primary alerting I notification. This action will not be subject to specific time requirements.

All actions to broadcast stations will be simulated. Systems that use automatic sending technology may be demonstrated by explanation during an interview.

Each evaluated municipality per Risk County will demonstrate, by interview, route alerting of the hearing impaired residents within their jurisdiction. Hearing impaired notification teams will not be deployed.

128

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Criterion 5.a.2: [RESERVED]*

Criterion 5.a.3: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within a reasonable time following the detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notijicatiOn system. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, E.6, Appendix 3.B.2.c) .

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, drills, or operational testing of equipment that wou~d fully demonstrate capability.

If the exercise scenario calls for failure of any portion of the primary system(s) or if any portion of the primary system(s) actually fails to function during the exercise, OROs must demonstrate backup means of alert and notification. Backup means of alert and notification will differ from facility to facility.

Backup alert and notification procedures that would be implemented in multiple stages must be structured such that the population closest to the plant (e.g., within two miles) is alerted and notified first. The populations farther away and downwind of any potential radiological release would be covered sequentially (e.g., two to five miles, followed by downwind five to ten miles, and finally the remaining population as directed by authorities). Topography, population density, existing ORO resources, and timing will be considered in judging the acceptability of backup means of alert and notification.

Although circumstances may not allow this for all situations, FEMA and the NRC recommend that OROs and operators attempt to establish backup means that will reach those in the plume exposure EPZ within a reasonable time of failure of the primary alert and notification system, with a recommended goal of 45 minutes. The backup alert message must, at a minimum, include (1) a statement thatan emergency exists at the plant and (2) instructions regarding where to obtain additional information.

When backup route alerting is demonstrated, only one route needs to be selected and demonstrated.

All alert and notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast) as negotiated in the Extent of Play.

Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted at an agreed-upon location.

OROs may demonstrate any means of backup alert and notification induded in their plans I procedures as negotiated in the Extent of Play Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Plans specify that route alerting is used as a back up to the sirens. County liaisons will provide a controller inject to the risk counties that a siren has failed. The county will demonstrate contacting one municipal EOC in regards to the failed siren in that municipality.

The municipal EOC will then dispatch one route alert team to cover one route alert sector affected by the failed siren. All other routes will be simulated. Route alert teams should finish their route in a reasonable time with a target time of about 45 minutes from time of siren failure.

OROs may utilize IPAWs or other public alerting systems in accordance with their plans but use of such systems will not negate the need to provide for demonstration of route alerting by the ORO.

129

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

AfterAction Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Criterion 5.a.4: Activities associated with FEMA-approved exception areas (where applicable) are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorized of/site emergency officials to notifY the public of an emergency situation. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, E.6; Appendix 3.B.2.c)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, drills, or operational testing of equipment that would fully demonstrate capability.

OROs with FEMA-approved exception areas (identified in the approved Alert and Notification System Design Report), five to ten miles from the NPP, must demonstrate the capability to accomplish primary alerting and notification of the exception area(s). FEMA and the NRC recommend that OROs and operators establish means that will reach those in approved exception areas in a timely manner, with a recommended goal of 45 minutes, once the initial decision is made by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an incident. The exception area alert message must, at a minimum, include (1) a statement that an emergency exists at the plant and (2) instructions regarding where to obtain additional information.

For exception area alerting, at least one route must be demonstrated and evaluated. The selected route(s) must vary from exercise to exercise. However, the most difficult route(s) must be demonstrated no less than once every eight years. All alert and notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcasted) as negotiated in the Extent of Play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted at an agreed-upon location. For exception areas alerted by aircraft, actual flights will be negotiated in the Extent of Play, but must be demonstrated no less than once ev~ry eight years.

All activities must be based on the ORO' s plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:"

This sub-element will not be demonstrated or evaluated during this exercise. Pennsylvania has no exception areas.

Sub-element 5.b - Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to disseminate appropriate emergency information and instructions, including any recommended protective actions, to the public. In addition, NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1 require OROs to ensure that the capability exists for providing information to the media. This includes the availability of a physical location for use by the media during an emergency. NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1 also provide that a system must be available for dealing with rumors. This system will hereafter be known as the "Public Inquiry Hotline."

130

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportlimprovement Plan . Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Criterion 5.b.l: OROs provide accurate subsequent emergency information and instructions to the public and the news media in a timely manner. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 7; G.3.a, G.4.a, c)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, or drills.

The responsible ORO personnel I representatives must demonstrate actions to provide emergency information and instructions to the public and media in a timely manner following the initial alert and notification (not subject to specific time requirements). For exercise purposes, timely is defined as with a sense of urgency and without undue delay. If message dissemination is identified as not having been accomplished in a timely manner, the evaluator(s) will document a specific delay or cause as to why a message was not considered timely.

Message elements: The ORO must ensure that emergency information and instructions are consistent with PADs made by appropriate officials. The emergency information must contain all necessary and applicable instructions (e.g., evacuation instructions, evacuation routes, reception center locations, what to .take when evacuating, shelter-in-place instructions, information concerning protective actions for schools and persons with disabilities and access I functional needs, and public inquiry hotline telephone number) to assist the public in carrying out the P ADs provided. The ORO must also be prepared to disclose and explain the ECL of the incident. At a minimum, this information must be included in media briefings and/or media releases. OROs must demonstrate the capability to use language that is clear and understandable to the public within both the plume and ingestion exposure pathway EPZs. This includes demonstration of the capability to use familiar landmarks and boundaries to describe protective action areas.

The emergency information must be all-inclusive by including the four items specified under exercise Demonstration Criterion 5 .a. l and previously identified protective action areas that are still valid, as well as new areas. The OROs must demonstrate the capability to ensure that emergency information that is no longer valid is rescinded and not repeated by broadcast media. In addition, the OROs must demonstrate the capability to ensure that current emergency information is repeated at pre-established intervals in accordance with the plans I procedures. OROs must demonstrate the capability to develop emergency information in a non-English language when required by the plans I procedures.

If ingestion pathway measures are exercised, OROs must demonstrate that a system exists for rapid dissemination of ingestion pathway information to pre-determined individuals and businesses in accordance with the ORO's plans I procedures.

Media information: OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide timely, accurate, concise, and coordinated information to the news media for subsequent dissemination to the public. This would include demonstration of the capability to conduct timely and pertinent media briefings and distribute media releases as the incident warrants. The OROs must demonstrate the capability to respond appropriately to inquiries from the news media. All information presented in media briefings and releases must be consistent with P ADs and other emergency information provided* to the public. Copies of pertinent emergency information (e.g., EAS messages and media releases) and media information kits must be available for dissemination to the media.

131

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Public inquiry: OROs must demonstrate that an effective system is in place for dealing with calls received via the Public Inquiry Hotline. Hotline staff must demonstrate the capability to provide or obtain accurate information for callers or refer them to appropriate information source. Information from the hotline staff, including information that corrects false or inaccurate information when trends are noted, must be included, as appropriate, in emergency information provided to the public, media briefings, and/or media releases.

HAB considerations: The dissemination of information dealing with specific aspects of NPP security capabilities, actual or perceived adversarial (terrorist) force or threat, and tactical law enforcement response must be coordinated I communicated with appropriate security authorities (e.g., law enforcement and NPP security agencies) in accordance with ORO plans I procedures.

All activities inust be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, un)ess noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Subsequent emergency information and instructions should be provided to the public and the media in a timely manner. This will NOT be subject to specific time requirements. One media briefing will be demonstrated in each risk county.

Risk and support counties will receive and handle "Public Inquiry" messages via their individual "Public Inquiry" processes (in compliance with NIMS terminology, Rumor Control is now considered to be "Public Inquiry"). Counties will receive approximately ten public inquiry calls from the State Exercise Cell assigned this responsibility. Counties will be expected to receive and log the calls, identify any trends and take appropriate actions to include follow-up message development, distributions and/or briefings.

The Commonwealth utilizes a virtual IlC in which the Commonwealth and the Utility/Independent Power Producer will run coordinated public information between the Commonwealth CRCC and from the Utility/IPP EOF. The coordination will be demonstrated by interview or simulation through a "Virtual News Conference."

132

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station EVALUATION AREA 6 Support Operation I Facilities Sub-element 6.a - Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement radiological monitoring and decontamination of evacuees, while minimizing contamination of the facility. OROs must also have the capability to identify and register evacuees at reception centers.

Criterion 6.a.1: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.4; J.10.h; J.12)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, drills, or SAV.

Radiological monitoring, decontamination, and registration facilities for evacuees must be set up and demonstrated as they would be in an actual emergency or as indicated in the Extent of Play Agreement.

OROs conducting this demonstration must have one-third of the resources (e.g., monitoring teams I instrumentation I portal monitors) available at the facility (ies) as necessary to monitor 20 percent of the population within a 12-hour period. This would include adequate space for evacuees' vehicles.

Availability ofresources can be demonstrated with valid documentation (e.g., MOU I LOA, etc.)

reflecting how necessary equipment would be procured for the location. Plans I procedures must indicate provisions for service animals.

Before using monitoring instrument(s), the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checking the insfrument(s) for proper operation. Staff responsible for the radiological monitoring of evacuees must demonstrate the capability to attain and sustain, within about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, a monitoring productivity rate per hour needed to monitor the 20 percent EPZ population planning base. The monitoring productivity rate per hour is the number of evac~ees that can be monitored, per hour, by the total complement of monitors using an appropriate procedure. For demonstration of monitoring, decontamination, and registration capabilities, a minimum of six evacuees must be monitored per station using equipment and procedures specified in the plans I procedures. The monitoring sequences for the first six simulated evacuees per monitoring team will be timed by the evaluators to determine whether the 12-hour requirement can be met.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to register evacuees upon completion of the monitoring and decontamination activities. The activities for recording radiological monitoring and, if necessary, decontamination must include establishing a registration record consisting of the evacuee's name, address, results of monitoring, and time of decontamination (if any), or as otherwise designated in the plan and/or 'procedures. Audio recorders, camcorders, or written records are all acceptable means for registration.

133

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use of trigger I action levels for determining the need for decontamination. They must also explain the procedures for referring any evacuees who cannot be adequately decontaminated for assessment and follow-up in accordance with the ORO's plans I procedures. All activities must be based on the plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play

.Agreement Decontamination of evacuees may be simulated and conducted by interview. Provisions for separate showering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained. The staff must demonstrate provisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisions could include floor coverings, signs, and appropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) to separate uncontaminated from potentially contaminated areas. Provisions must also exist to separate contaminated and uncontaminated evacuees, provide changes of clothing for those with contaminated clothing; and store contaminated clothing and personal belongings to prevent further contamination of evacuees or facilities. fu addition, for any evacuee found to be contaminated, procedures must be discussed concerning handling of potential contamination of vehicles and personal belongings. Waste water from decontamination operations does not need to be collected.

fudividuals who have completed monitoring (and decontamination, ifneeded) must have means (e.g.,

hand stamp, sticker, bracelet, form, etc) indicating that they, and their service animals and vehicles, where applicable, have been monitored, cleared, and found to have no contamination or contamination below the trigger I action level or have been placed in a secure area until they can be monitored and decontaminated, if necessary.

  • fu accordance with plans I procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not need to have their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not require confirmation that their vehicle is free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.

However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are then decontaminated will have their vehicles secure area or monitored and decontaminated (if applicable) and do require confirmation that their vehicle is being held in a secure area or free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Radiological monitoring demonstration sites should possess a roster of the monitoring personnel, as well as providing a means by which the mass care reception center or others could verify that the person has been monitored and has been deemed uncontaminated. The radiological monitoring station(s) should be prepared to monitor 20 percent of the risk population within a 12-hour period as allocated to that location.

fu some cases reception centers, monitoring and decontaminations centers, and/or mass care centers may be collocated.

At each reception center, a minimum of three volunteer evacuees will be processed, briefed, issued the appropriate strip map or directions, and instructed to proceed to a mass care center designated for demonstration of monitoring, decontamination, and registration. A sample of the appropriate strip maps or directions will be made available for the demonstration unless collocated with mass care and monitoring I decontamination. As negotiated with FEMA, this criterion will be demonstrated but not be evaluated because registration is not done at the reception center.

134

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station One mass care center and one public monitoring I decontamination center will be demonstrated per Support County during the out-of-sequence window. The support counties will provide space at designated mass care centers or reception centers for operation of monitoring I decontamination centers. Schematics of these monitoring I decontamination centers will be available to show the organization within the facility and space management for monitoring and decontamination. Procedures will be demonstrated to evidence the separation of contaminated and non-contaminated (clean) individuals.

At the evacuee monitoring I decontamination center, a minimum of six volunteer evacuees will be monitored (or one volunteer evacuee may be monitored six times). Suitable radiological monitoring instruments will be issued to and demonstrated by the initial monitoring team(s). A monitoring team consists of one monitor and one recorder equipped with one survey instrument. Those individuals found to be free of "contamination, based upon scenario injects, will be directed to the mass care registration point fot further processing. Note: Actual radiological sources will not be attached to or hidden upon the volunteer evacuees. Note: Ifportal monitors are used, the Portal Monitor Extent of Play described below shall be used.

One of the simulated evacuees, based upon controller injects, will not be able to be decontaminated.

Discussions concerning the processing of contaminated personnel will include capabilities and written procedures for showering females separate from males. Showering will be simulated, water will not be used. Note: If portal monitors are used, the Portal Monitor Extent of Play described below shall be used.

Monitoring I decontamination centers are not issued DRDs or KI since the centers and stations are outside the EPZ. Category "C" Dosimetry applies .. Permanent Record Dosimeters (PRDs) may be simulated.

Radiation readings I contamination data for the evacuees and vehicle will be provided by the controller as appropriate based upon information contained in the scenario package. Set-up of the facility will be performed the same as for an actual emergency with all route markings and contamination control measures in place including step-off pads. Long runs of plastic covered with paper will not be demonstrated, but the materials shall be available and explained. Positioning of a fire apparatus on-site may be simulated if otherwise required.

Participants should be able to describe how vehicles are identified for radiological screening and plans or layouts should show the locations and movements of vehicles.

Water from decontamination activities may go directly to a storm drain or other sewer or drain system or area normally designated for wastewater that has been used for bathing or washing of vehicles and or equipment.

Portal Monitor Use: Risk and support counties may, during this exercise, utilize portal monitors to monitor simulated evacuees and/or emergency workers. The monitoring I decontamination team requirements will be based on the portal monitor capabilities as applicable based on the procedure I guidelines, and the recommendations of the manufacturer. Note: PEMA guidance shall apply.

135

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Sub-element 6.b - Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment and Vehicles.

INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement radiological monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment, inclusive of vehicles.

Criterion 6.b.1: The facility I ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, drills, or SAV.

The monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to monitor emergency worker personnel and their equipment and vehicles for contamination in accordance with the ORO's plans I procedures.

Specific attention must be given to equipment, including any vehicles that were in contact with contamination. The monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need for decontamination of personnel, equipment, and vehicles based on trigger I action levels and procedures stated in the ORO plans I procedures. Monitoring of emergency workers does not have to meet the 12-hour requirement. However, appropriate monitoring procedures must be demonstrated for a minimum of two emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles. Before using monitoring instrument(s), the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checking the instrument(s) for proper operation.

The area to be used for monitoring and decontamination must be set up as it would be in an actual emergency, with all route markings, instrumentation, record keeping, and contamination control measures in place. Monitoring procedures must be demonstrated for a minimum of one vehicle. It is generally not necessary to monitor the entire surface of vehicles. However, the capability to monitor areas such as radiator grills, bumpers, wheel wells, tires, and door handles must be demonstrated. Interior surfaces of vehicles that were in contact with contaminated individuals must also be checked.

Decontamination of emergency workers may be simulated and conducted via interview. Provisions for separate showering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained. The staff must demonstrate provisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisions could include floor coverings, signs, and appropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) to separate uncontaminated from potentially contaminated areas. Provisions must also exist to separate contaminated and uncontaminated individuals where applicable; provide changes of clothing for those with contaminated clothing; and store contaminated clothing and personal belongings to prevent further contamination of emergency workers or facilities.

OROs must demonstrate the* capability to register emergency workers upon completion of the monitoring and decontamination activities. The activities for recording radiological monitoring and, if necessary, decontamination must include establishing a registration record consisting of the emergency worker's 136

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station name, address, results of monitoring, and time of decontamination (if any), or as otherwise designated in the plan and/or procedures. Audio recorders, camcorders, or written recorders are all acceptable means for registration.

Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use of 'trigger I action levels for determining the need for decontamination. They must also explain the procedures for referring any emergency workers who cannot be adequately decontaminated for assessment and follow-up in accordance with the ORO's plans I procedures.

Decontamination capabilities and provisions for vehicles and equipment that cannot be successfully decontaminated may be simulated and conducted by interview. Waste water from decontamination operations does not need to be collected.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

At the emergency worker monitoring I decontamination stations schematics of these monitoring I decontamination stations will be available to show organization and space management. One emergency worker will be monitored, including thyroid screening. Discussions concerning processing of contaminated personnel will include capabilities and written procedures for showering females separate from males. Showering will be simulated, water will not be used. Suitable radiological monitoring instruments will be issued to the initial monitoring team. Note: If portal monitors are used, the Portal Monitor Extent of Play described below shall be used.

Emergency worker station personnel will consist of a minimum of one monitor and one recorder and sufficient personnel to demonstrate monitoring of at least one vehicle. The evaluator will request that vehicle decontamination procedures be explained after the vehicle (with simulated contamination) has been monitored. One radiological survey meter, will be issued to each vehicle monitoring I decontamination team. One vehicle and/or piece of equipment will not be able to be decontaminated.

Simulated radiation contamination data will be included in the scenario package, and injected by a controller. Set-up of the facility will be performed as closely as possible to that for an actual emergency with all route markings in place.

  • Decontamination capabilities and provisions for vehicles and/or equipment that cannot be decontaminated will be simulated and conducted by interview. Water will NOT be used.

Radiation readings I contamination data for the evacuees and vehicle will be provided by the controller as appropriate based upon information contained in the scenario package. Set-up of the facility will be performed the same as for an actual emergency with all route markings and contamination control measures in place including step-off pads. Long runs of plastic covered with paper will not be demonstrated, but the materials shall be available and explained. Positioning of a fire apparatus on..:site may be simulated if otherwise required.

Portal Monitor Use: Risk and support counties may, during this exercise, utilize portal monitors to monitor simulated emergency workers. The monitoring I decontamination team requirements will be based on the portal monitor capabilities as applicable based on the procedure I guidelines, and the recommendations of the manufacturer. Note: PEMA guidance shall apply.

Emergency worker monitoririg and decontamination station personnel are not issued DRDs or KI since the centers and stations are outside the EPZ. Category "C" Dosimetry applies. PRDs may be simulated.

Water from decontamination activities may go directly to a storm drain or other sewer or drain system or .

area normally designated for wastewater that has been used for bathing or washing of vehicles and or equipment.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Sub-element 6.c - Temporary Care of Evacuees INTENT This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires OROs to have the capability to establish relocation centers in host I support jurisdictions. The American Red Cross normally provides congregate care in support of OROs under existing letters of agreement.

Criterion 6.c.1: Managers of congregate care facilities demonstrate that the centers have resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with American Red Cross planning guidelines.

Managers demonstrate the procedures to assure that evacuees have been monitoredfor contamination and have been decontaminated as appropriate prior to entering congregate care facilities. (NUREG-06541 FEMA-REP-1, J.10.h, J.12)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, drills, or SAV.

The evaluator must conduct a walk-through of the center to determine, through observation and inquiries, that the services and accommodations are consistent with applicable guidance.

For planning purposes, OROs must plan for a sufficient number of congregate care centers in host I support jurisdictions based on their all-hazard sheltering experience and what is.historically relevant for that particular area. In this simulation, it is not necessary to set up operations as they would be in an actual emergency. Alternatively, capabilities may be demonstrated by setting up stations for various services and providing those services to simulated evacuees. Given the substantial differences between demonstration and simulation of this criterion, exercise demonstration expectations must be clearly specified in Extent of Play Agreements.

Congregate care staff must also demonstrate the capability to ensure that evacuees, service animals, and vehicles have been monitored for contamination, decontaminated as appropriate, and registered before entering the facility.

Individuals arriving at congregate care facilities' must have means (e.g., hand stamp, sticker, bracelet, form, etc.) indicating that they, and their service animals and vehicles, where applicable, have been placed in a secure area or monitored, cleared, and found to have no contamination or contamination below the trigger I action leveL In accordance with plans I procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not need to have their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not need confirmation that their vehicle is free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.

However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are then decontaminated will have their vehicles held in a secure area until they can be monitored and decontaminated (if applicable) and does need confirmation that their vehicle is being held in 'a secure area or free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas. This capability may be determined through an interview process.

138

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station If operations at the center are demonstrated, material that would be difficult or expensive to transport (e.g., cots, blankets, sundries, and large-scale food supplies) need not be physically available at the facility (ies). I;Iowever, availability of such items must be verified by providing the evaluator a list of sources with locations and estimates of quantities.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

Each of the risk or support counties with mass care centers will demonstrate the operation of one mass care center during the out-of-sequence window. Floor plans with flow diagrams of the mass care centers will be available to show organization within the facility and space management during a real emergency. Mass care center locations are listed in the demonstration tables "Demonstration of Mass Care Centers (Attachment A,Section I.B.2)."

Personnel, at a minimum, will consist of one manager and one assistant for each mass care center opened during the out-of-sequence window. The evaluator will expect to see location and quantities of equipment and supplies needed to open the mass care center, as well as a staffing chart by job title for 24-hour staffing.

Schematics of these mass care centers will be available, during the demonstration window, to show organization within the facility and space allocation for the registration and sheltering the evacuating public. Necessary signs, directional arrows and forms will be available and used to demonstrate registration, at a minimum, of three evacuees requiring emergency housing. Evacuees will be shown the location where they would be housed in an actual situation. Bedding, cots, food, etc. normally associated with mass care will not be moved to the site, ~ut the sources of those items should be explained to FEMA evaluators. Mass care shelters should be prepared to discuss methods of coordination and communications.

AMERICAN RED CROSS SUPPORT COUNTY CHAPTERS For all TMI EPZ risk & support counties except for Schuylkill County:

ARC of Central PA Serving Adams, Bedford, Blair, Centre, Clinton, Cumberland, Dauphin, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Juniata, Lancaster, Lebanon, Lycoming, Mifflin, Northumberland, Perry, Snyder, Tioga, Union and York Counties)

Chris We:ldenhammer 1804 North Sixth Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17102 (717) 234-3101 E-mail: Chris. Weidenhammer@redcross.org 139

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program(REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station For Schuylkill County:

ARC of Eastern PA (Serving Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Delaware, Lackawanna, Lehigh, Luzerne, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Pike, Schuylkill, Susquehanna, Wayne and Wyoming Counties)

Leo Pratte 2221 Chestnut Street Philadelphia PA 19103 Sub-element 6.d - Transportation and Treatment of Contami.Ii.ated Injured Individuals INTENT This sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to transport contaminated injured individuals to medical facilities with the capability to provide medical services.

Criterion 6.d.l: The facility I ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical services to contaminated injured individuals. (NUREG-0654 I FEMA-REP-1, F.2; H.10; KS.a, b; L.1, 4)

Assessment I Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion may be accomplished during a biennial exercise, an actual event, or drills. FEMA has determined that these capabilities have been enhanced and consistently demonstrated as adequate; therefore, offsite medical services drills need only be evaluated biennially.

FEMA will, at the request of the involved ORO, continue to evaluate the drills on an annual basis. All hospitals listed in the plan as medical services hospitals must be evaluated, with a transportation provider, every 2 years. Additional transportation providers will be rotated through the drills in the 8-year exercise cycle. For ambulance providers who do not participate in an evaluated drill during the two year cycle, training will be provided. This training will be documented in the ALC.

Monitoring, decontamination, and contamination control efforts must not delay urgent medical care for the victim. OROs must demonstrate the capability to transport contaminated injured individuals to medical facilities.

An ambulance must be used for response to the victim. However, to avoid taking an ambulance out of service for an extended time, OROs may use any vehicle (e.g., car, truck, or van) to transport the victim to the medical facility. Itis allowable for an ambulance to demonstrate up to the point of departure for the medical facility and then have a non-specialized vehicle transport the "victim(s)" to the medical facility.

This option is used in areas where removing an ambulance from service to drive a great distance (over an hour) for a drill would not be in the best interest of the community.

Normal communications between the ambulance I dispatcher and receiving medical facility must be demonstrated. If a substitute vehicle is used for transport to the medical facility, this communication must occur before releasing the ambulance from the drill. This communication would include reporting 140

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station radiation monitoring results, if available. In addition, the ambulance crew must demonstrate, by interview, knowledge of where the ambulance and crew would be monitored and decontaminated, if required, or whom to contact for such information.

Monitoring of the victim may be performed before transport or en route, or may be deferred to the medical facility. Contaminated injured individuals transported to medical facilities are monitored a soon as possible to assure that everyone (ambulance ,and medical facility) is aware of the medical and radiological status of the individual(s). However, if an ambulance defers monitoring to the medical facility, then the ambulance crew presumes that the patient(s) is contaminated and demonstrate appropriate contamination controls until the patient(s) is monitored. Before using the monitoring instruments, monitoring activities must be completed as they would be in an actual emergency.

Appropriate contamination control measures must be demonstrated before and during transport and at the receiving medical facility.

The medical facility must demonstrate the capability to activate and set up a radiological emergency area for treatment. Medical facilities are expected to have at least one trained physician and one trained nurse to perform and supervise treatment of contaminated injured individuals. Equipment and supplies must be available for treatment of contaminated injured individuals.

The medical facility must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need for decontamination of the individual, follow appropriate decontamination procedures, and maintain records of all survey measurements and samples taken. All procedures for collection and analysis of samples and decontamination of the individual must be demonstrated or described to the evaluator. Waste water from decontamination operations must be handled according to facility plans I procedures.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans I procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent of Play Agreement.

PEMA Negotiated Extent of Play:

NOTE: This sub-element was be evaluated at Good Samaritan Hospital - March 24, 2016, Hanover Hospital-June 23, 2016, Carlisle Regional Medical Center-May 24, 2016, and Gettysburg Hospital-o'ctober J 2, 2016. Ephrata Hospital is an MS-1 Hospital for both TMI and Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station and will demonstrate on October 18, 2017.

141

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nueiear Generating Station THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 2017 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE ATTACHMENT A-DEMONSTRATION TABLES I. Plume Phase Exercise Activities -April 11, 2017

1. School Districts - Out-of-Sequence Exercise Risk Public School Districts with schools located within the EPZ and those districts situated outside the EPZ, but with students living within the EPZ, will participate and be evaluated by the Department of Homeland Security. Each identified District Administration Office will be evaluated. When a school system is comprised of multiple buildings (High School, Middle School, Elementary School), the affected buildings (those with students from the EPZ) will be evaluated on a rotational basis to coincide with the eight-year exercise cycle.

Time: 9:00-11:00 A.M.

COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL Central Dauphin Central Dauphin East High School Dauphin Swatara Middle School Tri Community Elementary Derry Township Hershey Intermediate Elementary Hershey Middle School I

Harrisburg Harrisburg High School Scott School Lower Dauphin Price School Lower Dauphin High School South Hanover Elementary School Middletown Area Middletown Area High School Milton Hershey Milton Hershey School Steelton-Highspire Steelton-Highspire Elementary School Dauphin County Technical School Lancaster Donegal Donegal High School Elizabethtown Area Elizabethtown Middle School East High Street Elementary School Palmyra Area Palmyra Middle School Lebanon Lingle Avenue ES Northeastern Northeastern Middle School York Spring Forge Intermediate Shallow Brook Intermediate 142

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nnclear Generating Station Schools Districts exercising at an alternative time COUNTY SCHOOL SCHOOL EXERCISE DATE I DISTRICT TIME York Central York Middle School March 7, 2017 Central York Hayshire Elementary School Time 9:30 - 11:30 AM Roundtown Elementary School Dover Area Intermediate March 7, 2017 Dover Area Time 1:00-3:00 PM K.reutz Creek Elementary March 7, 2017 Eastern Time 9:30 - 11:30 AM Northern Middle School March 7, 2017 Northern Time l:00-3:00PM Cedar Cliff High School March 7, 2017 New Cumberland Middle School Time 1:00-3:00 PM West Shore Allen Middle School Highland Elementary School Note: These schools will be exercising with exercise injects provided by the county via their EOC or from on-site distribution.

2. County Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs) - Plume Phase Exercise (Exercise Window is expected to be 4 PM to 10:30 PM)

Personnel may pre-stage or should be in area awaiting activation.

COUNTY Adams Cumberland Dauphin Franklin Lancaster Lebanon York Schuylkill 143

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Municipal Emergency Operations Centers (EOC) - Plume Phase Exercise (Exercise Window is expected to be 4 PM to 10:30 PM)

Personnel may not pre-stage but should be in the area awaiting activation.

Note: Bold is federally evaluated, No Bold is PEMA observed.

RISK COUNTY MUNICIPALITY Cumberland New Cumberland Borough Lower Allen Township Dauphin Conewago Township Derry Township Harrisburg City Highspire Borough Hummelstown Borough Londonderry Township Lower Paxton Township Lower Swatara Township Middletown Borough Paxtang Borough Royalton Borough South Hanover Township Steelton "Borough Swatara Township Lancaster Conoy Township East Donegal Township/\

  • Elizabethtown Borough I West Donegal Township/Mount Joy Township Lebanon South Londonderry Township York Dover Township Fairview Township Goldsboro Borough
  • Eastern York County EMA - Hellam Township
  • Newberry Regional EMA-Lewisberry Borough I Newberry TownshipNork Haven Borough
  • York United EMA-Manchester Township I Springettsbury Township
  • Northeast Area-Mt. Wolf IE. Manchester I Manchester I Conewago
  • Northern York EMA - Warrington Township
  • JointEOC /\New Facility 144

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Back-up Route Alerting Demonstration by one municipality in each risk county (April 1 l, 2017 during Plume Phase Exercise)

BACKUP ROUTE ALERTING Cumberland Lower Allen Township Dauphin Lower Paxton Township Lancaster East Donegal Township Lebanon South Londonderry Township York Yark United EMA Traffic I Access Control Points

  • Each municipal I regional police force with a TCP assigned in its plan will demonstrate all preparation duties including TCP responsibilities and radiological briefing. Dispatch of persons to the TCP site will not occur during the exercise.

Municipal and county staffs will be prepared to brief the FEMA evaluator on actions to be taken should there be an impediment to evacuation on a designated route. This will be demonstrated during municipal evaluations the evening of April 11, 2017 MUNICIPAL I REGIONAL POLICE FORCES Cumberland Lower Allen PD Dauphin Lower Paxton PD Lancaster Northwest Regional PD Lebanon South Londonderry Township PD York Springettsbury PD Bureau of Radiation Protection Evaluation of BRP field teams and Radiological Rapid Response Vehicle briefing and equipment check is scheduled to occur out-of-sequence in preparation for the Plume Phase Exercise.

This will be held at the South Central Regional Office.

Time: Out-of-Sequence1:30 - 3:00 P.M.

Activities - April 12, 2017 Traffic I Access Control Points (Out-of-Sequence)

Time: 10:00 A.M. - 12:00 Noon 145

Unclassified

After Action Re port/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station The Pennsylvania State Police will brief at the PSP Harrisburg Barracks located at 8000 Bretz Drive Harrisburg, PA 17112. Those attending the briefing will not deploy to ACP I TCP locations.

Reception Centers (Out-of-Sequence)

Time: 7:00-9:30 P.M.

coUNTY Reception Center Location

Adams Exempted
Cumberland +Shippensburg University
Dauphin #Williams Valley Jr/Sr HS - April 8, 2017 0800 I Franklin +Chambersburg Middle School South I

Lancaster Park City Mall Lebanon #Lebanon County Career and Tech Center Schuylkill +Blue Mountain HS York +Southern SD Complex

+ - Co-located Facility with Mass Care and Monitoring I Decontamination Centers

  1. - Co-located Facility with Monitoring I Decontamination Center p ublic Monitoring I Decontamination Centers (Out-of-Sequence)

Time: 7:00- 9:30 P.M.

COUNTY Public Monitoring and Decontamination Location Adams Exempted Cumberland Shippensburg University

Dauphin Williams Valley Jr/Sr HS -April 8, 2017 - 0800 Franklin Chambersburg Middle School South Lancaster Hempfield High School Le~anon Lebanon County Career and Tech Center Schuylkil Blue Mountain High School
York Southern SD Complex Mass Care Centers (Out-of-Sequence)

! Time: 7:00- 9:30 P.M.

County Mass Care Location Adams Exempted

' CumberIand Shippensburg University Dauphin Millersburg MS/HS Franklm Chambersburg Middle School South Lancaster Hempfield High School 146

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Lebanon Northern Lebanon Jr./Sr. High School Schuylkill Blue Mountain HS York Southern SD Complex

  • Note: The County will be exercising an unevaluated animal care component during the exercise.

Mass Care Centers (Facility Walk Down)

County Location Date Dauphin Upper Dauphin HS 2/8/2017 Upper Dauphin MS/ES Complex 2/8/2017 Enders-Fisherville ES 2/6/2017 Schuylkill Schuylkill Haven HS 2/6/2017 Pottsville Area MS 2/6/2017 Blue Mountain MS 2/6/2017 Pottsville Area HS 2/6/2017 Penn State Schuylkill 2/6/2017 Schuylkill Haven MS 2/6/2017 Emergency Worker Monitoring I Decontamination Stations (Out of Sequence)

Time: Out-of-Sequence 7:00- 9:30 P.M.

County Location Cumberland West Shore Bureau of Fire - Station #2 - Lemoyne Dauphin Pass Lancaster Marietta FD Lebanon Annville Fire Department York Monaghan Twp. Fire Department II.

  • Post Plume Exercise Not Applicable for this Exercise. The Post-Plume Exercise was last conducted during the week of March 7, 2011 for the Commonwealth.

147

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 2017 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE ATTACHMENT B - LISTING OF PRIOR ISSUES Previous Open Issues:

There are no open issues for this exercise.

! cout~TY J NUlVIBER I FACILlffY EVALUATED J t-=~-: ::=:-=c~----====---t==---=-----------------~----~~~-~=~~-=-J 148

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station This page is intentionally blank.

149

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17178A265&oldid=2438526"