ML17177A319
| ML17177A319 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 03/12/1992 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17177A320 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9203240026 | |
| Download: ML17177A319 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000237/1992002
Text
. \\
UNITED StATES
NUCLEAR. REGULATORY COMMtSSION
Docket No. 50-237 .
Docket No.
50~249
Commonwealth Edison.Company
ATTN: . Hr. Corde.11 Reed *
Senior Vic~ President*
Opus West II I
14000pus Place
Downer~ Grove, IL .60515
Dear Mr. Reed: *
. REGION Ill
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137
. MAR 12 1992
This refers to the inspection conducted by W. Rogers, M. Peck, H. Miller,
P. Lougheed, P. Rescheske, K. Shembarger, J. Schapker and D. Liao of this
office, and assisted by R. Zuffa of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
on January 13 through March 2, 1992. *.The inspection included a review of
authorized. activities for your Dresden Nuclear Power Station.* At the*
conclusion of the insp~ition, the finding~ were discussed with those members
- of you.r staff identified in the en_closed report.
Areas examined duririg the inspection ~re jdentified in the report. Within. *
- these areas, the inspection consisted of a selecti~e examination of procedures
and representative *records, observations; and :interviews with personnel .
. Based on the restilts of *this inspection, certain of ~our ~ciivities were i~.
violation of NRC requirementsi as ~pecified in the enclosed Notice of
Violation (Notice)~ You are required to respond to this letter and should
follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your
. response.
In your response, you should document the specific actions taken
and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing.
your response to this Notice, including* you~ proposed corrective actions and
the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRc*
enforcement act i'on is necessary to ensure comp l 1ance with NRC Regulatory
requirements. *
Also, during this inspection, one other activity was in violation of NRC .
requirements. However; as described in the enclosed inspection report~ you
identified this violation, and to ~ncourage and support licen~ee initiatives
for self-identific~tion ahd correction of violations, the ~iolation is no~
being cited because the criteria specified in Section V.G. of the 0 General
Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Action," (Enforcement*
- Pol icy, 10 CFR Part *2, Appendix. C (1991), were satisfied). *
9203240026 920312
ADOCK 05000237
G .
PDR. **
. The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
.
subject to the clearance procedure~ of the Office of Management and Budget as *
- . required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96"'.511.
- We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this irispection.
Enclosure:
1. Notic~ of Violation
2. Inspection Reports
50-237/92002(0RP); and
50-249/92002(0RP)
cc w/enclosure:
. O. Galle, Vice President - BWR
Operaiions
.
. T. Kovach, Nuclear
. .
. Licensing Manager
- *C. Schroeder, Station Manager
OCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFOCB
Resident Inspectors LaSalle,
Dresden, Quad Cities
Richard Hubbard
J. W. Mccaffrey, Chief, Public
- Utilities Division *
Robert Newmann, Office of Public
- .
Counsel, State of 1111 noi s Center
- Licensin~ Prriject Manager, NRR
C. J. Paperiello, Riii
J. Lieberman, OE
J. Partlow, NRR
J. Goldberg, OGC
.
'
.
~}:;}~*
.* Edward G. Greenman, Di rector,
Oivi~ion of Reactor Projects